Educational leadership-policy-standards-isllc-2008


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
1 Comment
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Educational leadership-policy-standards-isllc-2008

  1. 1. ISLLCEducational Leadership Policy Standards:2008As Adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration
  2. 2. Educational LeadershipPolicy Standards: ISLLC 2008 As Adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration Copyright © 2008 by the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC Contributions made by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration All rights reserved.
  3. 3. Council of Chief State School OfficersThe Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) is a nonpartisan, nation-wide, nonprofit organization of public officials who head departments ofelementary and secondary education in the states, the District of Columbia,the Department of Defense Education Activity, and five U.S. extra-statejurisdictions. CCSSO provides leadership, advocacy, and technical assistanceon major educational issues. The Council seeks member consensus onmajor educational issues and expresses their views to civic and professionalorganizations, federal agencies, Congress, and the public.Rick Melmer (South Dakota), PresidentElizabeth Burmaster (Wisconsin), Past PresidentT. Kenneth James (Arkansas), President-ElectGene Wilhoit, Executive DirectorOne Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20001-1431Phone (202) 336-7000Fax (202) 408-8072www.ccsso.orgNational Policy Board for Educational AdministrationThe following organizations and councils are members of the NationalPolicy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA): American Associationof Colleges for Teacher Education, American Association of SchoolAdministrators, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,Council of Chief State School Officers, National Association of ElementarySchool Principals, National Association of Secondary School Principals,National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, National Councilof Professors of Educational Administration, National School BoardsAssociation, and University Council for Educational Administration.For the past two years, the NPBEA Interstate School Leaders LicensureConsortium (ISLLC) Steering Committee has been revising the ISLLCStandards. This steering committee asked each NPBEA organization toobtain input from its respective constituencies regarding the revision of theISLLC Standards. The NPBEA/ISLLC Steering Committee also created anational Research Panel that identified the research base for updating theseISLLC Standards. This document presents the updated standards, explainsthe research behind the revisions, and provides other material explaininghow the policy standards can be used.The Wallace FoundationThe Wallace Foundation supported the development of EducationalLeadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008 as part of its long-term commitmentto develop and share knowledge, ideas, and insights aimed at increasingunderstanding of how education leadership can contribute to improvedstudent learning. Many of the resources cited in this publication and othermaterials on education leadership can be downloaded for free
  4. 4. Table of Contents Foreword 1 I. Introduction 3 II. Policy Standards: Building a Better Vision for Leadership 5 III. Research O ers New Insight on Education Leadership 9 IV. A Comprehensive Strategy to Improve Education Leadership 11 V. Educational Leadership Policy Standards 14 VI. Making the Standards Work 16 Appendix 1: Comparing ISLLC 1996 and ISLLC 2008 18 Appendix 2: ISLLC 2008 at a Glance 19 Appendix 3: Glossary of Terms 20 Acknowledgements NPBEA Members 21 NPBEA/ISLLC Steering Committee Members 22 NPBEA Research Panel Members 23 Bibliography 24 To review the extensive collection of research that was studied during the development of the policy standards and additional research conducted subsequent to this work, please go to: www.
  5. 5. Dear Colleagues:We are very pleased to announce the publication of Educational Leadership Policy Standards:ISLLC 2008, as adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA). We have been privileged over the past two years to co-chair NPBEA’s Steering Committee.Convened by NPBEA (the member organizations are listed on page 21) in response to requestsfrom our constituents for updated leadership standards, the Steering Committee developedand guided a process for updating the 1996 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium(ISLLC) Standards for School Leaders. We relied heavily on professional groups and stakeholdersthroughout the process, and the new standards are the result of this national collaboration. Theyincorporate what has been learned about education leadership in the past decade and addressthe changing policy context of American education. These standards retain the structure or “footprint” of the six original ISLLC Standards, butthey are written for new purposes and audiences. Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC2008 reinforces the proposition in the original ISLLC Standards that leaders’ primary responsibil-ity is to improve teaching and learning for all children. However, the updated standards areexplicitly policy-oriented because the 1996 ISLLC Standards for School Leaders have been sowidely used as a model for state education leadership policies. We are committed to gathering reactions to and learning from experience with these newpolicy standards in order to keep them vibrant in the ever-changing education policy arena.We encourage you to contact your respective organizational representatives with your feedbackon Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008. These standards are intended to enhancethe field by stimulating dialogue about a new conception of education leadership that willimprove policies and practices nationwide.Sincerely,Richard A. Flanary Joseph H. SimpsonCo-Chair, NPBEA Steering Committee Co-Chair, NPBEA Steering Committee
