Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
UNLAWFULNESS OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS
OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>Can unlawful act be justified by fact that person committing act is merely obeying orders of s...
OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>Duty to blind obedience </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Obedience always seen as ground of justification...
OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>3 rd  possibility most accepted </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Adopt a middle course </li></ul></ul><ul...
OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>Defence only successful if subordinate does not cause more harm than necessary to execute orde...
OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>When is order manifestly unlawful? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Take into account: </li></ul></ul><ul...
TRIFLING NATURE OF ACT  <ul><li>X commits act which is unlawful but the degree to which this act contravened it is minimal...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Unlawfulness%20obedience%20to%20orders

273 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Unlawfulness%20obedience%20to%20orders

  1. 1. UNLAWFULNESS OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS
  2. 2. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>Can unlawful act be justified by fact that person committing act is merely obeying orders of superior? </li></ul><ul><li>Distinguish: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Obedience to lawful order – acting in official capacity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Obedience to unlawful orders – determine if he has a defence </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2 different approaches: </li></ul>
  3. 3. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>Duty to blind obedience </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Obedience always seen as ground of justification </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>This approach unacceptable for serious crime </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Obeying order no ground of justification </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Implies subordinate, before obeying order, must first decide for himself if the issued order was lawful </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Not conducive towards discipline </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>3 rd possibility most accepted </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Adopt a middle course </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Q v Smith </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Court rejected two extreme approaches </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Soldier compelled to obey an order only if the order is manifestly lawful </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>If manifestly unlawful = may not obey order, and if you do your actions remain unlawful </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Approach confirmed in section 199(6) of SA Constitution </li></ul>
  5. 5. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>Defence only successful if subordinate does not cause more harm than necessary to execute order </li></ul><ul><li>Requirements: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Order from person lawfully placed in authority </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>X must be under duty to obey order </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Order not manifestly unlawful </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>X must have done no more harm than necessary to execute order </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS <ul><li>When is order manifestly unlawful? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Take into account: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Content of order </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Circumstances under which order given </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Than ask if reasonable soldier in position of X would have seen it as a lawful order </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>= does that which the soldier is ordered to do fall within the scope of his normal duties </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Mistake relating to nature of order </li></ul><ul><li>Necessity? </li></ul>
  7. 7. TRIFLING NATURE OF ACT <ul><li>X commits act which is unlawful but the degree to which this act contravened it is minimal, ie of trifling nature </li></ul><ul><li>De minimus non curat lex = the law does not concern itself with trifles </li></ul><ul><li>Depending on circumstances whether: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ground of justification, or </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mitigation of punishment </li></ul></ul>

×