Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
DuraSpace Summit Meeting        Baltimore, Md     March 13 & 14, 2013SUMMIT PRESENTATION SLIDES
DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The Role of DuraSpace in Managing   Community Source Software”      Part 1: Presented by         ...
Welcome
The Emerging Digital StackCode   Irods      LOCKSS    DSpace   Fedora   Etc.
The Emerging Digital Stack  DPNBackbone    Dark      Diverse   Replication   Audit    Succession Code      Irods      LOCK...
The Emerging Digital StackPreservation                TACC       SDR       APT          Hathi       Chrono.Repositories   ...
The Emerging Digital Stack                                                                               Interntet        ...
The Emerging Digital Stack                        Investing in Capabilities                          Sloan                ...
Brief History of DuraSpace
DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The Role of DuraSpace in Managing   Community Source Software”       Part 2: Presented by        ...
…first we need to uncover the              myths• DuraSpace has teams of developers working  on DSpace and Fedora• DuraSpa...
Who is DuraSpace?   Not for profit 501c3 formed in 2009Bringing together of the DSpace Foundation and Fedora              ...
Our missionDuraSpace is committed to providing leadership  and innovation for open technologies that  promote durable, per...
How is DuraSpace organized?    Funded through                                  Funded through servicesponsorship,RSP progr...
Why we are here today?              Projects       DSpace         FedoraTogether we must develop a sustainable       model...
Total funds raised from         sponsorship                Other               $21,000 Fedora$173,000                     ...
How are the sponsorship funds               spent?Item                    DSpace              FedoraStaff                 ...
Together we need to increase the    level of contribution andengagement for both projects to   ensure long term success
What do Open Source Projects        Need to Thrive?• Community contributions and  engagement• Great developers• Effective ...
How does DuraSpace support            projects?• Executive leadership• Technical leadership• Community outreach• Communica...
How does VIVO fit in?• VIVO worked with DuraSpace to  develop initial funding and governance• It compensates DuraSpace for...
How we fit as part of the larger    ecosystem of scholarship• Our focus is durability and preservation• We support the cor...
DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The University Librarian Perspective”           Presented by          Tyler Walters,    Dean of U...
Title Here                DuraSpace Summit:         The University Librarian PerspectiveTyler WaltersDuraSpace Summit Meet...
Ex.: VT Libraries’ participation     • $63,705 – digital infrastructure and services (5)        •   DPN        •   DuraSpa...
Running the numbers…     • $122,904 grand total        / $17,218,391 (Total 2012-13 Virginia Tech Libraries state budget) ...
For ~$123,000 we get…     • Shared scanned book / journal repository and research       initiatives – HathiTrust     • Dis...
Communities of practice and           knowledge sharing …     • Research library practices and experimentation       (ARL,...
Other real costs?       Yes, there are more digital infrastructure/service costs:     •Other library personnel involved, b...
Table Discussion •      What have you heard today? •      What do you have concerns about? •      What has inspired you? •...
We need your help• What continued investment do the  projects need to be successful?• What are ways to increase engagement...
DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The Fedora Futures project, a case   study for future collaboration”         Presented by    Edwi...
AgendaIntroduction1. Why Fedora Futures?2. Project Overview3. Project Roles and Community   ParticipationDiscussion
A (Funding) History of Fedora• Original software created 2000–08 with  $2.4M from the Mellon Foundation   – +$500,000 from...
The Success of Fedora• Architecture is demonstrably  Flexible & Extensible• Support for Durability• One foot in the linked...
Looming Storm CloudsTechnical           Organizational• Performance       • Small, fixed pool• Fault tolerance     of deve...
New Opportunities• Front-ends: eSciDoc, Hydra,  Islandora  – Attracting new energy and adopters  – Creating new technical ...
Fedora Futures Forms…• OR12: Ad hoc meeting• September:  – Meet to compare needs and notes  – Charter a 3 month investigat...
Fedora Futures Objectives• Preserve the strengths of the  architecture and community• Address the needs for robust and ful...
Technology Overview•   Highly scalable•   High availability•   Flexible storage*•   Durability*•   Reporting and metrics*•...
Technical Process & Organization• Technical Team   – 4 FTEs across 11 individuals, 8     institutions   – 12, 2-week sprin...
Project Roles•   DuraSpace•   Tech Team/Developers•   Fedora Community•   Institutional Support
New Challenges•   New use cases – sign of success•   Changing landscape – data•   Evolving developer community•   Funding
New Approaches• Sponsorship model• Transition planning• Sustainable funding model
Community Participation•   Developer participation•   Funding development•   Fedora governance•   Institutional engagement
Who is in Fedora Futures so far…•   Columbia            •   University of NSW•   DuraSpace           •   Indiana Universit...
