Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Rand Fishkin
Rand FishkinFounder, CEO, Author at SparkToro
Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | rand@moz.com
Why SEO That Used to Work Fails
How shifts in the search landscape, marketing channels, & user
behavior mean what used to work in SEO, doesn’t anymore.
bit.ly/whyseofails
Get the presentation:
#1
Tactical SEO fails. Strategic
SEO works.
SEO as a Tactic:
Example: Rand’s new site offering dating advice to Jewish guys
I went on dates with four
different people from
1995-2001 (then I met
Geraldine).
I must be qualified!
I want to rank for
these keywords.
SEO as a Tactic:
Controlling
your nebbishy
nature
How to say no
to Mom’s
setup
attempts
What is this
‘sports’ thing?
How schlubby
is too
schlubby?
Keywords for Menschify.com
I want to grow our search
traffic by 33% this year.
SEO as a Tactic:
Why Doesn’t This Work? What
Changed?
The Ranking Algo Used to Feel Like This:
Keyword
Matching
Domain
Authority
Link
Signals
QDF Ranking+ + + =
Great. Just do that stuff on the
pages I told you to rank.
Now It Feels More Like This:
Keyword
Matching
Domain
Authority
Link
Signals
QDF
(& QDD)
Ranking
+ + + +
Uhhh…OK. So just do all that now, right?
Intent
Matching
Topical
Authority
Usage
Signals
User
Experience+ + + =
HTTPS,
Mobile,
+
We Used to Run Marketing
Channels as Distinct, Separate Silos
Organic
Search
Social
Media
Paid
Search
Email
Brand
Marketing
Offline &
WoM
Onpage Channels
Quality
Score
List Size &
Quality
Sentiment Virality
Offpage Following Spend
Open &
Click Rate
Reach Distri-bution
Each Channel Contributed
Individually to the Whole
3X
Organic
Search
Social
Media
Paid
Search+ + =
Then, Some Marketers Realized the Benefits of
Channel Integration
6X=
Organic
Search
Social
Media
Paid
Search
This Integration Benefits from Two Trends
Search Social Offline Email Content WoM
#1: More web users consuming more of these in tandem:
#2: Many of these channels
directly & indirectly influencing
each other:
So What Does Strategic
SEO Look Like?
SEOAs a Strategy:
Audience
Amplification
Funnel
We need to answer questions
about each of these to form a
coherent SEO strategy
Who is my target customer?And who will
eventually become a target customer?
Who/what influences mytarget customers?
Audience
What channels can I use toreach these
three audiences?
Funnel
Which parts of our marketing
funnel are right for SEO?
What problems, questions, or topics
do people have that align w/ our
goals?
How will we earn the visibility signals
necessary tocompete?
Amplification
Why will those who see our work amplify us
rather than our competition?
SEOAs a Strategy:
Audience
Amplification
Funnel
Once you nail these, the
tactical to-do list is much
easier to create (and much
more effective)
#2
Building a well-SEO’d site may be
less valuable than building a
powerful brand.
2011:
I think that’s the only
one I’ve heard of…
2015:
Hmm… Pretty sure that’s 5 of
the 7 largest, best-known auto
insurers in the US?
2011:
I know Sunset, but none
of these others.
2015:
This is the only brand on
page one I don’t know.
Why? What Changed?
#1: Brands Got SeriousAbout Investing in SEO
In years past, big brands
didn’t have in-house SEO
teams. Today, it’s a
standard.
#2: Brands Benefitted from Shifts in Google’sAlgo
More Links = Higher
Rankings
Better Links =
Higher Rankings
Brand familiarity & UX
barely influence SEO
Usage signals mean brand & UX
are powerful influencers
Naïve KW matching
rewards KW-centric SEO
Topic & intent-matching reward
more holistic content
2015:2011:
These brand info drop-
downs suggest to me
Google’s deeply
interested in
highlighting brands in
their SERPs.
In many results, there’s
an eerie correlation
between high rankings
and sites that have the
brand drop-down.
Building a well-known brand may
soon be a prerequisite for ranking in
Google.
