SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Labor & Employment
                                                        Law Alert
                                                               July 2010



    NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LIMITS THE
      APPLICATION OF THE OVER-SEVENTY
  EXCEPTION TO THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST
              DISCRIMINATION
The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) has long held that it is an unlawful
employment practice to refuse to hire or to terminate someone because of their age. LAD also
contains an exception to this general prohibition, which allows employers to refuse to hire or
promote persons over age seventy. The New Jersey Supreme Court recently held that the
over-seventy exception does not apply to situations where an employer does not re-hire an
employee after the expiration of the employee’s employment contract.

In Rose Nini v. Mercer Community College, et al., (A-13/14-09), plaintiff claimed that she was
a victim of age discrimination because at age seventy-two, after twenty-six years as an
employee of Mercer Community College, the College refused to renew her employment
contract on the basis of her age. Specifically, Nini alleged that College president told her that
people who stay on a job for twenty-five years “lose their general effectiveness,” that she had
“no right to be working at her age,” and that the College would not renew her contract on
expiration.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the College, dismissing plaintiff’s claims
and holding that the decision to not renew Nini’s employment contract was not the equivalent
of an employment termination. Rather, once the contract expired, the College made the
decision not to re-hire Nini. As such, Nini was not protected by the LAD, as the College could
legally refuse to hire persons over age seventy.

The Appellate Division reversed, holding that a contract non-renewal should be considered a
termination and thus “outside the protection of the over-seventy exception” of the LAD.

The New Jersey Supreme Court granted certification. Despite settlement between the parties
prior to a final decision, the Supreme Court delivered its opinion given the importance of the
interpretation of the LAD and its impact on senior citizens in the workplace.

The Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court’s decision. Because the LAD “prohibits
termination and forced retirements based on age,” there is a “specific intention to protect those
employees over-seventy who have a pre-existing relationship with the employer from being
pushed out of the workplace based on age.” The Court observed that to construe the over-
seventy exception otherwise would “create a loophole …permitting employers to place their
aging employees under contract, [allow the contract to then expire and ultimately refuse to re-
hire the employee], thus precluding them from resorting to the salutary protection of the
LAD.” This would also effectively give greater rights to newly hired employees serving at-
will, than long-term employees serving under contract.

Additionally, the Court held that applying the over-seventy exception to non-renewal of
employee contracts would “not advance the managerial interests” at the heart of the exception.
While the over-seventy exception was included in the LAD to limit employers exposure to the
“financial and organization costs incident to hiring and promotion where an employee has
limited long term prospects,” the Court noted that the interests are “simply not implicated
where the employee is already on the job, requires no training, the organizational scheme is
not impacted, the employee is performing satisfactorily, and this issue is one of contract
renewal.”

The Court found that the over-seventy exception is limited in its application to “initial hires”
and does not apply to “workers whose contracts have not been renewed.” This interpretation,
whereby non-renewal of employee contracts are treated as terminations, “more fully advances
the aims of the LAD,” by protecting workers from being “pushed out of the workforce based
on age.”

The Nini decision once again emphasizes that New Jersey’s courts continue to apply LAD to
the fullest extent possible. As the Nini Court reaffirmed, LAD “is remedial legislation
intended to ‘eradicate the cancer of discrimination’ in our society and as such, it compels
liberal construction in order to advance its beneficial purposes.” New Jersey employers must
continually be guided by this principle in all of the employment decisions confronting them.




This Labor & Employment Law Alert was written by Pat Collins, Chair of the Labor & Employment
Group. If you have any questions regarding the information in this Alert or any other labor and
employment matters, please do not hesitate to contact the author at ptcollins@nmmlaw.com.




The Labor & Employment Law Alert provides information to our clients and friends about current legal developments of general
interest in the area of labor and employment law. The information contained in this Alert should not be construed as legal advice,
and readers should not act upon such without professional counsel. Copyright © 2010 Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.

