R&D Bottom Up for REDD+

714 views

Published on

by Deborah Barry, CIFOR

Published in: Technology, Career
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
714
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
45
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
26
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

R&D Bottom Up for REDD+

  1. 1. R& D Research & Development Bottom Up for REDD + CO2 Capture and Storage @ community landscape level Where you work means Who you work with Where: Forests Agro-forests landscapes Agricultural Who: in each of these organizations land use systems
  2. 2. Oaxaca, Mexico SAO - O axacan E nvironmental S ervices <ul><li>Where- type of landscape & vegetation </li></ul><ul><li>16 community forests + </li></ul><ul><li>22 shade coffee producing units </li></ul><ul><li>Who – organizations </li></ul>SAO 2 Unions Forest Ejidos Indigenous Muncipality 3 ejidos Federation Coffee producing cooperatives
  3. 3. “ Translation” to local understanding <ul><li>1- What is CO 2 ? </li></ul><ul><li>- Translate abstract to the concrete. (5 pools) </li></ul><ul><li>- Providing a service not a good </li></ul><ul><li>- Why should they be interested, who is buying? </li></ul><ul><li>2 - What does capture & storage mean? </li></ul><ul><li>3- Translate into: (most important) </li></ul><ul><li>- Changes in cultural/management practices (collective/indiv) </li></ul><ul><li>- Changes in forest use (consumptive) </li></ul><ul><li> What you have to stop doing/taking? (firewood) </li></ul><ul><li> What new things you have to do? (fire prevention) </li></ul>
  4. 4. Trade off analysis - Self evaluation <ul><li>They calculate the costs of these changes: </li></ul><ul><li>- subsistence sphere </li></ul><ul><li>- existing market relations (goods) </li></ul><ul><li>- social infrastructure sphere </li></ul><ul><li>$$$$ They weigh costs vs. payments </li></ul><ul><li>(trade offs) </li></ul><ul><li>They decide if its worth it???? </li></ul>
  5. 5. Management = rights & responsibilities <ul><li>Translate Upload </li></ul>Participatory Community/local management across landscapes or territory (learn and enforce) LUCUC - technical measurement instrument for CO 2 storage * Recalculate the costs to the community
  6. 6. Benefits Distribution = legitimacy <ul><li>They (who) decide what they want to do with the funds, how and where: (legitimacy is the guarantee for longevity) </li></ul><ul><li>- Collective funds: social spending </li></ul><ul><li>- In-kind development assistance (CBF) </li></ul><ul><li> Social infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>- Household level dividends </li></ul><ul><li>- Transparency - (communication) </li></ul>
  7. 7. Negotiation <ul><li>Whoever negotiates must represent the interests and proposals of the membership </li></ul><ul><li>And have the technical capacity to engage with ‘buyers.’ </li></ul><ul><li>Communication on changes w/ membership </li></ul>
  8. 8. Monitoring and Verification <ul><li>$$$$ Up to now, communities still have a marginal gain from price paid. </li></ul><ul><li>Clincher – Who monitors ??? </li></ul><ul><li>and where does the funding come from??? </li></ul><ul><li>* Renegotiations- communities can </li></ul>
  9. 9. Costs of R & D Bottom Up <ul><li>Bottom up for buy-in …… </li></ul><ul><li>Long term guarantee for CO 2 storage </li></ul><ul><li>Costs: to organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Field work and consensus building mtgs </li></ul><ul><li>Producing people’s time (compensation) </li></ul><ul><li>Travel, shelter and food for meetings </li></ul><ul><li>Training on technical issues </li></ul><ul><li>Transformation & translation of key documents </li></ul><ul><li>Communications (radio, brochures, manuals) </li></ul>

×