  6. 6. Foreword By Gene Wilhoit Executive Director, CCSSOEducation leadership is more important than research on education leadership conductedever. States recognize that schools and dis- over the past decade, while Part IV explainstricts will not meet demanding requirements how policy standards form the foundationfor improving achievement without effective for a continuum of policies and activities thatleaders. This publication, Educational guide education leaders throughout theirLeadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008, careers. Part V presents the new policyrepresents the latest set of high-level policystandards for education leadership. It These standards reflect the newprovides guidance to state policymakers as information and lessons learnedthey work to improve education leadershippreparation, licensure, evaluation, and about education leadership.professional development. standards, while Part VI describes specific As adopted by the National Policy Board activities, such as leadership academies andfor Educational Administration (NPBEA), professional development, that can bethese standards reflect the wealth of new guided by ISLLC 2008.information and lessons learned about This standards document builds on theeducation leadership over the past decade. Council of Chief State School Officers’This document, which introduces the tradition of leadership in this area. TheEducational Leadership Policy Standards: Interstate School Leaders Licensure ConsortiumISLLC 2008 (hereafter referred to as ISLLC (ISLLC) Standards for School Leaders (hereafter2008), shows the importance of policy referred to as ISLLC 1996) were written bystandards to leadership-related activities. representatives from states and professional Part I discusses the high-profile demands associations in a partnership with NPBEA inplaced on education leaders to raise student 1994–95, supported by grants from theachievement and the role that policy Pew Charitable Trusts and the Danforthstandards can play in helping them meet Foundation. The standards were publishedthese growing expectations. Part II describes by CCSSO in 1996.the differences between ISLLC 2008 and the Recognizing the importance of updatingoriginal leadership standards, reviews the that work, The Wallace Foundation providedupdating process, and makes the case for the support to review the growing base ofdevelopment of the new policy standards. research on education leadership and toPart III describes some of the highlights from disseminate ISLLC 2008. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 1
  7. 7. While it was clear that school leaders were ISLLC Standards for School Leaders in their essential to the smooth and efficient opera- entirety or as a template for developing their tion of schools, when the 1996 standards own standards. With these guiding standards were developed there was little research or in place, states have been much more consensus on the characteristics of good successful in addressing school leadership school leaders, the role principals play in and needs at each stage of an education raising student achievement, and the best leader’s career. policies and practices for expanding the These much-anticipated updated policy nation’s pool of effective administrators. standards would not have been possible In developing the new standards, NPBEA without the tireless dedication of several consulted with policy-oriented, practitioner- groups and individuals. For over ten years, based organizations, researchers, higher they have dedicated themselves to improv- education officials, and leaders in the field. ing the leadership of our nation’s schools. NPBEA also worked with a panel of scholars States should review the new policy stan- and experts in education administration to dards and use them to shape, develop, and identify the research base for updating help implement the policies and practices ISLLC 1996—research that previously did that will give our nation’s children the leaders not exist. they need and deserve to succeed in the 21st These standards helped lay the foundation century. Most states have made important necessary for states to develop—and be progress toward improving their school more informed as they built and supported leaders, but more work needs to be done, —various levels of the educator system, from particularly to support and train leaders at all preparation and induction to professional stages along the career continuum. We development and performance evaluation. believe these policy standards will provide Since then, 43 states have used the 1996 the foundation for this work.2 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  8. 8. I.IntroductionOver the past decade, dramatic changes have from ‘whether’ leadership really matters or isput education leadership at the forefront worth the investment, to ‘how’ to train, place,of education policy research and debate. and support high-quality leadership whereResearch has taught us that school leaders it’s needed the most: in the schools andare crucial to improving instruction and districts where failure remains at epidemicraising student achievement. At the policy levels,” wrote Wallace Foundation Presidentlevel, school performance measures have M. Christine DeVita in A Bridge to Schoolbeen codified in state and federal law to hold Reform. Unfortunately, the same report alsoschools increasingly accountable for raising noted that “states are only beginning to putstudent achievement among students fromall population subgroups. At the same time, ISLLC 2008 keeps the “footprint” of theschools are under pressure to produce high original ISLLC standards, but is writtenschool graduates who are better trainedand who can adapt to an ever-changing for new purposes and audiences.workplace. together coherent systems that reliably These mounting demands are rewriting achieve the goal of placing an appropriate,administrators’ job descriptions every year, well-trained principal in every school.”making them more complex than ever. Fortunately, the last decade has producedToday, education leaders must not only more research than ever about educationmanage school finances, keep buses running leadership and the role that school leaderson time, and make hiring decisions, but they can and should play in raising studentmust also be instructional leaders, data achievement. One of the clearest lessonsanalysts, community relations officers, and from this research is that the states that arechange agents. They have to be able to using education leadership standards are onmobilize staff and employ all the tools in an the right track. According to an extensiveexpanded toolbox. review of the research literature funded by Clear and consistent standards can help The Wallace Foundation, goal- and vision-them do this. ISLLC 2008 will help state policy- setting, which are articulated in the stan-makers strengthen selection, preparation, dards, are areas in which education leaderslicensure, and professional development for can have the most impact. Standards andeducation leaders—giving these leaders the other guidelines have been shown to betools they need to meet new demands. essential tools in developing effective “The national conversation has shifted pre-service training programs for principals. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 3
