Designingsoaformultiplebusinessunits 090312214200-phpapp01

537 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
537
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Presentation Title Date Author
  • Presentation Title Date Author
  • Presentation Title Date Author
  • Domestic : Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, DoD, Department of Energy, DHS Internal (UK) : Department for Transport, Metropolitan Police, Census Department, National Air Traffic Service, MoD
  • Presentation Title Date Author IT organizations, and enterprises in general, have long been made up of many different tribes divided by function, geography, M&A, etc. There are also other type of tribes that make up an enterprise these tribes are divided by things such as different business units, customer bases in large enterprises, and culture
  • Designingsoaformultiplebusinessunits 090312214200-phpapp01

    1. 1. Designing SOA for Multiple Business Units Tim Vibbert (SOA Chief) Enterprise Architect
    2. 2. Tim Vibbert (SOA Chief), <ul><li>Work </li></ul><ul><li>Staff Systems Engineer Lockheed Martin </li></ul><ul><li>School </li></ul><ul><li>MS Computer Information Science, LaSalle University </li></ul><ul><li>BS Computer Science, UT-Martin </li></ul><ul><li>SOA </li></ul><ul><li>OASIS SOA-RM/RA TC </li></ul><ul><li>Speaker Innovation World </li></ul><ul><li>Keynote Speaker SOA Executive Forum </li></ul><ul><li>SOA Consortium </li></ul><ul><li>Social </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Twitter: soachief </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>LinkedIn: Tim Vibbert (SOA Chief) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blogs: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Thoughts of the SOA Chief </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>SOA Chief in the Clouds </li></ul></ul>
    3. 3. <ul><li>Who is Lockheed Martin? </li></ul>
    4. 4. Lockheed Martin (LMT) <ul><li>Defense Contractor </li></ul><ul><li>2007 sales: $41B+ </li></ul><ul><li>Employees: 140,000 world-wide </li></ul>
    5. 5. LM Corporate Complexity
    6. 6. LM IS&GS Complexity
    7. 7. Information Systems and Global Services (IS&GS) <ul><ul><li>Sales: $10B </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Projects: 4,000 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Employees: 52,000 world-wide </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Operations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1,000 locations, every state in the nation, 50 countries around the world </li></ul></ul>
    8. 8. Global Customers Domestic International (UK)
    9. 9. <ul><li>What is the result of such complexity? </li></ul>
    10. 10. An Enterprise IT Jungle
    11. 11. <ul><li>How do enterprises reach this point? </li></ul>
    12. 12. Enterprise IT is an evolved system…
    13. 13. What are the Symptoms? <ul><li>Project Based Funding </li></ul><ul><li>ROI Measured Per-Project </li></ul><ul><li>IT Projects create messes for others </li></ul><ul><li>Good for me bad for you thinking… </li></ul><ul><li>Pushing cost and complexity </li></ul>
    14. 14. Tribalism within Organizations <ul><li>Fragmenting by Function </li></ul><ul><li>By Platform </li></ul><ul><li>By Legacy </li></ul><ul><li>Geography </li></ul><ul><li>Mergers and Acquisitions </li></ul><ul><li>System Integrators </li></ul><ul><li>By Centralization </li></ul><ul><li>Business Units </li></ul><ul><li>Culture Tribes </li></ul><ul><li>Customers </li></ul><ul><li>Long term/short term employees </li></ul>Good for Me, Bad for You…
    15. 15. Multiple Business Unit SOAs Business Unit 1 Business Unit 2
    16. 16. Result of SOA Silos
    17. 17. <ul><li>What’s the Cure? </li></ul>
    18. 18. How to Realize the promises of SOA?
    19. 19. Tribalism and Federation Relationship <ul><li>Different groups may select different technologies to satisfy their requirements </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Business Unit 1 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Open Source technologies </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Business Unit 2 selects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Single vendor SOA technology stack </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Forces governance interoperability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Requires governance interoperability guidelines and mechanisms </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Tribe 1 can not control what tribe 2 does </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Different tribes operate on different charging models </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Requires design-time and runtime governance interoperability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Runtime for enforcing service delivery contracts and gather invoicing metrics </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Design-time for advertising the available charging options via metadata </li></ul></ul></ul>
    20. 20. SOA Federation Patterns <ul><li>Direct SOA Federation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Best for small number of federates </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Each federate must have a priori knowledge of the other federates </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>To which it can communicate </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Configured via registry/repository metadata to expose services in other domains </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Proxied SOA Federation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Many different federates are interconnected via foundation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Foundation serves as a proxy but does not host services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Federates have no a priori knowledge of other federates just proxy </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Simple governance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Services and delivery contracts defined in foundation the propagated to federates </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Master-slave relationship </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Complete SOA Federation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Best for extremely complex enterprises with many different federates </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More complex extension of proxied pattern </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Hosts enterprise/shared services as well </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Federated governance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Federates have local authority but must observe enterprise foundation concerns </li></ul></ul></ul>
    21. 21. Direct SOA Federation Business Unit 1 Business Unit 2
    22. 22. Proxied SOA Federation Enterprise SOA Foundation Business Unit 1 Business Unit 2 Business Unit 3 Service Providers WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy
    23. 23. Complete SOA Federation Open Source Vendor 2 Vendor 1 Different Config Business Unit 1 Enterprise SOA Foundation Business Unit 2 Business Unit 3 Business Unit 4 Service Providers WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy WSDL/Policy Service Providers WSDL/Policy
    24. 24. Result of Enterprise Governance
    25. 25. 4 Keys to SOA Federation <ul><li>Understand SOA is Enterprise transformation & not just infrastructure </li></ul><ul><ul><li>SOA is a journey not a project </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Establish Enterprise objectives and outcomes </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Define strategy for enterprise SOA adoption </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Align business units with the enterprise </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Realize impacts of federation and interoperability on SOA Platform strategies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Align SOA federation strategy with SOA Governance strategy </li></ul></ul>
    26. 26. 4 Keys to SOA Federation <ul><li>Establish Enterprise SOA Foundation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Federated Ecosystem </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Determine the appropriate pattern(s) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Enterprise service delivery platform </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Enterprise portfolio </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Governance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>policies, processes, best practices </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>cost models, COE, enterprise service org </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>waiver plans </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Allow business units to operate as federates </li></ul>
    27. 27. Pilamaya yelo (Thank You)

    ×