IBM Political Economy of Int Trade


Published on

IBM Political Economy of Int Trade

Published in: Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

IBM Political Economy of Int Trade

  1. 1. Lecture IV: Political Economy of International Trade
  2. 2. Introduction Free trade : refers to a situation where a government does not attempt to restrict what its citizens can buy from another country or what they can sell to another country.
  3. 3. Instruments of Trade Policy: Tariffs and Subsidies Instrument of trade policy: Tariffs Subsidies Import quotas Voluntary export restraints Local content requirements Administrative policies Anti-dumping policies
  4. 4. Case for Government Intervention: Political Arguments for Intervention Political arguments for intervention: Protecting jobs and industries (Bush raised steel tariffs as it helped him win votes for election in states that had a steel industry) National security Retaliation Protecting consumers: Furthering foreign policy objectives: Japan, Korea, Germany Protecting Human rights: Carpet and sports industry
  5. 5. Economic arguments for intervention Infant industry argument : many developing countries have a potential comparative advantage in manufacturing, but new manufacturing industries cannot initially compete with established industries in developed countries. Strategic Trade Policy: A government can help raise national income if it can somehow ensure that the firm or firms to gain first-mover advantages in such an industry are domestic rather than foreign enterprises. It may pay government to intervene in an industry if it helps domestic firms overcome the barriers to entry created by foreign firms that have already reaped FMA
  6. 6. 20 th century trade Britain in the 19 th century was the largest exporter. Did away with the CORN LAWS (made to protect local corn producers) By 1930’s Great Depression occurred in which economy failed to rise up after WWI. In USA Smoot-Hawley Act was passed to erect huge tariff barriers Other nations retaliated. “ Beggar thy neighbor” approach
  7. 7. GATT After WWII: USA emerged victorious – militarily as well as economically. GATT established in 1947 – 1979) It was a multilateral agreement whose objective was to liberalize trade by eliminating tariffs, subsidies, import quotas and like (reductions were made in eight different rounds). Grew from 19 to 120 members by the time it was suspended by the WTO Economy grew throughout much of GATT period
  8. 8. Rise of Japan By 1980’s the trading system of GATT came under strain for greater protectionism. Economis success of Japan (at WWII, beginning of GATT Japan was in shambles. By 1980’s it was the 2 nd biggest economy) USA was in persistent trade deficits. (including a 45$ billion trade deficit with Japan) Many nations found ways to get around GATT [ Between Japan and USA. VERs. Value of imports affected by VERs in USA incraesed by 23% between 1981 – 1986 – exporting countries agreed to VERs (non-tariff barriers) so they wouldn’t have to face more punishing tariffs).
  9. 9. Uruguay Round Most ambitious round GATT previously covered only goods and commodities UR covered trade in services as well Dragged for 7 years before agreement reached in 1993. Aside from many other tariff reductioins, WTO would be created to implement the GATT round
  10. 10. WTO WTO was armed with an arbitration panel that can ordain compensation for nations that have been wrong. WTO was given TEETH (something that GATT did not have). The arbitration panel’s verdict is binding Has 148 members.
  11. 11. WTO’s successes 1997 WTO brokered deal to get countries to open the telecom markets December 1997 an agreement to liberalize cross-border trade in financial services.
  12. 12. Hurdles for WTO EU and US could not agree whether to endorse the aim of ultimately eliminating subsidies on agri exporters. EU had strong farmers lobbies and long history of subsidies to farmers was unwilling to agree US wanted to write ‘basic labor rights’ into the law of the world trading system. US wanted WTO to allow governments to impose tariffs on goods imported from countries that did not abide by what the US saw as fair labor practices. Developing countries rejected such attempts
  13. 13. Disputes from groups A variety of groups such as: Environmentalists (concerned over deforestation) Human Rights groups (failure to protect from child labor) Labor unions (loss of jobs) Rejected WTO saying it was an undemocratic institution that usurped rights of nations (their sovereignty).
  14. 14. Issues Anti-dumping policies : as WTO allows leeway for countries to impose them, but local businesses often use their political process to protect themselves from competition (even fair competition). Protectionism in Agriculture : non-agri tariffs are often 10 times lower than agri-tariffs that developed nations put up Protecting Intellectual Property Expanded market access : South Korea for example kept high rates for importing transportation equipment and electrical machinery
  15. 15. Doha Rounds Talks to help resolve the issues from the previous slide.
  16. 16. Lecture IV: Case Studies