Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Perceptions in Science <br />Unit 5:D1<br />
Peer Review<br />Aims: to understand peer review and identify its strengths and weaknesses<br />
D1explain the necessity for peerreview and why sometimes there is resistance to new scientific theories<br />For D1, learn...
And sends it to the editor...<br />The scientist writes up the research...<br />Who sends it to other scientists for peer ...
Peer review: key questions<br />What are the strengths of peer review?<br />What are the shortfalls of peer review?  <br /...
Other avenues to pursue:<br />Stephen C. Meyer’s paper in<br />Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington.<br />P...
http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/index.html<br />
http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/<br />
Thomas Kuhn<br />1922-1996<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Peer Review

5,594 views

Published on

Peer review

Published in: Technology, Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

Peer Review

  1. 1. Perceptions in Science <br />Unit 5:D1<br />
  2. 2. Peer Review<br />Aims: to understand peer review and identify its strengths and weaknesses<br />
  3. 3. D1explain the necessity for peerreview and why sometimes there is resistance to new scientific theories<br />For D1, learners need to be aware of a range of professional journals and understand that this is how scientific developments are communicated to the scientific world. They must understand the process a scientific paper is subject to in order for it to be published, and be able to explain the peer-review process. Drawing on their understanding of the development of scientific theories, they must then explain using examples, why a new theory is often greeted with scepticism and takes time to become accepted.<br />Hand in w/c Nov 30th 2009<br />
  4. 4. And sends it to the editor...<br />The scientist writes up the research...<br />Who sends it to other scientists for peer review...<br />They give their recommendations to the editor...<br />...who may reject it...<br />...return it to the scientist for corrections...<br />...or accept it for publication!<br />
  5. 5. Peer review: key questions<br />What are the strengths of peer review?<br />What are the shortfalls of peer review? <br />Does it rely too much upon scientists being honest? <br />Is there a better system for appraising research?<br />Does peer review detect fraud and misconduct?<br />Is maverick science rejected through peer review?<br />Does the peer review process slow down advances in scientific and medical knowledge?<br />
  6. 6. Other avenues to pursue:<br />Stephen C. Meyer’s paper in<br />Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington.<br />Peer review journal edited by Sternberg<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sternberg_peer_review_controversy<br />Alan Sokal’s hoax paper:<br />“Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity” Social Text 46/47(1996) pp. 217-252. <br />http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/11/15/specials/sokal-fish.html<br />http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/lingua_franca_v4/lingua_franca_v4.html<br />
  7. 7. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/index.html<br />
  8. 8. http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/<br />
  9. 9. Thomas Kuhn<br />1922-1996<br />

×