Contingency Theory

20,031 views

Published on

This power point is about contingency theory, one of some theories of leadership. Hope you guys find it useful. Email me if you have any question: dolphin.blue9x@gmail.com
I'd be delighted to receive your emails

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
8 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
20,031
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
11
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
647
Comments
0
Likes
8
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Contingency Theory

  1. 1. Group Presentation
  2. 2. Contingency TheoryGroup 5: Tran Hoang Mai Duong Thi HuongHa The He Bui Nhu Hong HanhNguyen Le Thuc Oanh Le Minh Tan Trung
  3. 3. Contingency TheoryUnderstanding the ModelLeadership StylesSituational VariablesStrengths and CriticismsApplication
  4. 4. Understanding the Model Born 1922 - is one of the leading researchers inIndustrial and organizational psychology of the20th century He helped this field move from the research ontraits and personal characteristics of leaders, toleadership styles and behaviors. In 1967 he introduced the contingency modelingof leadership, with the now-famous Fiedlercontingency model.Fred Fiedler
  5. 5. Understanding the Model There is no one best style of leadership. Instead, a leader’s effectiveness isbased on the situation.Leadership StylesSituationalFavorablenessv.s.
  6. 6. Leadership Styles
  7. 7. Leadership StylesTask motivated: primarily reaching a goalRelationship motivated: developing closerelationship
  8. 8. LPC – leadership instrumentsTo measure the leadershipstyleLeast Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) ScaleHigh LPCs = Relationship-motivatedLow LPCs = Task-motivated
  9. 9. Situational VariablesContingency theory suggest that situations can be characterized in terms ofthree factors:1. Leader-member relations2. Task structure3. Position power
  10. 10. Leader-member relation Consist of the group atmosphere and the degree of confidence, loyaltyand attraction that followers fell for their leader.Atm: +++subordinates trust, getalong with their leaderAtm: unfriendlyFriction exists within thegroup
  11. 11. Task structureConsidered as structured when: the performer know the requirement clearly the path to accomplishing the task has few alternatives completion the task can be clearly demonstrated only limited number of correct solutions to task exist- Is the degree to which the requirements of a task are clear and spelled out- Task that are completely structured tend to give more control to theleader, whereas vague and unclear tasks lessen the leader’s control andinfluence.
  12. 12. Position Power Position power: the amount of authority the leader has to reward or to punish followers Includes the legitimate power Strong: a person has the authority to hire and fire or give raises in rank or pay Weak: vice versa
  13. 13. Situational Variables The most favorable situation are those having good leader-followerrelations, defined tasks, and strong leader-position power. (task-motivated) The least favorable situation are those having bad leader-followerrelations, structured tasks and weak leader-position power. (task-motivated) The moderately favorable fall b/w these two extremes. (relationship-motivated)
  14. 14. Contingency theory is concerned witha. Styles and Traitsb. Situations and Stylesc. Traits and Situationsd. Skills and Stylesb. Situations and Styles
  15. 15. How many factors can situation be characterized?a. 1b. 2c. 3d. 4c . 3
  16. 16. Strengths and CriticismsStrengthsCriticisms
  17. 17. empirical research andpredictive powerbroaden ourunderstanding ofleadershipprovides data on leader’s stylesthat could be useful toorganization in developingleadership profiles.do not require thatleaders be effective in allsituationalIt failed to explain fully whypeople with certain leadershipstyles are more effective in somesituation than in othersFails to explain adequately whatorganization should do whenthere is a mismatch betweenleader and the situationThe LPC scale does not seemvalid on the surface because itdoes not correlate well with otherstandard leadership measuresUnfriendly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FriendlyUnpleasant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PleasantRejecting 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AcceptingTense 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RelaxedCold 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WarmBoring 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 InterestingBackbiting 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LoyalUncooperative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CooperativeHostile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SupportiveGuarded 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OpenInsincere 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SincereUnkind 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KindInconsiderate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ConsiderateUntrustworthy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TrustworthyGloomy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cheerful
  18. 18. Applications??????
  19. 19. Conclusion- Natural leadership style, and the situations in which itwill be most effective.- The model says that leader are either task-focused, orrelationship-focused.- It doesn’t allow for leadership flexibility, and the LPCscore might give an inaccurate picture of yourleadership style.
  20. 20. Thank you for your attention!! 

×