Brand Tracker of Coca-Cola


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Brand Tracker of Coca-Cola

  1. 1. Early History and Evolution Coca Cola was invented by Dr John.S.Pemberton (pharmacist from Atlanta Georgia) in May1886. He concocted the formula in his backyard. Carbonated water was added to syrup to make it arefreshing drink. The flowing letters which has become the logo of the company today is the gift ofFrank Robinson (bookkeeper of Dr Pemberton). Till 1905 the drink was served with cocaine & wassupposed to be the remedy for headache. In 1887 Asa Candler (another pharmacist from Atlanta Georgia) bought the formula from DrPemberton for 2300$. Due to his aggressive marketing strategy Coca Cola’s sale went up by 4000%between 1890 and 1900. By the turn of the 20th century the product was being sold in US & Canada. In 1915, Pepsi went for bankruptcy & was offered to Coca Cola to take over as it was theonly other major soft drink in the country. But Coca Cola didn’t accepted that offer as they thought itto be a liability to take over a loss making company. A blunder that haunts Coca Cola till date. Coca Cola elevated itself from just a product to a symbol of patriotism during World War-IIwhen they decided to sell the drink to the military men for 5 cents per bottle (thereby obtaining thelicense of unlimited cultivation of sugar). This made it the drink of America. In 1963, Pepsi positioned itself as a product of youth. The strategy was so influential that itbecame like a trend in US that a person with a bottle of Pepsi in his hand was considered to be hipidentifying himself as a new age American & a person with a bottle of Coca Cola in his hand wasconsidered to be orthodox old age American. Coca Cola identified this trend & again invoke thepatriotic sentiments of the American by identifying itself as the drink of America which helped themretrieve the market which was lost to Pepsi. In 1985, Coca Cola did something unthinkable. They changed the taste of Coca Cola & thenew product was launched in the name of Coca Cola refresh. The strategy failed big time as therewas not only drop in the sales but there was wide spread feeling of dissatisfaction among Americanswho proclaimed that Coca Cola had robbed the drink of America. The issue was finally settled, asthey re-launched Coca Cola in the name of Coca Cola classic.In India Coca Cola was 1st launched in the late 1970’s. But FERA Act (1973) compelled them todiscontinue their operations in India. In early 1990’s in the new liberalized Indian economy, CocaCola came back with vengeance, acquiring dominant market brands like Thumps up (a product ofRPG) laying a platform for its operations in India. Initially, it targeted the high income group with high price & eye catchy advertisement. Laterit repositioned itself as a drink for the masses and slowly as the cost of operations became cheaper itpenetrated the market of middle & lower middle income group with the reduction in price. It has distinctively positioned itself in urban & rural India. With the yawning mind-set gapbetween the two markets, Coca Cola in urban India has positioned itself as a symbol of style &celebration, while in rural India it is essentially a product which quenches thirst.
  2. 2. Quantitative Research Model – BAV Refer to EXIBIT 1 (BAV-Quantitative Technique), which is attachedResearch MethodologyThe BAV model is a proprietary tool designed by Young & Rubicam. The BAV model is used tomeasure the current and future status of the brand vis-à-vis its competitors. The current status ofthe brand (also known as Brand Stature) is measured keeping in mind two main attributes -Knowledgeand Esteem. And the future status of the brand (also known as Brand Vitality) ismeasured keeping in mind two other attributes – Relevance and Differentiation.As the BAV is a proprietary tool an independent questionnaire was designed to gauge theconsumer’s perception across the 4 pillars on which BAV is based. Each pillar is assigned 100%weightage and this is split amongst the questions pertaining to them. Weights are assigned on thebasis of how direct and how comprehensive is the information that could be derived from thequestion.The calculation is done by totaling the number of responses (in some cases only the correctresponse) and adding them after the weightage of the