  9. 9. Therefore, incorporating clear and consistent educator development. Standards are the standards and expectations into a statewide foundation and can inform all components of education system can be a core predictor of an aligned and cohesive system—prepara- strong school leadership. tion, licensing, induction, and professional Drawing on this new knowledge allows development. They can help states set expec- policymakers and educators to devote more tations for licensure, guide improvements in time and energy to strategies that have been administrator preparation programs at shown to work. ISLLC 2008 is meant to serve colleges and universities, and influence the process for screening and hiring leaders, even at the level of local school boards. Just as importantly, they can set parameters for developing assessment instruments, practice standards, and professional development to facilitate performance growth toward expert practice. Additionally, they can inform state poli- cies, not just for those coming into the field, but for all leaders as they move through their careers. These standards can help to further clarify expectations for professional develop- ment and the performance of veteran principals. Ultimately, the standards can help states create a seamless set of supporting policies and activities that span the career continuum of an education leader. This document presents the newly as a foundational piece for policymakers as adopted NPBEA standards coupled with the they assess current goals, regulations, growing research base available on educa- policies, and practices of education leaders. tion leadership and suggestions for how These policy standards can be used by standards can help serve as the foundation of policymakers to think about their system of an entire system of educator development.4 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  10. 10. II.Policy Standards:Building a Better Vision for LeadershipISLLC 2008 is designed to serve as a broad set ● How does a district or school evaluateof national guidelines that states can use the skills and dispositions of a candidateas a model for developing or updating their to improve student performance?own standards. These standards provide ● How does one evaluate appropriatehigh-level guidance and insight about the continuing education programs ortraits, functions of work, and responsibilities mentoring of new principals?they will ask of their school and district ● How does one evaluate existing schoolleaders. Using the policy standards as a leaders in meeting accountability goals?foundation, states can create a commonlanguage and bring consistency to education Responding to the Fieldleadership policy at all levels so that there In the fast-changing education policy envi-are clear expectations. ronment, a set of standards is only as good as Gene Wilhoit, the executive director of the the input on which it is based. ISLLC 2008Council of Chief State School Officers, addresses changes in the field and respondsdescribes policy standards as the first step to input from practitioners and policytoward creating comprehensive, locally leaders. Among the concerns addressed istailored approaches for developing andretaining high-quality leaders. The ultimate These standards provide high-levelgoal of these standards, as with any set of guidance and insight about theeducation standards, is to raise studentachievement. These standards contribute to traits, functions of work, andthis effort by improving coordination among responsibilities expected of schoolpolicymakers, education leaders, and and district leaders.organizations. They do this by beginning toanswer questions such as: the fact that the 1996 standards were too● How do schools of education know what restrictive, as the very nature of listing education leaders need to know as it examples of leadership indicators was relates to every child meeting academic unintentionally limiting and negated other achievement standards? areas that could have been included in an● How can schools of education effectively exhaustive listing. convey that knowledge in a coherent The new standards also respond to fashion? concerns that the 1996 standards “froze” leadership preparation programs. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 5
  11. 11. ISLLC 2008 is intended to encourage more recommendations regarding how the policy flexibility in how leadership preparation standards in this publication can be used to programs define and view leadership. Also, influence leadership practice and policy. by providing a representative sample of Other points of comparison between ISLLC empirical research, the new standards 1996 and ISLLC 2008 include: provide background material that was not ● The language and framework of the six contained in the 1996 standards. “broad standards” are similar, yet not The most fundamental change, however, identical. responds to the recognition that when ● “Indicators” are not listed in the revised implementing the 1996 standards, some policy standards as they were in the 1996 institutions used them differently, confusing version. Policy standards are there to set policy standards with practice standards overall guidance and vision. and/or program standards. Consequently, ● Significantly, “functions” that define each this document states unequivocally, in its title standard have been added to replace the and elsewhere, that the standards here are knowledge, skills, and dispositions. It is policy standards and are designed to be here that research findings and feedback discussed at the policymaking level to set from NPBEA and its members are policy and vision. NPBEA and other organiza- addressed. tions also are engaged in efforts to make Improving Leadership Standards Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008 organizes the functions that help de ne strong school leadership under six standards. These standards represent the broad, high-priority themes that education leaders must address in order to promote the success of every student. These six standards call for: 1. Setting a widely shared vision for learning; 2. Developing a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and sta professional growth; 3. Ensuring e ective management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, e cient, and e ective learning environment; 4. Collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources; 5. Acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner; and 6. Understanding, responding to, and in uencing the political, social, legal, and cultural contexts.6 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  12. 