More Related Content

What's hot

Small Claims 2017: Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals
Small Claims 2017:  Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals  Small Claims 2017:  Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals
Small Claims 2017: Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals Evelyn Perez Youssoufian
 
Managing Employment Law Issues in the Digital Age
Managing Employment Law Issues in the Digital AgeManaging Employment Law Issues in the Digital Age
Managing Employment Law Issues in the Digital AgeRudner Law
 
Employment Law 101: From Hiring to Firing
Employment Law 101: From Hiring to FiringEmployment Law 101: From Hiring to Firing
Employment Law 101: From Hiring to FiringRudner Law
 
Finding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road Map
Finding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road MapFinding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road Map
Finding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road MapWashington, DC Economic Partnership
 
Managing the Discontented Employee
Managing the Discontented EmployeeManaging the Discontented Employee
Managing the Discontented EmployeeRudner Law
 
Responding to Allegations of Harassment
Responding to Allegations of Harassment Responding to Allegations of Harassment
Responding to Allegations of Harassment Rudner Law
 
Employment Law: Discipline & Dismissal
Employment Law: Discipline & DismissalEmployment Law: Discipline & Dismissal
Employment Law: Discipline & DismissalRudner Law
 
Employment Law Considerations for the Franchise
Employment Law Considerations for the FranchiseEmployment Law Considerations for the Franchise
Employment Law Considerations for the FranchiseRudner Law
 
Mandatory Arbitration Searching for Fairness
Mandatory Arbitration Searching for FairnessMandatory Arbitration Searching for Fairness
Mandatory Arbitration Searching for FairnessWendi Lazar
 
Empire HR September Bulletin
Empire HR September BulletinEmpire HR September Bulletin
Empire HR September BulletinFrank Cozzo
 
Dorset HR Forum - March Employment Law Update
Dorset HR Forum - March Employment Law UpdateDorset HR Forum - March Employment Law Update
Dorset HR Forum - March Employment Law UpdateMandy Fitzmaurice
 
Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...
Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...
Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...Parsons Behle & Latimer
 

What's hot (14)

Small Claims 2017: Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals
Small Claims 2017:  Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals  Small Claims 2017:  Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals
Small Claims 2017: Essential Law, Winning Strategies for Lawyers & Paralegals
 
Managing Employment Law Issues in the Digital Age
Managing Employment Law Issues in the Digital AgeManaging Employment Law Issues in the Digital Age
Managing Employment Law Issues in the Digital Age
 
Employment Law 101: From Hiring to Firing
Employment Law 101: From Hiring to FiringEmployment Law 101: From Hiring to Firing
Employment Law 101: From Hiring to Firing
 
Finding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road Map
Finding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road MapFinding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road Map
Finding Talent & DC Labor Laws | Employment Law Group | Entrepreneur Road Map
 
Managing the Discontented Employee
Managing the Discontented EmployeeManaging the Discontented Employee
Managing the Discontented Employee
 
Responding to Allegations of Harassment
Responding to Allegations of Harassment Responding to Allegations of Harassment
Responding to Allegations of Harassment
 
Employment Law: Discipline & Dismissal
Employment Law: Discipline & DismissalEmployment Law: Discipline & Dismissal
Employment Law: Discipline & Dismissal
 
4. Unfair Dismissal
4. Unfair Dismissal4. Unfair Dismissal
4. Unfair Dismissal
 
Employment Law Considerations for the Franchise
Employment Law Considerations for the FranchiseEmployment Law Considerations for the Franchise
Employment Law Considerations for the Franchise
 
Mandatory Arbitration Searching for Fairness
Mandatory Arbitration Searching for FairnessMandatory Arbitration Searching for Fairness
Mandatory Arbitration Searching for Fairness
 
Empire HR September Bulletin
Empire HR September BulletinEmpire HR September Bulletin
Empire HR September Bulletin
 
Dorset HR Forum - March Employment Law Update
Dorset HR Forum - March Employment Law UpdateDorset HR Forum - March Employment Law Update
Dorset HR Forum - March Employment Law Update
 
Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...
Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...
Why You Should Team Up and Make Friends: Your Professional Responsibilities W...
 
