Lewis Theory Of Economic Development

39,170 views

Published on

A brief analysis of Lewis Theory Of Economic Development

0 Comments
15 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
39,170
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
20
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
824
Comments
0
Likes
15
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Lewis Theory Of Economic Development

  1. 1. Lewis Theory of Economic Development Imran Rafiq Shafqat Sahi Waqar Abbas Rehan Hashmi Rehan Khan
  2. 2. Economic Development <ul><li>Economic development is a process which entails a gradual transformation of basically a subsistent agrarian economy into a highly productive and self sustained industrial economy. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Why Transformation <ul><li>Natural Limits of Land Fertility </li></ul><ul><li>No prospects of increase in employment level in agriculture </li></ul>
  4. 4. Lewis Model of Transformation <ul><li>Traditional subsistent agri sector has zero marginal production of labor. </li></ul><ul><li>Highly productive urban industrial sector with high marginal production of labor. </li></ul>
  5. 5. Effects <ul><li>Industrial sector attracts labor from agri sector. </li></ul><ul><li>Profits generated by industrial sector results in expansion of industry. </li></ul><ul><li>Expansions ultimately absorb all of the surplus agri labor. </li></ul><ul><li>Agri sector wage rate start increasing. </li></ul>
  6. 7. Pitfalls <ul><li>Capitalist profits may not be re-invested. </li></ul><ul><li>Capitalist profits may be re-invested in labor saving and capital intensive technology. </li></ul><ul><li>Constant wage rate in manufacturing sector is questionable. </li></ul><ul><li>Assumption of full employment in urban area. </li></ul><ul><li>Application of diminishing returns. </li></ul>
  7. 8. Conclusion <ul><li>Dropping “the assumption that the supply of labor was fixed” Lewis was able to solve two problems that had troubled him. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>First, “What determines the relative prices of steel and coffee?” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What explained the rising share of profits in nineteenth century Britain, for the first 50 years of the industrial revolution. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>An ‘unlimited supply of labor’ will keep wages down, producing cheap coffee in the first case and high profits in the second case. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>It is the national economy model that leads to the Lewis Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>However, problems related to the world economy and hence to the issue of why some nations became rich while others remained poorer was more fundamental to Lewis’s life work. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Misperception: Lewis saw industrialization as the key to development and that he underplayed the role of agricultural. </li></ul>
  8. 9. Conclusion <ul><li>His main concern in the national economy model was not industrialization. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>It was, to understand the process by which a community which was previously saving and investing 4 - 5 % of its national income, converts into an economy where voluntary saving is running at 12-15 % approx. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>‘ Why do they [backward countries] save so little’, the … answer is not ‘because they are so poor’…. The answer is ‘because their capitalist sector is so small’ </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Overpopulation which at first appears to be a disadvantage can become an advantage in the process of development </li></ul><ul><ul><li>It is possible to vitalize the capitalist sector however small it might initially be, if unlimited labor is available at a constant real wage, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The capitalist surplus will rise continuously, and annual investment will be a rising proportion of the national income </li></ul></ul>
  9. 10. Conclusion <ul><li>The theory proposes a division of the economy into two sectors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Capitalist and a non-capitalist sector </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The model is intended to work equally well whether the capitalists are agriculturalists or industrialists. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The non-capitalist sector serves for a time as a reservoir from which the capitalist sector draws labor. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>In the world economy model, it shows how the persistence of surplus labor on a world scale can limit the possibilities for development in a particular country </li></ul>
  10. 11. Lessons Learned <ul><li>A rise in productivity in the subsistence sector could tend to push up wages in the capitalist sector but this would only happen if the subsistence producers were allowed to keep the benefit of the increased production </li></ul><ul><li>It is not profitable to produce a growing volume of manufactures unless agricultural production is growing simultaneously. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>This is also why industrial and agrarian revolutions always go together, and why economies in which agriculture is stagnant do not show industrial development </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Not that overpopulated underdeveloped countries needed to industrialize. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>It was that a process of accumulation could start with capitalist enterprise, be it in the agricultural, mining, manufacturing, tourist or other service sector. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Once initiated the productivity of the entire economy and notably the agricultural sector could be transformed leading to self sustaining development. </li></ul></ul>

×