12. ● While the titles of the standards and this research identified and the interest in design- publication have been changed to make ing an interactive forum that can be regularly clear that they are policy standards, the updated by researchers and practitioners, “ISLLC” moniker remains. Because so this information has been compiled into a many states have adopted the ISLLC database now available online at standards in one form or another, it is important to maintain this link. The initial research base, identified by the NPBEA research panel, contains empiricalDeveloping the Policy Standards research reports as well as policy analyses,The new standards flow from a two-yearrevision process led by NPBEA. In revisingISLLC 1996, NPBEA consulted with its memberorganizations (see member list on page 21)and other policy-oriented, practitioner-basedorganizations, researchers, higher educationofficials, and leaders in the field. Additionally,NPBEA created a panel of scholars andexperts in education administration toidentify the research base for updating ISLLC1996—a majority of this research did notexist when those original standards werepublished. The NPBEA/ISLLC Steering Committee (seepage 22 for a complete list) carried out itswork in several phases. Each NPBEA memberorganization identified a strategy to obtainmembership input regarding the revision ofISLLC 1996. Once a draft of the revisedstandards was complete, the NPBEASteering Committee distributed copies toand gathered feedback from NPBEA memberorganizations, other professional groups, and leadership texts, and other resourcesthe research panel. considered to be “craft knowledge” and The research panel was charged with “sources of authority” in the field.identifying a research base for updating ISLLC Based on this extensive process of input1996 and for users of the updated standards. and feedback, the NPBEA Steering Commit-Because of the extensive nature of the tee revised drafts and finalized ISLLC 2008, EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 7
  13. 13. recommending the standards for adoption The policy standards in this publication by the NPBEA Executive Board. will form the foundation for further thought, Starting in January 2008, NPBEA began research, dialogue, and debate on creating updating the Educational Leadership standards and guidelines that specifically Constituent Council (ELCC) Program meet the needs of practitioners. The intent Standards, which are used by the National of NPBEA is to continue to refine the process Council for Accreditation of Teacher Educa- of policy standard revision so that the tion (NCATE) to review preparation programs standards reflect changes in the knowledge in education leadership. The 2002 ELCC base. ISLLC 2008 will serve as a catalyst for Program Standards are based on the original research efforts to study the implementation ISLLC 1996. Updating them will contribute and effects of these policy standards and to a coherent vision and system of leadership the program and practice expectations that can guide state policies and aligned with or resulting from the policy leadership programs. standards. Setting the Stage for ISLLC 2008 The following principles set the direction and priorities during the development of the new policy standards: 1. Re ect the centrality of student learning; 2. Acknowledge the changing role of the school leader; 3. Recognize the collaborative nature of school leadership; 4. Improve the quality of the profession; 5. Inform performance-based systems of assessment and evaluation for school leaders; 6. Demonstrate integration and coherence; and 7. Advance access, opportunity, and empowerment for all members of the school community.8 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  14. 14. III.Research Offers New Insighton Education LeadershipAs noted in The Wallace Foundation 2007 In How Leadership Influences Student Learning,report, A Bridge to School Reform, until they report that direct and indirect leader-recently there was little evidence about what ship effects account for about one-quarter ofeffective education leadership looks like and total school effects on student learning.the best ways to evaluate this leadership. Effective principals and school administra-In the past decade, a new research literature tors set the organizational direction andhas filled this void. The research has drawn culture that influences how their teachersattention to the crucial connection between perform. According to How Leadershipschool leadership and student achievement.It gives state officials, education leaders, and Studies find leadership is secondthe institutions that train school leaders new only to classroom instruction inresources to guide their standards, policies,and practices. influencing student outcomes. ISLLC 2008 reflects the input of over 100 Influences Student Learning, the categoryresearch projects and studies, which helped called “setting directions” is the area in whichguide the standards revision process and, education leaders have the greatest impact,ultimately, influence the standards presented as the goals and sense of purpose theyin this document. provide strengthens the entire staff. Strong education leaders also attract,Effective Leaders Promote retain, and get the most out of talentedBetter Teaching teachers. Drawing on previous researchThis research consistently points out that reviews, Leithwood and his colleaguesstates and districts are right to focus on stan- judged the research supporting thisdards for education leaders. School leaders conclusion “substantial” and that effectiveare critical to helping improve student education leaders can enhance teachers’performance. Research now shows that performance by providing targeted support,leadership is second only to classroom modeling best practice, and offeringinstruction among school-related factors that intellectual stimulation.influence student outcomes, according to an Research also finds that successful leader-extensive review of the research literature ship preparation programs—particularlyconducted in 2004 by Kenneth Leithwood, those that train principals who are willingKaren Seashore Louis, Stephen Anderson, and able to work in our most challengingand Kyla Wahlstrom. schools—are modeled and organized around EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 9
  15. 15. clear goals for systemwide values and Making the Connections Among State, District learning. A 2007 report by Linda Darling- and School Policies and Practices (2006), there Hammond and colleagues at Stanford are three core system elements (namely University found that exemplary pre- and standards, training, and conditions) that in-service development programs for determine the quality of school leadership. principals have many common components, Adequate training and the right mix of including “a comprehensive and coherent incentives and conditions are needed to help curriculum aligned to state and professional facilitate strong leadership. But the most standards, in particular the NCATE/Interstate important element is “standards that spell School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) out clear expectations about what leaders standards, which emphasize instructional need to know and do to improve instruction leadership.” and learning and that form the basis for According to Leadership for Learning: holding them accountable for results.”10 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  16. 