Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

March presentation final v2


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

March presentation final v2

  1. 1. Corporate UpdateMarch, 2013
  2. 2. Cautionary StatementThis presentation may contain “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and the United StatesPrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or the anticipated performance of theCompany and reflect management’s expectations or beliefs regarding such future events and anticipated performance. In certain cases,forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”,”estimates”, ”forecasts”, ”intends”, ”anticipates” or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions,events or results “may”, ”could”, “would”, ”might”, or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”, or the negative of these words orcomparable terminology. By their very nature forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factorswhich may cause the actual performance of the Company to be materially different from any anticipated performance expressed or impliedby the forward-looking statements. Such factors include various risks related to the Company’s operations, including, without limitation,fluctuations in spot and forward markets for gold, silver and other metals, fluctuations in currency markets, changes in national and localgovernments in Mexico and the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, risks associated with obtaining necessaryexploitation and environmental licenses and permits, and the presence of laws that may impose restrictions on mining. A complete list ofrisk factors are described in the Company’s annual information form and will be detailed from time to time in the Company’s continuousdisclosure, all of which are, or will be available, for review on SEDAR at This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” and “inferred resources”. The Company advises readers thatalthough these terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure forMineral Projects (“NI43-101”)), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Readers are cautioned notto assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted in to reserves. In addition, “inferredresources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or anypart of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineralresources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as definedunder NI43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual performance to differ materially from thatdescribed in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause its performance not to be as anticipated. The Companyneither intends nor assumes any obligation to update these forward-looking statements or information to reflect changes in assumptions orcircumstances other than required by applicable law. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate,as actual results and future events could differ materially from those currently anticipated. Accordingly, readers should not place unduereliance on forward-looking statements.Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in US$. 2
  3. 3. Building Primero Value GOAL 400,000 to 500,000 ounces per year Americas low-risk regions only Pipeline of growth projects Leader in per share growth 3
  4. 4. Building the Primero Pipeline DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL EXPANSION Cerro Del CONSTRUCTION San Dimas GalloPRODUCTION San Dimas 3,000 TPDSan Dimas 2,500 TPD Platform 4
  5. 5. 2012 – Record Year for Primeroo Record Revenues and Operating Cash Flowo Record Annual Productiono Excellent Cost Controlo Strong Balance Sheeto Positive Tax Rulingo Increased Silver Sales At Spoto Positive Exploration Resultso San Dimas Expansion Announcedo Cerro Del Gallo Acquisition Announced 5
