SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 45
Google’s Ranking Factors 2011 Early data from SEOmoz’s survey of 132 SEO professionals and correlation data from 10,000+ keyword rankings Download at: http://bit.ly/rankfactorsmunich Rand Fishkin, SEOmoz CEO, April 2011
SEOmoz Makes Software! We don’t offer consulting.
Understanding, Interpreting & Using Survey Opinion Data Everybody’s wrong sometimes, but there’s a lot we can learn from the aggregation of opinions
#1: Opinions are Not Fact (these are smart people, but they can’t know everything about Google’s rankings) #2: Not Everyone Agrees(standard deviation can help show us the degree of consensus) #3: Data is Still Preliminary (these are raw responses without any filtering) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html Many thanks to all who contributed their time to take the survey!
Understanding, Interpreting & Using Correlation Data This is powerful, useful information, but with that power comes responsibility to present it accurately
Methodology 10,271 Keywords, pulled from Google AdWords US Suggestions (all SERPs were pulled from Google in March 2011, after the Panda/Farmer update) Top 30 Results Retrieved for Each Keyword(excluding all vertical/non-standard results) Correlations are for Pages/Sites that Appear Higher in the Top 30(we use the mean of Spearman’s correlation coefficient across all SERPs) Results Where <2 URLs Contain a Given Feature Are Excluded(this also holds true for results where all the URLs contain the same values for a feature) More details, including complete documentation and the raw dataset will be released in May with the published version of the 2011 Ranking Factors http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Correlation & Dolphins Dolphins who swim at the front of the pod tend to have larger dorsal fins, more muscular tails and more damage on their flippers. The first two might have a causal link, but the damaged flippers is likely a result of swimming at the front (i.e. having damaged flippers doesn’t make a dolphin a better front-of-the-pod-swimmer). Likewise, with ranking correlations, there’s probably many features that are correlated but not necessarily the cause of the positive/negative rankings. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Correlation IS NOT Causation Earning more linking root domains to a URL may indeed increase that page’s ranking. But, will adding more characters to the HTML code of a page increase rankings? Probably not. Just because a feature is correlated, even very highly, doesn’t necessarily mean that improving that metric on your site will necessarily improve your rankings. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
How Confident Can We Be in the Accuracy of these Correlations? Because we have such a large data set, standard error is extremely low. This means even for small correlations, our estimates of the mean correlation are close to the actual mean correlation across all searches. Standard error won’t be reported in this presentation, but it’s less than 0.0035 for all of Spearman correlation results (so we can feel quite confident about our numbers) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Do Correlations in this Range Have Value/Meaning? A factor w/ 1.0 correlation would explain 100% of Google’s algorithm across 10K+ keywords Most of our data is in this range A rough rule of thumb with linear fit numbers is that they explain the number squared of the system’s variance. Thus, a factor with correlation 0.3 would explain ~9% of Google’s algorithm. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Are You Ready for Some Data?!
Overall Algorithmic Factors These compare opinion/survey data from 2009 vs. 2011
In 2009, link-based factors (page and domain-level) comprised 65%+ of voters’ algorithmic assessment http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
In 2011, link-based factors (page and domain-level) have shrunk in the voters’ minds to only ~45% of algorithmic components. Note: because the question options changed slightly (and more options were added), direct comparison may not be entirely fair. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Page-Specific Link Signals These metrics are based on links that point specifically to the ranking page
Most Important Page-Level Link Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) My guess: Some voters didn’t fully understand the “linking c-blocks” choice With opinion data, voters ordered the factors from most important to least. Thus, when looking at opinion stats, the factor voters felt was most important will have the smallest rank. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
In the rest of this deck, we’ll use linking c-blocks as a reference point, hence the red  This data is exactly what an SEO would expect – the more diverse the sources, the greater the correlation with higher rankings. These numbers are relatively similar to June 2010 data. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Correlations of Page-Level, Anchor Text-Based Link Data No Surprise: Total links (including internal) w/ anchor text is less well-correlated than external links w/ anchor text Partial anchor text matches have greater correlation than exact match. This might be correlation only, or could indicate that the common SEO wisdom to vary anchor text is accurate. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Rand’s Takeaways #1: SEOs Believe the Power of Links Has Declined (correlation of link data w/ rankings has fallen slightly from 2010 to 2011 as well) #2: Diversity of Links > Raw Quantity (This fits well with most SEOs expectations. Also helps me feel better about the correlation data) #3: Exact Match Anchor Text Appears Slightly Less Well Correlated than Partial Anchor Text in External Links (This was surprising to me, though from Google’s perspective, it makes good sense. The aggregated voter opinions agreed with this, too.) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html These are my personal takeaways from the data; others’ interpretations may vary
Domain-Wide Link Signals These metrics are based on links that point to anywhere on the ranking domain
Most Important Domain-Level Link Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) C-Blocks: Likely the same vote interpretation issue as with page-level http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html Voters seem to believe that diversity/quantity is more important that quality.
Correlation of Domain-Level Link Data Nice Work! Excluding the “c-blocks” issue, voters + correlations match nicely. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html Domain-level link data is surprisingly similar to page-level link data in correlation
Rand’s Takeaways #1: Google May Rank Pages, But Domains Matter Too (the closeness of correlation data and the opinions of voters both back this up) #2: Link Velocity & Diversity of Link Types Would Be Interesting to Measure Given Voters’ Opinions  (Hopefully we can look at these in future analyses) #3: Correlations w/ “All” Links vs. Followed-Only is Odd (Let’s take a closer link at these correlations) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Something Funny About Nofollows These compare followed vs. nofollowed links to the domain + page
Correlation of Followed vs. Nofollowed Links Nofollowed Matters? Many SEOs have been saying that nofollow links can help w/ rankings. The correlation suggests maybe they’re right. These numbers exhibit why we like to build ranking models using machine learning. Models can help determine whether nofollowed links have a causal impact or whether it’s mere correlation. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
