Public notice

272 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
272
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Public notice

  1. 1. ‘ PUBLIC NOTICE Thisis rebuttal tothe recklessputtingorallowedtobe puton or inthe internetbyJustia.com, about, throughor withthe State of PennsylvaniaandUSA Governmentsknowledge suchfalse courtcase informationabout StanleyE.Kornafel yetvoidof hispermission. Forthose havinginterestinMr. Kornafel,,aswell astruth,moralsandmorallycorrectjustice the entity’s deceitful informationhas damagedhisreputationandgoodname. The federal andstate judgesandcourtsin collusionwith lawyersinconcertwiththe legal society andjustice departments arrivedatsuch writtenmattersby denying Mr. Kornafel libertyanddenyinghim hissubstantialandcivil/constitutionalrightsusingdeceit, coercion,fraud,lies,perjury aswell asdiscrimination andinderelictionof dutyandabsentjurisdiction practiceddespotism.The judgesrobbinghimof anyreasonable formof morallyfairandethical equal justice abortedall integrityof the courtsallowingthe courtsand lawyerspractice of fraudand extortion of the client. The federal andstate congressesinbedwiththe legal societyjudgesandlawyersthrough theirintentional negligence enablessuch ascommonpractice, thenwiththe complicity of the news mediaitsdespotismandtyrannygalore inthe goodole USA. The followingprovides the truthof the mattersregardingthe majorcases depicted. U.S. DISTRICTCOURT,,,, No. 99- 6416………The memorandumisprejudiciallywritteninillegal legal discriminationandfraud… Note;;Atno time wasMr. Kornafel everprovidedanyformof reasonable fairandequal hearing or trial where he couldenjoylibertytofreelyspeak hisfullcase andpresent filed legallyqualified exhibitsof evidence thathadnotbeendisputednordisproved. Pg.1, Background, par.1,lines1-2..is false perverting of truth….Truthtakenfrompolice report: “ USPS struck plaintiff’svehicle”…….Lines2- 5,,isfraudbyomissionof truthful facts..Truth::USPSinitated the claimby firstsendingtheirclaimform aswasrequestedbytheirownagent J.Michael DePompeo whichwasfilledinanreturnedasinstructedbythe same agentat the scene….Omittedis thatthe two estimates asadvisedbythe agentwere producedfromstate authorizedshopsandincludedwiththe returnedUSPSclaimform…… Pg.2,, par. 1. Is fraud byrule of law as omittedtruthful factthatthe USPS breachedtheirownagent’sdebate andcomprise withagreement andbindingconditionsattachedto the agreementmade atthe scene.…Omittedalsoisthatthe USPSso calledofferwasbasedon oppressioncombinedwiththeiruse of deceit,liesandfraudulentpractices…..par.2…isfalse asomitted truth that the judge incollusionwiththe defendantdeniedandrefusedtoallow the prose to perfect service…...par.3…isdeceitinomittingtrue factual matterthatthe lawyerinconspiracywiththe defendantUSA andjudge betrayedthe client andtreacherouslyextortedthe client notperforming normal professionalservicesagreedtoandexpected.The lawyervoidof cause failedtoobtain statementsaswell asdepositionsfromthe three witnessesthen failedtoserve courtproduced subpoenas and refusedtomake the scheduled courtappearance plusincollusionwiththe defendant producedvoidof permissionunauthorizedandunsignedfraudulentstipulationforcomprise.…Also omittedis thatthe case no. 1361 meritswas writtenandstatedas for negligence.asitwasnot a
  2. 2. propertydamage claim..….lines5-6,, isfalse intendedtodeceiveasthere wasneverany meetingof the partiesnorwas there any hearingnorwas there any pretrial hearingnoranytrial of any kind. Therefore anappeal wasimpossible sincethere wasno basis.Whereforethere wasno hearing, no discussionand noargumentandno allowingof presentingof evidenceandwitnesses therewas no decision. The citizenwastotallyrobbedof all libertyandjustice by the corruptedlegal societycollusive iniquity of the judge andcourt…..Par.4- 5,,,isfalselymisleadingasthere wasnohearing.The citizenwas deprivedof freedom asdenied of hisrightsof freely speakinghisfull case alongwithbeing deniedfrom usinghislegallyqualifieddocumentsof exhibits forevidence…..AlsoomittedisJudge ONeill wassame judge thatdeniedMr.Kornafel fromperfectingservice infirstprose action whichthenalsocolluded withdefendantandlawyerinsecondactionwihlawyerasrepresentation…..The plaintiffknowingit was the same judge knewconspiracy existedwhich made anyattemptatapproachingthe court sheerfolly. Viable conspiracyandiniquityof judge andcourtwithdefendantandlawyeris clearly manifestedby theiracceptingandallowingtobe filed the unauthorizedandunsignedcompromise voidof any notice of any hearingwiththe plaintiff……Pg.3,,regardingthe standard;;;lawyer’sfiledcomplaintas