Rd aupdate 8 27 12 (3)

382 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
382
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
181
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Rd aupdate 8 27 12 (3)

  1. 1. Results-Driven Accountability Update Office of Special Education Programs August 27, 2012
  2. 2. IDEA DataComparisons Six Years of APR Data
  3. 3. Trend in National Average Percent of Timely Transition of Students with Disabilities
  4. 4. Trend in National AveragePercent of Accurate Data
  5. 5. Trend in National Average Percent ofWritten Complaints Timely Resolved
  6. 6. Trend in National Average Percent of Timely Evaluations of Students with Disabilities
  7. 7. Trend in National Average Percent Due Process Hearings Adjudicated within Timelines
  8. 8. Comparison of Dispute ResolutionResolved/Adjudicated within Timelines
  9. 9. Comparison of Outcomes for Students with Disabilities
  10. 10. Trend in National Average ReadingProficiency for Students with Disabilities
  11. 11. Trend in National Average Math Proficiency for Students with Disabilities
  12. 12. Comparison of Academic Proficiency for Students with Disabilities
  13. 13. The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities shall be on- • improving educational RESULTS and functional OUTCOMES for all children with disabilities • ensuring that States meet… the program requirements, with… emphasis on those most related to improving results 20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(2) Sec. 616(a)
  14. 14. Monitoring PrioritiesThe Secretary shall monitor the States, and shall require eachState to monitor the local educational agencies…using quantifiableindicators in each of the following priority areas…:(A) Provision of a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment.(B) State exercise of general supervisory authority, including child find, effective monitoring, the use of resolution sessions, mediation,…and a system of transition services.(C) Disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services to the extent the representation is the result of inappropriate identification.The Secretary shall consider other relevant information and data,including data provided by States under section 618. Sec. 616(a)
  15. 15. Components of RDA SPP/APR – APR Indicators measure results Determinations – Broadly reflect State performance (not just compliance and accurate data) Differentiated monitoring and technical assistance based on weighted identification of States
  16. 16. Initial StepsO Offer opportunities for input O Conference calls O Blog, email, etc. O MeetingsO ED Steering CommitteeO OSEP Steering Committee and Strategy TeamO OSEP Logic ModelO Better understand what results data are available and how they can be used

×