  6. 6. Primero Operating Results Production Q4 ‘12 Q4 ‘11 2012 2011 (AuEq ounces) 1Mill Throughput 2,066 1,920 1,976 1,815 112,000 +8%(tonnes per day)Gold equivalent 2production 26,310 23,115 111,132 102,224(gold equivalent ounces) 102,000Gold production 23,143 20,191 87,900 79,564(ounces) 92,000Silver production 1.32 1.20 5.13 4.60(million ounces) 2011 2012Gold grade Gold Probable Reserves 3.90 3.70 3.90 3.86 (000’s ounces)(grams per tonne)Silver grade +16% 228 223 234 226 600(grams per tonne) 500 3Cash cost 677 719 636 640 400($ per AuEq ounce) 300 3Cash cost – by-product 535 580 366 384 200($ per gold ounce) 100Capital Expenditures 17.1 8.7 39.7 29.8 0($ million) Dec 30, 11 Jun 30, 12 See slide 24 for footnotes. 6
  7. 7. Primero Financial Results Earnings4(US$ thousands, except Q4 ‘12 Q4 ‘11 2012 2011 ($ per share)per share amounts) $0.50 +41%Revenues 43,597 35,645 182,939 156,542 $0.40Income from Mine $0.30 17,471 13,286 79,389 65,090Operations $0.20Net income 1,245 31 ,216 49,553 49,644 $0.10 $-EPS 0.01 0.35 0.54 0.56 2011 2012($ per share) Cash Flow 4 4,528 4,685 41,292 28,261 Op CF before changes in working capital ($ per share)Adjusted net income $1.00 +10%Adjusted EPS 0.05 0.05 0.45 0.32 4($ per share) $0.90Operating cash flowsbefore changes in working 17,775 14,602 88,808 77,591 $0.80capital $0.70CFPS 0.19 0.17 0.97 0.88($ per share) $0.60 2011 2012 See slide 24 for footnotes. 7
  8. 8. Primero Capital Structure$139M Balance Sheet Dec. 31, 2012 Cash $139 millionStrong Cash Balance Promissory note2 $40 million$120M Ownership 5 Goldcorp 32% Management & insiders ~2%Significant Operating Cash Flow Institutional & float ~66% Capital Structure$5M Feb.19, 2013 Repayment 97 million per year6 Shares outstanding Fully Diluted7 126 millionConservative Level of Debt Market Cap. ~C$560 million See slide 24 for footnotes. 8
  9. 9. Primero Growth ProfileEstimated Production Profile8,9 250 at 3,000 TPD(Attributable 000 AuEq ounces) San DimasCerro Del Gallo Gallo Primero Cerro Del 9 205 160 130 111 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E See slide 24 for footnotes. 9
  10. 10. Focused on Low Risk Regions in the AmericasBUILDS ON ESTABLISHED PRESENCE Risk Mining JurisdictionsMexico Remains One of the Lowest IN MEXICO Corporate Offices San Dimas Mine Gold-Silver Mine Durango, Mexicoo Politically stableo Long mining historyo One of world’s largest metals producers Ventanas Propertyo Excellent infrastructure Exploration Property Durango, Mexicoo Experienced workforce Cerro Del Gallo Project Gold-Silver-Copper Development Project Guanajuato, Mexico 10
  11. 11. SAN DIMASA Flagship AssetDISTRICT PRODUCED 11M OUNCES OF GOLD AND 600M OUNCES OF SILVERLocation Durango-Sinaloa State BorderOwnership 100% One of Mexico’s MostMetals Gold & Silver Significant PreciousMining U/G: cut and fill, long-hole Metals DepositsHistory 100+ years of production 2013E 2Gold equivalent production 120,000-130,000(gold equivalent ounces)Gold production 80,000-90,000(ounces) 10Silver production 6.0-6.5(million ounces) 10Silver sales at spot 900-1,000(thousand ounces) 3Cash cost $620-640($ per gold equivalent ounce) 3Cash cost – by-product $280-300($ per gold ounce) 15Capital Expenditures ($ million) $42 See slide 24 for footnotes. 11
  12. 12. SAN DIMASExpansion to 2,500 TPD11ATTRACTIVE IRR AND PAYBACK PERIODTotal capital expenditure of ~$16.5 millionExpand milling capacity to 2,500 TPDo Install third ball mill, already on-siteo Reconfigure crusherso Install new tailings thickener and pumpsExpand mine throughputo Develop Sinaloa Graben veinso Connect Central Block to Sinaloa Grabeno New mining equipmentFuture expansion to 3,000 TPD possible Mill Expansion to:o Dependent on exploration success 2,500 TPD CAPACITYo Minimal capital and no disruption to operation See slide 24 for footnotes. 12
  13. 13. SAN DIMASExpansion On-Track for Q1 2014 Ball Mill Foundation Jan 20, 2013 13 13
  14. 14. SAN DIMASExpansion On-Track for Q1 2014 Ball Mill Foundation Feb. 16, 2013 14 14
  15. 15. SAN DIMASIncrease Reserves Through ExplorationLarge 22,500 hectare land package; Over 120 known veins A’ ARANA HANGING TAYOLTITA WALL BLOCK CENTRAL BLOCK TAYOLTITA MINE SINALOA Mined 1975 - 2002 GRABEN Target BLOCK Tunnels WEST CENTRAL BLOCK MINE BLOCK Mined 2002 - Present 2013 Planned Tunnels Target Tayoltita Future Planned Tunnels Mill Veins SAN ANTONIO MINE Mined 1987 - 2002 Faults Ag-Au High Grade Trend A Targets Mines 15
