Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Repro protocology 101

3,640 views

Published on

  • Quite informative and interesting presentation
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Repro protocology 101

  1. 1. The Evolution and Implementation of Reproductive Synchronization ProtocolsRepro Protocology 101<br />Paul M. Fricke, Ph.D.<br />Professor of Dairy Science <br />University of Wisconsin-Madison<br />
  2. 2. SynchTimeline<br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  3. 3. Manipulating<br />Luteal<br />Function<br />in Cattle<br />
  4. 4. Mechanism of<br />Luteolysis<br />in Cattle<br />1956Hysterectomy was shown to extend luteal lifespan in cattle <br />(Wiltbank and Casida, J AnimSci 15:134-140)<br />
  5. 5. 1967– <br />Removal of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL prevented luteal regression, whereas regression occurred normally when the uterine horn contralateral to the CL was removed (Ginther et al., J ReprodFertil 14:225-229)<br />
  6. 6. Conclusions:<br />1) The luteolytic substance originates from the uterus<br />2) Luteolysis is a local rather than a systemic process<br />
  7. 7. A Brief History of Prostaglandin<br />1979– Lutalyse approved for use in cattle by the FDA<br />DinoprostTromethamine<br />Naturally occurring PGF2 in the form of the tromethamine salt<br />Lutalyse® – Pfizer<br />Cloprostenol Sodium<br />Synthetic analog of PGF2 <br />Estrumate® – Intervet<br />
  8. 8. PGF2<br />PGF2<br />PGF2<br />TAI (80h)<br />Targeted Breeding SystemUpjohn - 1980<br />46% CR<br />46% CR<br />4% CR<br />Estrus<br />Estrus<br />14 Days<br />14 Days<br />
  9. 9. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />SynchTimeline<br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  10. 10. Follicular Function during the Reproductive Cycle<br />Ovarian<br />Follicle<br />Corpus<br />Luteum<br />
  11. 11. New Technology<br />1986<br />O.J. Ginther at Wisconsin<br />J. E. Fortune at Cornell<br />
  12. 12. Progesterone<br />Ovulation<br />Atresia<br />Follicular Size<br />Dominance<br />Deviation<br />Recruitment<br />10<br />Ovulation<br />21<br />Follicular Waves<br />Day After Ovulation<br />
  13. 13. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1986<br />Follicular<br />waves<br />discovered<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />Synch Timeline <br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  14. 14. GnRH<br />PGF2<br />GnRH - PGF<br />Twagiramungu et al., 1990<br />6 Days<br />EDAI<br />
  15. 15. 73% of cows detected in estrus on<br />D 7 and 8 in the GnRH – PGF group<br />GnRH<br />or<br />Saline<br />PGF<br />Twagiramungu et al., 1990<br />
  16. 16. Ovsynch<br />Pursley and Wiltbank, 1995<br />GnRH<br />PGF2<br />GnRH<br />TAI<br />7 Days<br />48 h<br />16 h<br />
  17. 17. Ovsynch Schedule<br />
  18. 18. Ovsynch Schedule<br />
  19. 19. Jun, 2001<br />Mar, 2000<br />Distribution of DIM at 1st AI Service:Farm 1<br />DIM at 1st AI<br />Fresh Date<br />
  20. 20. Jun, 2004<br />Nov, 2003<br />Distribution of DIM at 1st AI Service:Farm 2<br />DIM at 1st AI<br />Fresh Date<br />
  21. 21. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1986<br />Follicular<br />waves<br />discovered<br />1995<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />Synch Timeline <br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  22. 22. Pre-Synch<br />Ovsynch<br />Moriera et al., 2001<br />PGF2α<br />TAI<br />GnRH<br />GnRH<br />PGF2α<br />PGF2α<br />7 days<br />16 h<br />12 days<br />56 h<br />14 days<br />
  23. 23. Conception Rate to TAI Ovsynch vs. Presynch – 12 d interval<br />n=262<br />n=272<br />n=264<br />n=278<br />
  24. 24. Presynch/Ovsynch 14/12<br />