#3
Choosing the right keywords is
much more complex than in the
past.
Old Keyword Prioritization Methodology
Term/Phrase Est. Volume Biz Value
What’saMensch
Whattowearona
firstdate
Sarmassophobia
Kosherdateideas
100/month
1,000/month
20/month
30/month
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Pri
2
1
5
3
Fearofdating 50/month Medium 4
Why doesn’t this work anymore?
What changed?
Even ranking #1 probably won’t
get the site many visits.
This SERP has a bias to
fresh content and an
image block that
probably gets a lot of the
traffic
It probably makes no sense to
target these queries separately
Opportunity seems higher and
competition lower than the
others keywords…
What Should Keyword Evaluation
Look Like in 2015?
New Keyword Prioritization Methodology
KW Volume Value
What’saMensch
Whattowearona
firstdate
Sarmassophobia
Kosherdateideas
100/mth
1,000/mth
20/mth
30/mth
Medium
Low
High
High
Pri
4
3
1
2
Fearofdating 50/mth High 1
Oppty FeaturesDiff
54%
47%
17%
50%
41%
Low
Medium
High
High
High
KG
Images
None
ForumSitelinks
None
54%
47%
17%
50%
41%
New Keyword Prioritization Methodology
KW Volume Value
What’saMensch
Whattowearona
firstdate
Sarmassophobia
Kosherdateideas
100/mth
1,000/mth
20/mth
30/mth
Medium
Low
High
High
Pri
Fearofdating 50/mth High
Oppty FeaturesDiff
Low
Medium
High
High
High
KG
Images
None
ForumSitelinks
None
These two should be targeted by
a single piece of content
4
3
1
2
1
4
3
1
2
1
54%
47%
17%
50%
41%
New Keyword Prioritization Methodology
KW Volume Value
What’saMensch
Whattowearona
firstdate
Sarmassophobia
Kosherdateideas
100/mth
1,000/mth
20/mth
30/mth
Medium
Low
High
High
Pri
Fearofdating 50/mth High
Oppty FeaturesDiff
Low
Medium
High
High
High
KG
Images
None
ForumSitelinks
None
This may not even be a target at all given
the low opportunity for traffic
4
3
1
2
1
54%
47%
17%
50%
41%
New Keyword Prioritization Methodology
KW Volume Value
What’saMensch
Whattowearona
firstdate
Sarmassophobia
Kosherdateideas
100/mth
1,000/mth
20/mth
30/mth
Medium
Low
High
High
Pri
Fearofdating 50/mth High
Oppty FeaturesDiff
Low
Medium
High
High
High
KG
Images
None
ForumSitelinks
None
The image block may be an easier target
for this query
Keyword Evaluation in 2015
Has to Be Broader to Be
Successful
Potential Reach
(volume)
Intent Overlap
Opportunity
Business
Value
Verticals/
Features
Content
Requirements
Audience
Targeting
#4
Earn links like a publicist, not
like a link builder.
Irony: IfAnyone Can Get the Link,
No One Should
Google should really have
an answer box here
warning searchers
against using any of
these results
Same story here – chase links like this and
Google will make your life rough.
BTW – if you ever want to get around these annoying things, just use
Google’s “cache:url” command and hit “Text only”
Every One of These is Dangerous:
Article Marketing
Private Blog Networks
Article Directories
Link Directories
Web 2.0 Links
Article Spinners
Xrumer blasts
Link Wheels
Press Release Submissions
Link Pyramids Social Bookmark Links
Dofollow Comments
SENuke
Open Edu/Gov Links
Redirection links
When it comes to links, stay away from these
verbs and adjectives:
Manual High PR
BuySpin
Dofollow
Submit Blast
Multi-tier
Expired Domain
Inject
Separate C-block Private
It’s not just manipulative links – manual link
acquisition in general sucks
I’ve spent months
mastering link building, and
can get 2-3 good
links/day… why can’t I beat
the competition?!