October Update
October UpdateOctober Update
October Update
 

Viewers also liked

Nada strizic ponudba_delo
Nada strizic ponudba_deloNada strizic ponudba_delo
Nada strizic ponudba_delonada.strizic
 
Điều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngực
Điều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngựcĐiều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngực
Điều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngựcrachell494
 
Dale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propio
Dale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propioDale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propio
Dale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propioIsabel Ojeda
 
สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556
สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556
สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556Parun Rutjanathamrong
 
Ar 201 cocuriculum (netball)
Ar 201   cocuriculum (netball)Ar 201   cocuriculum (netball)
Ar 201 cocuriculum (netball)Dyana Jalil
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Nada strizic ponudba_delo
Nada strizic ponudba_deloNada strizic ponudba_delo
Nada strizic ponudba_delo
 
Điều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngực
Điều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngựcĐiều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngực
Điều hòa cholesterol, ngăn chặn cơn đau thắt ngực
 
Marketing
MarketingMarketing
Marketing
 
Dale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propio
Dale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propioDale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propio
Dale la bienvenida al 2014 con tu propio
 
สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556
สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556
สถิติคดีในศาลยุติธรรมปี2556
 
Ar 201 cocuriculum (netball)
Ar 201   cocuriculum (netball)Ar 201   cocuriculum (netball)
Ar 201 cocuriculum (netball)
 
Dhb2014
Dhb2014Dhb2014
Dhb2014
 

Similar to NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LIMITS THE APPLICATION OF THE OVER-SEVENTY EXCEPTION TO THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION

Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace Improved
Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace ImprovedEmployment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace Improved
Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace ImprovedWendi Lazar
 
Recent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act
Recent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards ActRecent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act
Recent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards ActMitchQuick
 
The Buckley Lj On Employment Law
The Buckley Lj On Employment LawThe Buckley Lj On Employment Law
The Buckley Lj On Employment LawHeather Lee
 
A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970
A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970
A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970Mainan Ray
 
Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)
Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)
Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)Miqui Mel
 
Employment Law Ty Hyderally
Employment Law Ty HyderallyEmployment Law Ty Hyderally
Employment Law Ty HyderallyTayebHyderally
 
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docxChapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docxspoonerneddy
 
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docxChapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docxmccormicknadine86
 
BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010
BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010
BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010magstrench
 
"The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme...
"The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme..."The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme...
"The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme...C. Scott Schwefel
 
Contract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptx
Contract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptxContract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptx
Contract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptxRahulJain1235
 

Similar to NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LIMITS THE APPLICATION OF THE OVER-SEVENTY EXCEPTION TO THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (20)

Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace Improved
Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace ImprovedEmployment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace Improved
Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace Improved
 
Employment Law Chart Essay
Employment Law Chart EssayEmployment Law Chart Essay
Employment Law Chart Essay
 
Hanlester
HanlesterHanlester
Hanlester
 
Why Is Employment Law Important
Why Is Employment Law ImportantWhy Is Employment Law Important
Why Is Employment Law Important
 
Equal Employment Opportunity Essay
Equal Employment Opportunity EssayEqual Employment Opportunity Essay
Equal Employment Opportunity Essay
 
Recent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act
Recent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards ActRecent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act
Recent Wage and Hour Developments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act
 
Contract labour (regulation and abolition) act
Contract labour (regulation and abolition) actContract labour (regulation and abolition) act
Contract labour (regulation and abolition) act
 
Employment Law And Employee Relationship Essay
Employment Law And Employee Relationship EssayEmployment Law And Employee Relationship Essay
Employment Law And Employee Relationship Essay
 
The Buckley Lj On Employment Law
The Buckley Lj On Employment LawThe Buckley Lj On Employment Law
The Buckley Lj On Employment Law
 
A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970
A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970
A study of contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970
 
STANDING ORDERS.pptx
STANDING ORDERS.pptxSTANDING ORDERS.pptx
STANDING ORDERS.pptx
 
Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)
Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)
Zero Hours Contracts Factsheet (Unison)
 
Employment Law Ty Hyderally
Employment Law Ty HyderallyEmployment Law Ty Hyderally
Employment Law Ty Hyderally
 
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docxChapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
 
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docxChapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
Chapter Twenty one Employment DiscriminationBeing an employer was .docx
 
BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010
BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010
BarrCo Employment Law Bulletin April 2010
 
Employment Law Essays
Employment Law EssaysEmployment Law Essays
Employment Law Essays
 
"The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme...
"The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme..."The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme...
"The Same-Actor Inference: A Look at Proud v. Stone and its Progeny" Employme...
 