question is allocated to a particular attributeor a brand. This is done for every question to arrive at a score for each brand. All the scores from thequestions pertaining to a specific pillar for a particular brand is added to get the final score for thatpillar for that brand. Once this is done, percentile is assigned on the basis of the final score receivedby each brand.In Q.5 and Q.7 we tried to check how the products are different from each other. So in Q.5 we gavesome attributes with which the products are already associated with. And in Q.7 we provided a setof corporate personalities, along with the name of the corporate, with which the products are notrelated and asked people to relate them. The product getting the highest response for a givenattribute/corporate personality was set as a standard and then it is being deducted from theresponses that other products gets for that following attribute/corporate personality. The differencebetween the entire product for the same attribute/corporate personality is then added and thengiven a weightage.Similarly Q.4 and Q.9 is framed. In Q.4 the respondent is asked a close ended question so thathe/she gives a response that comes certainly in his/her mind. And a same kind of question is askedin Q.9 but in a different manner and it is kept open ended so that the respondent think a little andthen give the response. Thus in one case we get a pseudo response and in one we get a trueresponse.The questionnaire is being deliberately jumbled so that it looks that the questions are not related tothe previous question and also because the respondents should look at all the questions as anindividual question. Similarly the options given in all the questions are jumbled.Sample Size53 respondent
  3. 3. Sampling PlanAll the respondent in the sample size are non-MBA students. This is done because the brands thatwe have taken are well known brands and management students knowing about the brand, aboutits positioning and marketing strategy will have a biased opinion. So we took non MBA’s to ensurethat the sample is unbiased.Instrument of Data CollectionQuestionnaire (Online Survey) QuestionnaireQ1What is the first brand that comes to your mind when you hear the words ‘Happiness’?Sprite Pepsi Coca-Cola Thumps UPQ2Identify the brands with their associated taglines? Not Sprite Coca-Cola Pepsi Thumps Up ApplicableRasta Clear HainChange the gamePyaasBhujaaoOpen HappinessAajkuchtoofanikartehainBelieve in a brightertomorrow
  4. 4. Q3Which soft drink would you prefer to serve your guest during small get together?Pepsi Thumps Up Coca-Cola SpriteQ4With which soft drink brand you associate yourself with?Sprite Coca-Cola Pepsi Thumps Up OthersQ5Which brand would you associate with the following attributes? Not Pepsi Thumps Up Sprite Coca-Cola ApplicableMacho and daringYouthPride and respectStreet smartQ6While buying a soft drink which are the factor important to you?Availability Taste Peer Pressure Thirst Quenching Fizz/Burp
  5. 5. Q7Associate the following personalities with 4 different brands Pepsi Coca-Cola Sprite Thumps UpRatan Tata (Tatagroups)Mark Zuckenberg(Facebook)Vijay Malya (Kingfisher)Lakshmi Mittal(ArcelorMittal Steel)Q8To which soft drink would you like to give an award as the “soft drink of the nation?”Pepsi Sprite Thumps Up Coca-ColaQ9The soft drink which you have consumed the maximum number of times in the last 3 months?Q10Explain yourself in one/two word(s)Q11Name of the respondent
  6. 6. Results and Analysis of BAVIndividual AnalysisThe percentile score of all the individual brands across differentiation, relevance, esteem andknowledge was calculated and then converted into graphs. Then the graphs are comparedto find outin which category( new, unrealized potential/niche, leadership, declining, eroded and unfocused) dothese brands lie. The brands that were analyzed are Pepsi, Thums Up and Sprite as they are thecompetitor of Coca-Cola.Pepsi Pepsi Awareness Esteem Relevance Differentiation 33.33 0 0 0 1In this case we can clearly see that the awareness level of Pepsi is the second lowest, second toSprite. Mainly this thing happened because both Pepsi and Sprite use the youth culture inadvertising their product. This brand has low stature and low vitality. So it is advisable that thecompany should look for a better option than Pepsi.
