OpenStack Atlanta User Survey

!
Survey data gathered byT. Bell,T. Fifield, R. Lane, J.C. Martin

!
13th May 2014
OpenStack User Survey
and Feedback

• Survey

• Feedback and Comments

• Ongoing Activities

• How to Get Involved 
AGENDA

• What was new ?

• How do you consume OpenStack ?

• Support multiple entries for different
clouds (dev/QA/prod)

• Additional input for comments 
SURVEY SPRING 2014

1780
506
Top 10

Countries

(deployments)
107
13
266
195
19
21
512 Companies
293 UG Members
DEPLOYMENT SURVEY
US
CN
IN
FR
GB
CA
AU
CH
DE
BR 9
14
14
18
21
22
31
35
36
171
20
31
255
143
37
460
Deployments
Survey Responses
Top 10

Countries

(all)
US
CN
IN
FR
GB
CA
AU
DE
JP
BR 19
25
30
30
36
32
53
78
83
418

DEPLOYMENT SURVEY
10,000+
16%
5,001-10,000
8%
1,001-5,000
10%
501-1,000
6% 101-500
13%
21-100
17%
1-20
30%
Organization Size (employees)
Avoiding vendor lock-in
Cost savings
Operational efﬁciency
Open technology
Flexibility of underlying technology choices
Ability to innovate/compete
Time to market
Attracting talent
Control
Other 10
84
96
119
157
160
166
170
170
174
Business Drivers
Dev/QA
Proof of Concept
Production 209
218
210
Stage of Deployment

DEPLOYMENT SURVEY
Other
20%
Telecommunications
6%
Academic / Research
16%
Information Technology
58%
Other

30%
unspeciﬁed

10%Film/Media

18%
Government / Defense

12%
Retail

8%
Manufacturing/Industrial

7%
Healthcare

6%
Finance

5% Energy

2%
Transportation/Shipping

1%
Consumer Goods

1%
Industry

DEPLOYMENT SURVEY
docs.openstack.org
Blogs
OpenStack Mailing List
The OpenStack Operations Guide
Launchpad Answers
IRC
OpenStack Dev Mailing List
ask.openstack.org
Other Online Forums
forums.openstack.org
OpenStack Planet
Source Code
Other 73
81
98
106
248
264
340
344
400
485
512
516
759
Information sources User Types
Cloud Consumer
Ecosystem Vendor
Service Provider
Cloud operator 522
436
369
273
On-Premise Private Cloud
Hosted Private Cloud
Public Cloud
Hybrid Cloud
Community Cloud 6
22
57
65
224
Deployment Types

DEV/QA
unspecified
1-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,000+
50,000+ 0
1
4
11
10
42
107
19
# of cores
unspecified
1-10,000
10,001-100,000
100,001 to 1 million
1-100 million
100-500 million
500+ million 1
0
4
8
19
71
91
# of objects
unspecified
1-100
101 to 1,000
1,001 to 10,000
10,000+ 4
15
53
80
42
# of IPs
Unspecified
0-10 TB
11-100 TB
100-500 TB
500+ TB
1,000+ TB 2
9
8
46
81
48
Block Storage Size
unspecified
1-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,000-10,000
10,000+ 4
3
15
16
28
109
19
# of instances
unspecified
1-50
51-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,000+ 2
4
9
14
147
18
# of compute nodes

DEV/QA
Austin (2010.1)
Bexar (2011.1)
Cactus (2011.2)
Diablo (2011.3)
Essex (2012.1)
Folsom (2012.2)
Grizzly
Havana (2013.2)
Icehouse (2014.1)
Trunk 28
14
47
91
74
43
7
3
2
2
Release
Openstack Compute (Nova)
Openstack Image Service (Glance)
Openstack Identity Service (Keystone)
Openstack Dashboard (Horizon)
Openstack Network (Neutron)
Openstack Block Storage (Cinder)
Openstack Object Storage (Swift)
Ceilometer
Heat
OpenStack Database as a Service (Trove)
OpenStack Bare Metal (Ironic) 6
9
43
51
113
159
169
180
188
195
204
Services