16. IV.A Comprehensive Strategyto Improve Education LeadershipISLLC 2008 should be the starting point for Training Programs with Establishedfuture thought, research, dialogue, and Performance Expectationsdebate about standards for school leaders. Serving as a foundation, these policyCCSSO and NPBEA envision these standards standards are well poised to influence andas the foundation for a comprehensive drive training and preparation programs.framework that addresses each stage of an ISLLC 2008 plays out at the preparationeducation leader’s career. The new policy program level by establishing performancestandards build on ISLLC 1996 and expectations and lends itself to aid in and cancomplement other standards and expecta- facilitate curriculum development, candidatetions related to education leadership. assessment, and accountability. Certainly As a set of policy standards, ISLLC 2008 ISLLC 2008 is already informing the NCATEoffers high-level guidance to policymakers accreditation process and the programand education leaders as they set goals and standards that guide NCATE’s work. In 2002,design their own standards. Because the NPBEA-appointed Educational Leader-improving student achievement at the state ship Constituent Council released Standardslevel requires coordinated policies to for Advanced Programs in Educational Leader-cultivate excellent leadership at the school ship; they are now reviewing those standardsand district levels, policy standards establish so that they will be aligned with ISLLC 2008.common goals for policymakers and The CCSSO State Consortium on Educationorganizations as they form policies regarding Leadership (SCEL) will release in the spring ofschool leadership and set statewide goals for 2008 Performance Expectations and Indicatorsschool leadership development. for Education Leaders: A Companion Guide to These policy standards were updated to the Educational Leadership Policy Standards—provide a framework for policy creation, ISLLC 2008. Describing those expectationstraining program performance, life-long through dispositions, elements, andcareer development, and system support. indicators will help to operationalize theGiven their broad nature, they can influence policy standards at a more granular level.and drive many system supports andchanges which will ultimately lead to Licensing and Inductioneffective instructional leadership that In turn, ISLLC 2008 can inform licensingpositively impacts student achievement and induction programs, which assess new(please refer to graphic on page 13). leader professional knowledge. This helps to ensure that the new leaders in the system can EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 11
  17. 17. demonstrate adequate professional knowl- Performance-Based Principal Evaluation. These edge before moving into their position. These evaluations, developed collaboratively by policy standards are an anchor and will help the Missouri Department of Elementary states formulate in very concrete and direct and Secondary Education and the state’s terms what they expect of their school 17 preparation institutions, set out what leaders entering the profession. high-quality education leadership looks like and what school and district leaders must Evaluating Performance be able to do. Missouri has shown that policy States additionally have the ability to set standards can form the basis for ongoing guidelines for evaluating performance of professional development throughout the their school leaders and can use ISLLC 2008 as career continuum. They allow one to think a basis for this work. These evaluative about continuous improvement through measures must be performance-based and high-quality career development and can more readily formalize what is expected planning. Taken to a different level of of each leader in the system. Many states granularity, these standards can also serve have successfully implemented assessment as a basis for developing descriptors structures to ensure that there are resources of practice from aspiring to retiring. in place to continually evaluate leaders’ performance. The Wallace Foundation has Improving Working Conditions funded a large evaluation effort with As articulated previously, ISLLC 2008 is Vanderbilt University. In the fall of 2008, the designed to provide a framework and Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in foundation as each state develops and aligns Education (Val-Ed) will be available. It was its expectations for education leaders. As developed in recognition that leader assess- states and districts work toward all of these ment is an important step in evaluating improvements, they must also consider school performance and is a key determinant improving working conditions. ISLLC 2008 can of student success. Linking the assessment to drive and influence how one aligns and ISLLC 2008 helps states, districts, and schools assigns roles, responsibilities, and authority. create an aligned performance-based system. They can also form the basis for implement- ing incentives for leaders to choose certain Supporting Leaders Throughout positions in specific locations. They can the Career Continuum additionally serve as the foundation in devel- Many states have recognized the need for oping an advanced professional certification continuing evaluation. Missouri, for example for leaders. Making systemwide changes to has developed the Performance-Based the work environment can certainly help Superintendent Evaluation and the leaders meet their professional goals.12 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  18. 18. V.Educational Leadership Policy StandardsEducationalLeadershipPolicy Standards:ISLLC 2008 Standard 1 Standard 1:as adopted by An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development,the National PolicyBoard for Educational articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared andAdministration supported by all stakeholders.(NPBEA) on Functions:December 12, 2007. A. Collaboratively develop and implement a shared vision and mission B. Collect and use data to identify goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and promote organizational learning C. Create and implement plans to achieve goals D. Promote continuous and sustainable improvement E. Monitor and evaluate progress and revise plans Standard 2 Standard 1: An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. Functions: A. Nurture and sustain a culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations B. Create a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular program C. Create a personalized and motivating learning environment for students D. Supervise instruction E. Develop assessment and accountability systems to monitor student progress F. Develop the instructional and leadership capacity of staff G. Maximize time spent on quality instruction H. Promote the use of the most effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning I. Monitor and evaluate the impact of the instructional program Standard 3 Standard 1: An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Functions: A. Monitor and evaluate the management and operational systems B. Obtain, allocate, align, and efficiently utilize human, fiscal, and technological resources C. Promote and protect the welfare and safety of students and staff D. Develop the capacity for distributed leadership E. Ensure teacher and organizational time is focused to support quality instruction and student learning14 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  19. 