representationon behalf of clientaswell asthe fraudulentunsignedstipulationforcomprise are partof the court’s record….Since there wasnomeetingof the partiesandnohearingandno testimony therefore there wasnodecisionandtherefore no decision.Yetthere wasthe two documentsfiledas mattersof court records.The judge Buckwalter havingaccess tosaidrecord anddocumentsestablishes the judge’s prejudiced partisanfalsestatementsanddeceitasknew the plaintiff didhave setof facts and exhibitsof documentedproof supportinghisclaim.The standardis meansof deceitinconcerted activitycoveringupthe previousjudgesandlawyer……Pg.4to end…The background combinedwith the standard crediblyevidences thatthe memorandumwas writtenin prejudicedcollusionintendedto utterly robthe pro se of hislibertyandcivil rightswhile denying himanymeansof legallyentitledrelief while denyingjustice. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS,FEDERALCIRCUIT ,,,02- 5141,,,,Fed.Appx..651,2003… Note: There wasneverany trial nor anyhearingor pretrial hearingof anykindmaintainingthe plaintiff ina state of continuedbondage againsthiswill.The Discussionisfraudbylaw as omittingof critical to decisionmakingmatters.OmittedisdefendantUSA had misledfederal districtcourtsasbeingthe correct courts thenafterseveral yearsandcasesstatedthat the districtcourt wasthe wrong court,then statedthat the claimscourt wasthe wrongcourt….If the districtcourts were the wrongcourtshow couldjudgesacceptthe filings especiallywhenthe federal rulesof procedureidentifiedsame ascorrect. The judge’s hereinwrittenmattershows the corrupted perversionof due process justice into racketeeringmobrule soleytodenythe prose libertyaswell asfairand equal justice. U.S. DISTRICTCOURT,,No. 03- 6876……Judge Giles,,,,Memorandum. NOTE: At no time wasMr. Kornafel everallowedaccesstothe court, as he wasdeprivedof libertyand deniedhisrighttobe present,deniedtospeak,deniedtobe heard,deniedtopresentthe fullcase, deniedtopresentexhibitsof evidence,deniedtomake anyargumentanddeniedtomake anyrebuttal. Backgrounnd: Perversionof truthandby law itis fraudas omissionsof critical factual matteryet containingfalse statementsintendedtodeceive…..Lines1- 2 is falselystatedandfalse incontentaswas not a collisionsince the USPSstruckthe plaintiff’svehicle onthe passengerside…Provenfalse bythe
  3. 3. police reportstatement andlawyerRepetto’s filedstatementincase 1361…..Lines 4,,,Omittedisthat the USPS initiatedthe grievance claimbyfirstsendingthe plaintiff the USPSclaimformwhichthe agent himself hadrequestedof whichthe victimmerelyfilleditinandreturneditasinstructedbythe USPS agentat the scene of whichwasattachedtwo viable estimatesfromstate approvedshops. The victims actionscompletedhispartof the agreedcompromise andpromise adhereingtothe agent’sattached conditionsmade atthe scene……Lines 4- 5,,,,isfalse aswassuch documentationwas acknowledged as receivedbythe USPSwriting……Lines 4- 5 isshownas false byjudge’s conflictingstatementin99- 6416 at pg. 1, of the lastline……Lines 5- 6,,,Is false byomissionsof factthat USPS subsequentactionswere by deceitandfraudwhichisprovenbydocuments,,,,,,alsoomittedisthatthe vehiclewasa discontinuedvintage classicmodel thatwascurrentlyinrestoration…….Line 7 isfalse asomittedisoffer was made underoppressionandinfraudwhile omittingtheirbreadhof theiragent’s discussion, comprise withconditionsandpromise whichwasestablishedatthe scene honoredandacteduponin goodfaithby the victim……Lines7- 9,,isfraudby omissionsof fact that USPSdeniedthe claim maintainingthe victimundercoercion……Lines7- 8 isprovenfalse by judge’sconflictingstatementin99- 6416, pg.2, lines2- 3…..Lines10- 12 are false presentedandfalse incontentintendedtodeceive. Omittedisfactthat the judge inconspiracywiththe defendantdeniedandrefusedtoallow prose to perfectservice…….pg.2, par.1,,, Fraud withintenttodeceive byomissionsof critical factsalong with false statements..Repetto didnotnegotiateasthe original claimthatthe USPS agenthad alreadybeen establishedandagreed toforthat amountwhichthe USPS laterrenignedanddenied.Where itwasthe case wasnot aboutthe claimnorpropertydamage but as documentedbythe courtwas one of negligence..Omittedisfactthat the lawerbetrayedthe client…Proof isthe lawyersclaimfiledonbehalf of the client…thenfailedtoperformagreed tounderstoodasintended normal professional servicesas failedtoobtainanystatementsfromthe three witnesses,failedtosecure anydepositionsfromthe three witnessesandfailedtoserve the supoeanasasprovidedbythe courtthenrefusedtomake court scheduledcourtdate appearance voidof cause leavingthe