Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Franklin Street Station Rehabilitation


Published on

Robert P. O'Neill, Gannett Fleming; David Harrower, RA, LEED AP; and Dennis Louwerse, Berks Area Reading Transportation Authority

Published in: Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Franklin Street Station Rehabilitation

  1. 1. Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority (BARTA)Franklin Street Station Rehabilitation …Back to the Future
  2. 2. Project Location
  3. 3. City of Reading
  5. 5. About BARTA…• 1973 – Berks Area Reading Transportation Authority Formed• 1978 – Special Services Division Established• 2010 – Becomes a County Authority, Renamed Berks Area REGIONAL Transportation Authority (BARTA)BARTA Mission:Provide safe, efficient, convenient anddependable transportation to the people ofBerks County, PA
  6. 6. Eighth Street Sixth Street Norfolk Southern BARTA Transportation CenterFranklin Street Franklin Street StationChestnut Street BARTA Park-n-TransitBARTA Transportation Complex
  7. 7. 2002: BARTA Transportation Center (BTC)
  8. 8. 2005: BARTA Park-n-Transit
  9. 9. 2012: BARTA Franklin Street Station
  10. 10. 1928: Buses Preceded Station
  11. 11. 1981: Uncertain Future
  12. 12. When is a Site Considered "At Risk"?The property is listed on, or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; ORThe property is considered a contributing structure in a National Register Historic District; OR The property is designated historic by local government; AND The property is faced with imminent, recognized endangerment either from overt action, neglect, incompatible use, or loss of context.
  13. 13. Why Franklin Street Station?Purpose:• Accommodate future growth of local and regional bus transport by restoring the Franklin Street Station• Station Rehabilitation can accommodate future expansion of a regional commuter line from Norristown (Montgomery County) to the City of Reading• Rehabilitation will be consistent with the historic characteristics of both the building and the site.
  14. 14. THE PROCESS:NEPA & Section 106 Coordination
  15. 15. Process Highlights:• Early Coordination with FTA: EA vs. CATEX• Early Coordination with PHMC: CATEX Required “No Adverse Effect”• “No Adverse Effect” Contingent on Details of Rehabilitation• PHMC Review and Approval of Final Plans• Coordination with City of Reading HARB during Final Design
  16. 16. BEST PRACTICES:Building Preservation andRehabilitation
  17. 17. Best Practices: • Materials  Identify and Assess  Retain Original Materials Wherever Possible o Issue of hazardous materials  Treat Appropriately  Err on the Side of Caution o Salvage it all, decide later  Dilemmas
  18. 18. Dilemma: What Ceiling to Install?
  19. 19. Construction Progress: July 3, 2012
  20. 20. Best Practices:• Introducing Modern Elements  What and Why  Size Matters  Location, Location, Location
  21. 21. Modern Elements: Egress and Accessibility
  22. 22. Modern Elements: HVAC Units
  23. 23. Modern Elements: Drawing Prepared at 60% Stage to Communicate Intent To PHMC for New Vestibules
  24. 24. Modern Elements: New Site Components – Lighting, Cameras Bus Shelters
  25. 25. Modern Elements: Drawing Prepared at 60% Stage to Communicate Intent To PHMC for New Bus Shelters
  26. 26. CONCLUSIONS…
  27. 27. Lessons Learned:• Thorough, concise site conditions report required (from Planning, through Design and Construction)• Expect the unexpected – What’s behind that wall? Under the pavement?• Plan for surprises – Walls that aren’t plumb, square; clay block interior walls, gyp-crete roof planks, etc.• Coordination with utilities; agencies will take longer than expected – plan for it!• Remember – Other involved entities have their own rules, goals and expectations – be flexible.
  28. 28. …Back to the Future
  29. 29. SAVED!
  30. 30. THANK YOU!