Advertisement

Rec 12 073 Lte Small Cells Presentation Arrows

shaylinau
Jul. 13, 2012
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Rec 12 073 Lte Small Cells Presentation Arrows

  1. Telefonica UK’s LTE & Small Cell Trials Robert Joyce Chief Radio Engineer Telefonica UK
  2. Telefonica UK Network Today • 2G (GSM) Network (Launched 1994) No. Sites: >11,000 Coverage: 99% Population Coverage Capacity: 5Gbps Capability: Voice, Data (240kbps DL/100kbps UL) • 3G (UMTS) Network (Launched 2004) No. Sites: >10,000 (U2100 & U900) Coverage: >90% Population Coverage UMTS Capacity: >50Gbps Capability: Voice, Data (42Mbps DL/ 5.8Mbps UL) • 4G (LTE) ...... Central London 4G Trial No. Sites: 25 Coverage: 40km2 Coverage: 40km2 Capability: Voice, Data (150Mbps DL/50Mbps UL)
  3. Telefonica UK Radio Network Evolution Cell SplitSplit Cell 3G900 4G1800/2600 /HSPA+ 4G800/900 6 Sector 6 Sector Small Cell Technology Microcells Microcells Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 What do customers want from O2’s network? Coverage, Capacity & Capability
  4. Why LTE? • LTE = “Long Term Evolution” commonly referred to as 4G (e.g. 4G iPad) • O2’s trial is achieving peak downlink 100Mbit/s, with 30-50 Mbit/s typical • Compared to 3G, offers: x5 Technology x10 x4 Higher peak user Higher spectral Decreased latency throughput efficiency Lower transmission Customer Faster data Shorter waiting costs per Mbit, so experience delivery for users times before data users can have more starts flowing data for their money
  5. Telefonica Global LTE FDD Trials
  6. Telefonica O2UK Slough Trial • Understand the performance of LTE • Coverage (cell range, in building penetration) • Capacity (peak throughput, average throughput, cell edge throughput, radio links/sec) • Mobility (LTE/LTE, LTE/3G, LTE/2G) • User experience (throughput/latency/services) • Vendor benchmarking • Understand the maturity of the technology • Develop wider company understanding of LTE, planning, deployment, operations, optimisation Lab Phase Execution (2600) Field Phase Execution (2600) Friendly User Trials (2600) LTE800Trials May 09 June 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10
  7. O2UK Trial – Network Overview (LTE2600) Slough LTE RAN Central London Heathrow Airport Basingstoke SAE Core
  8. LTE Slough 2009: LTE2600 Radio Coverage Prediction
  9. LTE Slough 2009: Huawei LTE Equipment Overview (Test Lab) Application Server HSS (Home Subscriber Server) Remote Radio Units x3 MME (Mobility Management Entity) S-GW/PDN-GW Baseband Unit x2 Entire SAE Core Contained in 2 Racks
  10. LTE Slough 2009: Typical GSM/UMTS/LTE Site Configuration – Cab Area Power LTE BBU Area for future expansion 3G BTS 2G BTS LTE (MultiRAN) BTS
  11. Typical GSM/UMTS/LTE Site Configuration – Tower Top 2100/2600 Antenna 2600 RET Actuator NEC Ethernet Radio Backhaul LTE2600 RRUs x 3 900/1800 Antenna
  12. GSM/UMTS/LTE Internal O2 HQ Distributed Antenna System 4G BTS 2G BTS 3G BTS
  13. LTE Slough 2009: O2UK Trial – Test UEs Huawei LTE2600 Samsung LTE2600 Test UE Test UE (Model Name: GT-B3710) DL 50Mbs / UL 35Mbps DL 100Mbs / UL 50Mbps (Cat 3 UE)
  14. Selected LTE Trial Results • TelefonicaTrials aims are to understand the performance of LTE is terms of • Coverage • Capacity • Mobility • User experience/services
  15. Selected LTE Trial Results • TelefonicaTrials aims are to understand the performance of LTE is terms of • Coverage • Capacity • Mobility • User experience/services
  16. Selected LTE Trial Results - Coverage Drive Test/Coverage Analysis Refine Link Budget Planning Levels Network Planning Site Count Estimation Network Coverage Maps