Manual links can’t compete against a scalable flywheel
Do Amazing Stuff
(content, product, press, events, etc)
Get attention from those
who can amplify to a
bigger audience
Grow your amplification abilities
(social, blog, RSS, PR, authority from links, etc)
Earn more attention,
amplification, and growth
next time
Manual links can’t compete against a scalable flywheel
Do Amazing Stuff
(content, product, press, events, etc)
Get attention from those
who can amplify to a
bigger audience
Grow your amplification abilities
(social, blog, RSS, PR, authority from links, etc)
Earn more attention,
amplification, and growth
next time
So that’s
why…
Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails
Why can’t we “acquire” links? What
changed?
1997-2011: Link Spam was Google’s Problem
Via the Moz Blog
2012-Present: Link Spam is Our Problem
Via Marie Haynes
What kinds of links still work?
Link from a guest post by
Geraldine on MarieClaire.
The Ones You Earn
Link from an interview by
Mashable.
The Ones You Earn
Granted, the anchor text is a little
weird, but it’s still a great link!
The Ones You Earn
This Will Get You in Trouble:
Crappy Links
Seek out
links to rank
better
Acquire
them
manually
Submit,
pay, beg,
trade, etc.
+ + = Low Scalability
Risk of Penalties
This Will Get You the Right Links:
Do stuff
worthy of
attention
Earn
amplifi-
cation
Links come
in naturally+ + =
Traffic
Branding
Rankings
#5
Nailing SEO might not produce
results w/o accompanying user &
usage signals.
Say you make some
great content, get some
great links, and rank
here.
But, the piece doesn’t engage
visitors (or it loads slow, or
doesn’t look right on their device).
They click “back” and choose a
different result.
Unbelievably, eHarmony ranks w/ this awful
page (10 signs? They only list 1!!)
But, searchers who click this
one engage with it, browse
more pages on the site, and
don’t repeat the query.
All that effort probably won’t help
you maintain those rankings (and
having a poor user experience
could hurt your whole site in the
engines’ eyes)
Why won’t I keep my rankings?
What changed?
Search engines call the click-back-
and-choose-a-different-result
behavior “pogo-sticking,” and they
use it in evaluating rankings.
Read more about
Yahoo!’s Patent Application here.
Read more about
Google’s patent application on usage data here.
Engines probably also use data
related to the visit frequency of
pages/sites, so getting traffic from
other sources and satisfying those
visitors might help your SEO, too.
Perfect
Keyword
Targeting
Domain
Authority
Loads of
Links
Anchor Text+ + + +
Great
Content
Excellent
UX
Lots of
Traffic
High
Engagement+ + +
Schema
Markup
Might Be Worse Than:
Perfect
Keyword
Targeting
Domain
Authority
Loads of
Links
Anchor Text+ + + +
Great
Content
Excellent
UX
Lots of
Traffic
High
Engagement+ + +
Schema
Markup
Might Be Worse Than:Smart players will invest in all of these.
#6
SEO might no longer be a great way
to get early traction.
Bad biscuits make the
baker broke, bro.
Great Biscuits A Brand People Know,
Love, & Share
Great Rankings
Great Biscuits A Brand People Know,
Love, & Share
Great Rankings
The era of this formula being
reversible is disappearing fast.
Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | rand@moz.com
bit.ly/whyseofails
1 of 76

More Related Content

Viewers also liked(20)

2017 State of Marketing Report2017 State of Marketing Report
2017 State of Marketing Report
Manny Rivera45.1K views
How To Suck at MarketingHow To Suck at Marketing
How To Suck at Marketing
HubSpot247.4K views
How To Create Buyer Personas - Digital OlympusHow To Create Buyer Personas - Digital Olympus
How To Create Buyer Personas - Digital Olympus
Gianluca Fiorelli123.3K views
Why Visual Content WorksWhy Visual Content Works
Why Visual Content Works
Matt Siltala208.8K views
DO GOOD (Better)DO GOOD (Better)
DO GOOD (Better)
Bruce Kasanoff515.6K views
Optimizing Your Content Marketing and Blog for ConversionsOptimizing Your Content Marketing and Blog for Conversions
Optimizing Your Content Marketing and Blog for Conversions
Kissmetrics on SlideShare275.2K views
Experiences: The Seventh Era Of MarketingExperiences: The Seventh Era Of Marketing
Experiences: The Seventh Era Of Marketing
The Content Advisory118.2K views
Secrets to building an actionable audienceSecrets to building an actionable audience
Secrets to building an actionable audience
Mark Schaefer221.1K views
8 Free Types of Marketing Strategies8 Free Types of Marketing Strategies
8 Free Types of Marketing Strategies
Brian Downard233.5K views

Similar to Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails(20)

SEO Tactics to Love vs. LeaveSEO Tactics to Love vs. Leave
SEO Tactics to Love vs. Leave
Rand Fishkin263.2K views
How to Fix Failing SEO EffortsHow to Fix Failing SEO Efforts
How to Fix Failing SEO Efforts
Affiliate Summit811 views
SEO & Conversions 7.25.10SEO & Conversions 7.25.10
SEO & Conversions 7.25.10
Josh Ward304 views
Long term seo - how to win for years - not daysLong term seo - how to win for years - not days
Long term seo - how to win for years - not days
Search Marketing Expo - SMX728 views
What you don't know about SEO CAN hurt youWhat you don't know about SEO CAN hurt you
What you don't know about SEO CAN hurt you
Leading Results, Inc1.1K views
The Business of SEOThe Business of SEO
The Business of SEO
Lisa Myers2.2K views
Ranking Elements of the FutureRanking Elements of the Future
Ranking Elements of the Future
Rand Fishkin69.8K views
Search engine optimisation seminar - Glos/Bris Autumn 2010Search engine optimisation seminar - Glos/Bris Autumn 2010
Search engine optimisation seminar - Glos/Bris Autumn 2010
Business Link South West - Events 697 views
Keeping up with Google 2014Keeping up with Google 2014
Keeping up with Google 2014
Calvin Nguyen1.5K views

More from Rand Fishkin(20)

SparkToro Beta Sneak PeekSparkToro Beta Sneak Peek
SparkToro Beta Sneak Peek
Rand Fishkin31.2K views
Building Influence in 2019Building Influence in 2019
Building Influence in 2019
Rand Fishkin28.2K views
Influence Not InfluencersInfluence Not Influencers
Influence Not Influencers
Rand Fishkin32.7K views
The Big 7 Startup Marketing MistakesThe Big 7 Startup Marketing Mistakes
The Big 7 Startup Marketing Mistakes
Rand Fishkin28.3K views
The Search & SEO World in 2018The Search & SEO World in 2018
The Search & SEO World in 2018
Rand Fishkin136K views
SEO in 2017/18SEO in 2017/18
SEO in 2017/18
Rand Fishkin229.2K views
B2B SEO in 2017B2B SEO in 2017
B2B SEO in 2017
Rand Fishkin91.2K views
Inside Google's Numbers in 2017Inside Google's Numbers in 2017
Inside Google's Numbers in 2017
Rand Fishkin1.9M views
Why We Can't Do SEO WIthout CROWhy We Can't Do SEO WIthout CRO
Why We Can't Do SEO WIthout CRO
Rand Fishkin82.8K views
The Digital Marketer's FrameworkThe Digital Marketer's Framework
The Digital Marketer's Framework
Rand Fishkin128.6K views
SEO & UX: So Happy TogetherSEO & UX: So Happy Together
SEO & UX: So Happy Together
Rand Fishkin53.6K views
The Search Landscape in 2017The Search Landscape in 2017
The Search Landscape in 2017
Rand Fishkin98.1K views
The Paradox of Great ContentThe Paradox of Great Content
The Paradox of Great Content
Rand Fishkin80.9K views

Recently uploaded(20)

childcare.pdfchildcare.pdf
childcare.pdf
fatma alnaqbi13 views
zotabet.pdfzotabet.pdf