DEV/QA
Puppet
DevStack
Chef
Other 36
22
26
42
PackStack
SaltStack
Crowbar
Other
None
CFEngine
Foreman
Fuel
StackOps
Substratum
FAI
Custom
Anvil
Ansible 0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
5
5
16
Deployment Tool
kvm
xen
esx
Other 82
22
30
175
QEMU
lxc
Bare Metal
hyperv
xenserver
Docker
OpenVZ
Other
PowerVM 3
3
5
7
9
9
11
16
19
Hypervisor
SQL
LDAP
PAM
KVS
AD
Templated 1
3
10
11
58
92
Identity Driver
Open vSwitch
Linux Bridge
Cisco
Other 92
24
59
97
Nicira
Brocade
Hyper-V
nova-network
Modular Layer 2 Plugin
Big Switch
Ryu
NEC
MidoNet
Other
PLUMgrid
Mellanox
Juniper
Custom
Arista
Embrane
Extreme Networks
Ruijie Networks
ML2 0
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
6
8
8
9
11
10
12
Network Driver
JSON
XML 36
66
API Format

DEV/QA
Ubuntu
CentOS
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Windows
Debian
Fedora
SUSE Linux Enterprise
FreeBSD
Scientific Linux
Other
openSUSE 0
0
1
1
2
3
4
9
21
36
66
Operating System
Prefer not to say
1-100
101-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,001-50,000
100,000+ 2
0
0
7
17
96
88
# of users
EC2 compatibility API
S3 compatibility API
OCCI compatibility API
GCE compatibility API 1
4
54
71
Compatibility APIs
LVM
Ceph RBD
NFS
GlusterFS
NetApp
Nexenta
Windows
SAN/HP
EMC
XIV
SAN/Solaris
Storwize
SolidFire
Coraid
Xenapi
Sheepdog
Zadara
HP 3PAR
Huawei
HDS
HP LeftHand
Scality
Dell EqualLogic
EqualLogic
Mellanox
Other
iSCSI 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
5
5
6
6
7
8
8
17
23
38
51
89
Block Storage Drivers

PROOF OF CONCEPT
unspecified
1-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,000+
50,000+ 0
4
1
6
5
34
128
25
# of cores
unspecified
1-100
101 to 1,000
1,001 to 10,000
10,000+ 1
11
51
93
47
# of IPs
unspecified
1-10,000
10,001-100,000
1-100 million
100-500 million
500+ million 0
0
2
5
20
82
94
# of objects
unspecified
0-10 TB
11-100 TB
100-500 TB
500+ TB
1,000+ TB 0
8
6
37
98
54
Block Storage Size
unspecified
1-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,000-10,000
10,000+ 2
1
7
12
28
128
25
# of instances
unspecified
1-50
51-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,000+ 2
5
6
7
159
24
# of compute nodes

PROOF OF CONCEPT
Austin (2010.1)
Bexar (2011.1)
Cactus (2011.2)
Diablo (2011.3)
Essex (2012.1)
Folsom (2012.2)
Grizzly
Havana (2013.2)
Icehouse (2014.1)
Trunk 31
10
37
102
87
38
10
3
4
2
Release
Openstack Network (Neutron)
Ceilometer
Heat
10
35
46
116
156
158
171
176
182
202
Services

PROOF OF CONCEPT
Puppet
DevStack
Chef
Other 45
23
28
37
PackStack
Crowbar
SaltStack
Fuel
None
Other
Foreman
Substratum
Ansible
StackOps
Anvil
CFEngine
Custom
FAI 0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
8
11
14
Deployment Tool
kvm
esx
xen
Other 83
37
38
169
lxc
xenserver
QEMU
hyperv
Bare Metal
Docker
OpenVZ
Other
PowerVM 2
2
3
4
10
13
15
17
17
Hypervisor
SQL
LDAP
PAM
KVS
AD
Templated 2
4
11
17
67
83
Identity Driver
Open vSwitch
Linux Bridge
Cisco
Other 80
30
58
95
Hyper-V
Brocade
Nicira
Big Switch
nova-network
Ryu
Juniper
MidoNet
NEC
PLUMgrid
Other
Custom
Mellanox
Arista
Embrane
Extreme Networks
ML2
Ruijie Networks 0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
4
4
4
5
6
6
8
8
10
10
11
Network Driver
JSON
XML 56
132
API Format