  17. Selected LTE Trial Results – Coverage (Huawei UE) RLC Throughput vs. PathLoss (20MHz DL, OL) Good Coverage Medium Coverage Poor Coverage RLC Throughput[Mbps] 40Mbps 20Mbps 5Mbps 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 PathLoss[dB] UE is limited to 50Mbps so x2 for a 100Mbps UE
  18. Selected LTE Trial Results • TelefonicaTrials aims are to understand the performance of LTE is terms of • Coverage • Capacity • Mobility • User experience/services
  19. Selected LTE Trial Results – Predicted Capacity Average Cell Throughput (Mbps) in 5MHz Carrier 8 7 Average Cell Throughput (Mbps) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 HSPA R6 Rake HSPA R6 Type HSPA R7 HSPA R7 2X2 HSPA R8 DC LTE R8 2X2 LTE R8 2X4 LTE R8 4X4 Rx 3 Rx 64QAM MIMO MIMO MIMO MIMO Technology
  20. Selected LTE Trial Results - Capacity x4 Bandwidth x? Capacity Improvement vs. HSPA+ Modem LTE Modem
  21. Selected LTE Trial Results – Capacity (Peak Cell Throughput) Peak Cell Throughput Rate for 20MHz Bandwidth 160 Application throughput(Mbps) 140 134.99 135.40 120 100 80 63.11 64.10 60 40 20 0 DL FTP DL UDP UL FTP UL UDP Peak cell application throughput of 135Mbps and 64Mbps measured in Lab & Field
  22. Selected LTE Trial Results – Capacity (Average Cell Throughput) UE Locations Loaded (70% DL load) cell application throughput of 25Mbps in Lab & Field, compared to around 2-3Mbps in a loaded HSPA network (x2.5 more spectrally efficient)
  23. Selected LTE Trial Results • TelefonicaTrials aims are to understand the performance of LTE is terms of • Coverage • Capacity • Mobility • User experience/services
  24. Selected LTE Trial Results – Mobility (LTE<->LTE) LTE/LTE Handover Success Rate (HOSR) seen in field extremely high >99.9% Downlink Interruption Time ≈ 45ms LTE<->3G Handover testing awaiting multi-mode UEs
  25. Selected LTE Trial Results • TelefonicaTrials aims are to understand the performance of LTE is terms of • Coverage • Capacity • Mobility • User experience/services
  26. Selected LTE Trial Results – User Experience (Throughput) kbps WCDMA Average Throughput = 1.5Mbps kbps LTE Average Throughput = 20Mbps Comparative drive test around Slough 3G HSPA 7.2Mbps dongle vs. 4G Samsung 100Mbps Dongle
  27. LTE 2012 London Trial Coverage Map
  28. LTE 2012 Friendly User Trials - Devices Samsung GT-B3730 BandLuxe R501 AVM FritzBox LTE Huawei E589
  29. LTE 2012 Friendly User Trials - Feedback O2: “I don’t bother with the company LAN anymore Wi-Fi or cable as this is faster” Media: “We’ve already streamed live feeds over the 4G trial network” Consumer: “Why do I pay BT £15 per month for 2Mbps?”
  30. O2UK LTE Trial Stats
  31. O2UK LTE Trial Stats
  32. O2UK 4G Speed Test
  33. Telefonica UK Network of Tomorrow: Small Cells Cell SplitSplit Cell 3G900 4G1800/2600 /HSPA+ 4G800/900 6 Sector 6 Sector Small Cell Technology Microcells Microcells Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 What do customers want from O2’s network? Coverage, Capacity & Capability
  34. REC/12/062, Issue 1, 26/06/12 Confidential 35
  35. Trafalgar Square - Installs REC/12/061, Issue 1, 14/06/12 Confidential 36
  36. Trafalgar Square - Installs REC/12/061, Issue 1, 14/06/12 Confidential 37
  37. Trafalgar Square - Installs REC/12/061, Issue 1, 14/06/12 Confidential 38
  38. Data Traffic Forecast - Global
  39. Data Traffic Distribution London Data Traffic Increase in Cities is expected to by > x50
