Potential costs of_acclimatization_to_a_warmer4


Published on

Published in: Technology
1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Potential costs of_acclimatization_to_a_warmer4

  1. 1. Potential Costs of Acclimatization to a Warmer Climate: Growth of a Reef Coral with Heat Tolerant vs. Sensitive Symbiont Types Autors: Alison Jones and Ray Berkelmans (2010) May 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 5 | e10437 Plos One | Presented by Natalia Rodríguez Ortiz for costal environment class http://www.4realz.com/totm/200605/
  2. 2. Vocabulary <ul><li>Explants-(Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Biology) to transfer (living tissue) from its natural site to a new site or to a culture medium </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Symbiont-An organism in a symbiotic relationship. In cases in which a distinction is made between two interacting organisms, the symbiont is the smaller of the two and is always a beneficiary in the relationship, while the larger organism is the host and may or may not derive a benefit. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Zooxanthellae-the algae that live as symbionts inside the cells of the coral. The sugars that they produce by photosynthesis are an essential part of the diet of the coral. </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Vocabulary cont. <ul><li>Bleaching-increase of only a degree or two above the normal summer maximum temperature can cause the coral to lose its symbionts. without the pigmented algae (symbiont, farm), the white skeleton shows through the transparent coral polyps. Without their farm, they don't get enough nourishment to reproduce or to build their sckeleton fast enough to stay ahead of erosion. </li></ul><ul><li>Holobiont-The coral holobiont is the entire community of living organisms that make up a healthy coral head. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/symbiont </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.thereeftank.com/blog/the-coral-holobiont </li></ul></ul>http://www.garretts-acropolis.com/Info_Acropora.htm
  4. 4. Vocabulary cont. <ul><ul><li>Photokinetics- The changes in rate of a chemical reaction in response to light . </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Chlorophyll a Definition </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A type of chlorophyll that is most common and predominant in all oxygen-evolving photosynthetic organisms such as higher plants, red and green algae. It is best at absorbing wavelength in the 400-450 nm and 650-700 nm of the electromagnetic spectrum . Its molecular formula is C 55 H 72 O 5 N 4 Mg. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Chlorophyll c Definition </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A form of chlorophyll that occurs only in algae , specifically the diatoms , dinoflagellates and brown algae . Its role is to pass on the light excitation to chlorophyll a . Its molecular formula is C 35 H 28 O 5 N 4 Mg. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Fuente: http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Chlorophyll_c </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Introduction <ul><li>Acclimatization in reef corals </li></ul><ul><ul><li>To cope with a warmer climate they change to more thermally tolerant endosymbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) genotypes. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Example: In the Keppel Islands in the southern Great Barrier Reef this species naturally harbors thermally sensitive type C2 or thermally tolerant type D zooxanthellae of the genus Symbiodinium and can change dominant type following bleaching. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Changing to thermally tolerant Symbiodinium type D in one study was found to increase thermal tolerance between 1.0–1.5°C in a common Indo-Pacific coral species, A. millepora . </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Positive correlation between the tissue incorporation of radio-labeled carbon and the relative maximum rate of electron transport through photosystem II in A. millepora juveniles with C1 and D symbionts. </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Link between symbiont genotype, photosynthetic function and carbon fixation <ul><ul><li>Processes that affect photosynthesis have the potential to have a simultaneous effect on host calcification. </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Project Relevance <ul><li>The growth rate of reef-building corals has a substantial influence on the resilience and regeneration capacity of tropical reefs. </li></ul><ul><li>The hard skeletons of scleractinian corals form the framework of reefs, providing food and habitat for other marine organisms </li></ul><ul><li>Following disturbance, such as bleaching, the growth rate of the key structural corals, such as species belonging to the genera Acropora and Pocillopora, is the most important factor in reef recovery. