Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

of

The Paradox of Great Content Slide 1 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 2 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 3 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 4 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 5 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 6 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 7 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 8 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 9 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 10 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 11 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 12 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 13 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 14 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 15 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 16 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 17 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 18 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 19 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 20 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 21 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 22 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 23 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 24 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 25 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 26 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 27 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 28 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 29 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 30 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 31 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 32 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 33 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 34 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 35 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 36 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 37 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 38 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 39 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 40 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 41 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 42 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 43 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 44 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 45 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 46 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 47 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 48 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 49 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 50 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 51 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 52 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 53 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 54 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 55 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 56 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 57 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 58 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 59 The Paradox of Great Content Slide 60
Upcoming SlideShare
The Worst Lessons Marketing Ever Taught Content
Next
Download to read offline and view in fullscreen.

23 Likes

Share

Download to read offline

The Paradox of Great Content

Download to read offline

Why do some pieces of "10X" content make the leap while others languish in obscurity? Rand examines the common elements that make for success vs. failure in this analysis of 99 unique pieces of extremely high quality content pieces.

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

The Paradox of Great Content

  1. Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | rand@moz.com The Paradox of “Great Content” Why Some Pieces Make the Leap While Others Languish in Obscurity
  2. A Tale of Two “10X” Content Investments
  3. Source
  4. Yikes. #10. Behind many far lower-quality, less-investment- heavy results 
  5. Source
  6. #1 for this and dozens of other keywords
  7. For 2.5 years, I’ve maintained a list of remarkable content from across the web…
  8. Analysis of 99 10X Pieces
  9. Links, Shares, & Ranking KWsAnalyzed
  10. Avg. Linking RDs: Avg. Ranking KWs: Avg. Facebook Shares: 919 2,834 77,990
  11. Correlation Shares->KWs: Correlation Shares->Links: Correlation Links->KWs: -0.014 0.069 0.386
  12. What Separates 10X Pieces That Perform vs. Those That Don’t?
  13. Keyword Research & Targeting#1
  14. Google made an immense investment in this resource.
  15. If only they’d done any SEO at all… Not blocking your own crawler might be a start 
  16. This piece may not look like much…
  17. But, sweet Christmas, does it rank…
  18. AStrong Investment in KW Research Clearly Paid Off IFixIt knows what searchers want, and delivers
  19. WhatYou Call Your 10X Content MattersALOT! Sadly, Polygraph titled their excellent analysis unwisely, & missed out on lots of extra search traffic
  20. Failure to Optimize for SERP CTR#2
  21. The Economist’s college rankings (which are, IMO, vastly better & more scientific than others) can’t compete in featured snippets b/c of the chart embed 
  22. FiveThirtyEight made the same type of mistake w/ their piece on gun deaths.
  23. Domain/URL Segmentation#3
  24. Many folks shoot themselves in the foot, creating unique domains or subdomains for their 10X content 
  25. Building on Another’s Platform#4
  26. Why Put a Phenomenal,Traffic & Link-GeneratingArticle on Medium & Not Your Own SiteToo?!
  27. Github seems like an even more peculiar choice as one’s only publishing platform…
  28. Some folks use 3rd-party platforms wisely – for distribution, not the primary home
  29. Accessibility #5
  30. 1,540 linking RDs 60K+ FB Shares Ranks for only 24 keywords 
  31. No, Frinkiac, you really don’t deserve this shabby lack of an internal link structure.
  32. Delightful, But Not Useful#6
  33. It’s hard to justify 10X investments that don’t provide ongoing value… unless you’re an ad agency 
  34. Ignores the Searcher’s Intent#7
  35. Content that fails to answer searchers’ goals can have a brief ranking “pop,” but usually falls thereafter
  36. We observe this w/ time- sensitive content, too. E.g. This amazing NYTimes graphic was a snapshot in Curry’s 3-point history, and thus, didn’t rank for long.
  37. Creates No Incentive to Link#8
  38. Made Reddit’s Front Page w/ 6568 upvotes 600+ Facebook Shares in a Week 42 Links
  39. IcelandAir made a big investment w/ this piece on the Northern Lights, but got only 5 links…
  40. A Few Additional Patterns & Observations
  41. There’s Subtle Evidence that Social VisitsAre Connected to Google’s Rankings Source
  42. I Observed This Same Phenomenon: Source
  43. In 10X Content, Data >Almost Everything Else Source
  44. Interactivity isAlso Powerful Source
  45. Media Companies Dominate FiveThirtyEight New York Times Bloomberg Other Media 7 7 7 19
  46. Brand ROI Can Be Outstanding, & Isn’t Just About Links or Rankings Source 515 Linking RDs Ranks for 92 KWs Worth it just for the positioning
  47. Source 248 Linking RDs Ranks for 47 KWs Shows off the UVP brilliantly
  48. Source 225 Linking RDs Ranks for 465 KWs Worth it for the brand awareness
  49. The Three Most Successful* Pieces *from an SEO perspective
  50. #3: Timelines of Geeky Fiction Source 96 Linking RDs Ranks for 9,616 KWs! 585 FB Shares
  51. #2: US Election Odds Source 7,180 Linking RDs Ranks for 22,723 KWs! 344 FB Shares
  52. #1: Zillow’s “Digs” Source 834 Linking RDs Ranks for 2,630 Insanely High Value KWs 8570 FB Shares
  53. Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | rand@moz.com bit.ly/contentparadox
  • sarvanmani

    Apr. 17, 2021
  • ericarueschhoff

    Oct. 29, 2019
  • JonathanKogan1

    Jun. 29, 2019
  • ShawnVenasse

    Apr. 22, 2019
  • PetrNachtmann

    Feb. 15, 2019
  • ChadWalsh2

    Aug. 11, 2018
  • Ukwelii

    Jul. 18, 2018
  • Slide117

    Jul. 18, 2018
  • joemedicis

    Jul. 18, 2018
  • simplyarun

    Jul. 17, 2018
  • TansuDasli

    Dec. 12, 2017
  • basaam07079

    Sep. 17, 2017
  • WeAreTheWords

    Aug. 25, 2017
  • MichaelPierangelino

    Aug. 15, 2017
  • AnuragKhare7

    Aug. 7, 2017
  • jgcallahan

    Aug. 2, 2017
  • waiwitchotchawjaru

    Jul. 31, 2017
  • ladybirda

    Jul. 30, 2017
  • WolfgangKhler

    Jul. 26, 2017
  • MarkoDenona

    Jul. 19, 2017

Why do some pieces of "10X" content make the leap while others languish in obscurity? Rand examines the common elements that make for success vs. failure in this analysis of 99 unique pieces of extremely high quality content pieces.

Views

Total views

72,118

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

27,851

Actions

Downloads

268

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

23

×