  16. 16. SAN DIMAS District Wide Exploration Potential Longitudinal Cross Section West Block 2013 EXPLORATION Sinaloa Graben Central Block Tayoltita Block Arana San Antonio Mined 1987-2002 Mined 2012-Current Mined 2002-Current Mined 1975-2002 Hanging WallSW NE3,000 m. 3,000 m.2,000 m. 2013 EXPLORATION PROGRAM 2,000 m. DRILLING FOR EXTENSIONS OF KNOWN VEINS1,000 m. 1,000 m. Source: San Dimas Geology OfficeA A’ 0 1 2 Mineralization – Ore Bodies Extension of the Favorable Horizon Faults Favorable Horizon Potential Intrusive K I L O M E T E R S 16
  17. 17. SAN DIMAS Focused Exploration & Development Targeting Vein Extensions from Existing MinesDevelopmento 6,500 metres development driftingo Tunnels joining Sinaloa Graben and Central Block being completedo Lower level tunnel commenced, expected to be completed in 18-24 monthsExplorationo $15.4 million exploration programo 34,000 metres delineation drillingo 40,000 metres exploration drilling, plus 3,800 metres of exploration drifting 17
  18. 18. SAN DIMAS2012 Discoveries in 2013 Mine PlanSignificant Opportunity Close to InfrastructureLocated in Prolific Central Corridor Strategic Underground Drill Locationso Alexa located 125m north of Victoria o Drilling from old El Pilar workings, Sinaloa Grabeno Targeting inclusion in Reserves by 2012 tunnel and east-west drift from Robertita year-endo Mining access achieved within 12 months of discovery 18
  19. 19. CERRO DEL GALLOA Transformational AcquisitionTransaction Detailso Cerro shareholders to receive 0.023 of a Primero share for each Cerro share and 80.01% in “Spinco”o Transaction value of $119 million as at announcement date December 12, 2012o Cerro Resources NL shareholder approval meeting mid April 2013, transaction expected to close in Q2 2012Benefits to Primero Shareholderso Accretive to Primero on key metricso Leverages Primero’s regional expertise and solidifies position in Mexico, with further consolidation opportunitieso Diversifies near term production with additional 95,000 AuEq. oz per yearo Doubles Reserves and Triples Measured and Indicated ResourcesBenefits to Cerro Resources Shareholderso Attractive premiumo Significantly improved market presence and liquidityo Provides opportunity to participate in valuation re-rating as the combination diversifies production and cash flows 19
  20. 20. CERRO DEL GALLOProvides ~95,000 AuEq ounces per year starting 201512Technical Overviewo Open pit, heap leach gold-silver-copper projecto Large resource base relative to reserveso Excellent local infrastructure in a region known to actively support miningo Two phased development plan 12o Phase I heap leach facility with SART metallurgical processing to recover silver and coppero Commercial Production of Phase I expected in 2015o Potential future Phase II incorporates Carbon In Leach (CIL) and presents optimization opportunity12 See slide 24 for footnotes. 20
  21. 21. CERRO DEL GALLOLarge Gold Domain Resource3.2M oz of Gold or 5.6M oz of Gold Equivalent 13,14 See slide 24 for footnotes. 21
  22. 22. CERRO DEL GALLO Cerro Del Gallo Development Plan 2013 2014 2015 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Detailed Engineering GeotechnicalPermitting/Land Acquisition Earth Works Mill TestsAcid Generation Tests SART OptimizationPlant & MillConstruction Estimated Transaction Closing ProductionCommissioning Commercial Production Phase IIFeasibility Study 22 22
  23. 23. The Primero Opportunity A Compelling Investmento San Dimas: A Platform for Cash Generationo Transformational Cerro Del Gallo Acquisition Scheduled to Close in Q2 2013o Cash Flow and Capital to Fund Growtho Significant Exploration Potential at San Dimas and Cerro Del Galloo Attractive Valuation on Key Metrics 23 19
