Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Tn bbcon 2016_data made me test this

82 views

Published on

Tiffany Neill at bbcon 2016 in Washington, DC

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Tn bbcon 2016_data made me test this

  1. 1.   Tiffany Neill, CFRE   Lautman Maska Neill & Company The Data Made Me Test This
  2. 2. What Kind of Data? What Tests? •  Qualitative data •  Overall file analytics •  Analysis of internal prospects •  External data sources •  Bottom line…
  3. 3. Overarching Themes Make sure you are asking a clear question — both when you look at the data and when you test Separate theory from practice Don’t hope your way to a result Test, analyze, rinse, repeat
  4. 4. Qualitative Data Sometimes it’s more than numbers
  5. 5. Qualitative Data •  Focus Groups •  Surveys •  Feedback from Donors •  Don’t be afraid of non-scientific data sets
  6. 6. Focus Groups: A Love Story •  11 focus groups •  Plus survey research •  Focus groups look at “look and feel” •  Participants asked to bring something that to them said, “this is HRC”
  7. 7. What Did the Data Tell Us to Test? •  Messaging •  Images •  Benefits (people volunteered what benefits they liked) Not everything was a winner, but everything led us down a new road.
  8. 8. What Else … LISTEN! Donors called to say “thank you” for bigger labels… bigger font tests!
  9. 9. What Else … LISTEN! Donors contributed when asked if they wanted benefits!
  10. 10. Overall File Analysis What Those Big Numbers Are Telling You
  11. 11. So You Get Your donorCentrics Assessment •  You know EVERYTHING •  Look big – look small •  Beware of rabbit holes
  12. 12. What Did We See? •  First Year Retention is moving the wrong way! •  Acquisition strategy virtually unchanged •  Let’s look 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Retention First Year Retention Benchmark Multi Year Retention Benchmark
  13. 13. What Did We Test? •  New Welcome Kit •  New first year letter strategy •  PHONE CALLS What happened: First year retention is crawling up again
  14. 14. What Else … Average Gift fall off? “Just $5 more”
  15. 15. What Else … Average Giving Flat? Give it meaning
  16. 16. Internal Prospects They Like Us
  17. 17. Internal Prospects •  Online List Build •  Volunteers •  Event Participants You know you have them …
  18. 18. Lots of a Good Thing… •  1.5 million records •  All past behavior •  Multiple sources •  Declining Performance
  19. 19. What Did We Test? •  Lots of subgroups •  “Modeled” different behaviors •  Dug into what made people better prospects •  Focused on what channel was best for different people The Results: Lower Cost To Acquire
  20. 20. What Else … Pie Buyers? Event Participants? Use the Merge!
  21. 21. External Data Sources We learned something…
  22. 22. You Can Learn A Lot •  Data Append •  Wealth Screening •  Behavior tagging
  23. 23. •  Gift amount goals •  Major donor likelihood •  Where do they merge? •  Who are the people “slightly” below where major gift officers want them? For These Healthy Animal Lovers
  24. 24. What Did We Test? •  Special Packages •  Invitations to events •  Special follow up Worked tremendously!
  25. 25. What Else? Age-targeted CGA marketing
  26. 26. What Else? Email appends
  27. 27. What Else?
  28. 28. •  Look at the results many times •  Short and long-term •  What you “thought” was impacting that data point may not be •  Don’t force it You May Not Get It Right
  29. 29. @lautmandc Facebook.com/lautmandc linkedin.com/in/lautmandc Thank you!
  30. 30. Did we leave you inspired, wired, or fired up? Tell us in a session survey on the mobile app, and you’ll be entered to win a complimentary pass to bbcon 2017 in Baltimore!

×