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Methodology: Filed study <ul><ul><li>Reef slope at Miall Island in the Keppel region </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Before bleaching event- March 2005, 16 colonies of the Indo-Pacific stony coral A. millepora , with Symbiodinium type C2(9) or type D (7) were transplanted from the Keppel Islands region </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>After bleaching event- February 2006 to investigate its effect on the growth differences between C2 and D types </li></ul></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Methodology: Filed study <ul><li>Buoyant weight measurements were repeated seasonally every three months, at the end of autumn (March to June 2005), winter (June to September 2005) and spring (September to December 2005). </li></ul><ul><li>The field growth experiment was repeated for another 12 months after a bleaching event in February 2006. </li></ul><ul><li>D colonies were sourced from the field and C2 colonies were sourced from colonies in the first experiment that bleached but survived due to low abundance of C2 colonies in the field post-bleaching. </li></ul><ul><li>Only colonies with strong C2 or D SSCP ( Single Stranded Conformational Polymorphism ) bands were chosen for the experiment (verified by the intensity of the band). </li></ul>
  10. 10. Methodology: Filed study <ul><li>The weekly growth rates for each season in the two studies were analyzed with ANOVA using the fixed factor Bleaching (before or after bleaching), and the random factor Season (three levels) as predictor variables. </li></ul><ul><li>The growth rate was expressed as the weekly buoyant weight gain as a percentage of the initial buoyant weight of the colony. </li></ul><ul><li>All statistical tests were completed using SPSS Version 15.0 </li></ul>
  11. 11. Methodology: Laboratory Study <ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Controlled conditions at 23°C and 29°C temperatures that represent the average stressful summer and non-stressful spring/autumn temperature ranges for corals </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Three months at Magnetic Island to allow recovery from transportation and acclimatization prior to the experiment. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Corals were kept on wire mesh racks at approximately the same depth that they were collected. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>http://bermudabream.blogspot.com/2009/09/offshore-coral-husbandry-for-research.html  
  12. 12. Methodology: Laboratory Study <ul><li>Experimental protocol </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Six explants were cut from each of the 16 colonies and distributed randomly and equally between three tanks within each of two temperature treatments ( 23°C and 29°C ).  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Coral explants were fixed to plastic stands and then placed on elevated rotisseries, turned 180 ° twice daily </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>For the duration of the four week experiment, corals were supplied with 3.5 hours of shaded light followed by 5 hours of un-shaded light, followed by another 3.5 hours of shaded light and 12 hours darkness each day to approximate their natural diurnal light cycle. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Light was provided by metal halide lamps with a spectral quality suitable for coral photosynthesis. </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Methodology: Laboratory Study <ul><li>Symbiodinium identification </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Was before the experiments, using Single Stranded Conformational Polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of the Intertranscribed Spacer Region 1 (ITS1) of algal nuclear ribosomal DNA </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Only colonies with intense SSCP bands representing type C2 and type D (EU189443, EU1894505) were chosen for the studies although the presence of other types below 5% abundance is not ruled out </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. <ul><li>Determination of Zooxanthellae densities and pigments concentrations </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Explants were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 220 grades C immediately following the experiment. Frozen branches were stripped of tissue using an air gun and the resultant slurry was macerated with a tissue homogenizer for 20 s. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Zooxanthellae counts were made on eight independent drops (0.0001 mm3) from each sample using a New Improved Nuebauer haemocytomer under a compound light microscope. </li></ul></ul>Methodology: Laboratory Study
  15. 15. Methodology: Laboratory Study <ul><ul><li>Chlorophyll was extracted overnight from the algal pellet using 100% methanol </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Due to the low abundance of type D colonies at Miall Island when the study began, thirty C2 colonies and only five D colonies were included in the first field experiments. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Initial buoyant weight measurements were made on the coral colonies in March 2004. Buoyant weight measurements (to the nearest gram) were performed by carefully transporting the colonies submerged in seawater to the weighing equipment a few 100 m from the study site. </li></ul></ul>
