Neicn 2010 presentation


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Neicn 2010 presentation

  1. 1. 1 NEICN 2010 Dr Marie Arndt Up your KILT! Techie teaching Waiting for Godot. Technology has become an increasingly featured pedagogical tool in teaching and learning. It is, however, unevenly used within various disciplines, and is significantly less applied in teaching literature than in many other disciplines. E-learning may be the salvation for many people who want to study, but are unable to have direct access to education for different reasons. In the current financial climate the additional constraint of funding cuts, especially in areas like our own, alternatives must be considered, but not allowed to reduce the focus on our subject. E-learning, purely online studying, or blended learning, online and face- to-face learning, offer alternatives that can help squeeze shorter contact time and/or growing group sizes into a manageable situation for a lecturer, but first you need to know what is available in terms of, for example web 2.0 tools and the pedagogical gains to be had from using technology in teaching and learning. I am not going to give you a lesson in e-learning, but I am going to talk you through an example of how technology can be used in teaching a particular text that we all know, Waiting for Godot.
  2. 2. 2 Waiting for Godot can be a challenge to teach to both A-level and undergraduate students. Students are not necessarily familiar with the theatre of the absurd in general, nor with Beckett or his work. Furthermore, we would probably also encounter insurmountable obstacles due to time constraints if we consider the diverse contextual aspects, including culture and language, that we may want to bring to our students’ attention. In this presentation I will pay attention to how blended learning can be particularly beneficial when teaching an area like Irish literature to students with little or no background knowledge of the Irish context in order to acquire an informed reading. In my introduction I highlighted the dilemma of covering a lot of material and angles in a short space of time. This problem can be for example be solved by preparing podcasts, documents and provide links for additional material that students can access out of contact time, at any time they wish. It is advisable that they are required to feedback on key material provided, to check the progress of their learning and understanding of context and the play. Preparing podcasts may seem like a daunting and time-consuming task, but there are easy-to-use programmes to use, like Audacity. Another programme, ScreenToaster, allows you to record a sound to comments on presentations or documents that can be stored as screenshots, with
  3. 3. 3 sound to accompany the whole presentation. If you are teaching the same text to several groups and for several years this presentation can be re-used and thereby save you time. The students will also benefit from podcasts as it provides the opportunity to listen several times, and focus on parts that they find particularly difficult. In designing elearning reflective writing has become an important feature. This element requires or encourages students to record difficulties or thoughts while engaged in study; these entries can be used for peer or seminar discussions, revision and assessment. Reflective writing can also benefit analysis and preparation for written assignments. In this context it is worth mentioning that research has argued a lot for the benefit of using reflective writing by students as a source for assessment. Objections, however, have included arguments that if students know that their reflective writing will be assessed it may inhibit their honesty in verbalising difficulties in understanding a text, for fear of being marked down. In order to overcome these obstacles it is necessary to weigh up beforehand the pros and cons, and justify to yourself and your students why you want them to use reflective writing and for what purpose. Reflective writing can be done in blogs, in eportfolio-systems like Mahara, or by using an eportfolio-style system, like Google Docs. Your institutional VLE may allow all these methods.
  4. 4. 4 Students should be encouraged to collaborate and technology makes that easy. Apart from discussions in seminars students can comment on each other’s blogs and also create a group wiki, for example, as preparation of group activities and for collaborative preparation of particular aspects of the text for seminars. Students can be encouraged or required to keep a reflective journal throughout a course, in order to keep track of their learning and understanding. All documents can be collected in an eportfolio. Example: integrating technology in teaching Waiting for Godot. Activity 1
  5. 5. 5 + What do you associate with the expression ‘Nothing to be done’? Write down your thoughts in a blog post. This reflection can form the basis of the initial discussion at the first lecture, which can lead into an introduction of the play that can focus on ‘the human condition’ and that Waiting for Godot is a play where nothing happens, twice. In a lecture we have time to give a few initial points about the philosophy at the heart of the play, but only additional material, will give students the opportunity to learn more about Existentialism. Here you can record a lecture in a podcast about Existentialism and/or refer in links to material on YouTube. + Students can then be required to write what they have learnt about Existentialism in a blog entitled ‘Existentialism’, including reflection on the difference between ‘existing’ and ‘living’. Also encourage students to read and comment on blogs by their peers. Students should go back to their description later, to check on aspects of Existentialism in the play. Students’ blog entries can form the basis of an introductory lecture to the play, including a Power Point presentation. It is also helpful to add a transcript, for students who need additional support to follow the presentation. Activity 2 Students should now have learnt more about the philosophy and ideas in the play, so they can start exploring the play.
  6. 6. 6 Watch a clip in class from YouTube or any film source available of the opening of the play. As this is a play, it is meant to be watched, not read. Watch the clip with the sound turned off. Link to watch the opening of the play. While watching the clip consider the following points: + How does the lack of sound add to your observations about setting, time, and the characters? Pay particular attention to how the pair behave towards each other; you’ll find a lot of clues in their body language. + Does the silence give you a better idea about pace in the play? + Who seems to be doing most of the talking, Vladimir or Gogo? What does that add to your understanding of their relationship? + The setting. Describe the landscape. + The characters. Describe their dress and what it may tell you about them. Observe the body language to describe the relationship between Vladimir and Estragon (Gogo). Discuss in class Now watch the same clip with the sound switched on. Consider the following points: + Describe Vladimir and Gogo’s perception of time and place? Remember that Vladimir says that conversations will help to ‘pass the time’. + What difference does it make to watch the clip without and with sound?
  7. 7. 7 Discuss in class. Afterwards there students should add comments in their blog, including points about watching the clip with and without sound. This is reflective writing as a follow-up from lecture and discussion. Students prepare for lecture or seminar. Read Act 1 Reflect on the following point: + The language in the play. ‘Nothing to be done’ is a key phrase in the play, and it is repeated several times in this short clip. When would you use that phrase? Why are Vladimir and Gogo using it so often? How does it relate to their waiting for Godot? How does it relate to what you know about Existentialism? Add your notes to your blogpost about the opening of the play. These are examples of how technology can be used in teaching literature. What you use depends on time at your disposal, learning objectives, students’ technological skills, what they can easily access and technology available in the institution. Whatever you use, you must be comfortable using it and justify its pedagogical benefit.