Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Implication of fdi in indian retail sector first group1


Published on

Published in: Business, Career
  • Be the first to comment

Implication of fdi in indian retail sector first group1

  1. 1. Implication of FDI in Indian retail
  2. 2. Group No.1• Sanoop Manoharan • Neeraja Vijayan • Shajina M V • Mridula. C • Sajila K P • Pravija M • Mithun T
  3. 3. FDI or Foreign Direct Investment• A company from one country making a physical investment into building a factory in another country• FDI has come to play a major role in the internationalization of business
  4. 4. Implementation stages of FDI in IndiaYear stages1995 World Trade Organization’s general agreement on Trade in Services, which includes both wholesale and retaililng services,came into effect1997 FDI in cash and carry (wholesale) with 100% rights allowed under the Govt. Approval route2006 FDI in cash and carry brought under the automatic route Up to 51% investment in single brand retail outlet permitted2011 100 FDI in single brand retail permitted
  5. 5. RETAIL sector in India•The Retail Industry is the sector of economy which is consistedof • individuals stores, • commercial complexes, •agencies, •companies, and •organizations, etc•They involved in the business of selling or merchandizingfinished products or goods to the end-user consumers directlyand indirectly
  6. 6. • Indian retail sector today is valued at $450 billion, and is increasing day by day due to its increasing middle class population and their spending power.• Indian retail sector has two parts: organized and unorganized sector.• Organized sector which forms around 20 -30 % in other countries .• In India it forms only about 6% while rest is all unorganized consisting of small retailers called as ‘kirana shops’, paan/beedi wala, convenience stores, departmental stores, pavement vendors etc.• Organized retail consists of supermarkets, hypermarkets and modern retail outlets, malls, exclusive brand outlets etc which are located in urban areas or metros.
  7. 7. • Indias growing economy(8% per year) opens new and new opportunities to the foreign investors• Global Jurix, a full-fledged legal organization prominent worldwide, provides all- encompassing services and advice for most lucrative and secured fdi in indian retail sector.
  8. 8. • Diverse foreign direct investment in indian retail is greatly cherished by most of the major and leading including • Walmart (USA), • Tesco (UK), • Metro (Germany), and • Carrefour (France)
  9. 9. FDI in Retail sector• FDI in retail sector is not allowed, it is only allowed up to 51 % in single brand and government is still considering the opinion of allowing FDI in multi brand segment• 100% FDI is allowed in cash and carry wholesale and export trading, both wall mart and Carrefour have already entered in India in this segment.• Many big giants like Wall mart, Carrefour are waiting to earn their fortune in continuously growing market.• FDI in retail sector will have both positive and negative effect if allowed. Both organized and unorganized sector will face adverse competition from global players. Wal-Mart has a turnover of $256 billion and growing at an average of 12 -13 % annually. Average size of its stores is 85000sq ft and average turnover is $51 million
  10. 10. Forms of FDI in Indian retailing• Joint Ventures• Franchising• Sourcing of Supplies from small-scale sector• Cash and Carry Operations• Non-Store Formats
  11. 11. Challenges of FDI in Retailing• Economies of scale: – economies of scale and perfect cost cutting – providing the consumer the best at lowest price• Brand name: – They bring with them world class products which have high quality and a highly valued brand name. – The domestic brands don’t have that charm and attracting power as of global brands.
  12. 12. • Technology: – Global players are highly advanced in technology. – The tools, equipments, kind of warehouses they use, their way of performing processes are highly advanced and cannot be compared with those used by Indian retail firms, – they provides better services and better quality products even in categories like perishable food etc.• Attract skilled employees: – They believe in earning profits by cutting costs as much as possible and at the same time are conscious towards career of their employees. – Attractive salary and high incentives can also attract skilled employees towards global players which is also a threat for big Indian retail firms.
  13. 13. • Better infrastructure: – Better storage facilities, better transportation medium and high investment can pose another threat to Indian retail firms which can hardly match the capabilities of giants on their own.• Joint ventures: – Global players may not prefer to enter into joint ventures with Indian firms and may also close down the existing ventures in wholesale and single brand which may adversely affect the Indian firms. – This is possible when 100% FDI is allowed in multi-brand retail.
  14. 14. Why they choose India………..?• Liberalization of trade policy• loosening of barriers and restrictions to the foreign investment• Another important reason is changing consumer pattern• Growing urban population
  15. 15. Indian Consumers are Changing… Classification Annual household income 1995-96 2005-06 2009-10 (P) (‘000)Deprived <90 1,31,176 1,32,249 1,14,394Aspirers 90-200 28,901 53,276 75,304Seekers 200-500 3,881 13,183 22,268Strivers 500-1,000 651 3,212 6,173Near Rich 1,000-2,000 189 1,122 2,373Clear Rich 2,000-5,000 63 454 1,037Sheer Rich 5,000-10,000 11 103 255Super Rich >10,000 5 52 141 Total 164,876 204,651 221,945Source: NCAER (2005) and These figures are given at 2001-02 prices., P - Projected
  16. 16. Trends of Urban population45 Percentage of Urban Population 4240 3535 3130 27 2525 23 2020 17.5 181510 5 0 1950-51 1960-61 1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2010- 11 2020-21 2030-31 Percentage of Population
  17. 17. Why FDI is BAD…..?• One of the conditions for this proposal is that multi-brand companies should source at least 60% of their farm produce from small farmers. – The justification is that this will give a boost to small farmers but there is an inherent flaw in the argument• The second argument is that this FDI will create jobs. – there is no specification regarding • the kind of jobs it will create • The kind of jobs that it will threaten, namely the small grocer and kirana shops that is the hallmark of any Indian neighborhood
  18. 18. • The model of multi-brand supermarkets is hardly working nor is it sustainable. – It involves • massive supply chains ranging from remote corners of the globe • encourages consumerism, cheap produce and planned obsolescence.• India already struggles with massive infrastructural problems with waste management – what is the proposal to deal with the excessive amounts of waste created by the FDI investment
  19. 19. • The multi-brand supermarket is a failed business model even in those countries that pioneered them, notably the United States.• Indian government still fears that if FDI is allowed in retail then unorganized sector will be affected very badly and it will result in a large lot of unemployed retailers• youth which is employed in the supply chain, this unemployed lot can’t be absorbed in manufacturing or service sector which can ultimately push a large chunk of population below poverty line
  20. 20. CONCLUSION• If the Indian government is really serious about encouraging small farmers, then they will be rejecting GMO and making sure locally produced organic food is more widely available.• If the government is serious about creating jobs then they should be focusing on improving sectors within the country namely waste management, agriculture and infrastructure development.