Regions and cities in a post-Covid world
Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
Rome, 4 February 2021 (virtual)
The pandemic and its geographic implications
2
Covid-19 as a challenge for territories
3
o Covid-19, not the first global pandemic
o But the first to do so in a much more connected, digital and globalised world
oBig cities regarded as the main focus:
o Air connectivity
o International travellers
o Density
oAnd considered by many as facing a turning point
o Is this the death of the large city as we know it?
o Is this an opportunity for a more balanced growth?
o Technological change allowing to delocalise activity (a ‘flat’ world)?
o Smaller, more remote locations offering protection and refuge.
Drivers of the pandemic
4
o Connectivity
o Density
oPoverty, inequality and crowdedness
o Pollution
o Institutions
o Government responses
o Civic responses
But the geography of Covid-19 is very uneven
5
But the geography of Covid-19 is very uneven
6
6
But the geography of Covid-19 is very uneven
7
Poverty, inequality, connectivity?
8
As of 13 June 2020.
Source: New York City Health Department. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page#download
Poverty, inequality, connectivity?
9
Poverty, inequality, connectivity?
10
London Madrid
Poverty, inequality, connectivity?
11
The forces of change
12
The risk of making predictions
oTerritorial impact will depend on:
o Duration of the pandemic
o Economic, social and Political conditions in each territory
o Institutional conditions
o Luck
oMaking predictions is thus risky
oBut these are exceptional circumstances and we must
take risks
13
The forces of change
Social scarring Forced social experiment
Changes to maintain social
distance
14
The transformation
15
The impact on territories
16
Macrogeography
17
Microgeography
Sustainable transportation
CREATIVE CiTY
18
What’s the role for infrastructure investment?
19
o COVID-19 is not going to solve pre-existing development problems as if
by magic
o It will accelerate pre-existing transformation trends
o With the risk of greater polarisation and discontent
o Hence, development strategies will be more needed than ever
oBut integrated strategies at a territorial level
o With infrastructure investment as one of its pillars
COVID-19 and development
20
Towards integrated strategies
21
ROOTING
ECONOMIC
ACTIVITY
INWARD
INVESTMENT
LABOUR
SKILLS
LOCAL FIRMS
INFRASTRUCTURE
DEPENDENCE
EASY ACCESS BY COMPETITORS
SUBSIDIZING
NON
COMPETITIVE
FIRMS
MIGRATION
BRAIN DRAIN
Expo Station, Seville ‘Radial’ motorways, Madrid
Castellón Airport
AVE Toledo-Albacete
July 17, 2015 5:38 pm
Spanish ghost airport costing €1bn attracts offer of just €10,000
Ciudad Real Airport
22
From 2000 to 2011, Italy received more than $60 billion
in the European Union financing to underwrite a wide
array of programs, in areas including agriculture and
infrastructure, most of it directed to the south, with
little but a half-completed highway to show for it.
Spain, which was given a little more than US$100
billion, at least built a world-class high-speed rail
network. (Greece received 50 billion, an enormous
amount in per capita terms, also to a clear effect.) Rachel
Donadio, NYT, Oct. 7, 2012
Motorway Salerno-
Reggio Calabria
A1
Motorway
Greece
23
o Returns of infrastructure policies
Big or small infrastructure projects
24
With, perhaps, shifts in emphasis
25
Social infrastructure
Transport infrastructure
Conclusions
26
Conclusions
27
1. Large cities will not die
o They will be transformed
o The very characteristics that have made cities thrive and weather past pandemics will
remain in operation
o The hierarchy of cities will, most likely, remain in place
o It would be naïve to think that the pandemic alone will address the huge problems of
lagging behind cities and areas and the high inequality within our cities
2. Many of the pre-existing tendencies will be accelerated
o The pandemic will accelerate the retail ‘apocalypse’ of the high street
o Distance working will remove the need for large inner city office space
o That will liberate inner city space for housing
o Suburbs may initially win
o City centres initially lose
Conclusions (II)
28
1. The pandemic, for all its horrific toll, offers a window of opportunity to
rethink how we promote development, tackle inequality and the discontent
linked to it
o Need for more integrated policies
o More attention for the micro-scale (within regions, across regions)
2. What role for infrastructure? And transport infrastructure?
o Crucial role
o But within integrated territorial development policies
o And more geared towards addressing local bottlenecks than providing large mega-project
o Ensure that this is done in a fairer and more just way.
Regions and cities in a post-Covid world
Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
More information at http://personal.lse.ac.uk/rodrigu1/
@rodriguez_pose

Regions and cities in a post-Covid world

  • 1.
