Using New Literacy Studies to Understand Participation in Online Social Networking Systems<br />Royce Kimmons<br />
Part 1Literacy and Technology<br />
What is Literacy?<br />Literacy as:<br /><ul><li>Social participation (Cazden et al., 1996)
“Way of Being” vs. “Way of Doing” (Gee, 2009)
Developing community membership by copying, adapting, and synthesizing (Ivanic, 1998)</li></li></ul><li>Literacy and Ident...
"People's diverse identities constitute the richness and the dilemmas of their sense of self" (Ivanic, 1998).</li></li></u...
How do technology and language shape culture? Vice-versa? Identity?</li></li></ul><li>Neutral Media?<br /><ul><li>“The med...
Part 2Facebook from a Literacy Perspective<br />
What does participation in Facebook look like?<br /><ul><li>Connect with or “friend” others
Sharing thoughts, updates, pictures, etc. with others
Communicate with different communities, ranging from individuals (message), groups of strangers (groups), friends or sub-g...
Connections vary from professional to personal
May sustain relationships or seek new ones</li></li></ul><li>What embedded values does Facebook have, and how do these inf...
Sharing of personal information; sharing too much?  Too often?
Ad revenues -> privacy concerns; sharing information with unintended sources
Digital footprint that is persistent
Personal … but not personal enough; is this really friendship?</li></li></ul><li>Are there different levels or types of me...
Merely maintaining contact vs. active socialization vs. meeting new people vs. stalking</li></li></ul><li>How does one bec...
Sustain relationships
Share a lot, share many types of media, share with many, share often
Be interesting, concise, witty, unpredictable, and/or controversial
Check often and reply quickly</li></li></ul><li>How does participation in Facebook influence culture and identity?<br /><u...
Makes a variety of activities social (e.g. commerce, play, advocacy); “likes”
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Using New Literacy Studies to Understand Participation in Online Social Networking Systems

2,878 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,878
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1,396
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Using New Literacy Studies to Understand Participation in Online Social Networking Systems