  24. 24. Footnotes1. Based on 365 days per year.2. “Gold equivalent ounces” include revenue from silver converted to a gold equivalent based on estimated average realized commodity prices ($1,600 per ounce of gold and $9.41 per ounce of silver in full year 2012, consensus prices thereafter).3. Cash cost is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to the fourth quarter 2012 MD&A for a reconciliation of cash costs.4. Refer to fourth quarter 2012 MD&A for adjustments.5. Estimated five-year average after-tax operating cash flow based on production profile discussed in the October 15, 2012 News Release “Primero Announces Expansion of its San Dimas Mine”.6. Goldcorp: 5 year, 6% note repaid $5M/yr with balloon payment at end of 2015. Principal prepayment equal to 50% of Excess Free Cash Flow.7. Fully diluted shares include 20.8 million warrants with an exercise price of Cdn$8 per share, expiring on July 20, 2015; and 7.8 million options with an average exercise price of Cdn$5.65.8. “Gold equivalent ounces” include silver and copper production converted to a gold equivalent based on consensus estimated commodity prices ; accounts for the San Dimas silver purchase agreement; and uses Cerro Resources publically disclosed production estimates delayed by 12 months.9. Assumes 100% ownership of Cerro Del Gallo and that it begins production in mid-2015.10. Silver production is subject to a silver purchase agreement. Refer to the fourth quarter 2012 MD&A for details.11. See October 15, 2012 News Release “Primero Announces Expansion of its San Dimas Mine” for details.12. Cerro Resources Phase I Definitive Feasibility Study as of May 2012 and Phase II Preliminary Economic Assessment as of May 2011.13. As estimated by Cerro Resources using gold, silver and copper price of US$1,341/oz, US$25.58/oz and US$7,582/t (or $3.44/lb) respectively. See Cerro Resources Phase I Definitive Feasibility Study as of May 2012.14. See note 7 in January 23, 2012 News Release “ Primero achieves 2012 Guidance and Provides 2013 Outlook.15. Does not include exploration costs. 24
  25. 25. Primero MomentumPrimero ProductionAppendix A: Acquisition of Cerro Del Gallo
  26. 26. CERRO DEL GALLOTechnical DetailsPhase I Heap Leach (Source: Cerro Resources Definitive Feasibility Study June 2012)Heap Leach Grades 0.69 g/t Au, 14.8g/t Ag, 0.08% CuStrip Ratio1 0.91Capital Costs $154 millionOperating Costs2 $514/AuEq.ozPhase I Life of Mine (LOM) 7.2 years Primero to complete its ownPhase I Average Annual Production3 94,600 AuEq.oz optimization studiesPermitting To be completed in 2013 1. 9 million tonnes of ‘fresh’ material expected to be mined during Phase I for processing in Phase II. The material has been treated as ‘waste’ material for purposes of calculating the Phase I LOM strip ratio. 2. Cash cost is a non-GAAP measure as estimated by Cerro Resources and include costs for mining, processing, metal transport and refining and administration but do not include capital costs or royalties (4%). 3. Gold equivalent ounces estimated by Cerro Resources include revenue from silver and copper converted to a gold equivalent based three year historic prices as of Definitive Feasibility Study of June 2012, of Gold $1,341/oz, Silver $25.58/oz and Copper $7,582/tonne. 26
  27. 27. CERRO DEL GALLO Reserves and In-Pit Resources1 Total Resources Within the Gold Domain - 20082 M Tonnes Au Au Ag Ag Cu Cu Au Eq* AuEqCategory (g/t) (M ozs) (g/t) (M ozs) (%) (M lbs) (g/t) (M oz)Measured & Indicated 209.0 0.48 3.22 11.0 70.3 0.08 396.9 0.83 5.58Inferred 20.0 0.30 0.19 7.0 4.5 0.09 39.7 0.59 0.38 1. Gold equivalent ounces calculated by Cerro Resources using gold, silver and copper prices of US$1,341/oz, US$25.58/oz and US$7,582/t respectively. 2. These resources are reported using internal cut-off grade of 0.2 g/tAu as per Golder Associates Technical Report, 2008. Phase I Heap Leach In-pit Proven and Probable Reserves – DFS June 20123 M Tonnes Au Au Ag Ag Cu Cu Au Eq* AuEqCategory (g/t) (M ozs) (g/t) (M ozs) (%) (M lbs) (g/t) (M oz)Proven & Probable 32.2 0.69 0.71 14.8 15.3 0.08 56.4 1.11 1.15 3. These reserves are reported using internal cut-off grades of 0.24 and 0.29 gAuEq/t for weathered and partially oxidized, respectively. Phase II In-pit Resources (excluding P+P Reserves) – PEA May 20114,5 M Tonnes Au Au Ag Ag Cu Cu Au Eq* AuEqCategory (g/t) (M ozs) (g/t) (M ozs) (%) (M lbs) (g/t) (M oz)Measured & Indicated 47.9 0.60 0.92 13.3 20.5 0.10 103.4 1.03 1.58 4. These resources are reported using internal cut-off grades of 0.24, 0.29, and 0.34 gAuEq/t for weathered, partially oxidized, and fresh material respectively. 5. See note 7 in January 23, 2013 News Release “Primero achieves 2012 Guidance and Provides 2013 Outlook”. 27
