Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Small feederscreeners


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Small feederscreeners

  1. 1. ® Small Feeder Screeners Sales call preparation
  2. 2. ® Small Feeder Screeners• Material is introduced into the back of the tray and the vibratory action causes the material to move forward and be: Scalped - (remove overs) Screened (sizing) Dedusted (remove fines)
  3. 3. ® APPLICATIONS• Salt• Sugar• Sand• Coffee Beans• Plastic pellets• Metal Chips• Candy
  4. 4. ® INSTALLATION LOCATIONS• After a metering device• After a bucket elevator• Under a chute• Before a conveyor• Before filling equipment
  5. 5. ® INSTALLATION LOCATIONS• Before shredders to protect the equipment• After shredders to separate the different material sizes.• Before and after grinders for the same reasons as the shredders
  6. 6. ® Typical InstallationsScalping over sized salt Removing broken piece of candies and fines
  7. 7. ®Small Feeder Screener Customers• Basic American Foods • Custom Coatings• Hershey • Chatham Village• Cargill Salt • Thayer Scale• GAF • 3m• Kraft Foods • Automation Design• Hillshire Foods • Bloomer Chocolate
  8. 8. ® Small Feeder Screeners FEATURES BENEFITS• AC Drives • No Rectifier Required Low power consumption• 15 more models available • More sizes to fit application• 3600 cycle operation • More capacity with fine materials• Low profile • Fits into compact locations
  9. 9. ® Small Feeder Screeners FEATURES BENEFITS• Electromagnetic Drives • No normal maintenance (no belts and bearings)• Small size • Less expensive than Circular Screens & Mechanical• Can be ganged together • Transfer and screen in same application
  10. 10. ® Small Feeder Screeners FEATURES BENEFITS• .075” amplitude at 60Hz • Excellent for screening (HS Screeners) fine materials • Greatest capacity of all Small Feeders (both• 3/16” amplitude at 30Hz Eriez and competitors) (HD Screeners) • Best for very light products
  11. 11. ® COMPETITION Syntron
  12. 12. ® SYNTRON • Cannot screen as efficiently • DC units cannot screen as slowly resulting in less screen contact by the product • Fewer models available to handle the volume range resulting in exact sizing and less efficient screening
  13. 13. ® SYNTRON • Uses “B” Feeders - designs F-152 and F- 212 • Equivalent to Eriez 56C and 66C design • Eriez open over hand design makes it more user friendly • Shorter over all length
  14. 14. ® SYNTRON • Does not have HD designs • They try to substitute with a more expensive mechanical design. • Mechanical design provide less contact with the screen area because of greater displacement thus less efficient screening
  15. 15. ® COMPETITION ARBO A. E. G.
  16. 16. ® ARBO, A.E.G• Do not screen with their small electromagnetic feeders• They use Mechanical designs• More expensive and less precise