Progression Points


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Progression Points

  1. 1. PhD Evaluation The Progression Points Dr Sonja Tomaskovic Dr Raju Pathmeswaran Developed by Dr Victoria Sheppard
  2. 2. What are Progression Points for? <ul><li>Evaluate Progress </li></ul><ul><li>Quality Assurance </li></ul><ul><li>Provide Structure and Support </li></ul>Sisyphus from
  3. 3. Today’s Session <ul><li>Academic Criteria </li></ul><ul><li>Timeline for PhD Process at Salford </li></ul><ul><li>What does each progression point involve? </li></ul><ul><li>Tips and student experience </li></ul>
  4. 4. Criteria <ul><li>Doctoral students expected to demonstrate: </li></ul><ul><li>Relevant research skills </li></ul><ul><li>Understanding & knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Effective project design and management </li></ul><ul><li>Originality </li></ul>
  5. 5. Research Skills <ul><li>“ a detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry;” </li></ul><ul><li>Framework for Higher Education Qualification (FHEQ) Descriptors </li></ul>
  6. 6. Understanding and Knowledge <ul><li>“ a systematic acquisition and understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice;” </li></ul><ul><li>FHEQ </li></ul>
  7. 7. Project Design and Management <ul><li>“ the general ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, applications or understanding at the forefront of the discipline, and to adjust the project design in the light of unforeseen problems;” </li></ul><ul><li>FHEQ </li></ul>
  8. 8. Originality <ul><li>“ the creation and interpretation of new knowledge, through original research or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, extend the forefront of the discipline, and merit publication.” </li></ul><ul><li>FHEQ </li></ul>
  9. 9. Timeline for Salford full time PhD Year 1 Learning Agreement 3 month Year 2 Year 3 Interim Assessment 12 – 15 months Internal Evaluation – 12 months after IA Annual Report Annual Report Annual Report Self Evaluation Report Self Evaluation Report Self Evaluation Report Write-up and assessment period
  10. 10. Part time model Learning Agreement 6 months Interim Assessment 20-26 months Internal Evaluation 20 months after IA Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 + 2 Write up and assessment Annual Report Annual Report Annual Report Annual Report Annual Report Self-Evaluation Self-Evaluation Self-Evaluation Self-Evaluation Self-Evaluation
  11. 11. Forms <ul><li>All the paperwork relating to PhD progression can be found at: </li></ul> Image © Luxomedia
  12. 12. 1. Learning Agreement <ul><li>Agreement between research student and supervisor </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative planning of the research project </li></ul><ul><li>Outlines training and resource requirements </li></ul>
  13. 13. 2. Annual Reports <ul><li>Annual progress report : Supervisor </li></ul><ul><li>Self-evaluation report : Postgraduate researcher </li></ul><ul><li>Compulsory progress checks </li></ul><ul><li>Completed at end of each registered year </li></ul><ul><li>Both forms available on PG website. </li></ul><ul><li>Should be returned to school support office before registration </li></ul>
  14. 14. Why have annual reports? <ul><li>To give PGR and Supervisor opportunity to comment on academic progress </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisor: </li></ul><ul><li>Achievements in last 12 months </li></ul><ul><li>Likelihood of submitting in time </li></ul><ul><li>Training undertaken </li></ul><ul><li>Levels of contact </li></ul><ul><li>Satisfactory progress? </li></ul><ul><li>Recommends continuation of candidature (or otherwise) to Board of Faculty </li></ul>
  15. 15. PGR: <ul><li>Learning agreement completed </li></ul><ul><li>Training undertaken and planned </li></ul><ul><li>Achievements </li></ul><ul><li>Progress </li></ul><ul><li>Difficulties </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisory support </li></ul><ul><li>Research environment </li></ul><ul><li>Submission of thesis </li></ul>
  16. 16. 3. Interim Assessment <ul><li>12–15 months (20–26 for p/t) </li></ul><ul><li>Ensuring PGR reached certain threshold of academic performance </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluation of progress of project </li></ul><ul><li>Completion of required training and identification of any future training </li></ul>
  17. 17. Requirements <ul><li>4,000 word report </li></ul><ul><li>Details work done to date, training (in line with learning agreement), identifies plans for remainder of PhD </li></ul><ul><li>Oral Exam </li></ul><ul><li>Panel of supervisor (or co-supervisor), and 2 members of academic staff from school </li></ul>
  18. 18. Panel Evaluates: <ul><li>Clarity of research focus </li></ul><ul><li>Completion of literature review </li></ul><ul><li>Brief review and discussion of the work already undertaken </li></ul><ul><li>Presentation of the data/findings to date </li></ul><ul><li>General knowledge of particular field of learning </li></ul><ul><li>Details of original contribution to knowledge likely to emerge </li></ul><ul><li>Statement of intended further work </li></ul>Image © benprks
  19. 19. IA Outcomes Continue with PhD Repeat Interim Assessment (3 months) OR Terminate candidature Transfer to different programme – MPhil, MRes, MSc by Research Image © SLightlynorth
  20. 20. 4. Internal Evaluation <ul><li>12 months after Interim Assessment </li></ul><ul><li>To ensure continuing academic progress </li></ul><ul><li>Check on course to produce a thesis of acceptable quality on time </li></ul><ul><li>Check participation in relevant training </li></ul>
  21. 21. IE requirements <ul><li>Substantive piece of work </li></ul><ul><li>The format is determined by the School, eg. could be chapter of thesis or report on interim findings. c. 10,000- 15,000 words. Element of primary research framed within an overview </li></ul><ul><li>Oral Examination </li></ul><ul><li>Panel of two research active members of school but not the supervisor </li></ul>
  22. 22. Panel Evaluates: <ul><li>Original research/advanced scholarship </li></ul><ul><li>Acquisition/understanding of a substantial body of knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Creation and interpretation of new knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Ability to make informed judgements on complex issues </li></ul><ul><li>Ability to adjust research in light of unforeseen problems </li></ul><ul><li>Personal responsibility/autonomous initiative </li></ul>
  23. 23. IE Outcomes Continue with PhD Repeat Internal Evaluation (3 months) OR Terminate candidature Transfer to different programme – MPhil, MRes, MSc by Research
  24. 24. Arrangements <ul><li>The student should be aware to when their assessment is due. </li></ul><ul><li>A reminder should be sent either by the supervisor or the research support staff. </li></ul><ul><li>If no reminder has been sent, then the student must initiate this process through the supervisor. </li></ul><ul><li>The supervisor will liaise with the research support staff to make the arrangements </li></ul>
  25. 25. Testimonials The presentation gave an overview of my report but concentrated on certain aspects of it The assessors did not pick up on the things I thought they would […] Nobody picked up on ontological or etymological issues. We discussed in some detail a semantic definition of one of my central terms. We all realised that this will need some further work. In the end, it was much more relaxed than I thought it would be. It was more a guidance than an examination.
  26. 26. Advice from researchers <ul><li>Let the university know well in advance </li></ul><ul><li>During the assessment/evaluation don't panic, they are just trying to find the boundaries of your knowledge at the time, not trip you up </li></ul><ul><li>Prepare well </li></ul><ul><li>Make sure you present ideas clearly, concisely and confidently </li></ul><ul><li>TAKE NOTES – some v helpful tips </li></ul>
  27. 27. And a few more… <ul><li>Make use of the knowledge and experience of others </li></ul><ul><li>Practise explaining your work to others </li></ul><ul><li>Get used to reflecting on your research, methods, and working practices </li></ul>
  28. 28. Please give us your FEEDBACK about this session: For any further queries <ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>PLEASE FILL IT IN – it will take only 5 minutes! </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>