clientinaforcedfraudulentlyandcoerced statedwhile extortingthe clientsfunds….Omittedisthatthe stipulationforcompromised filedvoidof client’spermissionwithouthissignature andknowledge was false as contraryto the lawyers complaint filedonbehalf of the clientpluscontained false statementsandnotagreedtoterms whichreducedthe client/victimtoservitudeandbondage while nullifyingthe amount…..Conspiracybetweenjudge, defendantUSA,andlawyerisprovenbythe same judge andcourt acceptingthe unauthorizedand unsignedcomprise voidof anyhearing plus voidof anycontact withthe plaintiff requestingcause asto whynot signedtoensure fairnessof whichthere wasnone……Pg.2,,par.3…( referalsotocase No.09- 06,,pg. 2,,topportionof page.) Paragraph isfraudintendedtodeceive byfalse statementandomission of factsthat Mr. Kornafel hadfiledtimelyanswerwhichincludedexhibitsas well asthe notingof them alongwith notingspecificallyof defendantsomissionsof critical matterandfalse statements,all of whichthe judge didnotread and completelyignoredprejudicinganddiscriminating againstthe prose reducingthe court to hisdespotism engineeringthe courtininiquity……Lines 8- 9…Omittedisthat SuperiorCourtinintentional actionsdeprivedprose of libertyasdeniedhimhisrightof freedomto freelyspeak,deniedhimtopresent hiscase,deniedhimtomake argument…The judgesutterly practicedextortionasallowedthe court’sacceptingof paymentfor15 minute argumentwhichthe judgesrobbedhimof bydenyinghisuse of hispaidfor time.The judgesabrogatedall jurisdiction reducingthe court inconspiracywithdefendinglawyerinto itscorruptedracketeeringmob
  4. 4. actions…….par.4,,,simplyresonateswiththe same perversionof the systemtodenyjustice……Pg. 3,, par. 1,, Lines4- 5..Anyimmunitywasdissolvedbyabortionof jurisdictionresultingfromcriminal negligence. Judge Yohnknewpf existingcollusionthatrobbedprose of any reasonable fairandequal due processjustice…..Pars.2- 5….Judge knew issuesof moralsandethicsinvolvedmeritsof deniedfair and equal justice.Yetfurtherdeprivedthe prose by barringhimfromthe court , refusinghimfreedom as denyhimto be presentandfreelyspeaktotestifytohisfull case andpresentall issues.Hisfailure to act to correct by sendingthe case to eitherthe U.S. Supreme Ct.or back tothe lowercourtfor a jury trial hearingevidencehiscomplicitytopervertjustice anddiscriminateagainstthe prose….Onthe balance of the memorandumitisthat the combiningof the aforementionedof pages1,2, and 3 establishes pages4,5 and 6 of the memorandumisfalse,phony,deceitfulmatterputthroughpolicy, hypocrisyasmeansof coveringupthe legal society’sturningthe systemintoamobracket…..Pg..5…Par. 1 alongwith2 evidencesthe judge failingtoprotectthe constitutionbyfailingtoprotectthe citizen’s rights. The judge’suse of “final judgement”isnothinglessthanfraudintendedtodeceiveasthe citizen was deprivedof libertyanddeniedhisfreedomrightsdeniedaccesstothe court and freelyspeakto presenthisfull case andexhibitsof evidence abortingthe court’sequity. Since the meritsof the case involvedconstitutional andsubstantial rightsviolationsthe judge andcourthadobligationtocompletely reviewthe entire case mattersorhave the pro se testifyandgive hisfull statementof case. The judge alsohad the optionsof forwardingthe entire case mattertothe U Refusal todo eitherpervertedthe court intoprejudice anddiscriminationagainstthe prose reducinghimtoforcedbondage beyondhis control as a meansof collusiontoprotectthe priorjudgesanddefendinglawyer. Pa. Supreme Court….146MM 2007 incomplicitywiththe defendantandlowercourtrefusedtoallow pro se to file aresponse todefendantandinbiasprejudice denied himtofile appeal voidof any justification. CLOSING A personcan verifythese crediblefactshereinstatedalongwiththe full andcompletedetailedtruthby goingto the variouscourts andreadingin depththat isall of the filingsaswell asfiledexhibitsof each case alongwitheachand everyrelatedcase’smaterialsandfactthat has been fraudulentlyfailedto be shown. Or a personmay envision all byobtainingacopyof the book, “Policy,Hypocracy,Despotism and Tyranny,The Evil Injustice”atPublishAmerica.com/bookstore. Of course once havingthe bookthe readerwill enjoybeing able tofullyrealize the intentionally negligentfederalandstate congressesbeinginbedandcomplicity withthe legal societyjudgesand lawyers readinghowthey allowsuch injusticetobe practiced.One may thenalsofind how the news
  5. 5. mediaisno longerthe free press thatnolongeroperateswith the citizen’sinterestasprimary since alsobeinginbedwiththe lawyersandjudges.Take yourpick,,,mobrule ortyranny? Forthose consideringuse of lawyersthe bookmayprovide agoodeducation.

×