  40. Telefonica UK Macro Site Evolution Technology @ Site Peak User Cumulative Average Site Throughput Throughput 4G+ (2015) – LTE-A + HSPA++ 150Mbps 160 Mbps Site Throughput 4G (2013) – LTE + HPSA+ 100Mbps 110 Mbps Capacity x8 3G HSPA+ (2012) – HSPA+42 17.7 Mbps 25.2 Mbps 3G HSPA (2011) – HSPA 14.4 17.7 Mbps 18.9 Mbps 3G (2004) – HSPA 3.6 6 Mbps 5.4 Mbps 2G (2000) - GPRS/EDGE 40 kbps 120kbps 3G and 4G will deliver a x8 Capacity Increase on Macrocells x50 will be required in the high traffic areas Small cells are the only option
  41. 2100 MHz (1) – 1st carrier 3G Macrocell 2100 MHz (2) – 2nd carrier Network 2011 Limited to 7 macrocells within 1x1km area 42
  42. 2100 MHz (1) 900 MHz (1) Microcell Picocell 2100 MHz (2) 900 MHz (2) Network 2015 Macrocell 800/1800/2600 MHz Busy areas require 50m radius microcells Limited to 7 macrocells All microcell deployed with 3 within 1x1km area carriers (2xU2100 1xLTE2600). Busiest 200x200m area requires 6 microcells plus 3 carrier picocells/public femto cells Microcell range limited to 150m due to building loss and corner loss
  43. 2009-2010: Street Level “Micro” Cells  Upgrading of 2G Street Level Microcells to 3G Micro Bellbox antenna •Cost •Time •Landlords RF Feeder •Maintenance •Volumes •Transmission •Technology Street Level Macrocell equipment and NTE Located in basement/ store cupboard Microcell/Macrocell RSCP -20.0 -30.0 •Traffic Capture Erlangs -40.0 RSCP (dBm) Macro RSCP [dBm] -50.0 Micro RSCP [dBm] -60.0 -70.0 •Macrocell -80.0 •Shared Carrier 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Cell Distance (m) Traditional Microcell: Very High Cost per kE/Mbps/km2
  44. 2011: Small Cell TCO Modelling 3rd Party Pole, Public Indoor Femto & WLAN looking most promising
  45. 2011: O2 wifi 3rd Party Pole, Public Indoor Femto & WLAN looking most promising
  46. Public Wifi ... but also exclusive access to Central London Street Furniture
  47. 2012: O2 Metro Wifi Deployment Areas All priority areas to be delivered by Summer 2012
  48. High Level Delivery Plan with Planning after Design Approval Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 06-May 13-May 20-May 27-May 04-Dec 11-Dec 18-Dec 25-Dec 05-Feb 12-Feb 19-Feb 26-Feb 04-Mar 11-Mar 18-Mar 25-Mar 01-Jan 08-Jan 15-Jan 22-Jan 29-Jan 01-Apr 08-Apr 15-Apr 22-Apr 29-Apr Responses Responses Decision Decision Issued RFP RFP RFP RFP RFP Generic Design & Development - Street to Data Centre (Core) RF Kit - AP Design, including Antennas Backhaul Design Mesh Design Micro - Macro Design Macro - Data Centre (Core) Design Power to site design Bank Holiday Bank Holiday Backhaul orders placed & Delivered - BT etc Site Surveys Ph 1a 1st batch of vendor street Site AP & Backhaul Deployment - units delivered Local Network Design - Exhibition Rd - Ph 1a Exhibition Rd - Ph 1a Optimisation - Ph 1a Local Authority Planning Approval Hub Survey & Hub Deployment Plan - A end Bank Holiday Bank Holiday Power to AP site order & Delivery Site Surveys Vendor street units delivered Ph 1b Local Network Design - Ph 1b Bank Holiday Bank Holiday Optimisation Ph 1b Local Authority Planning Approval Planning Approval Site AP & Backhaul Hub Survey & Plan Hub Deployment - A end Deployment - Ph 1b Power to AP site order & Delivery y y
  49. Small Cells  Small cells Rio Style! Confidential 50
  50. Example Install: Parliament Square Type 1 Install Type 2 Install Transmission Hub (7762) Access Point (8800)
  51. Access Point and Transmission Equipment Ruckus 7762 5GHz Remote Terminal (Wi-Fi) 239x195x141mm Weight 1.9kg Ruckus 8800 Access Point (Wi-Fi/Cellular) 380x310x170mm 10kg
  52. Access Point Ruckus 8800 Access Point (Wi-Fi/Cellular) 380x310x170mm 10kg
  53. UK Small Cells – The Future (Wifi + Femto) Adaptor plates attaches to Wifi unit with two Flat head M6 screws ALU Femto Unit per side mounts to adaptor plates.