  28. 28. Significantly Increases Reserves & Resources1 New Primero Attributable Gold Equivalent Reserves and Resources1,2,4 +261% (million gold equivalent ounces) 2.3 Cerro Del Gallo Primero San Dimas +133% 1.0 1.2 0.9 0.8 P+P M+I 3 Inferred1. Primero’s gold equivalent reserves and and resources are adjusted for the silver purchase agreement and only attributable silver ounces to Primero are included. 29% of all silver reserves and resources for San Dimas are considered attributable.2. Based on 100% ownership of Cerro Del Gallo. Gold Equivalency based on long-term prices per ounce: Gold $1,350, Silver $23.25, Copper $7,447.3. M+I Resources include Reserves.4. See note 7 in January 23, 2013 News Release “ Primero achieves 2012 Guidance and Provides 2013 Outlook.” 28
  29. 29. CERRO DEL GALLOExploration Upside PotentialPotential Exploration Targets Early stage regional prospecting previously returned1: o 1.5m @ 590g/t Ag and 3.40g/t Au o 4.6m @ 428g/t Ag and 3.52g/t Au o 3.6m @ 359g/t Ag and 1.57g/t Au o 4.6m @ 239g/t Ag and 1.91g/t Au o 6.0m @ 243g/t Ag and 1.70g/t Au o 3.1m @ 200g/t Ag and 1.05g/t Au o 7.6m @ 168g/t Ag and 1.51g/t Au 1. As reported by Cerro Resources in November 16,2012 Investor Presentation: sentations1/ 29
  30. 30. CERRO DEL GALLOTransaction Summaryo Creates a diversified, high growth, low cost producer in Mexico with further consolidation opportunitieso Strengthens growth profile and cash flows with estimated production of approximately 260,000 Au Eq. ounces by 20162o Combined attributable proven and probable reserves of approximately 1.7 million Au Eq. ounces and measured and indicated resources of 3.1 million Au Eq. ounces1o Strong balance sheet with cash flow sufficient to fund development growtho Significant additional exploration upsideo Solidifies and leverages Primero’s established presence in Mexicoo Delivers on strategy of delivering value to shareholders through low risk exposure to precious metals in the Americaso Attractive acquisition metrics and accretive on key measureso Limited dilution of only 15% to Primero shareholders1.See note 7 in January 23, 2013 News Release “ Primero achieves 2012 Guidance and Provides 2013 Outlook.”2.Assuming the successful closing of the Cerro Del Gallo acquisition as announced by the Company on December 12, 2012 in the news release “Primero toAcquire Cerro Del Gallo”, available on the Company’s website or Sedar and that it begins production in mid-2015 inaddition to the successful expansion of San Dimas to over 160,000 gold equivalent ounces per annum. 30
  31. 31. CERRO DEL GALLOCautionary StatementCerro Resources NL (“Cerro”) has filed a technical report under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for MineralProjects (“NI 43-101”) entitled “Technical Report, First Stage Heap Leach Feasibility Study, Cerro del Gallo Gold Silver Project,Guanajuato, Mexico” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective date of May 11, 2012. Mr. Gabriel Voicu P.Geo, Vice President,Geology and Exploration, Primero, who is a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101, has reviewed the Technical Report onbehalf of Primero. To the best of Primero’s knowledge, information and belief, there is no new material scientific or technicalinformation that would make the Technical Report inaccurate or misleading. Primero plans to file a technical report on the CerroDel Gallo project within 180 days of December 13, 2012 in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101.Cautionary Note to US Investors Regarding Mineral Reporting Standards:Primero prepares its disclosure in accordance with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from therequirements of US securities laws. Terms relating to mineral resources