Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

National Overview: Regional Transportation Planning Organizations

41 views

Published on

On August 29, NADO Associate Director Carrie Kissel participated in a peer exchange on rural transportation planning. Kissel provided an overview of regional transportation planning organizations structure, functions, and benefits for stakeholders.

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

National Overview: Regional Transportation Planning Organizations

  1. 1. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE National Overview: Regional Transportation Planning Organizations RTPO Peer Exchange Tallahassee, FL | Aug 29 – 30, 2018
  2. 2. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE About NADO ▪ National association for 540 regional development organizations, including emerging network of Rural Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs or RPOs) ▪ Promote public policies that strengthen local governments, communities and economies through the regional strategies, coordination efforts and program expertise of the nation’s regional development organizations
  3. 3. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE About NADO ▪ Through the NADO Research Foundation, develop training and resources related to: • Rural/small metro transportation planning, RPO America • Small business finance • Economic development planning • Regional resiliency • Developing quality of place
  4. 4. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Our Resources Image of website homepage for www.RuralTransportation.org. Image of email newsletter for Rural Transportation Newsletter.
  5. 5. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE • Images of report covers
  6. 6. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Regional Transportation Planning Models
  7. 7. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE • Image of person looking at sticky notes on a wall, participating in a planning process How Did We Get Here? Photo courtesy Southern Tier Central Regional Planning and Development Board
  8. 8. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE How Did We Get Here? • ISTEA (1991) – Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act • TEA-21 (1998) – Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century • SAFETEA-LU (2005) – Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users • 2003 FHWA/FTA planning regulations were adopted implementing language on rural planning and state-local consultation. (4-year process) • Same language used in 2007 regulations • In essence requires meaningful input by local officials in the transportation planning process/decision making—separate from public outreach efforts
  9. 9. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE MAP-21 & FAST Act RTPOs • Structure: policy committee, fiscal agent • Basic regional planning, TA duties outlined • State outreach to local officials separate from public outreach • States: – “Cooperate” with RTPOs on LRTP – “Consult” with RTPOs on Interstate, Bridge, NHS, 5310, 5311 projects in STIP – “Cooperate” with RTPOs on other projects in STIP for areas with a population under 50,000 – “Consult” with RTPOs on Strategic Highway Safety Plan 9
  10. 10. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Typical RTPO Tasks
  11. 11. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Required RTPO Tasks More tasks: Participate in planning/ policy process Foster coordination of existing plans Share plans with neighbors Other
  12. 12. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Why Form RTPOs? • Value propositions for: – State DOT – Local governments – Businesses – Residents 12
  13. 13. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Regional/Rural Planning Organization •R-Relationships •P-Priority •O-One • Communication is Essential
  14. 14. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Value Proposition: State DOT • Efficient consultation and cooperation – Enhanced participation of local governments required – One meeting for DOT staff to attend • RTPO assistance with reviewing projects in the pipeline: – What’s changed at local level? What’s still a priority? • Public outreach – Help DOT host regional local official forum, public forum – RTPOs often attend local government meetings – Can conduct general public + targeted stakeholder outreach 14
  15. 15. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Value Proposition: RPCs • Efficient planning – Bring a clearer transportation lens to other work – Align plans and programs to minimize planning fatigue of officials, committee members, public – ID potential projects that support multiple regional goals – Connect programmatic dots in-house • i.e., aging services + transportation planning = greater understanding of mobility 15
  16. 16. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Value Proposition: Local Governments • Clear sense of planning/programming process and roles • Regional cooperation = larger voice • Access to a general resource on transportation • Awareness of big picture trends in demographics, economy 16
  17. 17. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Value Proposition: Local Governments • Technical assistance to rural places – Traffic counts, parking counts, safety studies, ADA audits, local roads issues – Convene local transit providers or road managers – Learn major state/fed program categories: answer questions about what projects are eligible or assist with grant writing – Joint purchasing opportunities 17
  18. 18. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Value Proposition: Businesses • Identify pain points that can realistically be addressed • Transportation + economic development opportunities • Avoid surprises 18
  19. 19. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Value Proposition: Residents • Benefit from regional perspective, aligned planning efforts • Participate through citizen’s advisory committee or providing input through engagement opportunities • Local technical assistance benefits people, not just governments, when there are improvements to mobility, safety, accessibility, efficiency 19
  20. 20. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Equity? • Easy to lose focus on equity when implementing new processes and trends • Not just rural vs. urban, but within rural • Tips: Broad engagement, link planning processes and programs, and connect to implementation • Make economic resilience meaningful to all residents 20
  21. 21. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Lessons Learned • Be clear about how RTPOs fit into consultation • Be consistent about roles • Develop regional priority list: – What can we agree on? – What issues/projects are most important? • Be realistic and strategic—may need to focus on specific corridors rather than needs of region’s entire network • Build buy-in strategically 21
  22. 22. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Lessons Learned • Build buy-in strategically – Quick wins – Champions – Consistent participation – Quality meeting agendas • Invest in new RTPOs: training, mentoring, regular statewide meetings 22
  23. 23. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Lessons Learned • Level of state investment & match: you get what you pay for – Meet federal requirements for consultation/cooperation – Pain points for state – RPC capabilities – Local government needs – Baseline tasks for all RTPOs – Flexibility: Rural planning work programs, pilots, special studies 23
  24. 24. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE RTPO Funding • Most common source is FHWA Statewide Planning and Research – 80:20, with match combo of state/local funds • FTA Planning, state funds, other • Range from $5,000 – $300,000+ annual funding including match – $80,000 – $100,000+ common 24
  25. 25. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Contact us Carrie Kissel, Associate Director ckissel@nado.org | 202.643.9560 Joe McKinney, Executive Director jmckinney@nado.org | 202.624.5947 25
  26. 26. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE 26
  27. 27. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE Project example: Lower Savannah COG Photo courtesy Lower Savannah COG
  28. 28. RTPOs:STATEOFTHEPRACTICE 28 U.S. 321 & U.S. 78 in Denmark, SC Before road diet U.S. 321 & U.S. 78 in Denmark, SC After road diet Photos courtesy Lower Savannah COG

×