Binational Insurance


Published on

What is the cost of healthcare Latino/Hispanic immigrants use (including undocumented)?

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • The idea of private health insurance as a way to cover a vulnerable population is perhaps a bit counterintuitive, but in the spirit of exploring all the options, we should consider if there are special circumstances for this particular population that provide a role for private sector insurers. The work I will talk about today, done with my colleage Saad Ahmad at the Urban Institute, was commissioned by The California Endowment to flesh out the idea of binational health insurance and its potential to reduce the high rate of uninsurance in the Mexican/American binational population
  • Binational Insurance

    1. 1. Improving Access In a Binational Population The Potential Role for Binational Health Insurance Tim Waidmann & Saad Ahmad The Urban Institute
    2. 2. Background on BHI <ul><li>Insurance product with care options on both sides of US/Mexico border </li></ul><ul><li>Address issue of “binational” families </li></ul><ul><li>Take advantage of lower-cost, culturally competent providers </li></ul><ul><li>Build on existing private models </li></ul><ul><li>Aligned interests of US providers, Mexican economy (and immigrants) </li></ul>
    3. 3. Factors Influencing Demand What’s in it for potential enrollees? <ul><li>Can predictable access to providers be improved? </li></ul><ul><li>How important is border-crossing care? </li></ul><ul><li>Potential improvements for family members in Mexico? </li></ul>
    4. 4. Could BHI fill gaps? <ul><li>5.4 Million uninsured Mexican immigrants in the U.S. </li></ul><ul><li>2/3 are undocumented, so border crossing to see a doctor is unrealistic. </li></ul><ul><li>Up to half a million legal immigrants live outside of the 4 border states. </li></ul><ul><li>Bottom line: About 25% of uninsured Mexican immigrants might reasonably expect to benefit from BHI (1.3 million) </li></ul>
    5. 5. Measuring Affordability/ Willingness to Pay <ul><li>No established market to do econometric estimates </li></ul><ul><li>Survey evidence </li></ul><ul><li>Income-based affordability (fixed relative expenditure on health) </li></ul><ul><li>Current total binational expenditure estimates </li></ul>
    6. 6. Out of Pocket Expenditures <ul><li>Uninsured recent Latino immigrants spend an average $200/year in US. (MEPS) </li></ul><ul><li>Remittances to family: (Mexico received $20Bn in 2006) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>At the margin, 20% of additional remittances are spent on health care </li></ul></ul>
    7. 7. Other considerations <ul><li>Private insurance is unfamiliar </li></ul><ul><li>Some surveys indicate no perceived problems in current access to care </li></ul>
    8. 8. Supply side:What could be offered & at what price? <ul><li>Care in US: MEPS data suggest half the cost. $1000/mo becomes $500. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Exclude hospitalization (about half of cost). $500 becomes $250. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Care in Mexico: Full IMSS for $40/mo ($80 if cover parents). SP could be half that. </li></ul><ul><li>Existing BHI plans: $350/mo. (group, family), $75 (non-group, individual) </li></ul>
    9. 9. Coverage alternatives, cost   Full US-based plan New Migrant plan + IMSS New Migrant Plan + Seguro Popular Border HMO Mexi-Plan Primary & ER $12,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 4,080 $ 1,800 Hospital cvd $ 519 $ 180 cvd cvd Out of Pocket $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 800 Remittances $ 450 $ 450 $ 225 $ 450 $ 450 Total $12,650 $ 4,169 $ 3,330 $ 4,430 $ 3,050
    10. 10. Price is right? <ul><li>$3,000 to $4,500/year for low-cost alternatives. (Best case) </li></ul><ul><li>Using the 10% rule: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>at $3,000, roughly 20% of uninsured Mexican immigrants could afford coverage. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>At $4,500, 5-8% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Full freight, $12,000, <1% </li></ul></ul>
    11. 11. A little help? <ul><li>Employers </li></ul><ul><li>US federal/state governments </li></ul><ul><li>Mexican government </li></ul><ul><li>Hometown Associations </li></ul>
    12. 12. Best case? <ul><li>Reweighting exercise </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Choose a comparison population that represents an attainable standard, i.e., without altering fundamental socioeconomic characteristics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Match on age, sex, education, income, geography, employment and family structure </li></ul></ul>
    13. 13. Adults, simulated coverage *Legal status imputed from other characteristics.
    14. 14. Implementation issues <ul><li>Potential opposition </li></ul><ul><li>Legislative/regulatory changes </li></ul><ul><li>Plan management challenges </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Quality control </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Past enrollment experience with this population </li></ul>
    15. 15. Summary <ul><li>Adults are most challenging target </li></ul><ul><li>Low utilization among recent immigrants creates opportunity for lower cost products </li></ul><ul><li>Geographic concentration makes BHI feasible </li></ul><ul><li>Mexican public sector most likely partner </li></ul><ul><li>Immigration reform important </li></ul><ul><li>Legislative changes at state level necessary </li></ul><ul><li>Outreach would be key </li></ul>
    16. 16. Research Questions <ul><li>Immigration Reform. Many possible outcomes. (Too many?) </li></ul><ul><li>Modeling takeup. Estimation challenges in new population. </li></ul><ul><li>Utilization under cross-border plans. </li></ul><ul><li>Accessibility of providers for families of potential enrollees. </li></ul><ul><li>What about expanding public program eligibility? </li></ul>
    17. 17. Concluding thoughts <ul><li>Is insurance necessary? </li></ul><ul><li>Is comprehensive plan necessary? </li></ul><ul><li>Is integrated product necessary? </li></ul><ul><li>Equity issues </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Non-citizens? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mexican citizens only? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Non-border populations? </li></ul></ul>
    18. 18. MEPS spending estimates