Contract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptx
Contract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptxContract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptx
Contract Labour (regulation and abolition) act , 1970 PPT.pptx
 
Persuasive Essay On Breaking The Law
Persuasive Essay On Breaking The LawPersuasive Essay On Breaking The Law
Persuasive Essay On Breaking The Law
 

Recently uploaded

One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..mathiasanna557
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEl Estrecho Digital
 

Recently uploaded (8)

One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
 

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LIMITS THE APPLICATION OF THE OVER-SEVENTY EXCEPTION TO THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION

  • 1. Labor & Employment Law Alert July 2010 NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LIMITS THE APPLICATION OF THE OVER-SEVENTY EXCEPTION TO THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) has long held that it is an unlawful employment practice to refuse to hire or to terminate someone because of their age. LAD also contains an exception to this general prohibition, which allows employers to refuse to hire or promote persons over age seventy. The New Jersey Supreme Court recently held that the over-seventy exception does not apply to situations where an employer does not re-hire an employee after the expiration of the employee’s employment contract. In Rose Nini v. Mercer Community College, et al., (A-13/14-09), plaintiff claimed that she was a victim of age discrimination because at age seventy-two, after twenty-six years as an employee of Mercer Community College, the College refused to renew her employment contract on the basis of her age. Specifically, Nini alleged that College president told her that people who stay on a job for twenty-five years “lose their general effectiveness,” that she had “no right to be working at her age,” and that the College would not renew her contract on expiration. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the College, dismissing plaintiff’s claims and holding that the decision to not renew Nini’s employment contract was not the equivalent of an employment termination. Rather, once the contract expired, the College made the decision not to re-hire Nini. As such, Nini was not protected by the LAD, as the College could legally refuse to hire persons over age seventy. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that a contract non-renewal should be considered a termination and thus “outside the protection of the over-seventy exception” of the LAD. The New Jersey Supreme Court granted certification. Despite settlement between the parties prior to a final decision, the Supreme Court delivered its opinion given the importance of the interpretation of the LAD and its impact on senior citizens in the workplace. The Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court’s decision. Because the LAD “prohibits termination and forced retirements based on age,” there is a “specific intention to protect those employees over-seventy who have a pre-existing relationship with the employer from being
  • 2. pushed out of the workplace based on age.” The Court observed that to construe the over- seventy exception otherwise would “create a loophole …permitting employers to place their aging employees under contract, [allow the contract to then expire and ultimately refuse to re- hire the employee], thus precluding them from resorting to the salutary protection of the LAD.” This would also effectively give greater rights to newly hired employees serving at- will, than long-term employees serving under contract. Additionally, the Court held that applying the over-seventy exception to non-renewal of employee contracts would “not advance the managerial interests” at the heart of the exception. While the over-seventy exception was included in the LAD to limit employers exposure to the “financial and organization costs incident to hiring and promotion where an employee has limited long term prospects,” the Court noted that the interests are “simply not implicated where the employee is already on the job, requires no training, the organizational scheme is not impacted, the employee is performing satisfactorily, and this issue is one of contract renewal.” The Court found that the over-seventy exception is limited in its application to “initial hires” and does not apply to “workers whose contracts have not been renewed.” This interpretation, whereby non-renewal of employee contracts are treated as terminations, “more fully advances the aims of the LAD,” by protecting workers from being “pushed out of the workforce based on age.” The Nini decision once again emphasizes that New Jersey’s courts continue to apply LAD to the fullest extent possible. As the Nini Court reaffirmed, LAD “is remedial legislation intended to ‘eradicate the cancer of discrimination’ in our society and as such, it compels liberal construction in order to advance its beneficial purposes.” New Jersey employers must continually be guided by this principle in all of the employment decisions confronting them. This Labor & Employment Law Alert was written by Pat Collins, Chair of the Labor & Employment Group. If you have any questions regarding the information in this Alert or any other labor and employment matters, please do not hesitate to contact the author at ptcollins@nmmlaw.com. The Labor & Employment Law Alert provides information to our clients and friends about current legal developments of general interest in the area of labor and employment law. The information contained in this Alert should not be construed as legal advice, and readers should not act upon such without professional counsel. Copyright © 2010 Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.