PROOF OF CONCEPT
Prefer not to say
1-100
101-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,001-50,000
100,000+ 2
2
1
5
15
93
100
# of users
Ubuntu
CentOS
Debian
Windows
openSUSE
Fedora
FreeBSD
Other
Scientific Linux 1
1
1
2
4
7
8
8
22
42
66
Operating System
GCE compatibility API
OCCI compatibility API 3
3
50
68
Compatibility APIs
LVM
NFS
Ceph RBD
NetApp
GlusterFS
EMC
Windows
SAN/HP
Xenapi
Nexenta
SAN/Solaris
XIV
SolidFire
Storwize
Coraid
HP LeftHand
HDS
Huawei
HP 3PAR
Zadara
Scality
Sheepdog
ZFS
Custom
Dell EqualLogic
EqualLogic
IBM GPFS
Mellanox
Other
XenAPI Storage Manager 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
6
7
8
9
11
13
23
27
42
49
83

PRODUCTION
unspecified
1-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,000+
50,000+ 2
13
7
18
14
48
79
22
# of cores
unspecified
1-100
101-1,000
1,001-10,000
10,000+ 9
28
59
52
55
# of IPs
unspecified
1-10,000
10,001-100,000
1-100 million
100-500 million
500+ million 2
3
4
12
23
49
110
# of objects
unspecified
0-10 TB
11-100 TB
100-500 TB
500+ TB
1,000+ TB 2
13
13
57
59
59
Block Storage Size
unspecified
1-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,000-10,000
10,000+ 9
6
24
20
44
77
23
# of instances
unspecified
1-50
51-100
101-500
501-1,000
1,000+ 12
7
17
21
125
21
# of compute nodes

PRODUCTION
Austin (2010.1)
Bexar (2011.1)
Cactus (2011.2)
Diablo (2011.3)
Essex (2012.1)
Folsom (2012.2)
Grizzly
Havana (2013.2)
Icehouse (2014.1)
Trunk 26
5
42
84
64
61
10
2
2
1
Release
Openstack Network
Ceilometer
Heat
7
26
53
101
135
151
160
185
187
196
Services

PRODUCTION
Puppet
Chef
DevStack
Other 31
18
32
65
PackStack
SaltStack
Other
Crowbar
Custom
Substratum
Ansible
Anvil
CFEngine
FAI
StackOps
Foreman
Fuel
None 0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
6
11
Deployment Tool
kvm
esx
xen
QEMU
Other 40
18
18
19
173
xenserver
lxc
hyperv
Bare Metal
OpenVZ
Docker
Other
PowerVM 1
1
2
5
5
6
10
10
Hypervisor
SQL
LDAP
KVS
PAM
AD
Templated 0
3
6
8
55
112
Identity Driver
Open vSwitch
Linux Bridge
nova-network
Other 74
23
41
84
Network Driver
Cisco
Nicira
Hyper-V
Brocade
Custom
NEC
Big Switch
MidoNet
Ryu
Juniper
Arista
PLUMgrid
Extreme Networks
Other
ML2
Mellanox
Ruijie Networks
Embrane 0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
15
20
JSON
XML 47
135
API Format

PRODUCTION
Prefer not to say
1-100
101-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,001-50,000
100,000+ 4
3
4
14
38
72
74
# of users
Ubuntu
CentOS
Windows
Debian
openSUSE
Fedora
Scientific Linux
FreeBSD
Other 1
1
2
2
3
3
7
8
20
31
89
Operating System
OCCI compatibility API
GCE compatibility API 0
4
54
87
Compatibility APIs
LVM
Ceph RBD
NFS
NetApp
GlusterFS
EMC
Windows
SAN/Solaris
SAN/HP
Nexenta
Storwize
SolidFire
Sheepdog
HP LeftHand
Zadara
XIV
Coraid
Custom
Scality
Violin
Xenapi
Huawei
Dell EqualLogic
EqualLogic
HDS
HP 3PAR
IBM GPFS
XenAPI Storage Manager
ZFS 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
12
17
28
30
58
63