zotabet.pdf
zotabetcasino6 views
AI Powered event-driven translation botAI Powered event-driven translation bot
AI Powered event-driven translation bot
Jimmy Dahlqvist15 views
Serverless cloud architecture patternsServerless cloud architecture patterns
Serverless cloud architecture patterns
Jimmy Dahlqvist15 views
KHNOG 5: APNIC ServicesKHNOG 5: APNIC Services
KHNOG 5: APNIC Services
APNIC405 views
informing ideas.docxinforming ideas.docx
informing ideas.docx
MollyBrown8612 views
Audience profile.pptxAudience profile.pptx
Audience profile.pptx
MollyBrown8612 views
DU Series - Day 4.pptxDU Series - Day 4.pptx
DU Series - Day 4.pptx
UiPathCommunity73 views
 FS Design 2024 V2.pptx FS Design 2024 V2.pptx
FS Design 2024 V2.pptx
paswanlearning7 views
Existing documentaries (1).docxExisting documentaries (1).docx
Existing documentaries (1).docx
MollyBrown8613 views
informationinformation
information
khelgishekhar6 views
WEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptxWEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptx
WEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptx
narmadhamanohar218 views
DU_SERIES_Session1.pdfDU_SERIES_Session1.pdf
DU_SERIES_Session1.pdf
RohitRadhakrishnan8773 views

Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

  • 1. Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | rand@moz.com Why SEO That Used to Work Fails How shifts in the search landscape, marketing channels, & user behavior mean what used to work in SEO, doesn’t anymore.
  • 3. #1 Tactical SEO fails. Strategic SEO works.
  • 4. SEO as a Tactic: Example: Rand’s new site offering dating advice to Jewish guys I went on dates with four different people from 1995-2001 (then I met Geraldine). I must be qualified!
  • 5. I want to rank for these keywords. SEO as a Tactic: Controlling your nebbishy nature How to say no to Mom’s setup attempts What is this ‘sports’ thing? How schlubby is too schlubby? Keywords for Menschify.com
  • 6. I want to grow our search traffic by 33% this year. SEO as a Tactic:
  • 7. Why Doesn’t This Work? What Changed?
  • 8. The Ranking Algo Used to Feel Like This: Keyword Matching Domain Authority Link Signals QDF Ranking+ + + = Great. Just do that stuff on the pages I told you to rank.
  • 9. Now It Feels More Like This: Keyword Matching Domain Authority Link Signals QDF (& QDD) Ranking + + + + Uhhh…OK. So just do all that now, right? Intent Matching Topical Authority Usage Signals User Experience+ + + = HTTPS, Mobile, +
  • 10. We Used to Run Marketing Channels as Distinct, Separate Silos Organic Search Social Media Paid Search Email Brand Marketing Offline & WoM Onpage Channels Quality Score List Size & Quality Sentiment Virality Offpage Following Spend Open & Click Rate Reach Distri-bution
  • 11. Each Channel Contributed Individually to the Whole 3X Organic Search Social Media Paid Search+ + =
  • 12. Then, Some Marketers Realized the Benefits of Channel Integration 6X= Organic Search Social Media Paid Search
  • 13. This Integration Benefits from Two Trends Search Social Offline Email Content WoM #1: More web users consuming more of these in tandem: #2: Many of these channels directly & indirectly influencing each other:
  • 14. So What Does Strategic SEO Look Like?
  • 15. SEOAs a Strategy: Audience Amplification Funnel We need to answer questions about each of these to form a coherent SEO strategy
  • 16. Who is my target customer?And who will eventually become a target customer? Who/what influences mytarget customers? Audience What channels can I use toreach these three audiences?
  • 17. Funnel Which parts of our marketing funnel are right for SEO? What problems, questions, or topics do people have that align w/ our goals?
  • 18. How will we earn the visibility signals necessary tocompete? Amplification Why will those who see our work amplify us rather than our competition?
  • 19. SEOAs a Strategy: Audience Amplification Funnel Once you nail these, the tactical to-do list is much easier to create (and much more effective)
  • 20. #2 Building a well-SEO’d site may be less valuable than building a powerful brand.