and mineral reserves in this material change report andother documents referenced herein are defined in accordance with NI 43-101 under the guidelines set out in the CanadianInstitute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “SEC”) permits mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that acompany can economically and legally extract or produce. Primero uses certain terms, such as, “measured mineral resources”,“indicated mineral resources”, “inferred mineral resources” and “probable mineral reserves”, that the SEC does not recognize(these terms may be used in this presentation and other documents referenced herein and are included in the public filings ofPrimero which have been filed with securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada). 31
  32. 32. Primero MomentumOther Appendices
  33. 33. SAN DIMAS PositiveCreated Positive Leverage to SilverRecent Tax Ruling Leverage to Silver Primero sells 50% of annual silver production above 3.5 million ounces at spot o Remainder sold at ~$4 per ounce under silver purchase agreement o Threshold commences August 6 to following August 5 o Threshold increases to 6.0 million ounces on August 6, 2014 o Planned expansion anticipated to generate similar silver sales at spot as 2012 post August 6, 2014 Silver as Percentage of 2013E Revenue Silver Gold 25% 75% 33
  34. 34. SAN DIMASExpansion TimelineExpansion to 2,500 TPD and Potential for Further Expansion to 3,000 TPD 2013 2014 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Optimization (SD at 2,150 TPD) 3D Mine Planning Expansion 1 (SD at 2,500 TPD) Crushing/Grinding Leaching Potential Expansion 2 (SD at 3,000 TPD) Exploration 34
  35. 35. Executive Management Joseph F. Conway | President & C.E.O. 1 Tamara Brown | VP, Investor Relations o Former CEO, President and Director of IAMGOLD o Former Director Investor Relations for IAMGOLD; from 2003 to 2010 Partner of a Toronto based, boutique investment bank; Professional engineer in mining industry o Former President, CEO and Director of Repadre Capital from 1995 to 2003 H. Maura Lendon | VP, Chief General Counsel and Corporate Secretary o Former Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer Renaud Adams | C.O.O. and Corporate Secretary of HudBay Minerals Inc.; Chief Counsel Canada, Chief Privacy Officer - o Former SVP, American Operations for IAMGOLD Canada of AT&T o Former General Manager of Rosebel Gold Mine 2007 to 2010 o Former General Manager El Toqui Mine in Chile Gabriel Voicu | VP, Geology and Exploration and then the El Mochito Mine in Honduras o 25 Years of mining experience, formerly held senior technical and exploration positions with Cambior and Iamgold David Blaiklock | C.F.O. o Former controller IntraWest David Sandison | VP, Corporate Development o Previously controller for a number of public and private companies in real estate development o Former VP, Corporate Development of Clarity Capital ; Director, Corporate Development Xstrata Zinc Canada ; Director Business Development, Noranda/Falconbridge;;Former EVP, Noranda Chile Board Committees: 1.Health, Safety and Environment 35
  36. 36. Board of Directors Wade Nesmith | Chairman Rohan Hazelton | Director 1,5 Robert Quartermain | Director 2,3 o Founder of Primero o VP, Strategy, Goldcorp o Founder and President & CEO, o Founding and current director o Formerly with Wheaton River Pretivm Resources of Silver Wheaton, former and Deloitte & Touche LLP o Former President, Silver Standard Chairman of Selwyn Resources o Director of Vista Gold Corp. and Canplats Resources David Demers | Director2,3,4,5 Timo Jauristo | Director 2 Michael Riley | Director 5 o Founder, CEO and Director o EVP, Corporate Development, o Chartered accountant with more Westport Innovations Goldcorp than 26 years of accounting o Director of Cummins Westport o Former CEO of Zincore Metals experience and Juniper Engines Inc. and Southwestern o Chair of Primero Audit Committee, Resources Corp. Chair of Audit Committee of B.C. Lottery Corporation and member of the Audit Committee of Canalaska Uranium Ltd. Grant Edey | Director 3,5 Eduardo Luna | Director 1 Joseph Conway | Director1 see Executive Management o Former Director of Breakwater o Former EVP & President, Resources, former director of Mexico. Former Chairman and Queenstake Resources, Santa CEO of Silver Wheaton, Board Committees: Cruz Gold Executive VP of Goldcorp and 1.Health, Safety and Environment o Former CFO, IAMGOLD Luismin S.A. de C.V. (San Dimas) 2. Human Resources and Compensation and President of Mexican 3. Governance and Nominating Mining Chamber and the Silver 4. Lead Director 5. Audit Institute 36