19. Standard 4Standard 1:An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty andcommunity members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizingcommunity resources.Functions:A. Collect and analyze data and information pertinent to the educational environmentB. Promote understanding, appreciation, and use of the community’s diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resourcesC. Build and sustain positive relationships with families and caregiversD. Build and sustain productive relationships with community partners Standard 5Standard 1:An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness,and in an ethical manner.Functions:A. Ensure a system of accountability for every student’s academic and social successB. Model principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behaviorC. Safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversityD. Consider and evaluate the potential moral and legal consequences of decision-makingE. Promote social justice and ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling Standard 6Standard 1:An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to,and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.Functions:A. Advocate for children, families, and caregiversB. Act to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learningC. Assess, analyze, and anticipate emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt leadership strategies EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 15
  20. 20. VI.Making the Standards Work Educational Leadership Policy Standards: the system. Just as importantly, they can set ISLLC 2008 is now ready for state policymak- parameters for developing professional ers to adopt or adapt as they develop development and evaluation systems that coherent education leadership policies that can readily facilitate performance growth of promote student success. These standards all education leaders. By and large, states are the first step toward creating innovative have yet to evaluate performance assess- policies and programs that ensure our invest- ments for education leaders against policy ments of time and resources deliver the best standards—this is a promising area for possible results for our schools. pioneering states. Ensuring that the standards are used at different levels of education leadership to Guidance for Leadership influence student achievement should be the Academy Activities primary goal for policymakers. By painting a New, comprehensive systems of education portrait of effective education leadership— leadership standards are only as good as their the traits and objectives that all education implementation. To ensure that these leaders should share—the standards enable standards improve education leadership state policymakers to guide improvements. statewide, policymakers should consider While Part IV described in more general terms creating or expanding leadership academies how these standards can drive and influence for school and district leaders. These acade- different parts of the educator development mies create opportunities to bring together system, here are some specific examples in faculty members from leadership preparation making standards work. programs throughout a particular state and improve the coordination and consistency of Setting Common Expectations expectations for education leaders. For As a national standards document, ISLLC example, Missouri’s Department of Elemen- 2008 can help state leaders create a common tary and Secondary Education operates a language when discussing expectations for leadership academy in cooperation with education leaders. They bring greater university-based preparation programs that consistency to education leadership policy, provides standards-based evaluation and while providing high-level guidance that can professional development for education serve as the foundation for other portions of leaders.16 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  21. 21. Improving Professional Development Maximizing Returns for Student ResultsThe policy standards outlined in this publica- By drawing on the latest research on educa-tion can be used in evaluating current tion leadership, these new standards orientprofessional development offerings for policymakers toward the most importanteducation leaders. Ohio’s Department of aspects of education leadership, allowingEducation has collaborated with the state them to maximize the impact of limitedelementary and secondary principals resources on student achievement. Stateassociations to create a two-year induction policymakers can adopt or adapt them intoprogram for new principals. Each new statute and/or regulation. Chief state schoolprincipal selects a content track for perform- officers can work closely with governors andance-based professional development based legislators to pass new standards and policieson ISLLC 1996. However, states can do much and allocate funding for implementation.more to create standards-based mentoring These standards can also provide greaterprograms for educational leaders and clarity to the public by outlining thecollect performance data that link areas of expectations we should have for each andweakness to professional learning plans every leader.for leaders. ISLLC 2008 supports the role of principals as instructional leaders and the importanceStrengthening State Systems of sound education leadership at all levels toStates need to do more to comprehensively raising student achievement—and offersmonitor and report the impact that prepara- concrete policy recommendations that flowtion and professional development programs from these standards. As such, they are anare having on the quality of education important resource for guiding the nextleadership—ISLLC 2008 can help with this generation of education leadership policiestask. Some states have taken initial steps: and programs.Delaware, for example, has developed assess-ments to report on preparation programs;and Kentucky has commissioned validationstudies on certification exams. Standards-based professional evaluation remainsan area ripe for additional development andleadership by states. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 17
