Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, andcan’t, help.Surviving the recession: maximising your valueASLIB Eng...
Introduction  • Institutional, financial and strategic context  • Previous methods used to review journals collections  • ...
Cranfield University  • The UKs only wholly postgraduate university focused    on science, technology, engineering and    ...
Key Drivers  •   Financial realities  •   Demonstrating value for money  •   Strategic alignment  •   Research Excellence ...
Expenditure on Journals                         Journal Spend       2006-07     2007-08           2008-09   2009-10
Expenditure onResources                         Cranfield University                  Information Provision Expenditure   ...
How do we demonstrate that the collection  is meeting the needs of the University?
Previous TechniquesUsed:  Annual journals review using the follow data  • Circulation figures – issues and renewals  • “Sw...
New ApproachQuantitative:         Qualitative:•   Size              • Academic Liaison•   Usage             • Reading List...
Quantitative Reporting
Quantitative Reporting  •   Systematic  •   Sustainable  •   Internal benchmarking  •   Elevator pitch  •   So what?  •   ...
Brought to you by theletters…                        &
Our Approach  • What has everyone else done?     • Analysing Publisher Deals Project  • Storage centre  • Excel training  ...
Basic Metrics  • Number of titles within a package  • Total annual full-text downloads  • Cost:     • Core titles     • e-...
Value Metrics  •   Average number of requests per title  •   Average cost per title  •   Total cost as % of information pr...
The Long TailDownloads             Titles        Titles     Titles            Long Tail   Short Tail   No Tail
Subscribed Titles  •   Reviewing performance of core collection  •   REF Preferred?  •   Popular?  •   Three year trends i...
Popular Titles  •   Which titles are the most popular?  •   Top 30 titles in the package  •   Three year trends in downloa...
Considerations  • When to measure from/to?       • calendar, financial/academic, or contract year?  •   Which titles make ...
Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, and can’t,help.
Qualitative Measures
Academic Liaison  • Who‟s using it?     • Why?     • How?  • How valuable is it?  • What will be the impact if we cancel? ...
Quantitative on theQualitative:  Analysis on the five REF Preferred Recommended    Journals Lists:  • Overlapping titles  ...
Reading List Review  Qualitative analysis on course reading lists:  • What are our academic recommending?  • Where is it p...
Using the results
What they can do:  • Both qualitative and quantitative measures tell the    story of the resource  • Aid decision making  ...
What they can’t do:
Conclusions
Closing thoughts  • Is it worth investing in this?  • Qualitative & Quantitative  • Danger of relying on cost-per-download
Looking Ahead  • Review of all budgets     • All Resources     • Systems     • Staff     • Services  • Demonstrating Value...
Thank YouSelena Killick                John HarringtonCranfield University          Cranfield Universitys.a.killick@cranfi...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Electronic Collection Management: How statistics can, and can't, help.

763 views

Published on

Presentation delivered at the ASLIB Engineering & Technology group and the Aerospace & Defence Librarians Group event titled: Surviving the recession: maximising your value. Held at Imperial College on the 15th of November 2011.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Electronic Collection Management: How statistics can, and can't, help.

  1. 1. Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, andcan’t, help.Surviving the recession: maximising your valueASLIB Engineering & Technology GroupAerospace & Defence Librarians GroupJohn Harrington Selena KillickHead of Information Services Library Quality Officer
  2. 2. Introduction • Institutional, financial and strategic context • Previous methods used to review journals collections • Role of qualitative and quantitative measures • What these measures can and cannot tell us
  3. 3. Cranfield University • The UKs only wholly postgraduate university focused on science, technology, engineering and management • One of the UKs top five research intensive universities • Annual turnover £150m • 40% of our students study whilst in employment • We deliver the UK Ministry of Defences largest educational contract
  4. 4. Key Drivers • Financial realities • Demonstrating value for money • Strategic alignment • Research Excellence Framework (REF) • Income Mission critical • Reputation
  5. 5. Expenditure on Journals Journal Spend 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
  6. 6. Expenditure onResources Cranfield University Information Provision Expenditure by Format 2009-10 0% 8% 29% Books inc. special collections Total Journals e-Books 58% Other databases Other digital documents 4%
  7. 7. How do we demonstrate that the collection is meeting the needs of the University?
  8. 8. Previous TechniquesUsed: Annual journals review using the follow data • Circulation figures – issues and renewals • “Sweep survey” to capture in-house use • Journal contents page requests • Download figures • Journal prices v the cost of ILL requests More recent focus on “cost per download”
  9. 9. New ApproachQuantitative: Qualitative:• Size • Academic Liaison• Usage • Reading Lists Review• Coverage • REF Preferred• Value for Money
  10. 10. Quantitative Reporting
  11. 11. Quantitative Reporting • Systematic • Sustainable • Internal benchmarking • Elevator pitch • So what? • Enable informed decision making • Demonstrate smart procurement
  12. 12. Brought to you by theletters… &
  13. 13. Our Approach • What has everyone else done? • Analysing Publisher Deals Project • Storage centre • Excel training • Template design
  14. 14. Basic Metrics • Number of titles within a package • Total annual full-text downloads • Cost: • Core titles • e-Access Fee • Total costs
  15. 15. Value Metrics • Average number of requests per title • Average cost per title • Total cost as % of information provision expenditure • Cost per full-text download • Average download per FTE student/staff/total • Average cost per FTE student/staff/total
  16. 16. The Long TailDownloads Titles Titles Titles Long Tail Short Tail No Tail
  17. 17. Subscribed Titles • Reviewing performance of core collection • REF Preferred? • Popular? • Three year trends in cost / downloads / CPD • Cost / Downloads / CPD categorised: • Zero • Low • Medium • High • Cancel?
  18. 18. Popular Titles • Which titles are the most popular? • Top 30 titles in the package • Three year trends in downloads • REF Preferred? • Subscribed title?
  19. 19. Considerations • When to measure from/to? • calendar, financial/academic, or contract year? • Which titles make up our core collection? • Do we have access to all of the „zero use‟ titles? • What constitutes Low/Medium/High? • What about the aggregator usage statistics? • Do we trust the usage statistics? • What is the size of the target population?
  20. 20. Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, and can’t,help.
  21. 21. Qualitative Measures
  22. 22. Academic Liaison • Who‟s using it? • Why? • How? • How valuable is it? • What will be the impact if we cancel? • Teaching? • Research?
  23. 23. Quantitative on theQualitative: Analysis on the five REF Preferred Recommended Journals Lists: • Overlapping titles • Unsubscribed titles • Financial shortfall • Current recommended subscribed titles • Usage data
  24. 24. Reading List Review Qualitative analysis on course reading lists: • What are our academic recommending? • Where is it published? • How often is it recommended? • Are there alternatives?
  25. 25. Using the results
  26. 26. What they can do: • Both qualitative and quantitative measures tell the story of the resource • Aid decision making • Justify procurement • Safeguard budgets
  27. 27. What they can’t do:
  28. 28. Conclusions
  29. 29. Closing thoughts • Is it worth investing in this? • Qualitative & Quantitative • Danger of relying on cost-per-download
  30. 30. Looking Ahead • Review of all budgets • All Resources • Systems • Staff • Services • Demonstrating Value and Impact • Resources • Services
  31. 31. Thank YouSelena Killick John HarringtonCranfield University Cranfield Universitys.a.killick@cranfield.ac.uk j.harrington@cranfield.ac.ukTel: 01793 785561 Tel: 01234 754477

×