  16. 16. Results: Field study <ul><li>First experiment: (march 2005 before bleaching) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The weekly growth rate of A. millepora colonies varied significantly with symbiont genotype and season. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The growth rate of D colonies was 38% lower than that of C2 colonies (p,0.05). </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Growth rates were 27% higher in spring than in autumn (p,0.05) and 71% higher in spring than in winter (p,0.0.5) and 34% higher in autumn than inwinter (p,0.05). There was no interaction between symbiont type and season. </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Results: Field study Second Experiment (2006 after bleaching) <ul><ul><li>The highest growth rate was in spring, (six months after), 76% lower than the spring of 2005 before the bleaching </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Growth rate in autumn 2006 (12 months after) was 46% lower than in autumn 2005 before bleaching. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The winter 2006 growth rate (nearly 18 months after the bleaching), was 47% lower than the growth rate in the winter 2005 before the bleaching. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The highest growth rates of A. millepora colonies after the bleaching event were in spring and the lowest growth rates were in autumn and winter. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The overall growth rate of all the colonies in the second experiment (after bleaching) was 47% lower than the lowest growth rate (that of type D colonies) in the first experiment. </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. <ul><ul><li>Box boundaries represent the 75th and 25th percentiles. Thick lines within the boxplots represent the mean and thin lines represent the median. Whisker bars above and below the boxes represent the 95th and 5th percentiles. Dots represent data that fall outside the confidence limits. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Growth of A. millep ora colonies was severe ly affected by bleachi ng. event in January/February 2 006. Boxes represent the weekly buoyant weight gain expressed as a percentage of the initial buoyant weight of the colony. </li></ul>
  19. 19. Results: Laboratory study <ul><li>The skeletal growth rate of A. millepora explants in the laboratory varied significantly with predominant symbiont genotype. </li></ul><ul><li>The buoyant weight gain of explants with type D symbionts for the four weeks of the study was 29% less than that gained by C2 explants. </li></ul>
  20. 20. Results: Laboratory study <ul><li>Zooxanthellae densities for type D explants (averaged across temperature treatments) were 22% lower than densities for C2 explants (p,0.05). </li></ul><ul><li>Zooxanthellae densities at 29°C were 21% lower than densities at 2 3°C (p,0.05). The algal cell chlorophyll a content of type D explants was 16% lower than for type C2 explants (p,0.05) while chlorophyll c2 for type D explants was 17% lower (p,0.05). At 29 ° C, the mean algal chlorophyll a was 20% higher than concentrations at 23 ° C(p,0.05) while chlorophyll c2 was 19% higher (p,0.05). </li></ul>Algal densities and chlorophyll pigments
  21. 21. Discussion <ul><li>The growth rate of reef-building corals is likely to be significantly compromised by two separate and independent processes as they acclimatize to a warmer, more stressful, climate. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Symbiont population shuffling to more thermally tolerant types in response to thermal stress. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Effect of bleaching stress itself on coral growth. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Irrespective of symbiont genotype, corals were affected to an even greater degree by the stress of a bleaching event which reduced growth by more than 50% for up to 18 months compared to pre-bleaching rates. </li></ul>
  22. 22. Discussion <ul><li>Under normal (non-stressful) conditions, this shift is likely to have caused ,38% lower growth in surviving colonies with predominantly type D symbionts. </li></ul><ul><li>Effects of the bleaching event itself far out-weighed the effects of symbiont genotype, reduce growth in all colonies by 56% compared to the growth rate in the year before the bleaching. </li></ul><ul><li>Even in corals with type D symbionts, growth was significantly reduced for at least 18 months after the bleaching event. </li></ul>
  23. 23. Discussion <ul><ul><li>Link between symbiont identity and growth rate was confirm with model results. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The growth differences of adult A. millepora with symbionts of contrasting thermal tolerance in the field and laboratory were not as dramatic as those found for juveniles of this species. </li></ul></ul>http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t173908.html