  22. 22. Appendix 1: Comparing ISLLC 1996 and ISLLC 2008Changes made to the text of each standard are underlined below.ISLLC Standards for School Leaders (1996) Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008STANDARD 1: STANDARD 1: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes An education leader promotes the success of every studentthe success of all students by facilitating the development, by facilitating the development, articulation,articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learninglearning that is shared and supported by the school community. that is shared and supported by all stakeholders.Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions: 29 Functions: 5STANDARD 2: STANDARD 2: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes An education leader promotes the success of every studentthe success of all students by advocating, nurturing, and sus- by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culturetaining a school culture and instructional program conducive and instructional program conducive to student learningto student learning and staff professional growth. and staff professional growth.Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions: 39 Functions: 9STANDARD 3: STANDARD 3: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes An education leader promotes the success of every studentthe success of all students by ensuring management of the by ensuring management of the organization, operations,organization, operations, and resources for a safe, efficient, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learningand effective learning environment. environment.Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions: 38 Functions: 5STANDARD 4: STANDARD 4: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes An education leader promotes the success of every studentthe success of all students by collaborating with families and by collaborating with faculty and community members,community members, responding to diverse community responding to diverse community interests and needs,interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources. and mobilizing community resources.Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions: 29 Functions: 4 STANDARD 5: STANDARD 5:A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes An education leader promotes the success of every studentthe success of all students by acting with integrity, fairness, by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner.and in an ethical manner.Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions: 29 Functions: 5STANDARD 6: STANDARD 6: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes An education leader promotes the success of every studentthe success of all students by understanding, responding to, by understanding, responding to, and influencingand influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal, the ** political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.and cultural context.Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions: 19 Functions: 318 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  23. 23. Appendix 2: ISLLC 2008 at a Glance Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008 An education leader promotes the success of every student by... STANDARDS FUNCTIONS Facilitating the development, A. Collaboratively B. Collect and use C. Create and D. Promote E. Monitor and articulation, implementation, develop and data to identify implement plans continuous and evaluate progress and stewardship of a vision of implement a goals, assess orga- to achieve goals sustainable and revise plans learning that is shared and shared vision nizational e ec- improvement supported by all stakeholders and mission tiveness, and promote organiza- 1 tional learning Advocating, nurturing, and A. Nurture and B. Create a C. Create a D. Supervise E. Develop assess- F. Develop the G. Maximize time H. Promote the I. Monitor and sustaining a school culture and sustain a culture comprehensive, personalized and instruction ment and instructional and spent on quality use of the most evaluate the instructional program conducive of collaboration, rigorous, and motivating accountability leadership instruction e ective and impact of the to student learning and sta trust, learning, coherent learning environ- systems to capacity of sta appropriate instructional professional growth and high curricular ment for students monitor student technologies to program expectations program progress support teaching 2 and learning Ensuring management of the A. Monitor and B. Obtain, C. Promote and D. Develop the E. Ensure teacher organization, operation, and evaluate the allocate, align, protect the capacity for and organiza- resources for a safe, e cient, management and and e ciently welfare and safety distributed tional time is and e ective learning operational utilize human, of students leadership focused to support environment systems scal, and techno- and sta quality instruction logical resources and student 3 learning Collaborating with faculty and A. Collect and B. Promote under- C. Build and D. Build and community members, responding analyze data and standing, appreci- sustain positive sustain productive to diverse community interests information ation, and use of relationships with relationships with and needs, and mobilizing pertinent to the the community’s families and community community resources educational diverse cultural, caregivers partners environment social, and intel- 4 lectual resources Acting with integrity, fairness, A. Ensure a system B. Model principles C. Safeguard D. Consider and E. Promote social and in an ethical manner of accountability of self-awareness, the values of evaluate the justice and ensure for every student’s re ective practice, democracy, equity, potential moral that individual academic and transparency, and and diversity and legal student needs social success ethical behavior consequences of inform all aspects decision-making of schooling 5 Understanding, responding to, and in uencing the political, social, economic, legal, and A. Advocate for B. Act to in uence children, families, local, district, and caregivers state, and C. Assess, analyze, and anticipate emerging trends cultural context national decisions and initiatives inEDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 a ecting student order to adapt learning leadership19 6 strategies