On-Page Signals These metrics are based on keyword usage and features of the ranking document
Most Important On-Page, Keyword-Use Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) My guess: Some voters didn’t fully understand the internal/external link anchors choice NOTE: We surveyed SEOs about more on-page optimization features, but I didn’t include them all on this chart as it would make the labels very tiny and hard to read  http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Correlation of On-Page Keyword-Use Elements Curious: Longer documents seem to rank better than shorter ones Keyword-based factors are generally less well correlated w/ higher rankings than links. This is just a sampling of the on-page elements we observed; some factors haven’t yet been calculated and thus couldn’t be compared for this presentation. They’ll be in the full version. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Correlation of On-Page Keyword-Use Elements The theory that AdSense use boosts rankings isn’t supported by the data More reason to believe Google when they say page load speed is a factor, but a very small one There’s a longtime rumor that linking externally to Google.com (or Microsoft on Bing) helps with rankings. It’s comforting to see that correlation-wise, linking to MS is better on Google  http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Rand’s Takeaways #1: Very Tough to Differentiate w/ On-Page Optimization (as in the past, the data suggests that lots of results are getting on-page right) #2: Longer/Larger Documents Tend to Rank Better (It could be that post-Panda/Farmer update, robust content is rewarded more) #3: Long Titles + URLs are Still Likely Bad for SEO (In addition to the negative correlations, they’re harder to share, to type-in and to link to) #4: Using Keywords Earlier in Tags/Docs Seems Wise (Correlation backs up the common wisdom that keywords closer to the top matter more) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html We definitely need to look at more on-page factors in the data for the full report, too.
Social Signals These signals are based on data from users of Twitter, Facebook & Google Buzz via their APIs
Most Important Social Media-Based Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) Curious: For Twitter, voters felt authority matters more, while for Facebook, it’s raw quantity (could be because GG doesn’t have as much access to FB graph data). Although we didn’t ask voters for a cutoff on what they believe matters vs. doesn’t, I suspect many/most would have said that Google Buzz and Digg/Reddit/SU aren’t used in the rankings. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Correlation of Social Media-Based Factors(data via Topsy API & Google Buzz API) Amazing: Facebook Shares is our single highest correlated metric with higher Google rankings. Although voters thought Twitter data / tweets to URLs were more influential, Facebook’s metrics are substantially better correlated with rankings. Time to get more FB Shares! http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Percent of Results (from our 10,200 Keyword Set) in Which the Feature Was Present It amazed me that Facebook Share data was present for 61% of pages in the top 30 results For most link factors, 99%+ of results had data from Linkscape; for social data, this was much lower, but still high enough that standard error is below 0.0025 for each of the metrics. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Rand’s Takeaways #1: Social is Shockingly Well-Correlated (it’s hard to doubt causation, particularly after reading the SearchEngineLand interview here) #2: Facebook may be more influential than Twitter (Or it may be that Facebook data is simply more robust/available for URLs in the SERPs) #3: Google Buzz is Probably Not in Use Directly (Since so many users simply have their Tweet streams go to Buzz, and correlation is lower) #4: We Need to Learn More About How Social is Used (Understanding how Google uses social metrics, parses “anchor text,” etc. looms large) Expect more experimentation and, sadly, some gaming attempts w/ Twitter + Facebook by SEOs (and spammers) in the future. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Highest Positively + Negatively Correlated Metrics Overall These are the features most indicative of higher vs. lower rankings
Top 8 Strongest Correlated Metrics Exact match domain is actually not in the top 8, but I thought I should include it, as we haven’t discussed domain name matches yet. More data on that will be calculated/released in the full set. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Top 8 Most Negatively Correlated Metrics Be concise and to-the-point; it’s good for users and for your rankings  Long domain names, titles, URLs and domain names all had negative correlations with rankings. Again, I’ve included # of words in title, which isn’t technically in the top 8, but still interesting http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Top 8 Most Negatively Correlated Metrics One of the most surprising finds in our dataset. We double-checked to be sure. 40% of URLs in the set had only followed links, and these tended to have lower Page Authority (and lower rankings) than those w/ both followed and nofollowed links. Our data scientist thinks there’s some correlation between having nofollowed and other good/natural link signals. Also note that % of followed links on a page has a slightly negative correlation with rankings. Perhaps sites that make all their links out followed aren’t being careful about what they link to? http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Which Domains Appeared Most Frequently in Our 10K+ SERPs?
Top 20 Root Domains Most Prevalent in our 10,200 keyword set (top 30 rank positions) SEOs may be disappointed to see eHow.com performing so well, but classic content aggregators like About.com + Wikipedia still beat them. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
What do the Experts thinkthe Future Holds?
What Do SEOs Believe Will Happen w/ Google’s Use of Ranking Features in the Future? While there was some significant contention about issues like paid links and ads vs. content, the voters nearly all agreed that social signals and perceived user value signals have bright futures. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
IMPORTANT! Don’t Misuse or Misattribute Correlation Data! Think of correlation data as a way of seeing features of sites that rank well, rather than a way of seeing what metrics search engines are actually measuring and counting. A well-correlated metric can often be its own reward, even if it doesn’t directly impact search engine rankings. Virtually all the data in this report reflect the best practices of inbound marketing overall – and using the data to help support these is an excellent application  Thanks much! Rand We are looking forward to sharing the full data in the new version of the Search Ranking Factors report coming in ay 2011. Lots more cool info along with the full dataset will be available then. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
Q+A Download at: http://bit.ly/rankfactorsmunich You can now try SEOmoz PRO Free! http://www.seomoz.org/freetrial Rand Fishkin, CEO & Co-Founder, SEOmoz ,[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