ICEHOUSE/JUNO COMPARISON
User Types:
Icehouse
Juno
CloudConsumerEcosystemVendorServiceProviderCloudoperator
CloudConsumerEcosystemVendorServiceProviderCloudoperator
522
377
436
343 369
290 273
194
Dev/QA Proof of Concept Production
Icehouse Juno Icehouse Juno Icehouse Juno
209218210
165178173
Stage of Deployment
Survey Responses Deployments Companies UG Members
Icehouse Juno Icehouse Juno Icehouse Juno Icehouse Juno
293
512506
629
216
539
387
822
General Stats

APP SURVEY
OpenStack clients
jclouds
None
FOG
Deltacloud
php-opencloud
pkgcloud
OpenStack.net
Other 35
7
17
17
29
33
34
35
139
226 Survey Responses
71 Companies
81 UG Members
Application Libraries
Custom
Libcloud
Euca/Boto
Cloudforms
Juju
OCCI
Moxie
Bosh
SlipStream
Hybridfox
Rally
Vagrant
Other 15
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
4
Python
Java
Ruby
PHP
Perl
Node.js
C/C++
C#
Other 26
8
15
16
17
29
34
45
123
Languages
Bash
Go
Scala
Clojure
Julia
Other 14
1
1
2
3
5
Vim
Eclipse
Sublime
Other
IntelliJ
Emacs
Visual Studio
Atom
Pycharm
Other 5
3
3
9
11
17
20
33
69
121
Developer Envs
Linux
Windows
Mac OS X
Solaris
BSD 2
4
40
40
184
OS
Puppet
Heat
Docker
Chef
Ansible
OpenShift
SaltStack
Cloud Foundry
Other 23
14
23
31
37
64
68
85
111
Conﬁg Tools
JSON
XML 33
136
API Format
Open technology
Avoiding vendor lock-in
Ability to innovate/compete
Cost savings
Operational efﬁciency
Flexibility of underlying technology choices
Time to market
Attracting talent
Control
Other 8
43
53
75
101
104
105
106
110
114
Business Drivers

APP SURVEY
Information Technology
Academic / Research
Telecommunications
Film/Media
Government / Defense
Manufacturing/Industrial
Finance
Healthcare
Insurance
Consumer Goods
Retail
Energy
Other 8
1
1
1
1
3
3
4
4
6
19
31
150
Industry
Top 10

Countries
US
FR
JP
CN
GB
AU
IN
DE
CA
NL 5
5
7
7
8
10
12
13
15
87
10,000+
17%
5,001-10,000
14%1,001-5,000
10%
501-1,000
6%
101-500
13%
21-100
11%
1-20
28%
Organization Size
Cloud operator
Service Provider
Ecosystem Vendor
Cloud Consumer 67
76
82
125
User Types
docs.openstack.org
Blogs
OpenStack Mailing List
The OpenStack Operations Guide
ask.openstack.org
IRC
Launchpad Answers
OpenStack Dev Mailing List
Source Code
Other Online Forums
OpenStack Planet
Other 33
43
67
71
78
80
81
90
111
112
117
170
Info Sources

• Users asked for free-form feedback (including some requests from the projects)

• Foundation Priorities

• What they like about OpenStack

• What they feel should be the emphasis for 2014

• Neutron compared with nova network

• What do we do with the comments ?