DuraSpace Summit Meeting          Day 2“Open discussion on governance,funding and strategic direction of          DuraSpace”
DSpace• What does the project need to be  successful?    • Financial contributions    • Developer contributions    • Artic...
Breakouts• How should we fund the continued  management and stewardship of  DSpace?• What is the best way to increase  dev...
DSpace Futures Meetings• Oct / Nov 2012• 5 discussions with Sponsors, RSPs,  Committers, DCAT• Open feedback and discussio...
DSpace Futures Initiatives• Official REST API• Possible DSpace + Hydra Integration• Metadata Improvements (March 20)  – Up...
Initiative Teams• Lead / Co-Leads• Steering Committee  – may be optional for small initiatives• Developers• DuraSpace in a...
DuraSpace Summit Meeting          Day 2“Open discussion on governance,funding and strategic direction of            Fedora”
Agenda    Setting Direction for the MorningObjectives and Development ProcessRoles and BudgetGovernanceNext Steps
Moving Toward a SustainableFuture - Roles, Responsibilities &            Financing
Responsibilities–   Governance–   Product Management–   Community Management–   Communication & Marketing–   Administratio...
Roles• Community• Partners – non-profit and service  providers• Steering & Advisory• Product Manager• Technical Lead• Tech...
Funding• Early Years   – Grant Funded   – Dedicated Team• Recent Years – stretching the grant dollar   – Sponsorship   – C...
Current Players•   Community Sponsors & Adopters•   Duraspace•   Fedora Futures Project Steering Group•   Fedora Futures T...
Finances• Expenses   – Indirect Costs   – Direct Costs• Current Revenue Sources   – Sponsorship   – Incremental Project Fu...
Needs – Community Engagement
First Lesson in EconomicsThere is No Such Thing as a Free Lunch
Fedora Governance
Some Governance Models• Apache• Kuali• Jasig• Sakai• VIVO
Members   vsSponsors
DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013
DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013
DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013
DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013
DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013

253

Published on

Presentation slides
March 13-14, 2013
Baltimore, Maryland

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
253
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "DuraSpace Sponsor Summit Presentation Slides, March 2013"

  1. 1. DuraSpace Summit Meeting Baltimore, Md March 13 & 14, 2013SUMMIT PRESENTATION SLIDES
  2. 2. DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The Role of DuraSpace in Managing Community Source Software” Part 1: Presented by James Hilton, DuraSpace Board of Directors, President
  3. 3. Welcome
  4. 4. The Emerging Digital StackCode Irods LOCKSS DSpace Fedora Etc.
  5. 5. The Emerging Digital Stack DPNBackbone Dark Diverse Replication Audit Succession Code Irods LOCKSS DSpace Fedora Etc.
  6. 6. The Emerging Digital StackPreservation TACC SDR APT Hathi Chrono.Repositories DPN Backbone Dark Diverse Replication Audit Succession Code Irods LOCKSS DSpace Fedora Etc.
  7. 7. The Emerging Digital Stack Interntet CLOCKSSPreservation TACC SDR APT Hathi Chrono. PorticoRepositories Meta DPN Backbone Dark Diverse Replication Audit Succession Code Irods LOCKSS DSpace Fedora Etc.
  8. 8. The Emerging Digital Stack Investing in Capabilities Sloan Inst Interntet Access DPLA Dig CRL Publishers Repos Sky CLOCKSSPreservation TACC SDR APT Hathi Chrono. PorticoRepositories Meta DPN Backbone Dark Diverse Replication Audit Succession Code Irods LOCKSS DSpace Fedora Etc.
  9. 9. Brief History of DuraSpace
  10. 10. DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The Role of DuraSpace in Managing Community Source Software” Part 2: Presented by Michele Kimpton, DuraSpace Chief Executive Officer & Jonathan Markow, DuraSpace Chief Strategy Officer
  11. 11. …first we need to uncover the myths• DuraSpace has teams of developers working on DSpace and Fedora• DuraSpace is funded by the Moore foundation and others• DuraSpace is DSpace on Fedora• Our sponsorship dollars are funding Duracloud• Bringing on more projects reduces effort on existing projects
  12. 12. Who is DuraSpace? Not for profit 501c3 formed in 2009Bringing together of the DSpace Foundation and Fedora Commons Organization
  13. 13. Our missionDuraSpace is committed to providing leadership and innovation for open technologies that promote durable, persistent access to digital data.We collaborate with academic, scientific, cultural, and technology communities by supporting projects and creating services to help ensure that current and future generations have access to our collective digital heritage.