A Few Favorite Tools for Inbound Marketing
A Few Favorite Tools for Inbound MarketingA Few Favorite Tools for Inbound Marketing
A Few Favorite Tools for Inbound Marketing
Rand Fishkin
 

What's hot (20)

Secret Ingredients of Better Marketing
Secret Ingredients of Better MarketingSecret Ingredients of Better Marketing
Secret Ingredients of Better Marketing
 
Inbound Marketing for Startups in 2011
Inbound Marketing for Startups in 2011Inbound Marketing for Startups in 2011
Inbound Marketing for Startups in 2011
 
SEO for Food Bloggers
SEO for Food BloggersSEO for Food Bloggers
SEO for Food Bloggers
 
The Story of Moz: 1981-2011
The Story of Moz: 1981-2011The Story of Moz: 1981-2011
The Story of Moz: 1981-2011
 
Big Budget Link Building (Advanced Analysis)
Big Budget Link Building (Advanced Analysis)Big Budget Link Building (Advanced Analysis)
Big Budget Link Building (Advanced Analysis)
 
10 SEO Lessons from 2010
10 SEO Lessons from 201010 SEO Lessons from 2010
10 SEO Lessons from 2010
 
White vs. Black Hat SEO
White vs. Black Hat SEOWhite vs. Black Hat SEO
White vs. Black Hat SEO
 
Why Great Marketers Must Be Great Skeptics
Why Great Marketers Must Be Great SkepticsWhy Great Marketers Must Be Great Skeptics
Why Great Marketers Must Be Great Skeptics
 
Great Failures in Competitive Intelligence
Great Failures in Competitive IntelligenceGreat Failures in Competitive Intelligence
Great Failures in Competitive Intelligence
 
Why Search Needs Social (Wappow)
Why Search Needs Social (Wappow)Why Search Needs Social (Wappow)
Why Search Needs Social (Wappow)
 
Keeping Up with Google's Insane Pace of Change
Keeping Up with Google's Insane Pace of ChangeKeeping Up with Google's Insane Pace of Change
Keeping Up with Google's Insane Pace of Change
 
Building Great Digital Marketing Teams
Building Great Digital Marketing TeamsBuilding Great Digital Marketing Teams
Building Great Digital Marketing Teams
 
Introduction to SEO
Introduction to SEOIntroduction to SEO
Introduction to SEO
 
Google Ranking Factors 2014: Correlations, Testing, & Hypotheses
Google Ranking Factors 2014: Correlations, Testing, & HypothesesGoogle Ranking Factors 2014: Correlations, Testing, & Hypotheses
Google Ranking Factors 2014: Correlations, Testing, & Hypotheses
 
SEOmoz: The Future of Great Links
SEOmoz: The Future of Great LinksSEOmoz: The Future of Great Links
SEOmoz: The Future of Great Links
 
A Few Favorite Tools for Inbound Marketing
A Few Favorite Tools for Inbound MarketingA Few Favorite Tools for Inbound Marketing
A Few Favorite Tools for Inbound Marketing
 
Pre-Qualifying + Winning New Clients - #BrightonSEO April 2014
Pre-Qualifying + Winning New Clients - #BrightonSEO April 2014Pre-Qualifying + Winning New Clients - #BrightonSEO April 2014
Pre-Qualifying + Winning New Clients - #BrightonSEO April 2014
 
Moz 2013 Ranking Factors - Matt Peters MozCon
Moz 2013 Ranking Factors - Matt Peters MozConMoz 2013 Ranking Factors - Matt Peters MozCon
Moz 2013 Ranking Factors - Matt Peters MozCon
 
Intro to Mozcon 2016
Intro to Mozcon 2016Intro to Mozcon 2016
Intro to Mozcon 2016
 