  37. 37. SAN DIMAS Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, June 30, 2012 Classification Tonnage Gold Grade (g/t) Silver Grade Contained Gold Contained Silver(MINERAL RESOURCES (million tonnes) (g/ t) (000 ounces) (000 ounces) INCLUDE MINERAL RESERVES)Mineral Reserves Probable 3.785 4.8 290 584 34,700Mineral Resources Indicated 3.193 6.6 400 678 40,630 Inferred 6.865 4.0 300 866 67,500Notes to Reserve Statement:1. Cutoff grade of 2.52g/t gold equivalent (“AuEq”) based on total operating cost of US$98.5/t. Metal prices assumed are gold US$1,250 per troy ounce and silver US$20 per troy ounce. Silver supply contract obligations have been referenced in determining overall vein reserve estimate viability.2. Processing recovery factors for gold and silver of 97% and 94% assumed.3. Exchange rate assumed is 13 pesos/US$1.00.4. The Mineral Reserve estimates were prepared by Mr. Herbert A. Smith P.Eng. of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. and a QP for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”).Notes to Resource Statement:1. Mineral Resources are total and include those resources converted to Mineral Reserves.2. A 2g/t AuEq cutoff grade is applied and the AuEq is calculated at a gold price of US$1,400 per troy ounce and a silver price of US$25 per troy ounce.3. A constant bulk density of 2.7 tonnes/m3 has been used.4. The Mineral Resource estimates were prepared by Mr. Rodney Webster MAusIMM, MAIG and Mr. J. Morton Shannon P.Geo., both of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. and a QP for the purposes of NI 43-101.Additional exploration potential estimated at 6-10 million tonnes at grade ranges of 3-5 grams per tonneof gold and 200-400 grams per tonne of silver.It should be noted that these targets are conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration todefine an associated Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the targetbeing delineated as a Mineral Resource. 37
  38. 38. SAN DIMASReserves & Resources within Wireframes by Vein Estimated as at June 30, 2012 Inferred Resources Reserves Indicated Resources constrained within wireframes Block Vein Tonnes (t) Au (g/t) Au (oz) Percentage Tonnes (t) Au (g/t) Au (oz) Percentage Tonnes (t) Au (g/t) Au (oz) PercentageCentral Robertita 1,007,000 5.60 182,300 31% 766,000 8.12 199,800 29% 603,000 6.17 119,700 25%Central Roberta 992,000 5.40 172,100 29% 709,000 9.13 208,100 31% 759,000 4.61 112,500 24%Central Marina 1 299,000 7.00 67,800 12% 279,000 8.39 75,194 11% 182,000 6.39 37,420 8%Sinaloa Elia 143,000 6.10 28,100 5% 100,000 9.63 31,100 5% 82,000 9.28 24,600 5%Central San Enrique 197,000 4.30 27,000 5% 186,000 5.07 30,300 4% 97,000 3.88 12,100 3%Central Santa Lucia 341,000 2.00 22,100 4% 384,000 2.12 26,100 4% 302,000 1.51 14,600 3%Sinaloa Aranza 146,000 4.10 19,200 3% 120,000 5.60 21,700 3% 33,000 7.98 8,500 2%Central Castellana 216,000 2.50 17,400 3% 207,000 3.17 21,100 3% 183,000 2.87 16,900 4%Central Celia 160,000 2.60 13,300 2% 154,000 3.15 15,600 2% 159,000 2.95 15,000 3%Central Marina 2 76,000 4.80 11,600 2% 99,000 6.29 20,000 3% 93,000 5.99 18,000 4%Central Gloria 51,000 6.60 10,900 2% 34,000 11.23 12,200 2% 23,000 8.13 6,000 1%Central Jael 56,000 2.60 4,700 1% 49,000 3.41 5,400 1% 21,000 4.97 3400 1%Central Soledad 46,000 2.90 4,300 1% 42,000 4.76 6,500 1% 32,000 4.19 4,300 1%Central Gabriela 47,000 2.00 3,000 1% 42,000 2.90 3,900 1% 43,000 2.37 3300 1%Central San Salvador 5,000 1.30 200 0% 14,000 1.15 500 0% 30,000 0.93 900 0%Central Angelica 4,000 1.80 200 0% 8,000 1.73 500 0% 35,000 1.83 2000 0%Sinaloa Victoria 346,000 6.46 71,700 15%Sinaloa Alexa 26,000 8.94 7,500 2% Total 3,785,000 4.80 584,300 3,193,000 6.60 677,994 3,049,000 4.90 478,420 381 . See slide 36 for Total Inferred Resources including veins outside wireframes.
