1. Tentative Title An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Decision in
Tentative TitleAn Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah
and How the Case Fits into the Interpretation of the Practice Clause of the First
Amendment Freedom of Religion GuaranteeTopic DescriptionPractitioners of the Yoba
religion, also known as Santeria, sacrifice animals, including fowls, goats and turtles as part
of their rituals, after which the sacrificed animals are consumed as food. Hialeah, Fla.,
officials adopted an ordinance prohibiting ritual sacrifice of animals within the city limits.
The church claimed that the ordinance violated its members’ constitutional freedom of
religion rights. The lower courts applied the Smith doctrine, which distinguishes between
religious faith and religious conduct, to the Hialeah issue.Purpose of Term PaperThe
researcher proposes to explore and analyze literature related to issues raised before the
U.S. Supreme Court in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah. In the conclusion of
the paper, the researcher will attempt to identify rationales the U.S Supreme Court used in
its ruling and implications of the outcome.Value of the StudyThe researcher will arrive at a
clearer understanding of the guarantee of freedom of religion – particularly the difference
between belief and an action based upon faith.Bibliography of Tentative
SourcesArticles“Babalu Aye Is Not Pleased: Majoritarianism and the Erosion of Free
Exercise,” 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 1061 LEXIS (May 1991).Colson, Charles. “The Cross and the
Crown.” Chapter in Kingdoms in Conflict. New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc.,
1987, 109-21.Lawton, Kim A. “Uncle Sam v. First Church.” Christianity Today, 7 October
1991, 25-28.Laycock, Douglas. “Summary and Synthesis: The Crisis in Religious Liberty,” 60
Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 841 LEXIS (March 1992).McConnell, Michael W. “Accommodation of
Religion: An Update and a Response to the Critics,” 60 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 685 LEXIS (March
1992).Pelieur, Matthew. “Commercial Speech Applications of the Lukumi Case.” Journal
of Church and State 21 (Fall 1993): 294-99 in Advertising Law Anthology 17 (1993): 701-
25.Ward, Antonio. “Santeria Case May Affect First Amendment Rights of
Journalists,” American Journalism Review 19 (January 1993): 43-48.CasesChurch of the
Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993).Good News Club et al. v. Milford
Central School, 533 U.S. 98 (2001).Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn., 485
U.S. 439 (1988).Oregon et al. v. Alfred L. Smith et al., 494 U.S. 872, (1990).