PhaseVis: What, When, Where, and Who in Visualizing the Four Phases of Emergency Management Through the Lens of Social Media
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 1
PhaseVis:
Visualizing the Four Phases of
Emergency Management
Through the Lens of Social
Media
Seungwon Yang et al.
Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech
5/13/2013
Outline
1. Motivation
2. Hurricane Isaac
3. Approach (Selection, Classification, Visualization)
4. PhaseVis in Action
5. Limitations
6. Discussion
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 2
1. Motivation
Four Phases of Emergency Management Model
FEMA training material adds ‘Prevention/Protection’
http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/IS230B/IS230bCourse.pdf
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 3
Response
Recovery
Mitigation
Preparedne
ss
2. Hurricane Isaac: Trajectory
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 4
8/24
Cuba, Hispaniola:
approx. 30 died
8/28-29
Mississippi River, Georgia,
Port Fourchon, LA: 9 died
After 8/30
N. Louisiana: degenerated
to tropical depression
*Image by Cyclonebiskit (Wikipedia)
8/21
Tropical storm
Isaac
8/19-20
Extratropical cyclone
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 5
Disaster Tweets
with emergency
orgs, agency names
Visualiza on
&
Interac on
Manual
Labeling
Training
Data
Trained
classifica on
model
Cleaned
Tweets
Original
Tweets
Original &
Retweets
Classified
Tweets
Select and
Preprocess
Tweets
Classify into
4 phases
Implement
visualization
& interaction
3. Overall Approach
Tweet collection using ‘#isaac’ with
yourTwapperKeeper
Situation report & Information sharing
Majority of tweets
Embedded URLs: news webpages, videos,
photographs
Personal activity report
Very few
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 6
3. Tweet Collection
Approx. 56,000 English tweets collected with
‘#Isaac’
5,677 tweets (10%) with reference to Red Cross,
FEMA, or Salvation Army
1,453 non-retweets
1,121 manually labeled with one of four phases
(response, recovery, mitigation, preparedness)
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 7
3. Building a Dataset (1/2)
Tweet text + resource title
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 8
Nice article abt our Dir. Of emerg srvcs @leopratte
in #Louisiana organizing #redcross #Isaac relief
http://t.co/D4RPr33n
3. Building a Dataset (2/2)
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 9
Response More than 4,700 people in as many as 80 shelters in 7
states overnight; more than 3,000 #RedCross workers (37
from KC region) at #Isaac
Recovery FEMA announces that federal aid has been made available
for the state of Louisiana. #Isaac
Mitigation FEMA mitigations advisers to offer rebuilding tips in St.
Bernard and Ascension Parishes. http://t.co/ZziRGOGw
#Isaac
Preparednes
s
Very cool app! MT @redcross: Our hurricane app has info
on #RedCross shelters, a toolkit w flashlight, alarm
http://t.co/E7o1rtJK #Isaac
3. Examples of 4 Phases
SVM multiclass with linear kernel
Large num. of features, small num. of training
examples
Naïve Bayes multinomial
Bag-of-words model fits well for tweet data
Random forest
One of the robust algorithms for text classification
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 10
3. Classification Algorithms
Majority of tweets in Preparedness phase (84%)
Content: fill up the gas tank, hurricane App,
preparedness tips, replace food/water in emergency
kit, etc…
Clustered around
Red Cross, FEMA, & CraigatFEMA
Study focus was rather on the US (English tweets)
Spanish tweets from Cuba, Hispaniola not
considered
Unable to understand phases in such areas
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 15
4. Summary (8/23-8/24)
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 16
4. PhaseVis in Action (8/28-8/29)
- Mainly in Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia -
High increase in tweet volume
Isaac landed in the US in 8/28 with hurricane
strength
Response (20%), Recovery (34%), Mitigation (0%),
Preparedness (46%)
Content:
Recruiting volunteers (Response, Recovery)
Asking for donations/support (Recovery)
RT regarding ‘Mitt Romney’
Providing shelters (Response)…
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 17
4. Tweet Details (8/28-8/29)
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 18
4. PhaseVis in Action (9/5-9/7)
- US continued -
Mostly Recovery phase (75%), followed by
continued Response actions…
Lots of activities in New Orleans, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana
Active tweet account: FEMA, Red Cross,
RedCrossSELA (South East Louisiana)
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 19
4. Tweet Details (9/5-9/7)
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 20
5. Limitations
Language
Only English tweets considered
Unable to analyze Spanish tweets when Isaac hit Cuba &
Hispaniola
Small data set
Only tweets containing FEMA, Red Cross & Salvation
Army
E.g., RedCrossSELA, SalvationArmy, craigatFEMA, …
Approx. 10% of tweets had those names
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 21
6. Discussion
What are other valuable information to uncover from
disaster tweets and why are they important?
Sentiment, Reliability of tweets
Embedded URLs: news articles, images, videos…
??
To what extent can tweet analysis actually help
emergency managers in the field?
Identification of ‘actionable’ tweets from affected areas,
victims, and witnesses…
??
NSF for funding: IIS-0916733 (CTRnet project)
Internet Archive for collaboration
Big thanks to co-authors who couldn’t come here
Haeyong Chung, Xiao Lin, Sunshin Lee, Liangzhe
Chen, Andy Wood, and the CTRnet Team
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 22
Acknowledgment
Evaluation
Preprocessing & Accuracy
ISCRAM 2013, May 12-15 25
TF IDF Normali
zation
Naïve Bayes
Multinomial
SVM Multiclass
76% 80.1%
X 77% 80.4%
X 60% 78.8%
X X 78.1%
X 75% 80.4%
X X 78% 80.8%
X X 63% 78.9%
X X X 79.0%
(QUESTION for Audience)Often ‘NULL’ title if attempts to access URLs after a month.Sometimes, title is almost the same as tweet contentAlso note the informal word usage: ‘abt’, ‘emerg’, ‘srvcs’