The 7 Biggest Trends in SEO: 2016
The 7 Biggest Trends in SEO: 2016The 7 Biggest Trends in SEO: 2016
The 7 Biggest Trends in SEO: 2016
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (10)

SEO & UX: So Happy Together
SEO & UX: So Happy TogetherSEO & UX: So Happy Together
SEO & UX: So Happy Together
 
Social Media for SEO in 2012
Social Media for SEO in 2012Social Media for SEO in 2012
Social Media for SEO in 2012
 
Strategies to Drive Web Traffic in the Real Estate World
Strategies to Drive Web Traffic in the Real Estate WorldStrategies to Drive Web Traffic in the Real Estate World
Strategies to Drive Web Traffic in the Real Estate World
 
Incorporating Clicks, Attention and Satisfaction into a SERP Evaluation Model
Incorporating Clicks, Attention and Satisfaction into a SERP Evaluation ModelIncorporating Clicks, Attention and Satisfaction into a SERP Evaluation Model
Incorporating Clicks, Attention and Satisfaction into a SERP Evaluation Model
 
The Paradox of Great Content
The Paradox of Great ContentThe Paradox of Great Content
The Paradox of Great Content
 
Link Building's Tipping Point
Link Building's Tipping PointLink Building's Tipping Point
Link Building's Tipping Point
 
The Future of Mobile - Presented at SMX Munich
The Future of Mobile - Presented at SMX MunichThe Future of Mobile - Presented at SMX Munich
The Future of Mobile - Presented at SMX Munich
 
The Search Landscape in 2017
The Search Landscape in 2017The Search Landscape in 2017
The Search Landscape in 2017
 
The Remarkable SEO Power of Republishing
The Remarkable SEO Power of RepublishingThe Remarkable SEO Power of Republishing
The Remarkable SEO Power of Republishing
 
Keeping Up With SEO in 2017 & Beyond
Keeping Up With SEO in 2017 & BeyondKeeping Up With SEO in 2017 & Beyond
Keeping Up With SEO in 2017 & Beyond
 

Similar to SMX Munich Keynote: Moz Ranking Factors

Google's ranking factors 2011
Google's ranking factors 2011Google's ranking factors 2011
Google's ranking factors 2011
Shipra Malik
 
Google ranking evolution
Google ranking evolutionGoogle ranking evolution
Google ranking evolution
Shipra Malik
 
In depth seo webinar
In depth seo  webinarIn depth seo  webinar
In depth seo webinar
Sam shetty
 

Similar to SMX Munich Keynote: Moz Ranking Factors (20)

Google's ranking factors 2011
Google's ranking factors 2011Google's ranking factors 2011
Google's ranking factors 2011
 
SEO Masterclass Webit 2010
SEO Masterclass Webit 2010SEO Masterclass Webit 2010
SEO Masterclass Webit 2010
 
Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.
Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.
Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.
 
Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.
Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.
Ebriks-Tips for Google Ranking Evolution.
 
Links As SEO Ranking Factor: Still Very Powerful!
Links As SEO Ranking Factor: Still Very Powerful!Links As SEO Ranking Factor: Still Very Powerful!
Links As SEO Ranking Factor: Still Very Powerful!
 
Google ranking evolution
Google ranking evolutionGoogle ranking evolution
Google ranking evolution
 
eStudio34 presents London Search Love 2015 | Search Ranking Factors in 2015: ...
eStudio34 presents London Search Love 2015 | Search Ranking Factors in 2015: ...eStudio34 presents London Search Love 2015 | Search Ranking Factors in 2015: ...
eStudio34 presents London Search Love 2015 | Search Ranking Factors in 2015: ...
 
Search Ranking Factors in 2015
Search Ranking Factors in 2015Search Ranking Factors in 2015
Search Ranking Factors in 2015
 
In depth seo webinar
In depth seo  webinarIn depth seo  webinar
In depth seo webinar
 
Helping customers find you online - Rand Fishkin at Business of Software Conf...
Helping customers find you online - Rand Fishkin at Business of Software Conf...Helping customers find you online - Rand Fishkin at Business of Software Conf...
Helping customers find you online - Rand Fishkin at Business of Software Conf...
 
SEO Tactics to Love vs. Leave
SEO Tactics to Love vs. LeaveSEO Tactics to Love vs. Leave
SEO Tactics to Love vs. Leave
 
Google SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlations 2014
Google SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlations 2014Google SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlations 2014
Google SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlations 2014
 
MOZ - Google Ranking Factors 2014 Correlations, Testing, & Hypotheses
MOZ - Google Ranking Factors 2014 Correlations, Testing, & HypothesesMOZ - Google Ranking Factors 2014 Correlations, Testing, & Hypotheses
MOZ - Google Ranking Factors 2014 Correlations, Testing, & Hypotheses
 
2014 SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlation Google
2014 SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlation Google2014 SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlation Google
2014 SEO Ranking Factors and Rank Correlation Google
 
Keeping up with Google 2014
Keeping up with Google 2014Keeping up with Google 2014
Keeping up with Google 2014
 
SEO Master Class Webit 2010
SEO Master Class Webit 2010SEO Master Class Webit 2010
SEO Master Class Webit 2010
 
Fundamentals of Great SEO
Fundamentals of Great SEOFundamentals of Great SEO
Fundamentals of Great SEO
 
Rand Fishkin, Moz: How Can a Marketer Keep Up with Google's Insane Pace of Ch...
Rand Fishkin, Moz: How Can a Marketer Keep Up with Google's Insane Pace of Ch...Rand Fishkin, Moz: How Can a Marketer Keep Up with Google's Insane Pace of Ch...
Rand Fishkin, Moz: How Can a Marketer Keep Up with Google's Insane Pace of Ch...
 
