Evaluation Reading habit

2. Abstract
The aims to 1) evaluate supportive reading habit
project of Choowicharat School 2) to compare the
results of supportive
reading habit project between the before and after
periods of the project operation. The sample groups
used in the evaluation consists of 133 people,
selected by probability selection, 1 administrator, 10
instructors, 7 basic education committees of
Choowicharat School, 58 Prathomsuksa 3-6 students,
58 parents of Prathomsuksa 3-6 students
As a result, it is found that the environment before
the operation is in a medium level. After the operation,
it is found that all terms are in a high level. The
comparison of environmental evaluation, basic factors,
operation and production are all significantly different
in 0.1 levels.

3. Background
Creating the habit of reading to children is very
important for the new century, so it 's absolutely
essential to combine forces to collaborate with each
other to create a new generation Thailand Children
love to read. A good reading is immune to intellectual
knowingly possessed the up- keep pace with
globalization as well . Because reading is the key to
navigate to a successful life.
The test assesses students' reading with reading by
the Thailand 's Board of Education Basic , the number
of students reading and writing proficiently labored.

4. Background
The assessor as school administrators.
Realize the importance of promoting the habit
of reading and established a project to
promote reading habits of school. The activity
devoted to promoting the habit of reading
activities to reduce the number of students
who can not read proficiently. Write a cash bar
and provides students with a love of reading
has increased from the original.

5. Research Questions
1.What is the level of evaluating supportive
reading habit project of Choowicharat
School ?
2. What is the results of comparative
supportive reading habit project between
the before and after periods of the project
operation

6. Research Objective Research
1.To evaluate supportive reading
habit project of Choowicharat School.
2.To compare the results of supportive
reading
habit project between the before and after
periods of the project operation.

7. Research Methodology
Research Design and Study
The research was quantitative to evaluate
the project with CIPP Model. The sample
groups used in the evaluation consists of 133
people, selected by probability selection, 1
administrator, 10 instructors, 7 basic
education committees of Choowicharat
School, 58 Prathomsuksa 3-6 students, 58
parents of Prathomsuksa 3-6 students.
.

8. Research Methodology
Instrument
The tool used to evaluate the program
promotes reading habits of school students held
a total of four editions
1. For the teachers and school administrators.
The CIPP evaluation model has four top 69 and
an open-ended question.
2.For the Committee for Basic Education
School. The CIPP evaluation model has four
top 38 questions and open-ended questions .

9. Research Methodology
Instrument
3. For the students who answered the
questionnaire. The assessments yield 46
questions and open-ended questions.
4. For parents. The assessments yield 15
questions and open-ended questions.

10. Research Methodology
The quality of the Instrument
The conformity assessment between question
on the particular behavior by the IOC and then
to try (try - out) with 30 teachers ,15 basic
educatio committees,30 students, 30 parents of
Tak kindergartens school to find the confidence.
(Reliability) No. 1 for teachers and school
administrators was 0.97 No.2 for school
education committee was 0.93 No.3 for the
student was 0.95 No. 4 for parents confidence
was 0.81.
eachers of basic education of 15 students, 30 parents and 30 kindergartens airing. Muang Tak Province under the jurisdiction of one cou

11. Research Methodology
Data collection methods
The assessment led to a discussion and self
assessment took two weeks to get the
questionnaires returned 100 percent .
Data analysis
The data was analyzed by using percentage,
mean, standard deviation, and t-test analysis,
and frequency.

12. Research Methodology
Data collection methods
The assessment led to a discussion and self
assessment took two weeks to get the
questionnaires returned 100 percent .
Data analysis
The data was analyzed by using percentage,
mean, standard deviation, and t-test analysis,
and frequency.

13. Results
Items
The level opinion
t-testBefore After
S.D. S.D.
Environment 3.3
3
0.5
4
4.3
2
0.5
1
7.942*
*
Basic factors 2.8
7
0.5
2
3.8
8
0.5
1
8.993*
*
Process 2.9
5
0.5
7
3.9
4
0.5
6
8.730*
*
Production of featured
books activity
3.0
4
0.6
4
4.0
5
0.6
4
10.388
**
Production of Daily
word language activity
3.0
2
0.6
2
4.0
1
0.6
1
10.357
**
Production of Useful 3.1 0.6 4.1 0.6 8.907*
ΧΧ

14. It is found that the environment ,Basic
factors, Process before the operation is in a
medium level, featured books activity, Daily word
language activity , Useful broadcasting activity,
Language clinic activity ,Top reader activity is in
a medium level. The satisfaction towards the
reading habit and quality of students is in a
medium level. After the operation, it is found that
all terms are in a high level.
The comparison of environmental
evaluation, basic factors, process and production
are all significantly different in 0.1 levels.
Conclusion

15. Discussion
The project promotes reading habits of school
subjects raised rat make. Note that the effect of the
project on the environment . Input the process And
output The right side The result was higher than the
assessment after the project before proceeding with the
project, and the difference was statistically significant
0.01 Can solve the liquidity of the students do not write
well. As a result, the number of students reading
proficiently fluent not written down . This is because the
activities encourage students to develop their skills.
Reading and writing can be improved. It also affects the
brain development of the learner is able to learn very
happy.