Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Kayyem case study wikipedia

1,154 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Kayyem case study wikipedia

  1. 1. Sarah Kayyem<br />Reham El Didi<br />Lujein Ramiz<br />
  2. 2. What is Wikipedia?<br /><ul><li>Free
  3. 3. Online
  4. 4. Collaborative
  5. 5. Encyclopedia</li></li></ul><li>When &Where?<br /><ul><li>Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales founded Wikipedia on 10th January,2001.
  6. 6. It initially started as Nupedia
  7. 7. Wikipedia prides itself on being a “neutral compilation of verifiable, established facts” and tries to maintain that through their five pillars.</li></li></ul><li>What makes wikipedia so special?<br /><ul><li>It is free and available to everyone with unlimited access.
  8. 8. Available in a variety of languages.
  9. 9. It is up to date
  10. 10. Variety of subjects
  11. 11. Wikipedia prides itself on being a “neutral compilation of verifiable, established facts” and tries to maintain that through their five pillars.</li></li></ul><li>Why is Wikipedia criticized so much?<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaADQTeZRCY<br />
  12. 12. Why is Wikipedia criticized so much?<br /><ul><li>Not 100% reliable.
  13. 13. Any Wikipedia contributor can be anonymous
  14. 14. Wikipedia has a bad reputation with educators; some see it as having low quality and unacceptable to be used in academic research.</li></li></ul><li>Should material be posted by random contributors?<br />No cost<br />Faster correction of errors and constant update.<br /> <br />More independence.<br />Reliability and accuracy.<br />Amateur Wikipedians from around the world constantly contribute, add and edit <br />
  15. 15. Wikipedians spend a good amount of their time, knowledge and time, receiving no pay, by volunteering to contribute to the growing Wikipedia database. The motivation behind these people has been greatly researched and narrowed down to the following four points.<br />Who are the wikipedians?<br />
  16. 16. How does Wikipedia mediate disputes on sensitive or controversial topics? <br />logical manner. <br />unbiased point of view policy<br />credible people<br />Wikipedia’s Controversy<br />
  17. 17. Values<br />Social<br />Understanding:<br />Career:<br />The 4 Wikipedian Values<br />
  18. 18. User Factors<br />Openness<br />Computer Skills<br />Motivation<br />Knowledge Factors<br />Type of Knowledge<br />Peer Review<br />Technology Factors<br />Easy Usability<br />Fast Access<br />Flexible Structure<br />Although Wikipedia might not be considered as a credible source HOWEVER it is built on many successful factors …<br />
  19. 19. There is no right answer<br />Some say its logic and have the unbiased point of view policy<br />Some claim its biased like “conservapedia.com” <br />conservapedia.com clearly shows some examples of Wikipedia’s liberal bias, deceit, frivolous gossip, and blatant errors on etc.<br /> 6) Is mediation likely to yield to unbiased results?<br />

×