
Be the first to like this
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Published on
The nature of data structures used for the representation of terrain has a great influence on the possible applications and reliability of consequent terrain analyses.
This research demonstrates a concise review and treatment of the surface network data structure, a topological data structure for terrains. A surface network represents the terrain as a graph where the vertices are the fundamental topographic features (also called critical points), namely the local peaks, pits, passes (saddles) and the edges are the ridges and channels that link these vertices. Despite their obvious and widely believed potential for being a natural and intuitive representation of terrain datasets, surface networks have only attracted limited research, leaving several unsolved aspects, which have restricted their use as viable digital terrain data structures. The research presented here presents novel techniques for the automated generation, analysis and application of surface networks.
The research reports a novel method for generating the surface networks by extending the ridges and channels, unlike the conventional critical pointsbased approach. This proposed algorithm allows incorporation of much wider variety of terrain features in the surface network data structure.
Several ways of characterising terrain structure based on the graphtheoretic analysis of surface networks are presented. It is shown that terrain structures display certain empirical characteristics such as the stability of the structure under changes and relationship between hierarchies of topographic features. Previous proposals for the simplification of surface networks have been evaluated for potential limitations and solutions have been presented including a userdefined simplification. Also methods to refine (to add more details to) a surface network have been shown.
Finally, it is shown how surface networks can be successfully used for spatial analyses e.g. optimisation of visibility index computation time, augmenting the visualisation of dynamic raster surface animation, and generating multiscale morphologically consistent terrain generalisations.
Clipping is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. You can keep your great finds in clipboards organized around topics.
Be the first to comment