  14. 14. How is DuraSpace organized? Funded through Funded through servicesponsorship,RSP program revenue and grants DuraSpace Projects Services DSpace Fedora Vivo DuraCloud Education Dspacedirect
  15. 15. Why we are here today? Projects DSpace FedoraTogether we must develop a sustainable model for these projects
  16. 16. Total funds raised from sponsorship Other $21,000 Fedora$173,000 DSpace $223,750 $417,750 for Fy2012
  17. 17. How are the sponsorship funds spent?Item DSpace FedoraStaff 244,000( 2.0 FTE) 221,666 (1.8 FTE)(Tech lead, exec mgt,outreach, communityprograms)Travel 20,000 20,000Outsourced services 20,000 20,000Infrastructure 7,000 7,000Indirect cost 45,000 45,000allocationTotal 336,000 313,666Sponsorship/RSP rev 258,750 186,000Net diff (77,250) (127,666)
  18. 18. Together we need to increase the level of contribution andengagement for both projects to ensure long term success
  19. 19. What do Open Source Projects Need to Thrive?• Community contributions and engagement• Great developers• Effective governance• Community support, partnerships, and growth• Strategic direction and product roadmap• Sustainability planning
  20. 20. How does DuraSpace support projects?• Executive leadership• Technical leadership• Community outreach• Communications/promotion• Business administration
  21. 21. How does VIVO fit in?• VIVO worked with DuraSpace to develop initial funding and governance• It compensates DuraSpace for services provided• DuraSpace provides a legal home for VIVO• VIVO is working with us to build a sustainable business model
  22. 22. How we fit as part of the larger ecosystem of scholarship• Our focus is durability and preservation• We support the core building blocks for access, management and preservation• We provide strategic guidance and technical expertise on many projects that use our software or are important to our community
  23. 23. DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The University Librarian Perspective” Presented by Tyler Walters, Dean of University Libraries, Virginia Tech
  24. 24. Title Here DuraSpace Summit: The University Librarian PerspectiveTyler WaltersDuraSpace Summit Meeting, March 13, 2013 Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier
  25. 25. Ex.: VT Libraries’ participation • $63,705 – digital infrastructure and services (5) • DPN • DuraSpace • Educopia/MetaArchive Cooperative • HathiTrust • LOCKSS Alliance • $59,199 – community convening / issue leadership (6) • ARL • ASERL • CLIR/DLF • CNI • Educopia/Library Publishing Coalition • SPARC $122,904 annual grand total29
  26. 26. Running the numbers… • $122,904 grand total / $17,218,391 (Total 2012-13 Virginia Tech Libraries state budget) • =0.007% of Libraries budget (seven one-thousandths of one percent!) • $87,500 software developer (salary plus benefits [$75,000 salary and 25% benefits]) • $122,904 represents 1.4 FTE software developers and no one else30
  27. 27. For ~$123,000 we get… • Shared scanned book / journal repository and research initiatives – HathiTrust • Distributed, international digital preservation network based on one software platform – MetaArchive • Distributed digital preservation network focused on published literature, development projects coordination, stewardship of software – LOCKSS Alliance • Distributed digital preservation network across technology stacks/platforms – DPN • Coordination of development projects and stewardship of core repository technologies, DSpace, Fedora, and DuraCloud – DuraSpace31
  28. 28. Communities of practice and knowledge sharing … • Research library practices and experimentation (ARL, ASERL) • IT-Library collaboration and digital library initiatives (CNI, CLIR/DLF) • Library-based publishing services and co-creating service models, technologies etc. (LPC) • Advocacy for open access to scholarly and scientific information (SPARC)32
  29. 29. Other real costs? Yes, there are more digital infrastructure/service costs: •Other library personnel involved, but they are leveraged with personnel from other libraries participating in a given initiative •There are also physical resource costs – ex. as distributed preservation networks grow so too must individual nodes – though this isn’t terribly expensive What do you think of this ROI?33
  30. 30. Table Discussion • What have you heard today? • What do you have concerns about? • What has inspired you? • What unanswered questions do you have?March 2013 DuraSpace Summit Meeting
  31. 31. We need your help• What continued investment do the projects need to be successful?• What are ways to increase engagement and contribution in the community?