Learn SEO in 5 Days
Learn SEO in 5 DaysLearn SEO in 5 Days
Learn SEO in 5 Days
 
Seo and soccer
Seo and soccerSeo and soccer
Seo and soccer
 

More from Rand Fishkin

More from Rand Fishkin (20)

SparkToro Beta Sneak Peek
SparkToro Beta Sneak PeekSparkToro Beta Sneak Peek
SparkToro Beta Sneak Peek
 
The Healthcare Search Landscape in 2019: SEO, Content Marketing, & More
The Healthcare Search Landscape in 2019: SEO, Content Marketing, & MoreThe Healthcare Search Landscape in 2019: SEO, Content Marketing, & More
The Healthcare Search Landscape in 2019: SEO, Content Marketing, & More
 
Building Influence in 2019
Building Influence in 2019Building Influence in 2019
Building Influence in 2019
 
Influence Not Influencers
Influence Not InfluencersInfluence Not Influencers
Influence Not Influencers
 
The Next Era of Web Marketing: 2019 & Beyond
The Next Era of Web Marketing: 2019 & BeyondThe Next Era of Web Marketing: 2019 & Beyond
The Next Era of Web Marketing: 2019 & Beyond
 
How to Kick Butt with Your Email Outreach
How to Kick Butt with Your Email OutreachHow to Kick Butt with Your Email Outreach
How to Kick Butt with Your Email Outreach
 
The Big 7 Startup Marketing Mistakes
The Big 7 Startup Marketing MistakesThe Big 7 Startup Marketing Mistakes
The Big 7 Startup Marketing Mistakes
 
Why Your Saas Marketing Sucks (and how to fix it)
Why Your Saas Marketing Sucks (and how to fix it)Why Your Saas Marketing Sucks (and how to fix it)
Why Your Saas Marketing Sucks (and how to fix it)
 
SEO on the SERPs - Brighton SEO Closing Talk
SEO on the SERPs - Brighton SEO Closing TalkSEO on the SERPs - Brighton SEO Closing Talk
SEO on the SERPs - Brighton SEO Closing Talk
 
7 Lessons That Would Have Made Me a Better Entrepreneur
7 Lessons That Would Have Made Me a Better Entrepreneur7 Lessons That Would Have Made Me a Better Entrepreneur
7 Lessons That Would Have Made Me a Better Entrepreneur
 
The Search & SEO World in 2018
The Search & SEO World in 2018The Search & SEO World in 2018
The Search & SEO World in 2018
 
SEO in 2017/18
SEO in 2017/18SEO in 2017/18
SEO in 2017/18
 
Why Startups Suck at Marketing
Why Startups Suck at MarketingWhy Startups Suck at Marketing
Why Startups Suck at Marketing
 
The Invisible Giant that Mucks Up Our Marketing
The Invisible Giant that Mucks Up Our MarketingThe Invisible Giant that Mucks Up Our Marketing
The Invisible Giant that Mucks Up Our Marketing
 
B2B SEO in 2017
B2B SEO in 2017B2B SEO in 2017
B2B SEO in 2017
 
How to Survive Google's Trojan Horsing of the Web
How to Survive Google's Trojan Horsing of the WebHow to Survive Google's Trojan Horsing of the Web
How to Survive Google's Trojan Horsing of the Web
 
What Startup Execs Need to Know About SEO in 2017
What Startup Execs Need to Know About SEO in 2017What Startup Execs Need to Know About SEO in 2017
What Startup Execs Need to Know About SEO in 2017
 
Inside Google's Numbers in 2017
Inside Google's Numbers in 2017Inside Google's Numbers in 2017
Inside Google's Numbers in 2017
 
Why We Can't Do SEO WIthout CRO
Why We Can't Do SEO WIthout CROWhy We Can't Do SEO WIthout CRO
Why We Can't Do SEO WIthout CRO
 
The Digital Marketer's Framework
The Digital Marketer's FrameworkThe Digital Marketer's Framework
The Digital Marketer's Framework
 

Recently uploaded

Powerpoint showing results from tik tok metrics
Powerpoint showing results from tik tok metricsPowerpoint showing results from tik tok metrics
Powerpoint showing results from tik tok metrics
CaitlinCummins3
 
Future of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot Report
Future of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot ReportFuture of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot Report
Future of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot Report
Dubai Multi Commodity Centre
 
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODFRATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
CaitlinCummins3
 