• Anonymise and classify

• Distribute summaries and details to the PTLs prior to the summit

• Provide input to design summit discussions

• Grouped into

• What people like about OpenStack – 202 comments

• User committee and Foundation priorities for 2014 – 252 comments

• Further enhancements – 431 comments

• Why nova-network – 38
COMMENTS

Over the last 6 months I think the documentation
has improved significantly. I have seen others
recently hold up OpenStack docs as a model to
strive for.
MY FAVORITE COMMENT

• Community

• Open Source

• Flexibility

• Extendible

• Code is accessible and easy to understand

• ‘Not a Lot’

• Scalable

• Easy automation

• ‘It pays my salary’
WHAT PEOPLE LIKED ABOUT OPENSTACK

• Channel operations needs to development and companies

• Arrange regular feedback from user groups and ambassadors

• Close the gap for Enterprise IT

• Industry specific working groups

• Focus on those consuming OpenStack

• Expand training and certification marketplace

• Define what OpenStack is

• Improve/replace Launchpad
USER COMMITTEE/FOUNDATION PRIORITIES

• Stability of core should be a priority above adding new functions

• Add how-to guides, problem management documentation, expire old
documentation, end user guide (but much less than previous surveys)

• Zero downtime migrations

• Installation and configuration (but much less than previous surveys)
• Cross Project consistency with APIs, SDKs and CLIs

• High availabilityVMs

• Neutron stability, simplification, resilience, IPv6 and scalability

• Improved function and usability in Horizon

• Security, auditing (but much less than previous survey)

• AWS/EC2 compatibility
FOCUS FOR FURTHER ENHANCEMENTS

• Mid-cycle gathering of operators

• At eBay in San Jose – Thanks Subbu

• Moderated by Sean Roberts and Tom Fifield

• 50+ attendees

• Take-away

• Very positive atmosphere – no tranquilizers needed

• Operators want to get involved early – Blueprint-on-blueprints

• Many volunteers to help ‘outside of the day job of running OpenStack clouds’

• Lots of ideas for the summit

• Aim to repeat in August/September 2014

• ‘Brief’ summary at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operators-
feedback-mar14
OPERATOR MINI-SUMMIT

• Operators Meetup

• Modelled on design summit – no slides!

• Monday afternoon and Friday morning

• http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ops+meetup

• Dev/Ops Design Summit sessions

• Each project has a Dev/Ops session for in-depth conversations on needs, usage and
priorities

• http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/?s=Dev%2FOps

• Volunteers for design sessions

• Follow the work of blueprint-on-blueprints to give operator input at the design stage

• Volunteer at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-ops-volunteer
ACTIVITIES ATTHE SUMMIT

• User Committee changes and scale-out

• More activities, need more help

• Session to discuss how to structure the feedback on Friday

• http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/797439515b4bd045895dc8195e72d317

• There is also a conference going on ☺

• 25 sessions in the operators track

• 13 talks in the community building

• Lots of other user related sessions in the project specific tracks
ACTIVITIES ATTHE SUMMIT (II)

• If you are interested, have the time to help and the skills to bridge
from user feedback to development, please get in touch with us

• Volunteer at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/
1HOwsPp44fNbWv9zgvXW8ZnCaKszg_XKu7vmLbrPFMzQ/viewform

• user-committee@lists.openstack.org

• Follow up discussions to refine requirements and maximise inclusion

• Operations mini-summit on Friday https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-
unconference-RFC

• openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org

• Get involved in blueprint-on-blueprints process to improve the design
before coding starts
CAN YOU HELP ?

• Survey remains open at http://www.openstack.org/user-survey

• Survey November 2013 at http://www.openstack.org/assets/Uploads/
Deployments-IceHouse-v1.1.pptx

• Survey April 2013 at http://www.openstack.org/summit/portland-2013/
session-videos/presentation/openstack-user-committee-update-and-
survey-results
REFERENCES

• Ensure compatibility across different implementations

• Stability/Hardening of existing functionality

• Establish certification program

• Encourage training for different skill sets

• Support user groups, especially outside U.S.
FOUNDATION PRIORITIES (FEEDBACK FROM APRIL 2013)

OpenStack Atlanta User Survey

OpenStack Atlanta User Survey

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked(20)

Similar to OpenStack Atlanta User Survey

Similar to OpenStack Atlanta User Survey(20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded(20)

OpenStack Atlanta User Survey