  24. 24. Discussion <ul><li>Three factors may be responsible for this disparity. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Effect of isometric scaling with the size of the subject </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Older, larger colonies will partition less of their resources into growth than smaller, younger colonies that invest all their energy in tissue and skeletal growth in the absence of reproductive effort. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Age of the coral tissues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Cell senescence causes a reduction in the proportion of the coral’s energy allocated to growth and an increase in the energy allocated to reproduction </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The third rationale may lie in the identity of the symbionts compared in the studies. </li></ul></ul>
  25. 25. Discussion <ul><ul><li>In terms of symbiont effects on growth, one possible explanation for the lower growth of type D compared to type C2 A. millepora under normal conditions may lie in the photokinetics ( changes in rate of a chemical reaction in response to ligth ) of the symbionts. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lower photosynthetic function may help type D symbionts to cope with excess electrons and reactive oxygen species during heat stress, thereby maintaining normal photosynthetic function. </li></ul></ul>
  26. 26. Discussion <ul><li>In the second field study, A. millepora colonies with type D </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Symbiodinium had reduced growth in spite of retaining their </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>symbionts during the bleaching event. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The photosynthetically fixed carbon from intact type D symbionts may not be available to their hosts for skeletal growth. It is possible that surviving stress tolerant symbiont genotypes retain a greater portion of their photosynthetically fixed carbon for cell metabolism and repair, thereby ensuring their own survival but effectively starving the host coral. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A second explanation may be that during the warmer conditions of the summer bleaching event, in spite of retaining their symbionts, A. millepora with type D symbionts used more energy for respiration, which is positively correlated with </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Temperature. </li></ul></ul>
  27. 27. <ul><li>The third explanation may be that type D symbionts had increased rates of photo-Inhibition during the bleaching event which reduced carbon fixation. At high temperatures , type D Symbiodinium has been shown to undergo protective Photoinhibition. </li></ul><ul><li>Photoinhibition mimics reduced habitat irradiance, reducing photosynthesis. Finally, the effects of heat stress on ‘host factors’ may play a part in reducing photosynthate translocation to the corals which retained their type D symbionts. </li></ul>http://aquariumnnovations.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=slideshow.Slideshow&g2_itemId=163 Discussion
  28. 28. Disscusion <ul><li>The relative differences in growth rate of A. millepora in the field and the laboratory are likely to be caused by the interactions of light, morphology and changes in heterotrophic feeding behavior. </li></ul><ul><li>Increased heterotrophy in the field, where zooplankton and particulate matter are available, should reduce incorporation of the heavier carbon isotope 13C into the coral skeleton because zooplankton and particulate matter are lower in 13C than seawater. </li></ul>
  29. 29. Disscusion <ul><li>In the laboratory, corals were supplied with filtered seawater which has comparatively low 13C due to the absence of  zooplankton . </li></ul><ul><li>A second explanation is that the field growth rates incorporate both winter and summer rates. When compared to the growth rate of in spring (when temperatures were most similar to those in the laboratory), laboratory growth rates (at 23 ° C) assume greater parity. </li></ul><ul><li>   </li></ul>
  30. 30. <ul><li>Some of the most structurally important scleractinian corals may be able to acclimatize to gradually warmer waters by hosting thermally tolerant symbionts </li></ul><ul><li>Symbiont genotype will affect the growth rate of some reef corals </li></ul><ul><li>The pressures of annual heat stress, ocean acidification and permanent symbiont changes on growth may act synergistically in compromising the competitiveness of these species to recover and compete between events and have implications to the future resilience and regeneration capacity of reefs. </li></ul>Conclusions
  31. 31. Questions <ul><li>How applicable these effects are to other coral/algal associations and localities? </li></ul><ul><li>Local studies vs global studies </li></ul><ul><ul><li>How we can use local or global studies address effects of global warming? </li></ul></ul>