Constitution of Company Article of Association
Constitution of Company Article of AssociationConstitution of Company Article of Association
Constitution of Company Article of Association
seri bangash
 
NewBase 17 May 2024 Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
NewBase   17 May  2024  Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...NewBase   17 May  2024  Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
NewBase 17 May 2024 Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
Khaled Al Awadi
 
(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...
(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...
(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...
Spesiialis Kandungan BPOM
 
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
daisycvs
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)
Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)
Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)
 
Powerpoint showing results from tik tok metrics
Powerpoint showing results from tik tok metricsPowerpoint showing results from tik tok metrics
Powerpoint showing results from tik tok metrics
 
Innomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdf
Innomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdfInnomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdf
Innomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdf
 
Future of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot Report
Future of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot ReportFuture of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot Report
Future of Trade 2024 - Decoupled and Reconfigured - Snapshot Report
 
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODFRATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
 
(推特)Twitter账号批发(自助购买网址🎉top233.com🎉)
(推特)Twitter账号批发(自助购买网址🎉top233.com🎉)(推特)Twitter账号批发(自助购买网址🎉top233.com🎉)
(推特)Twitter账号批发(自助购买网址🎉top233.com🎉)
 
Constitution of Company Article of Association
Constitution of Company Article of AssociationConstitution of Company Article of Association
Constitution of Company Article of Association
 
NewBase 17 May 2024 Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
NewBase   17 May  2024  Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...NewBase   17 May  2024  Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
NewBase 17 May 2024 Energy News issue - 1725 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
 
Copyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to Know
Copyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to KnowCopyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to Know
Copyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to Know
 
stock price prediction using machine learning
stock price prediction using machine learningstock price prediction using machine learning
stock price prediction using machine learning
 
(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...
(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...
(( wa 0851/7541/5434 )) Jual Obat Aborsi Di Surabaya - Cytotec Misoprostol 20...
 
5 Brilliant Ways To Buy Verified Payoneer Accounts In 2024
5 Brilliant Ways To Buy Verified Payoneer Accounts In 20245 Brilliant Ways To Buy Verified Payoneer Accounts In 2024
5 Brilliant Ways To Buy Verified Payoneer Accounts In 2024
 
Raising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE Ventures
Raising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE VenturesRaising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE Ventures
Raising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE Ventures
 
Pay after result spell caster (,$+27834335081)@ bring back lost lover same da...
Pay after result spell caster (,$+27834335081)@ bring back lost lover same da...Pay after result spell caster (,$+27834335081)@ bring back lost lover same da...
Pay after result spell caster (,$+27834335081)@ bring back lost lover same da...
 
wagamamaLab presentation @MIT 20240509 IRODORI
wagamamaLab presentation @MIT 20240509 IRODORIwagamamaLab presentation @MIT 20240509 IRODORI
wagamamaLab presentation @MIT 20240509 IRODORI
 
1Q24_EN hyundai capital 1q performance
1Q24_EN   hyundai capital 1q performance1Q24_EN   hyundai capital 1q performance
1Q24_EN hyundai capital 1q performance
 
MichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdf
MichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdfMichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdf
MichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdf
 
Toyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & Transformations
Toyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & TransformationsToyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & Transformations
Toyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & Transformations
 
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
 
How Do Venture Capitalists Make Decisions?
How Do Venture Capitalists Make Decisions?How Do Venture Capitalists Make Decisions?
How Do Venture Capitalists Make Decisions?
 