  32. 32. DuraSpace Summit Meeting“The Fedora Futures project, a case study for future collaboration” Presented by Edwin Shin, MediaShelf & Tom Cramer, Stanford University
  33. 33. AgendaIntroduction1. Why Fedora Futures?2. Project Overview3. Project Roles and Community ParticipationDiscussion
  34. 34. A (Funding) History of Fedora• Original software created 2000–08 with $2.4M from the Mellon Foundation – +$500,000 from UVA Library• Moore Grant: 2007-11, $5.4M• Committers from 10 institutions• 2009–present: DuraSpace’s sponsorship program has provided funding for a tech lead
  35. 35. The Success of Fedora• Architecture is demonstrably Flexible & Extensible• Support for Durability• One foot in the linked data world• A decade of maturity & proven use• Substantial community of adopters, contributors, vendors
  36. 36. Looming Storm CloudsTechnical Organizational• Performance • Small, fixed pool• Fault tolerance of developers• Scalability • Demands outstrip• Complexity applied resources• Aging code base • Lack of vibrancy
  37. 37. New Opportunities• Front-ends: eSciDoc, Hydra, Islandora – Attracting new energy and adopters – Creating new technical demands• Evolved technical environment – Web architectures & horizontal scaling – Linked data• Data management mandates
  38. 38. Fedora Futures Forms…• OR12: Ad hoc meeting• September: – Meet to compare needs and notes – Charter a 3 month investigation• December: – Commit to a three year project – Announce, Invite and Launch
  39. 39. Fedora Futures Objectives• Preserve the strengths of the architecture and community• Address the needs for robust and full- featured repository services (that we now understand very well)• Provide a platform in the repository ecosystem for the next 5-10 years
  40. 40. Technology Overview• Highly scalable• High availability• Flexible storage*• Durability*• Reporting and metrics*• Developer-friendly*• Ease of deployment
  41. 41. Technical Process & Organization• Technical Team – 4 FTEs across 11 individuals, 8 institutions – 12, 2-week sprints• Build-Measure-Learn – Hydra – Islandora – Conferences and Hackfests
  42. 42. Project Roles• DuraSpace• Tech Team/Developers• Fedora Community• Institutional Support
  43. 43. New Challenges• New use cases – sign of success• Changing landscape – data• Evolving developer community• Funding
  44. 44. New Approaches• Sponsorship model• Transition planning• Sustainable funding model
  45. 45. Community Participation• Developer participation• Funding development• Fedora governance• Institutional engagement
  46. 46. Who is in Fedora Futures so far…• Columbia • University of NSW• DuraSpace • Indiana University• FIZ Karlsruhe • CDC• MediaShelf • USGS?• Oxford • Your name here• Stanford• Smithsonian• UPEI / Disc.Gard.• U of Virginia
  47. 47. DuraSpace Summit Meeting Day 2“Open discussion on governance,funding and strategic direction of DuraSpace”
  48. 48. DSpace• What does the project need to be successful? • Financial contributions • Developer contributions • Articulation of requirements• How to increase engagement with the community? – New models of funding ( membership?) – -Stronger project governance? – Other forms of communication?
  49. 49. Breakouts• How should we fund the continued management and stewardship of DSpace?• What is the best way to increase developer activity on the project?• What governance should be put in place for the project?
  50. 50. DSpace Futures Meetings• Oct / Nov 2012• 5 discussions with Sponsors, RSPs, Committers, DCAT• Open feedback and discussion of needs / requirements for future versions of DSpace• How institutions are using DSpace• What meets their needs & where “gaps” exist
  51. 51. DSpace Futures Initiatives• Official REST API• Possible DSpace + Hydra Integration• Metadata Improvements (March 20) – Update DSpace to latest Qualified Dublin Core – Other improvements TBDhttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/DSpace+Futures
  52. 52. Initiative Teams• Lead / Co-Leads• Steering Committee – may be optional for small initiatives• Developers• DuraSpace in a supporting / advisory role
  53. 53. DuraSpace Summit Meeting Day 2“Open discussion on governance,funding and strategic direction of Fedora”
  54. 54. Agenda Setting Direction for the MorningObjectives and Development ProcessRoles and BudgetGovernanceNext Steps
  55. 55. Moving Toward a SustainableFuture - Roles, Responsibilities & Financing
  56. 56. Responsibilities– Governance– Product Management– Community Management– Communication & Marketing– Administration– Project Management– Development
  57. 57. Roles• Community• Partners – non-profit and service providers• Steering & Advisory• Product Manager• Technical Lead• Technical Team
  58. 58. Funding• Early Years – Grant Funded – Dedicated Team• Recent Years – stretching the grant dollar – Sponsorship – Community Contributions• Now – Sponsorship – Contributions – Fedora Future Project Resourcing• Future?
  59. 59. Current Players• Community Sponsors & Adopters• Duraspace• Fedora Futures Project Steering Group• Fedora Futures Technical Lead• Fedora Committers• Fedora Futures Tech Team
  60. 60. Finances• Expenses – Indirect Costs – Direct Costs• Current Revenue Sources – Sponsorship – Incremental Project Funds• Net
  61. 61. Needs – Community Engagement
  62. 62. First Lesson in EconomicsThere is No Such Thing as a Free Lunch
  63. 63. Fedora Governance
  64. 64. Some Governance Models• Apache• Kuali• Jasig• Sakai• VIVO
  65. 65. Members vsSponsors
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×