  24. 24. Appendix 3: Glossary of Terms Craft Knowledge: Abilities, awareness, infor- Program Standards: Guide curriculum mation, and other accumulated knowledge planning, program and candidate assessment based on field and classroom experience. design, and implementation of the accredita- tion process for school building and district Empirical: A type of evidence “gained from leadership preparation programs at colleges observation or experiment rather than and universities undergoing NCATE theory” (Source: Webster’s II: New Riverside accreditation. Dictionary). Results: Outputs and outcomes achieved by Function: The action or actions for which a an organization. person or thing is responsible. Stakeholders: Individuals or groups that Policy Standards: High-level, broad national might be affected by a particular action standards that policymakers and states use as and/or activity. a model for developing their own policy standards. Policy standards are typically used Standards: The knowledge and skills that for visioning, policy development, and should be mastered in order to achieve a identifying general goals for education level of proficiency in a particular area. leaders. Standards are also a means of setting criteria for accomplishing or judging a particular Practice Standards: Observable behaviors activity or event. and actions required to meet performance standards. They are measurable and can be Systematic: Processes that are repeatable used as guides to establish individual and predictable, rather than anecdotal performance goals, professional develop- and episodic. ment plans, and evaluation conferences within a system of continuous improvement Systemic: Interrelatedness and interdepend- focused on expert performance. ency of parts and people within the system.20 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  25. 25. AcknowledgementsNational Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA) MembersNPBEA is committed to improving educational administration and practice by fostering modelsfor the preparation and professional development of educational leaders and improvingcertification standards. The development of ISLLC 2008 was a product of the collaborationamong the leaders from each NPBEA membership organization.American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE)Sharon P. Robinson, President and CEOAmerican Association of School Administrators (AASA)Paul D. Houston, Executive DirectorAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)Gene R. Carter, Executive DirectorCouncil of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)Gene Wilhoit, Executive DirectorNational Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP)Gail Connelly, Executive DirectorNational Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP)Gerald N. Tirozzi, Executive DirectorNational Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)Arthur E. Wise, Executive DirectorNational Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA)Gary Martin, Executive DirectorNational School Boards Association (NSBA)Joseph S. Villani, Deputy Executive DirectorUniversity Council for Educational Administration (UCEA)Michelle Young, Executive Director EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 21
  26. 26. NPBEA/ISLLC Steering Committee Members We would like to acknowledge and give special thanks to the committee members for sharing their perspectives and ideas in the development of ISLLC 2008. Richard Barbacane, Consultant Global Education Association Agnes Crawford, Assistant Executive Director Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Honor Fede, ELCC, Associate Director National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Lew Finch, Superintendent in Residence American Association of School Administrators (AASA) Richard A. Flanary, Director of Professional Development Services National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Gary Martin, Executive Director National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) Northern Arizona University Nona Prestine, Professor in Charge Graduate Programs in Educational Leadership The Pennsylvania State University (representing the University Council for Educational Administration-UCEA) Joe Simpson, Deputy Superintendent Wyoming Department of Education Carol Smith, Vice President for Professional Issues American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE)22 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  27. 27. NPBEA Research Panel MembersA tremendous amount of research and resources underpins the 2008 policy standards( We would like to give special thanks to the membersof the research panel for their efforts in providing the relevant research. Joseph Murphy andRosemary Papalewis, co-chairs of this research panel, provided remarkable leadership inthis endeavor.Colonel Arthur J. Athens, USMCRDepartment of Leadership, Ethics, and Law, U.S. Naval AcademyNelda Cambron-McCabe, ProfessorDepartment of Educational Leadership, Miami UniversityLen Foster, Associate DeanEducational Leadership & Higher Education, Washington State UniversityMary Gunter, Associate Professor and DirectorCenter for Leadership and Learning, Department of Educational LeadershipArkansas Tech UniversityJohn Hoyle, ProfessorAdministrative Leadership InstituteDepartment of Educational Administration and Human Resource DevelopmentTexas A&M UniversityKen Leithwood, Associate Dean of ResearchDepartment of Theory and Policy Studies, Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoBeryl Levinger, Distinguished ProfessorMonterey Institute of International StudiesDavid H. Monk, Professor of Educational AdministrationDean, College of Education, The Pennsylvania State UniversityJoseph Murphy, Professor of Education*Peabody College, Vanderbilt UniversityRosemary Papalewis, The Del and Jewell Lewis Chair, Educational Leadership*College of Education, Northern Arizona UniversityNancy Sanders, DirectorState Consortium on Education Leadership, Council of Chief State School OfficersTimothy Waters, President and Chief Executive OfficerMid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL)*Research panel co-chair EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008 23
  28. 28. Bibliography Darling-Hammond, Linda, Michelle LaPointe, Debra Meyerson, Margaret Terry Orr, & Carol Cohen. 2007. Preparing School Leaders for a Changing World: Lessons From Exemplary Leadership Development Programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. Kearney, Karen. 2003. Moving Leadership Standards Into Everyday Work: Descriptions of Practice. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Leithwood, Kenneth, Karen Seashore Louis, Stephen Anderson, & Kyla Wahlstrom. 2004. How Leadership Influences Student Learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. Sanders, Nancy M. & Joe Simpson. 2005. State Policy Framework to Develop Highly Qualified Educational Administrators. Washington, DC: The Council of Chief State School Officers. Toye, Carla, Rolf K. Blank, Nancy Sanders, & Andra Williams. 2006. Key State Education Policies on PK-12 Education: 2006. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. The Wallace Foundation. 2006. Leadership for Learning: Making the Connections Among State, District, and School Policies and Practices. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. The Wallace Foundation. 2007. A Bridge to School Reform. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. The production and release of the Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008 were made possible by: CCSSO: Lois Adams-Rodgers, Melissa Zack Johnston CommunicationWorks, LLC: Robert Johnston, Shep Ranbom, Thomas Showalter Design: David Kidd Printing: Beacon Printing, Inc.24 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP POLICY STANDARDS: ISLLC 2008
  29. 29. Council of Chief State School OfficersOne Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001-1431