Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

More from International Food Policy Research Institute(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Assessing Agri-food Trade Comparative Advantage among Myanmar’s Neighboring Countries: Findings from the UN Comtrade

  1. Assessing Agri-food Trade Comparative Advantage among Myanmar’s Neighboring Countries: Findings from the UN Comtrade Kevin Chen Senior Research Fellow and Head of East and Central Asia Office (ECAO) International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact email: k.chen@cgiar.org
  2. The Indicators for Myanmar and Selected Asian Economies (Year 2016) Myanmar Thailand Malaysia Viet Nam Indonesia Cambodia China India Annual GDP growth Rate % 6.5 3.2 4.2 6.2 5.0 6.9 6.7 7.1 GDP per capita (constant 2010 $US) 1,420 5,901 11,028 1,770 3,974 1,078 6, 894 1,861 GDP Share by agriculture % 28.2 8.3 8.6 18.1 13.5 26.7 8.6 17.4 GDP Share by industry % 29.5 35.8 35.7 36.4 39.3 31.7 39.8 28.8 GDP Share by Services % 42.3 55.8 55.7 45.5 43.7 41.6 51.6 53.8 Total population (million) 52.9 68.9 31.2 92.7 261.1 15.8 1378.7 1324.2 Urbanization ratio 34.7 52.0 75.0 34.0 54.0 21.0 57.0 33.0 The annual inflation rate 2011 10.3 3.7 5.4 21.3 7.5 3.4 8.2 8.5 The annual inflation rate 2016 9.3 1.7 1.9 1.1 2.5 3.5 1.2 3.6 Exchange rate ($US 1 for local currency) 1,234.8 35.3 4.2 21,935.0 13,308.3 4,058.7 6.6 67.2 Source: The World Bank Database
  3. Myanmar’s Agricultural Sector  Agriculture contributes to 37.8% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), 70% of employment, and 25% of total exports earnings (FAO 2017)  Agricultural potential: Vast land area (65.31 million ha) in three diverse agroecological zones, abundant water, low-cost labor resources, and approximate to large markets (e.g., China and India)  Since 2011, Myanmar has been taking measures to enhance the performance of its agricultural sector: opening to global trade, encouraging foreign direct invest, and deepening agricultural policy reforms (ADB 2013; WTO 2014)  Objectives: 1) Food security; 2) export promotion; and 3) increasing farm’s income and welfare  Missions: 1) Attain maximum market share in regional and global markets for agro-based value-added agriculture and specialty food products; 2) Improve food security and poverty alleviation, and 3) Manage green growth  Enhancing the export competitiveness in Myanmar plays an crucial role in improving Myanmar’s agricultural performance
  4. Objectives  Examine Myanmar agricultural export pattern including export destination, export value, and export trends of the selected commodities  Compare the revealed comparative advantages (RCAs) of Myanmar and its major trade competitors in agricultural export as well as the selected commodities  Consider policy options for enhancing Myanmar agricultural export competitiveness
  5. Data Source Method UN Comtrade Relative Comparative Advantage (RCA) • UN Comtrade contains annual imports and exports statistics for more than 160 reporting countries or regions up to 2016. • The trade statistics are detailed with values for disaggregated commodity broken down by countries. • The commodities are classified according to Harmonized System (HS) and SITC. • HS code comprises approximately 5,300 article/product descriptions that appear as headings and subheadings, arranged in 99 chapters, grouped in 21 sections. • RCA indicates the relative advantage or disadvantage of agricultural products in Myanmar’s exporting destinations as evidenced by trade flows. • Formula: 𝑋𝑖 𝑀𝑌𝐴 refers to Myanmar’s export of product i; X 𝑀𝑌𝐴 total exports of Myanmar; 𝑋𝑖 𝑊 world export of products i; 𝑋 𝑊 total world export • RCA takes a value between 0 and +. A RCA value between 0 and 1 indicates that a country has a comparative disadvantage in particular product, while a value of greater than 1 indicates a revealed comparative advantage. • The trade data from 2012-2016 is used. Data and Method
  6. Note: The export and import values are in 2016 price Source: UN Comtrade Agricultural Trade in Myanmar: 2007-16 -2000.0 -1000.0 0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Net Trade Export Import