  • 21. 2011: I think that’s the only one I’ve heard of…
  • 22. 2015: Hmm… Pretty sure that’s 5 of the 7 largest, best-known auto insurers in the US?
  • 23. 2011: I know Sunset, but none of these others.
  • 24. 2015: This is the only brand on page one I don’t know.
  • 26. #1: Brands Got SeriousAbout Investing in SEO In years past, big brands didn’t have in-house SEO teams. Today, it’s a standard.
  • 27. #2: Brands Benefitted from Shifts in Google’sAlgo More Links = Higher Rankings Better Links = Higher Rankings Brand familiarity & UX barely influence SEO Usage signals mean brand & UX are powerful influencers Naïve KW matching rewards KW-centric SEO Topic & intent-matching reward more holistic content 2015:2011:
  • 28. These brand info drop- downs suggest to me Google’s deeply interested in highlighting brands in their SERPs.
  • 29. In many results, there’s an eerie correlation between high rankings and sites that have the brand drop-down.
  • 30. Building a well-known brand may soon be a prerequisite for ranking in Google.
  • 31. #3 Choosing the right keywords is much more complex than in the past.
  • 32. Old Keyword Prioritization Methodology Term/Phrase Est. Volume Biz Value What’saMensch Whattowearona firstdate Sarmassophobia Kosherdateideas 100/month 1,000/month 20/month 30/month Low Medium Medium High Pri 2 1 5 3 Fearofdating 50/month Medium 4
  • 33. Why doesn’t this work anymore? What changed?
  • 34. Even ranking #1 probably won’t get the site many visits.
  • 35. This SERP has a bias to fresh content and an image block that probably gets a lot of the traffic
  • 36. It probably makes no sense to target these queries separately
  • 37. Opportunity seems higher and competition lower than the others keywords…
  • 38. What Should Keyword Evaluation Look Like in 2015?
  • 39. New Keyword Prioritization Methodology KW Volume Value What’saMensch Whattowearona firstdate Sarmassophobia Kosherdateideas 100/mth 1,000/mth 20/mth 30/mth Medium Low High High Pri 4 3 1 2 Fearofdating 50/mth High 1 Oppty FeaturesDiff 54% 47% 17% 50% 41% Low Medium High High High KG Images None ForumSitelinks None
  • 40. 54% 47% 17% 50% 41% New Keyword Prioritization Methodology KW Volume Value What’saMensch Whattowearona firstdate Sarmassophobia Kosherdateideas 100/mth 1,000/mth 20/mth 30/mth Medium Low High High Pri Fearofdating 50/mth High Oppty FeaturesDiff Low Medium High High High KG Images None ForumSitelinks None These two should be targeted by a single piece of content 4 3 1 2 1
  • 41. 4 3 1 2 1 54% 47% 17% 50% 41% New Keyword Prioritization Methodology KW Volume Value What’saMensch Whattowearona firstdate Sarmassophobia Kosherdateideas 100/mth 1,000/mth 20/mth 30/mth Medium Low High High Pri Fearofdating 50/mth High Oppty FeaturesDiff Low Medium High High High KG Images None ForumSitelinks None This may not even be a target at all given the low opportunity for traffic
  • 42. 4 3 1 2 1 54% 47% 17% 50% 41% New Keyword Prioritization Methodology KW Volume Value What’saMensch Whattowearona firstdate Sarmassophobia Kosherdateideas 100/mth 1,000/mth 20/mth 30/mth Medium Low High High Pri Fearofdating 50/mth High Oppty FeaturesDiff Low Medium High High High KG Images None ForumSitelinks None The image block may be an easier target for this query
  • 43. Keyword Evaluation in 2015 Has to Be Broader to Be Successful Potential Reach (volume) Intent Overlap Opportunity Business Value Verticals/ Features Content Requirements Audience Targeting
  • 44. #4 Earn links like a publicist, not like a link builder.
  • 45. Irony: IfAnyone Can Get the Link, No One Should Google should really have an answer box here warning searchers against using any of these results
  • 46. Same story here – chase links like this and Google will make your life rough.
