Mobile media challenging status quo. Smartphones, social media and the Occupy movement


Published on

Paper at the Nordmedia 2013 conference, Oslo August 8.-10.

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Mobile media challenging status quo. Smartphones, social media and the Occupy movement

  1. 1. Mobile media challenging status quo: smartphones, social media and the Occupy movement Nordmedia 2013 Kjetil Sandvik, MA, PHD, Associate Professor Dept. of Media, Cognition and Communication University of Copenhagen
  2. 2. The big question • The impacts and potentials of uses of various media and uses across media • Not limited to a solely media optimistic/utopian og pessimistic/dystopian approach.
  3. 3. What’s going on? The use of mobile devices and social media challenging established regimes… Revolution: • Rebelling against (the Arab Spring) • weaponization of social media (e.g. use of Twitter in the ongoing Gaza conflict) Evolution (slow changing, long-tailed…): • Destabilizing and/or distorting: setting new agendas (Occupy)
  4. 4. Agenda • Occupy Wall Street as an example on how social media with its democratic potential and its modes of communication through network structure, both enables and shapes the protests against the financial powers of the world and their role in the global financial crisis. • The main characteristics of social media are the same as the ones defining Occupy.
  5. 5. Mobilizing through media
  6. 6. Mobile/networked media characteristics • Speed (the quality of networked communication) • Availability (the quality of online-ness) • Usability (the quality of non-expert systems) • Mobility (the quality of navavigation and positioning)
  7. 7. Role of the media: from rebelling to destabilizing • From centralized gate keeping to open access and new online democratic voices • Broadcast media are no longer setting the agenda without competition • Information can not be controlled as before (open access (p2p), file sharing, hacking, leaking…)
  8. 8. Role of the media • Occupy is defined and shaped by social media: open, networked, user-driven • Collaborative, participatory, co-creative • Dynamic, long-tailed, perpetual beta- structured… • Beyond the utopian/dystopian dichotomy  sub-activist…?
  9. 9. Launched through Twitter
  10. 10. Driven by networked/networking users
  11. 11. Right here, right now: constant updates
  12. 12. Networked communication
  13. 13. Any time, any place…
  14. 14. Sense of community – without a clear cut case and a common language
  15. 15. Mashed-up communication
  16. 16. Summing up • Creating new democratic modes of debating, discussing, protesting – through (amongst others) innovative use of mobile and social media • Openness, agenda-suggesting and agenda-making rather than agenda-fulfilling: you do not need to have an answer before you act! •  Occupy is not necessarily revolutionary, but it represents a will to debate and criticize the established power system, its institutions and logics: occupying discourse! • And it does so by applying the modes of communication embedded in social media: collaboration, participation and co- creation. • The effect may be long-termed, it may come in the shape of new democratic initiatives focused on e.g. crowd sourcing, collective intelligence etc.