  1. 1. Using New Literacy Studies to Understand Participation in Online Social Networking Systems<br />Royce Kimmons<br />
  2. 2. Part 1Literacy and Technology<br />
  3. 3. What is Literacy?<br />Literacy as:<br /><ul><li>Social participation (Cazden et al., 1996)
  4. 4. “Way of Being” vs. “Way of Doing” (Gee, 2009)
  5. 5. Developing community membership by copying, adapting, and synthesizing (Ivanic, 1998)</li></li></ul><li>Literacy and Identity<br /><ul><li>There is no "essential 'real' self", but only selves moderated and framed by unique historical situations and boundaries; “identity without identification” (Gee, 2009).
  6. 6. "People's diverse identities constitute the richness and the dilemmas of their sense of self" (Ivanic, 1998).</li></li></ul><li>Power & Control<br /><ul><li>Learning = "creating the learning conditions for full social participation" (Cazden et al., 1996) vs. assimilation / enculturation</li></li></ul><li>Language, Technology, & Culture<br /><ul><li>Co-evolutionary artifacts in social anthropology (Pfaffenberger, 1992)
  7. 7. How do technology and language shape culture? Vice-versa? Identity?</li></li></ul><li>Neutral Media?<br /><ul><li>“The medium is the message” (McLuhan, 1964)</li></li></ul><li>Literacy Questions for any Medium<br />What does participation in the medium look like?<br />What embedded values does the medium have, and how do these influence social structures?<br />Are there different levels or types of meaningful participation in the medium?<br />How does one become a full or meaningful participant in the medium?<br />How does participation in the medium influence culture and identity?<br />What prevents or complicates participation in the medium?<br />
  8. 8. Part 2Facebook from a Literacy Perspective<br />
  9. 9. What does participation in Facebook look like?<br /><ul><li>Connect with or “friend” others
  10. 10. Sharing thoughts, updates, pictures, etc. with others
  11. 11. Communicate with different communities, ranging from individuals (message), groups of strangers (groups), friends or sub-groups of friends, networks, public, etc., depending upon the intention
  12. 12. Connections vary from professional to personal
  13. 13. May sustain relationships or seek new ones</li></li></ul><li>What embedded values does Facebook have, and how do these influence social structures?<br /><ul><li>“Friend,” really? Everyone?
  14. 14. Sharing of personal information; sharing too much? Too often?
  15. 15. Ad revenues -> privacy concerns; sharing information with unintended sources
  16. 16. Digital footprint that is persistent
  17. 17. Personal … but not personal enough; is this really friendship?</li></li></ul><li>Are there different levels or types of meaningful participation in Facebook?<br /><ul><li>Depends upon who you connect with and why; friends, family, colleagues, etc.
  18. 18. Merely maintaining contact vs. active socialization vs. meeting new people vs. stalking</li></li></ul><li>How does one become a full or meaningful participant in Facebook?<br /><ul><li>Reach out, find, connect, communicate
  19. 19. Sustain relationships
  20. 20. Share a lot, share many types of media, share with many, share often
  21. 21. Be interesting, concise, witty, unpredictable, and/or controversial
  22. 22. Check often and reply quickly</li></li></ul><li>How does participation in Facebook influence culture and identity?<br /><ul><li>Social grooming (Tufekci, 2008)
  23. 23. Makes a variety of activities social (e.g. commerce, play, advocacy); “likes”
  24. 24. Collapses identity (multiple spheres or networks into one)
  25. 25. Ties me to my activities, declarations (e.g., politics, religion, partying, school/work history), etc.
  26. 26. Homophily (Thelwall, 2009)</li></li></ul><li>What prevents or complicates participation in Facebook?<br /><ul><li>Tech competency and access? Not really.
  27. 27. Boundaries
  28. 28. Multiple groups of “friends” connected through the individual; multiple audiences
  29. 29. Unclear privacy (boyd, 2008); “not as safe as you think”
  30. 30. Single or multiple identities?
  31. 31. Controversial topics and hostility
  32. 32. Time and addiction</li></li></ul><li>Food for Thought<br /><ul><li>What implications arise from the mandated use or prohibition of Facebook? Identity?
  33. 33. Does Facebook transform our identities from multiple to single?
  34. 34. Does social presence (or lack thereof) impact real life and relationships?
  35. 35. Can our identities evolve as necessary with the world watching (and taking notes)?</li></li></ul><li>Part 3Twitter from a Literacy Perspective<br />
  36. 36. Explore Twitter<br /><ul><li>Break into groups and peruse the following Twitter pages:</li></ul>http://twitter.com/davecormier and http://twitter.com/andylevy<br />http://twitter.com/opencontent and http://twitter.com/ConanOBrien<br />http://twitter.com/henryjenkins and http://twitter.com/rainnwilson<br />http://twitter.com/veletsianos and http://twitter.com/justinbieber<br />http://twitter.com/gsiemensand http://twitter.com/chrisbrown<br />http://twitter.com/ewellburn and http://twitter.com/Oprah<br />
  37. 37. Twitter Literacy<br /><ul><li>Answer one of the questions here: http://bit.ly/qMytCg
  38. 38. Add food for thought or persistent questions</li></li></ul><li>Part 4Some Final Reflections for Educators<br />
  39. 39. Regarding Literacy<br /><ul><li>If technology choices introduce issues of power and identity into the classroom, then what challenges does this pose for educators in choosing how and when to use technology?
  40. 40. What is the difference between technical competency and technology literacy? Which is more important? Which is more difficult to teach/learn?</li></li></ul><li>Regarding Facebook<br /><ul><li>How should we approach the issue of “friending” students, colleagues, and others?
  41. 41. Are we transforming their experience/identity?
  42. 42. Are we prepared for the consequences in our own experience/identity?
  43. 43. What do we (and our students) want out of Facebook and what are the implications of relationships, communications, and what we share (or don't share) on our outcomes?
  44. 44. What are the dangers of the persistent and (potentially) public nature of all electronic communication?</li></li></ul><li>Thanks!<br />

×