SMX Munich Keynote: Moz Ranking Factors

  • 1. Google’s Ranking Factors 2011 Early data from SEOmoz’s survey of 132 SEO professionals and correlation data from 10,000+ keyword rankings Download at: http://bit.ly/rankfactorsmunich Rand Fishkin, SEOmoz CEO, April 2011
  • 2. SEOmoz Makes Software! We don’t offer consulting.
  • 3. Understanding, Interpreting & Using Survey Opinion Data Everybody’s wrong sometimes, but there’s a lot we can learn from the aggregation of opinions
  • 4. #1: Opinions are Not Fact (these are smart people, but they can’t know everything about Google’s rankings) #2: Not Everyone Agrees(standard deviation can help show us the degree of consensus) #3: Data is Still Preliminary (these are raw responses without any filtering) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html Many thanks to all who contributed their time to take the survey!
  • 5. Understanding, Interpreting & Using Correlation Data This is powerful, useful information, but with that power comes responsibility to present it accurately
  • 6. Methodology 10,271 Keywords, pulled from Google AdWords US Suggestions (all SERPs were pulled from Google in March 2011, after the Panda/Farmer update) Top 30 Results Retrieved for Each Keyword(excluding all vertical/non-standard results) Correlations are for Pages/Sites that Appear Higher in the Top 30(we use the mean of Spearman’s correlation coefficient across all SERPs) Results Where <2 URLs Contain a Given Feature Are Excluded(this also holds true for results where all the URLs contain the same values for a feature) More details, including complete documentation and the raw dataset will be released in May with the published version of the 2011 Ranking Factors http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 7. Correlation & Dolphins Dolphins who swim at the front of the pod tend to have larger dorsal fins, more muscular tails and more damage on their flippers. The first two might have a causal link, but the damaged flippers is likely a result of swimming at the front (i.e. having damaged flippers doesn’t make a dolphin a better front-of-the-pod-swimmer). Likewise, with ranking correlations, there’s probably many features that are correlated but not necessarily the cause of the positive/negative rankings. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 8. Correlation IS NOT Causation Earning more linking root domains to a URL may indeed increase that page’s ranking. But, will adding more characters to the HTML code of a page increase rankings? Probably not. Just because a feature is correlated, even very highly, doesn’t necessarily mean that improving that metric on your site will necessarily improve your rankings. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 9. How Confident Can We Be in the Accuracy of these Correlations? Because we have such a large data set, standard error is extremely low. This means even for small correlations, our estimates of the mean correlation are close to the actual mean correlation across all searches. Standard error won’t be reported in this presentation, but it’s less than 0.0035 for all of Spearman correlation results (so we can feel quite confident about our numbers) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 10. Do Correlations in this Range Have Value/Meaning? A factor w/ 1.0 correlation would explain 100% of Google’s algorithm across 10K+ keywords Most of our data is in this range A rough rule of thumb with linear fit numbers is that they explain the number squared of the system’s variance. Thus, a factor with correlation 0.3 would explain ~9% of Google’s algorithm. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 11. Are You Ready for Some Data?!
  • 12. Overall Algorithmic Factors These compare opinion/survey data from 2009 vs. 2011
  • 13. In 2009, link-based factors (page and domain-level) comprised 65%+ of voters’ algorithmic assessment http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 14. In 2011, link-based factors (page and domain-level) have shrunk in the voters’ minds to only ~45% of algorithmic components. Note: because the question options changed slightly (and more options were added), direct comparison may not be entirely fair. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 15. Page-Specific Link Signals These metrics are based on links that point specifically to the ranking page
  • 16. Most Important Page-Level Link Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) My guess: Some voters didn’t fully understand the “linking c-blocks” choice With opinion data, voters ordered the factors from most important to least. Thus, when looking at opinion stats, the factor voters felt was most important will have the smallest rank. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 17. In the rest of this deck, we’ll use linking c-blocks as a reference point, hence the red  This data is exactly what an SEO would expect – the more diverse the sources, the greater the correlation with higher rankings. These numbers are relatively similar to June 2010 data. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 18. Correlations of Page-Level, Anchor Text-Based Link Data No Surprise: Total links (including internal) w/ anchor text is less well-correlated than external links w/ anchor text Partial anchor text matches have greater correlation than exact match. This might be correlation only, or could indicate that the common SEO wisdom to vary anchor text is accurate. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 19. Rand’s Takeaways #1: SEOs Believe the Power of Links Has Declined (correlation of link data w/ rankings has fallen slightly from 2010 to 2011 as well) #2: Diversity of Links > Raw Quantity (This fits well with most SEOs expectations. Also helps me feel better about the correlation data) #3: Exact Match Anchor Text Appears Slightly Less Well Correlated than Partial Anchor Text in External Links (This was surprising to me, though from Google’s perspective, it makes good sense. The aggregated voter opinions agreed with this, too.) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html These are my personal takeaways from the data; others’ interpretations may vary
  • 20. Domain-Wide Link Signals These metrics are based on links that point to anywhere on the ranking domain
  • 21. Most Important Domain-Level Link Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) C-Blocks: Likely the same vote interpretation issue as with page-level http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html Voters seem to believe that diversity/quantity is more important that quality.
  • 22. Correlation of Domain-Level Link Data Nice Work! Excluding the “c-blocks” issue, voters + correlations match nicely. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html Domain-level link data is surprisingly similar to page-level link data in correlation
  • 23. Rand’s Takeaways #1: Google May Rank Pages, But Domains Matter Too (the closeness of correlation data and the opinions of voters both back this up) #2: Link Velocity & Diversity of Link Types Would Be Interesting to Measure Given Voters’ Opinions (Hopefully we can look at these in future analyses) #3: Correlations w/ “All” Links vs. Followed-Only is Odd (Let’s take a closer link at these correlations) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 24. Something Funny About Nofollows These compare followed vs. nofollowed links to the domain + page
