Sam Spata 30 Sept Mc Graw Hill Final


Published on

8 minute introduction into how IPD is affecting Architects

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Why is this good for architects?Why is this bad for architects?Why are contractors ramping up and architects leveling off?Why are architects losing interest? Why aren’t architects capturing value?Aren’t we all supposed to be benefiting?How do we fix this?IPD? Shared incentives? New services for architects? (Don’t think letting others use the BIM model ‘has legs’.)Architects need to get re-engaged in the change they first led.Led from ground-up; Darwinism ‘writ large’.
  • Client Expectations“Asymmetry”EfficiencyIntegrated Project DeliveryInnovation
  • Incentives must be related to ends, not means, if you want the client to pay for themThe BIM model is a meansThe delivered project is closes to the ends
  • Sam Spata 30 Sept Mc Graw Hill Final

    1. 1. Leaping Toward Integrated Project Delivery™<br />Sam Spata, AIA<br />Architect, LEED® AP<br /><br />
    2. 2. &quot;Half the failures in life arise from pulling in one&apos;s horse as he is leaping.&quot;<br />- Julius & Augustus Hare, Guesses at Truth<br />
    3. 3. Where Did We Leap From?<br />experience<br />
    4. 4. Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Higher<br />Owner<br />Expectations<br />Satisfaction<br />A/E/C<br />Response<br />Lower<br />Time<br />1960<br />1970<br />1980<br />1990<br />2000<br />2010<br />
    5. 5. Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Higher<br />?<br />Program Mgmt.<br />G-Max<br />Fast-Track<br />Satisfaction<br />Const. Mgmt.<br />Lower<br />Time<br />1960<br />1970<br />1980<br />1990<br />2000<br />2010<br />
    6. 6. Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Business As Usual?<br />Higher<br />Satisfaction<br />Lower<br />Time<br />1960<br />1970<br />1980<br />1990<br />2000<br />2010<br />
    7. 7. Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Recession<br />Integrated Project Delivery™<br />Higher<br />Satisfaction<br />Building Information Modeling<br />Lower<br />Time<br />1960<br />1970<br />1980<br />1990<br />2000<br />2010<br />
    8. 8. Where Will We Leap To?<br />Good & Bad<br />
    9. 9. Client Value<br />Design<br />Problem-Solving<br />Form-Seeking<br />Technology<br />Building Information Modeling<br />Project Information Management<br />Process<br />Integrated Project Delivery<br />Lean Construction<br />
    10. 10. Building Information Modeling<br />Benefits<br />Costs<br />Client Value<br />Break the “Asymmetry”<br />Efficient, Innovative Design<br />Integrated Project Delivery<br />Training, Hardware…<br />Exquisitely Modeled Chaos<br />Process as Important as the ‘Artifact’<br />Integrated Project Delivery<br /><ul><li>Ready to take risk?
    11. 11. Truly collaborate, peer-to-peer?
    12. 12. Process driven, client-sensitive?</li></li></ul><li>Author<br />3DS<br />Max<br />Rhino<br />Maya<br />ADT<br />Research<br />Gravity<br />Affinity<br />Ecotect<br />Sketch Up<br />Tekla<br />Create<br />BIM<br />VICO<br />Hold<br />Wind<br />CadDuct<br />5D<br />4D<br />Construction <br />Information <br />Model<br />TriRiga<br />(IWMS)<br />Purpose – built models<br />Purpose – driven exchange<br />Big BIM<br />
    13. 13.
    14. 14. Client Results<br />Client Strategy<br />“…a means to a means to an end”<br />- Prof Peter Barrett, Salford University<br />Project<br />Delivery<br />
    15. 15. High Design / Construct Integration<br />O<br />O<br />C<br />A<br />A<br />C<br />T<br />A<br />Design<br />Build<br />A<br />Design Bid Build<br />High Client Interaction<br />O<br />Design<br />Assist +<br />O<br />O<br />O<br />O<br />A<br />C<br />P3<br />PFI<br />A<br />C<br />C<br />Client Interaction<br />C<br />A<br />BIM<br />Design<br />Assist<br />T<br />GMP<br />A<br />C<br />BIM<br />T<br />Novation<br />IPD<br />A<br />Design / Construct Integration<br />T<br />
    16. 16. Integrated Project Delivery™<br />Design, Construction, Strategy<br />If you’re just integrating design and construction, you’re missing the point<br />Target Value Design (“Lean”)<br />Not ‘design-to-budget’, but &apos;strategize-design-construct to budget’<br />Reward Outcomes, not Intent<br />Relational Forms of Agreement<br />
    17. 17. Essential Features of IPD<br />Shared Objective<br />Joint Project Management<br />Early Participation<br />Shared Risk & Reward<br />Source - Howard W. Ashcraft, Jr.; Hanson Bridgett LLP<br />
    18. 18. $($)<br />Quality<br />APPROACH ‘good’ behavior<br />AVOID ‘bad’ behavior<br />$($)<br />Schedule<br />$($)<br />Cost<br />$$$$$$$<br />Contractor<br />$$$$$$$<br />Architect<br />$$$$$$$<br />Owner<br />Incentive Compensation<br />$($)<br />$$$$$$$<br />Trade Partners & Consultants<br />
    19. 19. How Do We ‘Stick’ the Landing?<br />Next steps<br />
    20. 20. Then - ‘Form follows function’<br />sustainable design, LEED™<br />design-build, design-assist, pre-construction<br />‘silos’ of expertise, design vs construction<br />Now - ‘Form is function’<br />living design, biomimicry<br />Target Value Design, “Lean”<br />collaborative iteration, design + construction<br />Rethink “Design”<br />Form-Solving™<br />
    21. 21. Learn all tools + processes<br />IPD, Lean Construction, BIM, MPS, PIM, Target Value Design, buildingSMART<br />Select as appropriate<br />Identify the single invariant<br />Client’s Strategic Result<br />Juggle multiple variables<br />Function, Form, Budget, Schedule<br />ISD, the Last Acronym You’ll Ever Need<br />I.ntegrated<br />S.trategic<br />D.elivery<br />
    22. 22. Thank you<br />Sam Spata, AIA<br />Architect, LEED® AP<br /><br />