Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Free Space Optical Communication


Published on

A brief review work on free space optics and communication technology

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

Free Space Optical Communication

  2. 2. PRESENTATION LAYOUT: O Introduction to the concepts of Free Space Optics (FSO). O Propagation concepts, Link Budget calculations. O FSO: Last Mile Bottleneck Solution. O Configurations of FSO systems. O Chaining in FSO Systems O DATA security/ Safety considerations for FSO systems. O Signal Propagation impediments. O Advantages of FSO as regards to other widely used systems. O Physical Applications of FSO systems O Manufacturers/Players in field of FSO.
  3. 3. Requirements of a good Transmission System: O High Bandwidth O High BER O Low SNR O Power efficient O Provide Data Security. O Low cost O Easy to install and maintain.
  4. 4. Introduction to the concepts of Free Space Optics (FSO) O FSO is a line-of-sight technology which uses LASERS and Photo detectors to provide optical connections between two points—without the fiber. O FSO can transmit data, voice or video at speeds capable of reaching 2.5 Gbps. Products capable of speeds upto 10 Gbps are expected to hit the markets within one year. O FSO units consist of an optical transceiver with a laser (transmitter) and a Photo detector (receiver) to provide full duplex (bi-directional) capability. O FSO systems use invisible infrared laser light wavelengths in the 750nm to 1550nm range.
  5. 5. FSO Major Sub System
  6. 6. Free Space Optic Link Equation: O • Preceived = received power O • Ptransmit = transmit power O • Areceiver = receiver area O • Div = beam divergence (in radians) O • Range = link length
  7. 7. Denver, Colorado Fog/Snowstorm Conditions
  8. 8. Theoretical Maximum Range:
  9. 9. LAST MILE BOTTLENECKS O Less then 5% of all buildings in the US have a direct connection to the very high speed (2.5-10 Gbps) fiber optic backbone, yet more than 75% of businesses are within 1 mile of the fiber backbone. O Most of these businesses are running some high speed data network within their building, such as fast Ethernet (100 Mbps), or Gigabit Ethernet (1.0 Gbps). O Yet, their Internet access is only provided by much lower bandwidth technologies available though the existing copper wire infrastructure (T-1 (1.5 Mbps), cable modem (5 Mbps shared) DSL (6 Mbps one way) ), etc. O The last mile problem is to connect the high bandwidth from the fiber optic backbone to all of the businesses with high bandwidth networks.
  10. 10. O DSL and cable modems cannot provide true broadband services. Cable modems enjoy higher capacity, yet the channel is shared and the amount of bandwidth at any given time is not guaranteed. O Copper lines provide data rates to a fraction of 1 Mbps. O T1 lines can reach upto a few Mbps but are still far away from the Gbps speed which the fiber backbone can support. O The chart below shows how these technologies address different market segments based on technology, technical capabilities (reach, bandwidth), and economic realities.
  11. 11. A high-bandwidth cost-effective solution to the last mile problem is to use free-space laser communication (also known as or optical wireless) in a mesh architecture to get the high bandwidth quickly to the customers.
  12. 12. DATA SECURITY To overcome the security in a network two conditions are necessary: O (1) Intercept enough of the signal to reconstruct data packets and O (2) Be able to decode that information.
  13. 13. Directional transmission: Narrow divergence of the FSO transmit path (shown in red) as compared to a typical Radio Frequency (RF) path (shown in blue). The tightly collimated FSO beam ensures that the signal energy is focused on the receiving unit, making interception of the beam extremely difficult. Preventing Interception of the Signal
  14. 14. Another view of the narrow beam divergence inherent in FSO transmission. (For clarity only one transit beam is shown.)
  16. 16. Signal Propagation Impediments: O Fog: It is the major challenge to reduce the effect, FSO distance must be reduced. O Absorption: Attenuation occurs due to absorption and decreased PSD. O Scattering: Caused by suspended particles. When the scatterer is smaller than the wavelength, this is known as Rayleigh scattering. When the scatterer is of comparable size to the wavelength, this is known as Mie scattering. O Physical obstructions: Flying birds can temporarily block a single beam. O Building sway/seismic activity: The movement of buildings can upset Rx-Tx alignment. O Scintillation: Heated air rising from the earth or man-made devices such as heating ducts creates temperature variations among different air pockets. This can cause fluctuations in signal amplitude which leads to image fluctuations at the FSO receiver end.
  17. 17. O Rough Estimate of Power losses in the system Infrared ight (765 nm) : O Clear, still air -1 dB/km -5 dB/km O Scintillation 0 to -3 dB/km 0 O Birds or foliage Impenetrable 0 to -20 dB O Window (double-glazed) -3 dB -1 dB O Light mist (visibility 400m) -25 dB/km -1 dB/km O Medium fog (visibility 100m) -120 dB/km -1 dB/km O Thick fog (visibility 40m) -300 dB/km -1 dB/km O Light rain (25mm/hour) -10 dB/km -10 dB/km O Heavy rain (150mm/hour) -25 dB/km -40 dB/km
  18. 18. ADVANTAGES OF FSO SYSTEMS O No licensing required. O Installation cost is very low as compared to laying Fiber. O No sunk costs. O No capital overhangs. O Highly secure transmission possible. O High data rates, upto 2.5 Gbps at present and 10 Gbps in the near future.
  19. 19. Applications Of FSO Systems ODisaster management as was exhibited during the Sept 11 attacks. OMerill Lynch & Co. has set up FSO system from its Vesey Street office towers across the Hudson River to an alternate site in New Jersey. OTeraBeam, a major producer of FSO equipment, successfully deployed FSO at the Sydney Summer Olympic Games. OA network of FSO devices is fast coming up in Seattle which is touted as the Capital of Fog. Manufacturers believe that if an FSO system can successfully work in Seattle then it can do so in any part of the world. OAffordably extend existing fiber network. ODisaster recovery and temporary applications
  20. 20. Manufacturers/ Players in the Field of FSO: O LightPointe: A San Diego based company which received contributions from Cisco Systems and Corning to the tune of $33 million. It has raised a total of $51.5 million. O AirFiber: Another San Diego based company which has received contributions from Nortel Networks to the tune of $50 million. It has raised a total of $92.5 million. O Terabeam: A Kirkland, WA based company has received funding from Luscent technologies to the tune of $450 million and has raised $585 million to date.