Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to The Emerging ‘Quiet Revolution’ in Myanmar's Aquaculture Value Chain(20)

Advertisement

More from International Food Policy Research Institute(20)

Advertisement

The Emerging ‘Quiet Revolution’ in Myanmar's Aquaculture Value Chain

  1. The Emerging ‘Quiet Revolution’ in Myanmar's Aquaculture Value Chain Ben Belton Food Security Policy Project Agriculture and Rural Transformation in Asia: Past Experiences and Future Opportunities Bangkok, December 13, 2017
  2. Background • Myanmar among the world's leading aquaculture producers. But less is known about its fish farm sector than any other Asian country. • Previous grey literature characterized Myanmar’s aquaculture as: 1. Strongly export oriented 2. Dominated by very large farms 3. Small fish farms non-existent due to strict regulations on conversion of paddy fields to ponds 4. Technologies of big farms ‘traditional’ and extensive/semi-intensive
  3. Methods • Analysis of pond area, using satellite images • Value chain study: 250 semi-structured interviews • Household survey: 1100 HH in main fish farming areas, including fish farming, crop farming and landless HH • Community survey: 73 villages – recall of numbers of aquaculture-related businesses over past 10 years
  4. Fish farm & survey locations 4
  5. Finding 1: Most farmed fish produced in Myanmar is sold on the fast growing domestic market • >75% of fish sold through San Pya market, of which:  40–50% to domestic markets outside Yangon;  30% to markets in and around Yangon;  20–30% for international export (mostly to Middle East) • Distributed throughout country by truck and express bus • Proliferation of transport services post-2011 • Better connected markets, faster, cheaper distribution to more distant locations inside Myanmar
  6. Finding 2: Large fish farms dominate in terms of area, but there are many small/medium commercial farms and nurseries Share of farms (frequency and area), by farm size category
  7. Finding 3: In the main fish farming zones, smaller farms have “worked around” restrictions on agricultural land use conversion 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 Cumulativearea(acres) Growout ponds Vertically integrated nursery ponds Specialized nursery ponds Cumulative area of ponds constructed, 1969-2015
  8. Need for informal arrangements: increases entry barriers & costs reduces tenure security slows down farm growth
  9. Finding 4: Upstream (feed and seed) and midstream (wholesale and logistics) VC segments have grown fast, driven by private investments of SMEs Nurseries + 200% Seed traders + 60% Enterprise 2006 2016 % change Reference area Hatchery 30 60 100 Village tract Nursery 501 1538 207 Village tract Seed trader 166 265 60 Village tract Pelleted feed trader 5 11 112 Local town Rice bran/oil cake trader 112 175 56 Local town Small boats for hire 115 216 88 Village Fish trader 46 68 47 Local town Ice factory 9 16 82 Local town Mechanical excavator hire 2 24 961 Local town Trucks for hire 1 20 1900 Village
  10. Finding 5: Farms (large and small) are using a mix of traditional and more modern farming practices and technologies Average yield, by yield quintile 0.6 2.1 4.1 5.9 6.9 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Viss/acre t/ha Q5
  11. Hlegu pond cluster (2004-2014) Pond area: 274 ha → 697 ha Integrated ponds: 0% → 74%
  12. Use of pelleted feeds increasing (from low base) 86 44 14 8 12 10 6 63 14 10 8 3 0 0 - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of farms using feed % of feed costs Share of farms using feed inputs, by feed type, and share of feed type in total value of feed inputs (%) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Cumulativenumberofadopters Sinking feed Floating feed Cumulative adoption of pelleted feed, by year and feed type (2000-2015)
  13. Some species diversification (from low base) Cumulative number of respondents farming species, by species and year 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Respondentsstocking(cumulative) Rohu Catla Mrigal Pangasius Pacu Tilapia Others 93% 77%
  14. 6) Fish farms produce bigger economic spillovers than crop farms; small fish farms produce bigger indirect spillovers than large fish farms Income gain by direct and indirect beneficiaries [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 SIM1: new acre small aqua SIM2: new acre big aqua SIM3: new acre agri SIM4: convert crop to small aqua SIM5: convert crop to big aqua USD direct indirect
  15. Conclusions • The domestic market for farmed fish is vibrant and growing, exports relatively unimportant. • Many smaller commercial farms and nurseries have emerged in last decade. • Land use restrictions not enforced uniformly, but still hamper small farm development • Off-farm segments of value chain have grown quickly in step with farms • Some technological change and diversification in farming • Aquaculture generates much larger economic spillovers than agriculture; small commercial fish farms generate bigger indirect spillovers than large fish farms • A Quiet Revolution is emerging Myanmar’s aquaculture value chain, but still has potential to go much further
  16. Thank you!

Editor's Notes

  1. Fish farms & nurseries under 10 acres >70% of total, growout mean 28 acres, median 10 acres, nursery mean 3 acres, median 2 acres
  2. Use of feeds: Bangladesh 38%, China 90% 26% farms reported receiving credit from the main buyer of their fish. It is more common for large farms to receive credit (55% of farms) than small or medium (both 17%)
Advertisement