Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Internetregulationjapan

5,804 views

Published on

Chris Salzberg discusses internet regulation and censorship trends in Japan

Published in: Technology, Education

Internetregulationjapan

  1. 1. Web Censorship and Public Awareness:The case of Internet regulation in Japan Chris Salzberg
  2. 2. To censor:to examine in order to suppress or delete anything  considered objectionable (Merriam­Webster)
  3. 3. What does “Web Censorship” mean? Different meanings in different contexts:  Censorship by governments against freedom of expression  and free access to information  Filtering of content seen as “harmful” to society  Violation of privacy rights: web monitoring, eavesdropping  “Censorship” against file sharing (copyrighted content) What is “anti­censorship”?
  4. 4. “The Age of Net Regulation is Coming”  In the last year, moves toward net regulation: 1.Internet content (transmission + broadcasting = ?) 2.Copyright legislation (file sharing) 3.Mobile web access (filtering, “harmful” content)  Fears about: “deai” (dating) sites, obscene/voilent  content, child porn, “adult” anime, net bullying,  death threats (Akihabara massacre), etc. etc. etc.
  5. 5. Filtering of “harmful” content Bill by LDP/DPJ passed into law on June 11th Included in the bill:  Obligation on PC makers to pre­install national  standards­based filtering software on PCs/mobile phones  Filtering on mobile phones for users under age 18  ISPs required to eliminate harmful content/services Government decides what is “harmful”
  6. 6. Support for Regulation A survey on regulation of “harmful content” (2007):  67.8% said the Internet should be regulated  22.7% said they lean toward regulation  3.1% said they lean toward non­regulation  1.4% said the Internet should not be regulated 76% support web filtering, 51% want police to  strengthen monitoring, 87% support manga porn  regulation
  7. 7. Opposition to Regulation Some of the greatest opposition from companies:  DENA, Yahoo, Microsoft, Rakuten, Net Star Emphasizing positives of an open Internet
  8. 8. Opposition strategies More so than free access to information, opposition  strategies emphasize economic considerations:  Regulation will stop innovation/creativity  Japan will be left behind, outcompeted Also emphasizes knowledge issues:  Many proposals are technologically contradictory  Lack of transparency in legislation
  9. 9. The “people” are killing the Internet Oppression of the people by governments and  corporations is not seen as a major concern Conern is about other citizens:  Bullying, death threats, dating sites, obscene content,  copyright violation, etc. etc. Conclusion: it is the people who are killing the  Internet, govt needs to step in and regulate
  10. 10. The future is now Citizen media coverage of Akihabara killings:  Instantaneous through Ustream, 2000­3000 viewers  No editing or censorship of footage  Large public backlash, criticism
  11. 11. Summary “Web censorship” means different things to  different people/groups/nations Different opposition strategies:  Technological problems with censorship  Lack of transparency in process  Economic considerations, innovation/creativity Awareness and literacy are key

×