Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Aquaculture Growth in Bangladesh:Enablers, Impacts, and the Path Ahead(20)

Advertisement

More from International Food Policy Research Institute(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Aquaculture Growth in Bangladesh:Enablers, Impacts, and the Path Ahead

  1. PREPARED FOR RESAKSS-ASIA CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL TRANSFORMATION IN ASIA DECEMBER 12-13, 2017 | DUSIT THANI HOTEL, BANGKOK, THAILAND Aquaculture Growth in Bangladesh Enablers, Impacts, and the Path Ahead Shahidur Rashid Senior Research Fellow, IFPRI
  2. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Talking points Page 2 • The Context • Sector highlights • Key Messages • Future scenarios
  3. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The Context Page 3 1. Policy Context: Links to Food and Ag Policy debates: Structural Adjustments Program and Green Revolution in 1980s  The main premise of the structural adjustment program was that if policy restrictions (distortion to economic incentives) are eliminated, economy will grow, which will in turn lead to higher income, lower poverty, and overall improvement in food security.  Green Revolution took roots: real prices of rice and wheat were declining, rural income was growing, and the region was enjoying overall prosperity.  A strong strand of research surfaced at around the same time, arguing that income growth doesn’t lead to improvement in nutrition. This research was at odds with the very premise of the structural adjustments (E.G., Pitt, 1983, Behrman and Deolalikar, 1987, 1990, Bouis and Haddad, 1992)
  4. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The Context (2) Page 4 2. Bangladesh context: • Fish is the second largest items in households’ budgets in Bangladesh • Bengalis derive over 60% of animal source protein from fish Consider the following quotes: “…although inflation-adjusted price of cereals in Bangladesh have declined by 40% over the past 25 years (a remarkable success), real price of lentils, vegetables, and animal products have increased by 25-50%. Real fish prices have more than doubled. The dietary quality of the poor may be declining due to these price effects…”
  5. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Sector Highlights: Sub-sectoral trends Page 5 1983-93 1994-03 2004-13 Produciionin000tons Sub-sectoral growth, 1983-2013 Marine Inland Capture Inland Culture 1. Three sub-sectors: Inland Capture, Inland Culture (aquaculture), Marine 2. Aquaculture production has increased from only about 100 thousand tons in 1983/84 to over 2 million tons in 2015! 3. From being smallest subsector, aquaculture now accounts for more than 50% of country’s total fish production
  6. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Sector Highlights: Prices and Consumption Page 6 1. Fish prices were rising rapidly in the through late 1990s. 2. But there has been a reversal in the price trends (except Hilsha, a marine fish)! 3. Per capita annual fish consumption has increased from just about 7kgs in 1990 to 23kgs in 2016.
  7. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Focus of this research Page 7 There are many questions underlying these phenomenal growth. We focused on the following aspects: 1. Enablers / drivers of growth 2. The impacts of the growth 3. Opportunities and challenges
  8. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Key messages Page 8 A. The enablers of growth: 1. Largely private sector driven with limited government supports (or interventions) o No national policies until 1998 o No regulations on inputs until 2010/11 2. Non-shrimp aquaculture growth is led by domestic market demand o Over ninety percent of non-shrimp aquaculture is consumed domestically. o Share of non-shrimp aquaculture in export is very small (less than 1% of the production).
  9. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Key messages (2) Page 9 A. The enablers of growth: 3. There have been transformation in the value chain through: o Growth, intensification, and specialization o Disintermediation and reduction in transactions costs o Innovation in marketing (markets are moving to the farm)
  10. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Key messages (3) Page 10 B. Impacts of growth: 1. Benefitted across income groups, geographic locations, and gender. 2. Large impacts on income and poverty reduction o Aquaculture growth accounted for 1.74% reduction in headcount poverty between 2000 and 2010 o The reduction due to aquaculture (1.7%) is about 10% of the overall reduction in poverty in the country (17.4%) during the same period.
  11. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Impacts (income) Page 11
  12. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Impacts (poverty) Page 12
  13. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Key messages (4) Page 13 C. Future scenarios: 1. Both prices and consumptions are expected to grow in the medium term (until 2030) 2. If investment in aquaculture increases, total production can increase by as much as 120% between 2015 and 2030. 3. In a high productivity (~6%) scenario, which is achievable, total production will increase by 152%, equivalent to total production of 7 million tons
  14. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Opportunities and Challenges Page 14 Paths ahead have both opportunities and challenges:  Opportunities: High potential for growth.  Current productivity is low relative to other countries. For example, shrimp yield in Bangladesh is less than 0.8 tons / ha, which compares with 3 tons / in Vietnam and Thailand. Striped catfish (pangasius) is yield is 60- 70 tons (under intensive), which can go over 200 tons / ha  There are also potentials for growth in marine aquaculture  Challenges: Domestic demand, which has been the main trigger, is going to saturate. Where will be the demand sinks?
  15. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Opportunities and Challenges Page 15 Challenges: Negative externalities (unintended consequences)  Knowledge (and strategies) about negative externalities are limited:  Habitat degradation, environmental consequences, is limited.  Food safety and human health  Missing institutions:  It is a risky business and there is no effective institutions (insurance and credit) to protect farmers against them  Very limited capacity to conduct market intelligence and risk management analysis
  16. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Thank you Page 16
Advertisement