  7. 7. Thums Up Thums Up Awareness Esteem Relevance Differentiation 66.67 66.67 66.67 66.67This is a brand which has high stature and high vitality and thus has a high potential. It is a verystrong brand and a consistent one also.Sprite Sprite Awareness Esteem Relevance Differentiation 100 100 100 0This is a brand which have high potential but lack in the awareness attribute. The reason why it hasvery low awareness are: a)In the last 1.5 years Sprite has changed their advertisement campaign 3times-Sprite bujhaye only pyaasbaki sab bakwas, University of Freshology and Rasta Clear Hain(present one) b) Both Sprite and Pepsi emphasizes on the youth, so people get confused with whichto associate youth c) Limca presently came up with a tag line called ‘pyaasbarao’ which is similar toSprite’s previous tag line ‘Sprite bujhaye only pyaasbaki sab bakwas’
  8. 8. Coca-Cola Coca-Cola Awareness Esteem Relevance Differentiation 100 66.67 33.33 33.33Coca-Cola being a 125 years old brand proves how much strong presence it has in the minds ofpeople. Again in the case of esteem it is second best to Sprite. But when it comes to future of thisbrand it looks little shaky. The reason why it has low vitality might be the following: In the top 4 softdrink brands, 3 products are Cola product.Overall Analysis Brand Asset Valuator 100 50, 100 75 Brand Stature 66.67, 66.67 Coca-Cola 50 Pepsi 83.34, 33.33 25 Thums Up Sprite 0 16.67, 0 0.00 25.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 Brand Vitality
  9. 9. If we look at the overall BAV Grid then we can see that the best brand here is Thums Up. The scoreof this brand is constant in all the attributes. The next best brand is Sprite because it has a goodpotential. Coca-Cola being a old brand have high brand stature but low brand vitality.From the survey done by us few things were very clear to us, Taste(58%) and Thirst Quenching(40%)are the two major reason why people drink soft drink. And Spite automatically relates itself with theabove mentioned attributes because it has been positioned like that and fulfills the need of thepeople.One more thing that came to our notice is that both the sex prefers Spite. Generally the fair sex donot like cola drink. But they like to have a drink which has fizz. And Sprite caters to that need. Againas both the sex like Sprite, so during small get together Sprite is more demanding.We adopted a customised version of ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique) for theQualitative Research of our Project of Brand Image Perception on Coca Cola. This was because of thelimitation we had in terms of selection of population.
  10. 10. Qualitative Technique-ZMET Refer to EXIBIT 2, which is attachedWe have chosen ZMET over R&G’s Laddering Method because of the following reasons:-• Our brand was Coca cola which is a lifestyle product and in addition to taste a lot of otherthings make the consumer buy the product which can be expressed more clearly by Elicitation thennormal Q&A.• The customised model of ZMET which we developed was helpful in determining how andwhy the consumer relates itself with brand.• In addition to the previous point we were also able to find out what are the other attributeswhich consumer think the brand has which our respondents don’t relate to.Steps Followed in Qualitative Research1. Story Telling about the pictures- We asked the respondents to select 10 pictures out of setof 32 which they think relates to their own character or personality. A bit of laddering was done tofind out how it relates to their personality.2. Connection with the brand- We asked them to select 3 pictures out of those 10 pictureswhich they think relates to the brand Coca cola. This was done to find out how respondents connecttheir personality with the brand. Similar process was repeated with other brands like Pepsi, ThumpsUp and Sprite to remove biasness among the respondents.3. Missing Image- We ask the respondents to select 1 more picture either from the selected 10or from the initial 32 or any other picture which they can describe, which they can relate to thebrand. This was done to find which all other attributes, which they think the brand has, but notnecessarily related to their own personality. The same process was repeated for other brands toremove biasness.4. Audio visual image- The respondents were then asked to describe any audio visual, be itmovie, scene of the movie, song, play, etc which they think connects with the brand. The objectiveof this exercise was same as mentioned in point 3. The same process was repeated for other brandas well to remove biasness.
  11. 11. Pictorial AnalysisSimilarities among respondent• Family Oriented• Fun Loving• Perfectionist• Responsible• Friendly• Innovator• Attention Seeker• Focussed• Happy• Positive Attitude• Refreshing• Reserved• Socially ResponsibleAttributes which connect the consumer with the brand• Family Drink• Friend Drink
  12. 12. • Happiness• Perfect Brand• Refreshing BrandThe brand has the following attributes in addition of the above• Celebration• Evergreen• Numero Uno• Thirst QuenchingIt is concluded that Coca-Cola is not merely a Numero Uno brand but “The Perfect Brand”. It hasstood through thick and thin and this evergreen quality has made Coca-Cola a brand that symbolizescelebration and happiness. It is a refreshing brand that quenches the thirst and is shared with familyand friends.