    Regions and citiesin a post-Covid world Andrés Rodríguez-Pose Rome, 4 February 2021 (virtual)
  • 2.
    The pandemic andits geographic implications 2
  • 3.
    Covid-19 as achallenge for territories 3 o Covid-19, not the first global pandemic o But the first to do so in a much more connected, digital and globalised world oBig cities regarded as the main focus: o Air connectivity o International travellers o Density oAnd considered by many as facing a turning point o Is this the death of the large city as we know it? o Is this an opportunity for a more balanced growth? o Technological change allowing to delocalise activity (a ‘flat’ world)? o Smaller, more remote locations offering protection and refuge.
  • 4.
    Drivers of thepandemic 4 o Connectivity o Density oPoverty, inequality and crowdedness o Pollution o Institutions o Government responses o Civic responses
  • 5.
    But the geographyof Covid-19 is very uneven 5
  • 6.
    But the geographyof Covid-19 is very uneven 6 6
  • 7.
    But the geographyof Covid-19 is very uneven 7
  • 8.
    Poverty, inequality, connectivity? 8 Asof 13 June 2020. Source: New York City Health Department. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page#download
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    The forces ofchange 12
  • 13.
    The risk ofmaking predictions oTerritorial impact will depend on: o Duration of the pandemic o Economic, social and Political conditions in each territory o Institutional conditions o Luck oMaking predictions is thus risky oBut these are exceptional circumstances and we must take risks 13
  • 14.
    The forces ofchange Social scarring Forced social experiment Changes to maintain social distance 14
  • 15.
  • 16.
    The impact onterritories 16
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
    What’s the rolefor infrastructure investment? 19
  • 20.
    o COVID-19 isnot going to solve pre-existing development problems as if by magic o It will accelerate pre-existing transformation trends o With the risk of greater polarisation and discontent o Hence, development strategies will be more needed than ever oBut integrated strategies at a territorial level o With infrastructure investment as one of its pillars COVID-19 and development 20
  • 21.
    Towards integrated strategies 21 ROOTING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY INWARD INVESTMENT LABOUR SKILLS LOCALFIRMS INFRASTRUCTURE DEPENDENCE EASY ACCESS BY COMPETITORS SUBSIDIZING NON COMPETITIVE FIRMS MIGRATION BRAIN DRAIN
  • 22.
    Expo Station, Seville‘Radial’ motorways, Madrid Castellón Airport AVE Toledo-Albacete July 17, 2015 5:38 pm Spanish ghost airport costing €1bn attracts offer of just €10,000 Ciudad Real Airport 22
  • 23.
    From 2000 to2011, Italy received more than $60 billion in the European Union financing to underwrite a wide array of programs, in areas including agriculture and infrastructure, most of it directed to the south, with little but a half-completed highway to show for it. Spain, which was given a little more than US$100 billion, at least built a world-class high-speed rail network. (Greece received 50 billion, an enormous amount in per capita terms, also to a clear effect.) Rachel Donadio, NYT, Oct. 7, 2012 Motorway Salerno- Reggio Calabria A1 Motorway Greece 23
  • 24.
    o Returns ofinfrastructure policies Big or small infrastructure projects 24
  • 25.
    With, perhaps, shiftsin emphasis 25 Social infrastructure Transport infrastructure
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Conclusions 27 1. Large citieswill not die o They will be transformed o The very characteristics that have made cities thrive and weather past pandemics will remain in operation o The hierarchy of cities will, most likely, remain in place o It would be naïve to think that the pandemic alone will address the huge problems of lagging behind cities and areas and the high inequality within our cities 2. Many of the pre-existing tendencies will be accelerated o The pandemic will accelerate the retail ‘apocalypse’ of the high street o Distance working will remove the need for large inner city office space o That will liberate inner city space for housing o Suburbs may initially win o City centres initially lose
  • 28.
    Conclusions (II) 28 1. Thepandemic, for all its horrific toll, offers a window of opportunity to rethink how we promote development, tackle inequality and the discontent linked to it o Need for more integrated policies o More attention for the micro-scale (within regions, across regions) 2. What role for infrastructure? And transport infrastructure? o Crucial role o But within integrated territorial development policies o And more geared towards addressing local bottlenecks than providing large mega-project o Ensure that this is done in a fairer and more just way.
  • 29.
    Regions and citiesin a post-Covid world Andrés Rodríguez-Pose More information at http://personal.lse.ac.uk/rodrigu1/ @rodriguez_pose