  • 25. Correlation of Followed vs. Nofollowed Links Nofollowed Matters? Many SEOs have been saying that nofollow links can help w/ rankings. The correlation suggests maybe they’re right. These numbers exhibit why we like to build ranking models using machine learning. Models can help determine whether nofollowed links have a causal impact or whether it’s mere correlation. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 26. On-Page Signals These metrics are based on keyword usage and features of the ranking document
  • 27. Most Important On-Page, Keyword-Use Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) My guess: Some voters didn’t fully understand the internal/external link anchors choice NOTE: We surveyed SEOs about more on-page optimization features, but I didn’t include them all on this chart as it would make the labels very tiny and hard to read  http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 28. Correlation of On-Page Keyword-Use Elements Curious: Longer documents seem to rank better than shorter ones Keyword-based factors are generally less well correlated w/ higher rankings than links. This is just a sampling of the on-page elements we observed; some factors haven’t yet been calculated and thus couldn’t be compared for this presentation. They’ll be in the full version. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 29. Correlation of On-Page Keyword-Use Elements The theory that AdSense use boosts rankings isn’t supported by the data More reason to believe Google when they say page load speed is a factor, but a very small one There’s a longtime rumor that linking externally to Google.com (or Microsoft on Bing) helps with rankings. It’s comforting to see that correlation-wise, linking to MS is better on Google  http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 30. Rand’s Takeaways #1: Very Tough to Differentiate w/ On-Page Optimization (as in the past, the data suggests that lots of results are getting on-page right) #2: Longer/Larger Documents Tend to Rank Better (It could be that post-Panda/Farmer update, robust content is rewarded more) #3: Long Titles + URLs are Still Likely Bad for SEO (In addition to the negative correlations, they’re harder to share, to type-in and to link to) #4: Using Keywords Earlier in Tags/Docs Seems Wise (Correlation backs up the common wisdom that keywords closer to the top matter more) http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html We definitely need to look at more on-page factors in the data for the full report, too.
  • 31. Social Signals These signals are based on data from users of Twitter, Facebook & Google Buzz via their APIs
  • 32. Most Important Social Media-Based Factors (as voted on by 132 SEOs) Curious: For Twitter, voters felt authority matters more, while for Facebook, it’s raw quantity (could be because GG doesn’t have as much access to FB graph data). Although we didn’t ask voters for a cutoff on what they believe matters vs. doesn’t, I suspect many/most would have said that Google Buzz and Digg/Reddit/SU aren’t used in the rankings. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 33. Correlation of Social Media-Based Factors(data via Topsy API & Google Buzz API) Amazing: Facebook Shares is our single highest correlated metric with higher Google rankings. Although voters thought Twitter data / tweets to URLs were more influential, Facebook’s metrics are substantially better correlated with rankings. Time to get more FB Shares! http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 34. Percent of Results (from our 10,200 Keyword Set) in Which the Feature Was Present It amazed me that Facebook Share data was present for 61% of pages in the top 30 results For most link factors, 99%+ of results had data from Linkscape; for social data, this was much lower, but still high enough that standard error is below 0.0025 for each of the metrics. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 35. Rand’s Takeaways #1: Social is Shockingly Well-Correlated (it’s hard to doubt causation, particularly after reading the SearchEngineLand interview here) #2: Facebook may be more influential than Twitter (Or it may be that Facebook data is simply more robust/available for URLs in the SERPs) #3: Google Buzz is Probably Not in Use Directly (Since so many users simply have their Tweet streams go to Buzz, and correlation is lower) #4: We Need to Learn More About How Social is Used (Understanding how Google uses social metrics, parses “anchor text,” etc. looms large) Expect more experimentation and, sadly, some gaming attempts w/ Twitter + Facebook by SEOs (and spammers) in the future. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 36. Highest Positively + Negatively Correlated Metrics Overall These are the features most indicative of higher vs. lower rankings
  • 37. Top 8 Strongest Correlated Metrics Exact match domain is actually not in the top 8, but I thought I should include it, as we haven’t discussed domain name matches yet. More data on that will be calculated/released in the full set. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 38. Top 8 Most Negatively Correlated Metrics Be concise and to-the-point; it’s good for users and for your rankings  Long domain names, titles, URLs and domain names all had negative correlations with rankings. Again, I’ve included # of words in title, which isn’t technically in the top 8, but still interesting http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 39. Top 8 Most Negatively Correlated Metrics One of the most surprising finds in our dataset. We double-checked to be sure. 40% of URLs in the set had only followed links, and these tended to have lower Page Authority (and lower rankings) than those w/ both followed and nofollowed links. Our data scientist thinks there’s some correlation between having nofollowed and other good/natural link signals. Also note that % of followed links on a page has a slightly negative correlation with rankings. Perhaps sites that make all their links out followed aren’t being careful about what they link to? http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 40. Which Domains Appeared Most Frequently in Our 10K+ SERPs?
  • 41. Top 20 Root Domains Most Prevalent in our 10,200 keyword set (top 30 rank positions) SEOs may be disappointed to see eHow.com performing so well, but classic content aggregators like About.com + Wikipedia still beat them. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 42. What do the Experts thinkthe Future Holds?
  • 43. What Do SEOs Believe Will Happen w/ Google’s Use of Ranking Features in the Future? While there was some significant contention about issues like paid links and ads vs. content, the voters nearly all agreed that social signals and perceived user value signals have bright futures. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 44. IMPORTANT! Don’t Misuse or Misattribute Correlation Data! Think of correlation data as a way of seeing features of sites that rank well, rather than a way of seeing what metrics search engines are actually measuring and counting. A well-correlated metric can often be its own reward, even if it doesn’t directly impact search engine rankings. Virtually all the data in this report reflect the best practices of inbound marketing overall – and using the data to help support these is an excellent application  Thanks much! Rand We are looking forward to sharing the full data in the new version of the Search Ranking Factors report coming in ay 2011. Lots more cool info along with the full dataset will be available then. http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html
  • 45.