Self Help Legal Software and Unauthorized Practice of Law

2,543 views

Published on

Presentation by Richard Granat and Marc Lauritsen to Legal Services Corporation annual conference on legal technology. Topic is how UPL rules apply to legal selfhelp software.

Published in: Self Improvement
  • Be the first to comment

Self Help Legal Software and Unauthorized Practice of Law

  1. 1. Self-Help Systems andUnauthorized Practice Richard Granat Marc Lauritsen TIG Conference January 2013 Jacksonville, Florida
  2. 2. What and why• Online services that gather information, give information, and generate documents• Used by self-helpers, clients, advocates, and court personnel• Benefits – Dissemination of knowledge and assistance – Efficient production of routine work – Better document results, more informed litigants
  3. 3. Today’s focus• Ethical and regulatory considerations bearing on delivery of online document assembly services outside of intended lawyer-client relationships• How to manage the risks and benefits
  4. 4. Online formsDocument preparation services
  5. 5. Online automated forms
  6. 6. Online services with lawyers in the loop
  7. 7. Traditional service Co-production Self help
  8. 8. Potential problems• Provider is charged with unauthorized practice• Lawyer participants are charged with unethically assisting unauthorized practice OR• An unintended lawyer/client relationship arises, with duties that aren‟t or can‟t be met AND/OR• An aggrieved user sues (malpractice, general negligence, consumer protection, …)
  9. 9. Preliminary points• Key question: what is the practice of law?• This is an evolving area, with lots of murky aspects. Few bright lines.• Great variation by jurisdiction• Competing values and policy perspectives (e.g. consumer protection cuts several ways)
  10. 10. Legal information vs. advice • Usually improper to give advice outside an attorney/client relationship • Where does interactive software fit? Can a machine give „advice‟?Information General advice Assistance Specific advice Representation
  11. 11. Issues if the service is found to be (legitimate) law practice• Confidentiality• Conflicts of Interest• Duty to inquire• Candor toward the tribunal• Clarity on scope of representation• Duties to prospective clients• Communication with opposing counsel and unrepresented parties
  12. 12. Unauthorized practice• Dacey, Parsons, Reynoso• Texas UPL statute exception• Form selection and document preparation• Does it make any difference if you are a nonprofit? If the service is free?• 1st amendment – speech vs. action• FTC, Dept of Justice
  13. 13. Example: “What is considered the "practice of law"? The practice of law is more than just appearing in court on behalf of a client. Though no concise definition of practice of law exists, certain characteristics make it more likely that the Court will view certain conduct as the practice of law. An early South Carolina case, cited by other jurisdictions as well, stated that the practice of law includes "the preparation of legal instruments of all kinds, and in general all advice to clients and all action taken for them in matters connected with the law." In re Duncan, 65 S.E. 210 (S.C. 1909). The practice of law "extends to activities in other fields which entail specialized legal knowledge." South Carolina v. Buyers Serv. Co., 357 S.E.2d 15 (S.C. 1987). Additionally, whether an individual is paid for his or her services is irrelevant. The reasons for prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law are not to protect licensed attorneys from losing business to unlicensed individuals. Rather, the purpose is to protect the public from consequences resulting "from the erroneous preparation of legal documents or the inaccurate legal advice given by persons untrained in the law." South Carolina v. McLauren, 563 S.E.2d 346 (S.C. 2002).”http://www.scbar.org/public_services/unauthorized_practice_of_law/
  14. 14. It is the opinion of the Pennsylvania Bar Association Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee that the offering or providing [in Pennsylvania] of legal document preparation services as described herein (beyond the supply of preprinted forms selected by the consumer not the legal document preparation service), either online or at a site in Pennsylvania is the unauthorized practice of law and thus prohibited, unless such services are provided by a person who is duly licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania retained directly for the subject of the legal services. Pennsylvania Bar Association Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, Formal Opinion 2010-01, March 2010
  15. 15. Texas exception„In this chapter, the "practice of law" does notinclude the design, creation, publication,distribution, display, or sale, includingpublication, distribution, display, or sale bymeans of an Internet web site, of writtenmaterials, books, forms, computer software,or similar products if the products clearly andconspicuously state that the products are nota substitute for the advice of an attorney.‟
  16. 16. Should software be treated like books? But … • Software is • Can be contextualized essentially just a to specific text being followed circumstances by a machine • Can feel like you • Incapable of interacting with a “judgment” person • Gives same results (avatars, audio, video) to all comers • Might be described as • Mutual anonymity an „expert system‟
  17. 17. Author, advisers, publisher, book store personnel, … Law is not being practiced here
  18. 18. Sponsoring programs, substantiveexperts, technical developers, funders, service providers Is law being practiced here?
  19. 19. Bidirectionalcommunication
  20. 20. <= One-way Human communication Two-way => Law practice (counsel, representation) Unauthorized practice Conversation Interpersonal “Live” Legit doc prep services Facts Opinions Expertise Advice Self help systems ? Impersonal “Pre-recorded” Publication Books, pamphlets Books, pamphlets <= Information Content Guidance =>
  21. 21. Important safeguards• Ensure quality control – testing, updating• Follow ABA best practices• Include qualifying questions and disclaimers• Provide well-crafted terms of service and privacy policies• Collaborate with the courts• Talk with bar regulators, UPL authorities• Talk with malpractice insurer
  22. 22. How to make clear to people that theyare not in a lawyer-client relationship • It comes down to “reasonable belief” • Disclaimers – Up front – In interviews – In documents/instructions • Get an affirmative acknowledgment
  23. 23. Risks we should be most concerned about• People being hurt by – misunderstandings about the service; – inaccurate or incomplete information.• People not being helped – out of exaggerated fears of impropriety or liability; – by giving in to unreasonable restraints on service delivery.
  24. 24. If your regulatory environmentseems an unreasonable obstacle • Encourage re-interpretation • Seek changes in the rules • Challenge on constitutional or federal preemption grounds • Consider limited services models
  25. 25. Resources• ED105 - Technology Ethics and Pitfalls in Online Legal Services (2005) - http://lsntap.org/ed105• http://www.abanet.org/cpr/model- def/model_def_statutes.pdf• ABA standards for provision of civil legal aid – http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/sclaid/• ABA best practices for legal information websites - http://www.elawyering.org/tools/practices.shtml• http://www.selfhelpsupport.org/library/folder.100606 -Court_Rules_Standards• Scriveners In Cyberspace: Online Document Preparation and the Unauthorized Practice Of Law, Catherine J. Lanctot (2002)
  26. 26. Recap• Online document assembly services can be delivered in legal and ethical ways• The risks are manageable• Make it your business to know local laws and rules• Talk with relevant authorities• Try to improve the regulatory environment if it seems unreasonable
  27. 27. Questions and Comments

×