  54. High Level Design - Project Metro Network Architecture - plan A O2 WiFi Core Network / O2 5GHz O2 Data Centre CBNL / Hemel Hempstead BT Ethernet CSL Fibre Link 28GHz 28GHz Hilton Park Lane BT NTE O2 O2 CBNL P-MP 28GHz Microwave 28GHz 5GHz 28GHz Ruckus / O2 O2 AWTG 5GHz O2 Street Lighting Column with Ruckus WiFi Access Point Point to Multi Point Dish O2 Existing O2 Macro Site Ruckus Radio Access Point
  55. High Level Design - Project Metro Network Architecture - plan B O2 WiFi Core Network / O2 5GHz O2 Data Centre CBNL / Hemel Hempstead BT Ethernet CSL Fibre Link 28GHz 28GHz Hilton Park Lane BT NTE O2 CBNL P-MP Microwave 28GHz 5GHz Virgin Fibre to Post Ruckus / X O2 AWTG Street Lighting Column with Ruckus WiFi Access Point Point to Multi Point Dish O2 Existing O2 Macro Site BT Fibre to Post Ruckus Radio Access Point
  56. High Level Design – Exhibition Road
  57. High Level Design – Exhibition Road • Target Outdoor RxLev >= -90dBm. • The design consists of 9 APs. • The design will deliver an estimated capacity of 9x15Mbps = 135Mbps within the planned coverage area. • Therefore delivering 1350Mbps/km2 • Already shown 50Mbps DL & UL during initial testing
  58. Exhibition Road: Banner Design
  59. Exhibition Road: Actual Install
  60. Exhibition Road: Actual Install
  61. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment
  62. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment  Telefonica UK has only 10MHz of U2100 spectrum and therefore has to share a Plot of Best Server HS-DSCH Throughput (Mbps) carrier between Macro and Femto layers  For some time now we have been studying 21 22 23 24 25 the feasibility of deploying a dense Femto Distance in bins 16 17 18 19 20 layer under a macrocell 11 12 13 14 15  And more recently we have deployed what 6 7 8 9 10 we believe to be the world’s densest Femto cell deployment 1 2 3 4 5
  63. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment
  64. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment 11 Plots 65 Blocks (1 – 8 blocks per plot) 564 Floors (7 – 11 floors per block) 2818 apartments (typically 6 per floor) Up to 16,962 beds
  65. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment 1. External CW Testing This identified that the building penetration loss was in the order of 20dB for 900MHz and 30dB for 2100MHz. Therefore an in-building solution would be required to provide assured service to users. Subsequent O2 propagation modelling indicated that approx 20% of accommodation was likely to experience acceptable 3G (2100MHz) service if the two proposed external macrocells are built. This reduces to 11% if they are not built. For GSM900 the predicted coverage is approximately 40% with and 20% without macrocells. 2. Internal CW testing This confirmed that two antennas (DAS or Femto) radiating +10dBm at 2100MHz could cover all rooms on a typical floor to RSCP -85dBm or better. One antenna would cover to -105dBm or better. Central riser and apartment service cupboard locations were equally effective. Penetration loss between floors was approximately 20dB meaning that floors could be covered in relative isolation from each other. 3. Femto-cell trial Confirmed that two ALU Enterprise Femto-cells, each located in a selected apartment service cupboard provides satisfactory 3G voice and data performance in all rooms on a single typical floor. Further testing identified no issues with femtos interfering between floors.
  66. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment Femto Home Hub Femto cell located within cupboard adjacent to BT Infinity Home Hub. Probably secured with cable ties to rear mesh (as shown by blue square) to minimise potential tampering and theft.
  67. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment
  68. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment
  69. London Small Cells – High Density (HD) Femto Deployment  Coverage provided via 1200 x ALU Enterprise V1.5 (100mW – 8 user) indoor femtocells with backhaul via BT Infinity FTTx.  Deployment, testing and validation concluded.  Alcatel-Lucent will provide a Managed Service to monitor and support the Femto Gateway and CPE 24/7.  High Density “Open” group deployment proven  Densest Femtocell deployment in the world!
  70. And Finally: Small Cells - Solar Pole Concept
  71. Small Cells: Solar Pole Test & Build Telefonica UK’s first Solar Powered 3G/4G/Wi-Fi Access Point
  72. In Summary  London “activities” in 2012 have accelerated the deployment of LTE & small cells for Telefonica UK • 3rd Party Poles, Indoor open Femto and Wifi are the way forward • Proven that lamppost mounted small cells are feasible – London Lampposts • Both fibre and Microwave is suitable for backhaul • High Density Open Femto deployments are possible – London Femtos  Next steps • Study further Femto/Wifi and Micro/Wifi integration • Study further the interaction with the Macro layers • Further prove 5GHz/Fibre, 5GHz/28GHz • Investigation of other small cell backhaul technologies › VDSL › 28GHz Mesh, 60GHz P2P 2012 was the year of trialling and 2013 will the year of deployment!
Advertisement