Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

IRR 3 (22/10/14)


Published on

Third IRR meeting (22/10/14)

Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

IRR 3 (22/10/14)

  1. 1. IRR Third meeting Wednesday the 22nd of October 2014 Tutor: Paolo Pareti * Available from: * Adapted from the slides of Mark van Rossum, Andrew Stewart and Vincent Valton found on the IRR wiki:
  2. 2. How did you find reading? How do you find reading academic papers? How long does it take to read one paper ?
  3. 3. Questions you should be able to answer 1. What was the problem the authors were trying to solve? 2. Why has related work not solved this problem? 3. What was the proposed solution? 4. What was the evaluation of the solution? 5. What future work did this work suggest? 6. What is the terminology used?
  4. 4. Hint Write as you read ● Write as you read. This keeps your attention focused and makes you engage with the paper. ● It also makes sure that you will remember your critical evaluation, to avoid having to read the paper multiple times
  5. 5. General comments on homework Still many old core papers... Most of you have already identified an interesting generic area Now question you should ask is: Within this area: ● Which are the sub-topics being researched in the last one or two years? ● Among those (if there are many), which one is the most interesting to you? IMPORTANT NOTE: ● you should review recent RESEARCH papers, ● REVIEW papers can be useful, but they do not count as a proof that the field is still alive. ● Do not focus your review on existing reviews
  6. 6. Hint to find most recent research Old papers are a good starting point to find new research: ● Who are the authors? ○ Did they publish new research on that topic? ■ If not, why did they change topic? ■ Did they discover a more interesting direction in the same area? ● Who cited those papers? ○ Are the researches that cited the paper working on something exciting in the same area?
  7. 7. Evolution of research fields The terminology used in some research field can change over time, to reflect some big or small changes in the field. However some core ideas and core challenges remain the same. Example: Expert Systems → Ontologies → Semantic Web → Linked Data → Big Data
  8. 8. Complete review? How to review ALL the papers for your topic? Modify the topic to adjust the scope. For example: 1. More specific topics: ○ Approaches of type Y to problem X for application Z 2. Review the state of the art approaches to problem X: ○ review ALL of the most recent works for each type of approach ○ some old approaches can be omitted, if they do not add more to the most recent ones you are reviewing.
  9. 9. Important From now on, do NEVER copy and paste what has been written by others Because: 1. Yes, it is plagiarism 2. You need to write your own review with your own opinions 3. If for some reason you want to copy exactly one or two sentences, you MUST properly quote them. This kind of quotations should be very rare (e.g. < 5% of your text)
  10. 10. Homework for next week. (1) Create bullet point draft of the review ● Abstract ● Introduction ● Main sections...what goes in here? ■ depends on your topic ■ give a first attempt: write the names of a few sections and subsection ■ next week we will talk more about the structure. ● Conclusion (2) Improve the abstract (including comments you got today) Send me a PDF by next Tuesday (the 28th) at 12:00 (noon). Recommended optionals: ● optional: (...but almost mandatory) use LaTeX and BiBteX! ● optional: (but recommended) store your review safely (e.g. on Dropbox) ● optional: use version control systems, e.g. GitHub or Bitbucket