  7. Export Trends of Major Agricultural Products in Myanmar
  8. 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Australia Cambodia China India Indonesia Japan Malaysia Myanmar Norway Pakistan Philippines Spain Thailand United Arab Emirates USA Viet Nam 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 RCA of Overall Agricultural Exports of Myanmar and Its Competitors
  9. RCA of Myanmar’s Agricultural Exports by 4-Digit or 6-Digit Levels in the Global Market The Revealed Competitive Advantage of Myanmar from 2012 to 2016 HS Code Commodity 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1005 Maize 0.75 0.60 0.29 0.52 1.21 1006 Rice 18.69 12.71 6.67 8.12 12.60 0303 Frozen fish 7.74 8.04 4.81 7.35 8.27 0304 Fish fillets 2.28 1.92 0.77 0.78 0.91 0306 Crustaceans 17.25 14.84 6.85 9.15 10.42 4001 Natural rubber 16.76 13.61 5.06 9.87 25.11 071321& 071360 Black gram & pigeon peas 999.90 933.65 453.26 626.83 765.08 0802 Nuts 0.60 0.88 0.68 1.59 1.84 0803 Bananas 1.32 0.87 0.51 1.00 1.21 080711 Watermelons 24.10 4.33 0.35 0.73 0.72 0813 Dry fruits 17.72 6.61 4.49 6.86 8.94 120740 Sesame seeds 56.13 35.08 11.10 15.13 29.17
  10. Identification of Myanmar’s Competing Countries on Agricultural Exports  Selected the top 9 exported commodities by 2-digit HS code.  Under these 2-digit HS code commodities, selected the top 1 or 2 exported commodities by 4-digit or 6-digit HS code.  For each of exported commodities selected above, selected the top four export destinations.  For each of these destinations identified, identified the top 4 leading exporting countries or regions as Myanmar’s competitors based on the following rules:  Chosen Asia countries as the priority for a consideration of neighboring countries  If non-Asia country is the top one exporter to Myanmar’s biggest export destination, or if non-Asia country is among the top four exporters in more than one destinations, that non-Asia country was selected as the competitor for Myanmar.
  11. HS Code Commodity Export Destinations 071331 & 071336 Black gram & pigeon peas India (82.29%) Malaysia (3.56%) Indonesia (3.53%) Sri Lanka (2.53%) 4001 Natural rubber China (74.41%) Malaysia (17.92%) Japan (3.94%) Korea (3.37%) 0306 Crustaceans Japan (33.41%) China, Hong Kong (17.39%) China (17.08%) USA (11.67%) 1006 Rice China (31.13%) Belgium (16.41%) France (8.65%) Germany (8.30%) 0303 Frozen fish UK (33.67%) Malaysia (15.48%) USA (14.72%) United Arab Emirates (11.33%) 120740 Sesame seeds Japan (53.01%) Other Asia (25.91%) China (18.6%) Singapore (1.65%) 0304 Fish fillets Japan (26.74%) Malaysia (23.82%) Korea (17.44%) UK (14.66%) 0813 Dried fruits China (80.23%) Pakistan (10.91%) Malaysia (8.48%) United Arab Emirates (0.27%) 080711 Watermelons China (92.04%) Malaysia (4.17%) China, Hong Kong (3.69%) Russian Federation (0.10%) 1005 Maize China (94.4%) Philippines (3.95%) Singapore (0.91%) Other Asia (0.74%) 0803 Bananas China (99.91%) Korea (0.08%) Singapore (0.01%) 0802 Nuts India (97.46%) Pakistan (0.98%) Australia (0.42%) UK (0.38%) Export Destinations of Major Agricultural Products from Myanmar
  12. HS Code Commodity Export Destinations Competitors for each Export Destinations Competitors 071331 & 071360 Black gram & Pigeon peas India (82.29%), Malaysia (3.56%), Indonesia (3.53%), Sri Lanka (2.53%) To India: Myanmar, United Rep. of Tanzania, Mozambique, Sudan To Malaysia: Myanmar, Australia, Thailand, China To Indonesia: Myanmar, Ethiopia, Australia, Thailand To Sri Lanka: Myanmar, Australia, India, Thailand Australia, China, India, Thailand, United Rep. of Tanzania 0306 Crustaceans Japan (33.41%), China, Hong Kong (17.39%), China (17.08%), USA (11.67%) To Japan: Russian Federation, Viet Nam, India, Indonesia To China: Canada, USA, New Zealand, Argentina To China, Hong Kong: China, Viet Nam, Australia, USA To USA: India, Canada, Indonesia, Ecuador Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Russian Federation, USA, Viet Nam Myanmar’s Competitors of Peas and Crustaceans