  • 47. BTW – if you ever want to get around these annoying things, just use Google’s “cache:url” command and hit “Text only”
  • 48. Every One of These is Dangerous: Article Marketing Private Blog Networks Article Directories Link Directories Web 2.0 Links Article Spinners Xrumer blasts Link Wheels Press Release Submissions Link Pyramids Social Bookmark Links Dofollow Comments SENuke Open Edu/Gov Links Redirection links
  • 49. When it comes to links, stay away from these verbs and adjectives: Manual High PR BuySpin Dofollow Submit Blast Multi-tier Expired Domain Inject Separate C-block Private
  • 50. It’s not just manipulative links – manual link acquisition in general sucks I’ve spent months mastering link building, and can get 2-3 good links/day… why can’t I beat the competition?!
  • 51. Manual links can’t compete against a scalable flywheel Do Amazing Stuff (content, product, press, events, etc) Get attention from those who can amplify to a bigger audience Grow your amplification abilities (social, blog, RSS, PR, authority from links, etc) Earn more attention, amplification, and growth next time
  • 52. Manual links can’t compete against a scalable flywheel Do Amazing Stuff (content, product, press, events, etc) Get attention from those who can amplify to a bigger audience Grow your amplification abilities (social, blog, RSS, PR, authority from links, etc) Earn more attention, amplification, and growth next time So that’s why…
  • 54. Why can’t we “acquire” links? What changed?
  • 55. 1997-2011: Link Spam was Google’s Problem Via the Moz Blog
  • 56. 2012-Present: Link Spam is Our Problem Via Marie Haynes
  • 57. What kinds of links still work?
  • 58. Link from a guest post by Geraldine on MarieClaire. The Ones You Earn
  • 59. Link from an interview by Mashable. The Ones You Earn
  • 60. Granted, the anchor text is a little weird, but it’s still a great link! The Ones You Earn
  • 61. This Will Get You in Trouble: Crappy Links Seek out links to rank better Acquire them manually Submit, pay, beg, trade, etc. + + = Low Scalability Risk of Penalties This Will Get You the Right Links: Do stuff worthy of attention Earn amplifi- cation Links come in naturally+ + = Traffic Branding Rankings
  • 62. #5 Nailing SEO might not produce results w/o accompanying user & usage signals.
  • 63. Say you make some great content, get some great links, and rank here.
  • 64. But, the piece doesn’t engage visitors (or it loads slow, or doesn’t look right on their device). They click “back” and choose a different result. Unbelievably, eHarmony ranks w/ this awful page (10 signs? They only list 1!!)
  • 65. But, searchers who click this one engage with it, browse more pages on the site, and don’t repeat the query.
  • 66. All that effort probably won’t help you maintain those rankings (and having a poor user experience could hurt your whole site in the engines’ eyes)
  • 67. Why won’t I keep my rankings? What changed?
  • 68. Search engines call the click-back- and-choose-a-different-result behavior “pogo-sticking,” and they use it in evaluating rankings. Read more about Yahoo!’s Patent Application here.
  • 69. Read more about Google’s patent application on usage data here. Engines probably also use data related to the visit frequency of pages/sites, so getting traffic from other sources and satisfying those visitors might help your SEO, too.
  • 70. Perfect Keyword Targeting Domain Authority Loads of Links Anchor Text+ + + + Great Content Excellent UX Lots of Traffic High Engagement+ + + Schema Markup Might Be Worse Than:
  • 71. Perfect Keyword Targeting Domain Authority Loads of Links Anchor Text+ + + + Great Content Excellent UX Lots of Traffic High Engagement+ + + Schema Markup Might Be Worse Than:Smart players will invest in all of these.
  • 72. #6 SEO might no longer be a great way to get early traction.
  • 73. Bad biscuits make the baker broke, bro.
  • 74. Great Biscuits A Brand People Know, Love, & Share Great Rankings
  • 75. Great Biscuits A Brand People Know, Love, & Share Great Rankings The era of this formula being reversible is disappearing fast.
  • 76. Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | rand@moz.com bit.ly/whyseofails