  39. 39. Notes to Investors Regarding the Use of ResourcesThis presentation has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian provincial securities laws which differ from the requirements of U.S.securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all mineral reserve and resource estimates included in this presentation have been prepared in accordancewith Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy andPetroleum classification systems. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosurean issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and reserve and resource estimates disclosed in this presentation may not be comparable to similarinformation disclosed by U.S. companies.The mineral reserve estimates in this presentation have been calculated in accordance with NI 43-101, as required by Canadian securities regulatoryauthorities. For United States reporting purposes, SEC Industry Guide 7 under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, asinterpreted by Staff of the SEC, applies different standards in order to classify mineralization as a reserve. As a result, the definition of “probable reserves”used in NI 43-101 differs from the definition in the SEC Industry Guide 7. Under SEC standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unlessthe determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination ismade. Among other things, all necessary permits would be required to be in hand or issuance imminent in order to classify mineralized material as reservesunder the SEC standards. Accordingly, mineral reserve estimates contained in this presentation may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards.In addition, this presentation uses the terms “indicated resources” and “inferred resources” to comply with the reporting standards in Canada. TheCompany advises United States investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them.United States investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into mineralreserves. Further, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally oreconomically. Therefore, United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the “inferred resources” exist. In accordance withCanadian securities laws, estimates of “inferred resources” cannot form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. It cannot be assumed that all orany part of “indicated resources” or “inferred resources” will ever be upgraded to a higher category or are economically or legally mineable. In addition,disclosure of “contained ounces” is permitted disclosure under Canadian securities laws; however, the SEC only permits issuers to report mineralization asin place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.NI 43-101 also permits the inclusion of disclosure regarding the potential quantity and grade, expressed as ranges, of a target for further explorationprovided that the disclosure (i) states with equal prominence that the potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, that there has been insufficientexploration to define a mineral resource and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resources, and(ii) states the basis on which the disclosed potential quantity and grade has been determined. Disclosure regarding exploration potential has been includedin this presentation. United States investors are cautioned that disclosure of such exploration potential is conceptual in nature by definition and there is noassurance that exploration will result in any category of NI 43-101 mineral resources being identified. 39
  40. 40. Tamara Brown Vice President, Investor RelationsPRIMERO MINING CORP. T 416 814 316820 Queen Street West, Suite 2301 info@primeromining.comToronto, ON M5H 3R3T 416 814 3160 F 416 814 3170 Trading SymbolsTF 877 619 3160 Common Shares TSX:P, Warrants TSX:P.WT