  13. HS Code Commodity Export Destinations Competitors for each Export Destinations Competitors 0813 Fruit, dried; mixtures of nuts or dried fruits of this chapter China (80.23%), Pakistan (10.91%), Malaysia (8.48%), United Arab Emirates (0.27%) To China: Thailand, Myanmar, USA, Chile To Pakistan: India, Indonesia, Afghanistan, Myanmar To Malaysia: Indonesia, Thailand, China, India To United Arab Emirates: Thailand, India, Turkey, USA China, India, Indonesia, Thailand, USA 0303 Fish; frozen UK (33.67%), Malaysia (15.48%), USA (14.72%), United Arab Emirates (11.33%) To UK: Norway, Myanmar, France, Netherlands To Malaysia: China, Viet Nam, Indonesia, Japan To USA: China, Canada, Korea, other Asia To United Arab Emirates: other Asia, Myanmar, India, Indonesia China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Norway, Viet Nam Myanmar’s Competitors of Dried Fruits and Frozen Fish
  14. HS Code Commodity Export Destinations Competitors for each Export Destinations Competitors 120740 Sesame seeds Japan (53.01%), Other Asia, nes (25.91), China (18.6%), Singapore (1.65%), Rep. of Korea (0.59%) To Japan: Nigeria, Paraguay, United Rep. of Tanzania, Myanmar Other Asia: India, Myanmar, Thailand, Sri Lanka To China: Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sudan, United Rep. of Tanzania Singapore: India, Mexico, Nigeria, Myanmar India, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Thailand, United Rep. of Tanzania 4001 Natural rubber, balata, gutta-percha, guayule, chicle and similar gums China (74.41%), Malaysia (17.92), Japan (3.94%), Rep of Korea (3.37%) To China: Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Viet Nam To Malaysia: Thailand, Cote d’loire, Viet Nam, Philippines To Japan: Indonesia, Thailand, Vet Nam, Malaysia To Rep of Korea: Indonesia, Thailand, Vet Nam, Malaysia Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Viet Nam Myanmar’s Competitors of Sesame Seeds and Natural Rubber
  15. HS Code Commodity Export Destinations Competitors for each Export Destinations Competitors 1006 Rice China (31.13%), Belgium (16.41), France (8.65%), Germany (8.30%) To China: Viet Nam, Thailand, Pakistan, Cambodia To Belgium: Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Pakistan To France: Italy, Thailand, Cambodia, Spain To Germany: Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Cambodia Cambodia, Italy, Pakistan, Spain, Thailand, Viet Nam 0802 Nuts (excludin g coconuts, Brazils and cashew nuts) India (97.46%), Pakistan (0.98%), Australia (0.42%), UK (0.38) To India: USA, Iran, Australia, Sri Lanka To Pakistan: Indonesia, USA, Iran, Afghanistan To Australia: USA, Turkey, Areas, nes, China To UK: USA, Germany, Spain, Italy China, Indonesia, Iran, Sri Lanka, USA Myanmar’s Competitors of Rice and Nuts
  16. Myanmar’s Competitors of Bananas and Fish Fillets HS Code Commodity Export Destinations Competitors for each Export Destinations Competitors 0803 Bananas, including plantains China (99.91%), Rep of Korea (0.08%), Singapore (0.01%) To China: Philippines, Ecuador, Thailand, Viet Nam To Rep of Korea: Philippines, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru Singapore: Philippines, Malaysia, Ecuador, Mexico Ecuador, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand 0304 Fish fillets and other fish meat (whether or not minced); fresh, chilled or frozen apan (26.74%), Malaysia (23.82%), Korea (17.44%), UK (14.66%) To Japan: Norway, USA, Chile, China To Malaysia: Viet Nam, Indonesia, China, USA To Korea: Viet Name, USA, Russian Federation, China To UK: Iceland, China, Germany, Russian Federation China, Indonesia, Norway, Russian Federation, USA, Viet Nam
  17. Myanmar’s Competitors of Watermelons and Maize HS Code Commodity Export Destinations Competitors for each Export Destinations Competitors 080711 Watermelons China (92.04%), Malaysia (4.17%), China, Hong Kong SAR (3.69%), Russian Federation (0.10%) To China: Viet Nam, Myanmar, Malaysia To Malaysia: Thailand, Rep. of Korea, Australia, China To China, Hong Kong SAR: Malaysia, China, Japan, Philippines To Russian Federation: Iran, Brazil, Turkey, China China, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Rep. of Korea, Thailand, Viet Nam 1005 Maize (Corn) China (94.4%), Philippines(3.95%, Singapore(0.91%), Other Asia, nes (0.74%) To China: Ukraines, USA, Lao People’s Dem. Rep., Myanmar To Philippines: Thailand, Argentina, Brazil, USA To Singapore: Malaysia, Pakistan, USA, Indonesia Indonesia, Lao People’s Dem. Rep, Malaysia, Thailand, Ukraine, USA
  18. RCA of Major Agricultural Exports of Myanmar and Its Competitors in the Global Market (1)
  19. RCA of Major Agricultural Exports of Myanmar and Its Competitors in the Global Market (2)
  20. RCA of Major Agricultural Exports of Myanmar and Its Competitors in the Global Market (3)
  21. Major Findings from UN Comtrade  Myanmar is a net importer in agricultural products and its agricultural export value exhibits a downward trend – not trade at its potential.  Myanmar’s agricultural exports are very much concentrated in small number of neighboring countries – two third goes to China and India. For black grams & pigeon peas and nuts, only concentrates in India, while for watermelon, natural rubber, dried fruits, and, only concentrates in China.  Compared with major agricultural exporting countries, Myanmar is comparably “competitive” in the global markets.  Myanmar enjoys high level of RCAs in black gram & pigeon peas, sesame seeds, natural rubber, crustaceans, rice, frozen fish, and dried fruits, while has a low level of RCAs in maize, nuts, and banana; and suffers a loss of RCAs in fish fillet and watermelon.  Compared with its competing countries, Myanmar is highly competitive in black gram & pigeon peas, crustaceans, dried fruits, and frozen fish, is competitive in sesame seeds, natural rubber, and rice; and noncompetitive in fish fillet, banana, nuts, maize, and watermelon.  Compared with its competing countries, Myanmar fluctuates most in terms of RCAs
  22. Unofficial Border Trade  Agricultural exports to Thailand was “disappearing” – cross border trade between Thailand and Myanmar were not recorded and reported  It was reported that significant amount of rice, fish, watermelons, and cattle might cross Myanmar- China border without records  While UN Comtrade data showed significant decline of watermelons from Myanmar to China, the industry source seemed to indicate increasing sales of melons to China in the recent years “Although the value of border trade (according to official statistics) accounts for only 7 per cent of Myanmar’s total trade value, the actual value of border trade is likely to be much higher due to the value of undocumented trade that flows through borders, which reached over US$1 billion in 2006. If this undocumented trade were to be included in official statistics, the value of border trade would have accounted for around 25 per cent of Myanmar’s total value of trade in 2006.” - (Aung 2009)
  23. Specific Policy Reforms Before the policy action After the policy action Tax Reform Prior to the deduction of the export tax, exported are required to pay commercial tax at a rate of 8%, and income tax at a rate of 2% before exporting goods (Kubo 2012). From Aug. 2011 to Feb. 2012, exports of seven agriculture commodities are exempted from the commercial tax. Commercial tax now is levied on exports of only five commodities (gem gas, crude oil, teak, and timber) (Naing 2014; WTO 2014). Export License Exports of most products require an export license prior to exporting (Kubo 2012). In 2013, the Ministry of Commerce removed license requirements from a selection of 152 exported commodities and 166 imported commodities (Naing 2014). Exchange Rate Myanmar had a multiple exchange rate regime comprising both the official exchange rate and the informal parallel market exchange rates. In 2012, the Central Bank of Myanmar replaced a pegged exchange rate (to the SDR) with a managed floating exchange rate for the national currency (WTO 2014). In 2013, the Government abolished foreign exchange certificates (FEC) and aligned the exchange rate (Bissinger and Maung 2014). Policy Reforms for Agricultural Trade
  24. Weak Linkages of Agri-food Value Chains Note: The value chain is mainly for the agricultural crops
  25. Foreign Direct Investment in Myanmar Sector Foreign capital brought in 2009-10 2010- 11 2012- 13 2013- 14 2014- 15 2015- 16 2016- 17 2017- 18 Agriculture crops 265 139 10 20 39. 7 7 15 Livestock &Fisheries 571 6 96 27 8 97 13 Oil & Gas 22410 10179 248 309 3220 4818 Manufacturing 8816 66 32 401 1827 1502 1065 1180 1056 Transportation& Communication 8308 1 1190 1679 1931 3081 153 Total 73341 4645 1420 4107 8011 9481 6650 2990 Source: DICA 2017 Note: FDI in 2017-2018 accounts for the investment by July 31th, 2017 Yearly Approved Amount of Foreign Investment by Sector (unit: in US $ in million)
  26. Policy Considerations Export promotion and development in four large neighboring markets – China, India, Thailand and Japan Export diversification to close the trade gap – Europe Food safety, branding, and cross- border value chain development – Strategy for attracting FDI Enhancing agricultural productivity – Constrained input markets; underdeveloped infrastructure; ineffective institutions

Editor's Notes

  1. Three diverse agroecological zones: the delta and coastal zone, the dry zone, and the hill regions Policies 1) Utilization of high-yielding & good quality seeds; 2) training for farmers; 3) research for sustainable agricultural development; 4) transformation for convectional to mechanized agriculture; 5) amendment of existing agricultural laws and regulations to reflect current situation Source: Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation 2013
  2. There is little existing literature measuring comparative advantages in agricultural export of Myanmar. Kim and Thun (2017) explores export competitiveness from the perspectives of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA using trade statistics between 2010 and 2015 under HS code. However, it didn’t compare the comparative advantage between Myanmar and its competitors. HS code: The Harmonized System is an international nomenclature for the classification of products. It allows participating countries to classify traded goods on a common basis for customs purposes. At the international level, the Harmonized System (HS) for classifying goods is a six-digit code system.  The HS comprises approximately 5,300 article/product descriptions that appear as headings and subheadings, arranged in 99 chapters, grouped in 21 sections. The six digits can be broken down into three parts. The first two digits (HS-2) identify the chapter the goods are classified in, e.g. 09 = Coffee, Tea, Maté and Spices. The next two digits (HS-4) identify groupings within that chapter, e.g. 09.02 = Tea, whether or not flavoured. The next two digits (HS-6) are even more specific, e.g. 09.02.10 Green tea (not fermented)... Up to the HS-6 digit level, all countries classify products in the same way (a few exceptions exist where some countries apply old versions of the HS).  Method: RCA method easy to calculate, widely, used, based on the economic efficiency of an industry, but also reveals a country’s weak and strong export sectors and provides implications for trade policy and is a basic way to evaluate a country a country for trade policy. RCA so far has been proved very reliable to understand competitiveness for industries or commodities. Even though other alternative measurements for comparative advantages such as trade-cum-production indices and Export-only indices are available, those indices are criticized due to the fact that the data they use are usually collected at different point of time using different classifications and definition.
  3. Note: For the agricultural sector, the HS code includes 01-24, 3301, 3501-3505, 382360, 380910, 4101-4103, 4301, 5001-5003, 5101-5103, 5201-5203, 5301-5302.
  4. Note: HS 0304-Fish fillets and other fish meat (whether or not minced); fresh, chilled or frozen
  5. Peas & rice
  6. Peas & rice
  7. Peas & rice
  8. Peas & rice
  9. RCA of Nuts through the last five years: 0.60, 0.88, 0.68, 1.59, 1.84
  10. rice, frozen fish, crustaceans, natural rubber, black gram and pigeon peas, bananas, dry fruit, sesame seeds enjoys comparative advantage
  11. rice, frozen fish, crustaceans, natural rubber, black gram and pigeon peas, bananas, dry fruit, sesame seeds enjoys comparative advantage
  12. Lack of FDI in agricultural Note: Foreign capital brought in indicators the accumulated FDI through the years.
Advertisement