  25. 25. Pre-Synch<br />Ovsynch<br />PGF2α<br />TAI<br />GnRH<br />GnRH<br />PGF2α<br />PGF2α<br />EDAI<br />10 to 12 days<br />16 h<br />7 days<br />56 h<br />14 days<br />
  26. 26. Frequency of AI Relative to the Second PGF Injection of Presynch<br />
  27. 27.
  28. 28. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1986<br />Follicular<br />waves<br />discovered<br />1995<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />2001<br />Presynch<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />Synch Timeline <br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  29. 29. PGF2<br />GnRH<br />GnRH<br />PGF2<br />PGF2<br />Compliance –Presynch/Ovsynch<br />On any given day, 95% of your cows <br />get the correct injection<br />0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 =77%<br />0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 =59%<br />
  30. 30. To Resynch or Not to Resynch<br />That is the question….<br />
  31. 31. Presynch/Ovsynch & Resynch<br />
  32. 32. G<br />US+P<br />G+TAI<br />23%<br />(28/120)<br />19<br />26<br />28<br />T<br />T<br />R<br />US+G<br />G+TAI<br />P<br />34%<br />(41/121)<br />26<br />33<br />35<br />T<br />T<br />R<br />US+G<br />G+TAI<br />P<br />38%<br />(54/143)<br />33<br />40<br />42<br />T<br />T<br />R<br />n=711<br />G+TAI<br />0<br />R<br />Fricke et al., J. Dairy Sci. <br />86:3941-3950; 2003<br />
  33. 33. G<br />P<br />G TAI<br />T<br />T<br />R<br />F<br />32<br />39<br />41<br />42<br />Synch and Resynch<br />Presynch/ Ovsynch for first TAI<br />G TAI <br />P<br />G<br />P<br />P<br />R<br />T<br />T<br />R<br />R<br />F<br />0<br />Resynch for nonpregnant cows<br />
  34. 34. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1986<br />Follicular<br />waves<br />discovered<br />1995<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />2001<br />Presynch<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />2003<br />Resynch<br />protocol<br />comparison<br />published<br />Synch Timeline <br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  35. 35. GnRH<br />PGF<br />GnRH +TAI<br />48 h<br />7 Days<br />GnRH<br />PGF<br />TAI<br />GnRH<br />GnRH<br />PGF<br />GnRH +TAI<br />7Days<br />56 h<br />16 h<br />7 Days<br />72 h<br />Comparison among Cosynch and Ovsynch 56 protocolsBrusveen et al., 2008. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1044-1052.<br />Cows were submitted for TAI after Presynch or as Resynch treatment<br />1507 TAI in 927 lactating Holstein cows<br />
  36. 36. Effect of Treatment on conception rate and pregnancy loss<br />Brusveen et al., 2008. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1044-1052.<br />
  37. 37. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1986<br />Follicular<br />waves<br />discovered<br />1995<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />2001<br />Presynch<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />2003<br />Resynch<br />protocol<br />comparison<br />published<br />2008<br />Ovsynch56<br />protocol<br />published<br />Synch Timeline <br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  38. 38. Future Directions<br />
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
  45. 45. Effect of Cyclicity Status on P/AI and Pregnancy Loss after first TAISterry et al., 2006; J Dairy Sci 89:4237<br />n=105<br />n=274<br />
  46. 46. Double Your Pleasure Double Your Fun<br />
  47. 47. Double Ovsynch ScheduleSouza et al., 2009<br />
  48. 48. Effect of synchronization protocol on pregnancies per AI, DIM, lactation number, BCS and locomotion score in lactating dairy cowsSouza et al., Theriogenology 2009 <br />
  49. 49. Effect of treatment onfertility 39 to 45 d after TAISouza et al., 2009<br />n=88<br />n=107<br />n=69<br />n=73<br />
  50. 50. 1979<br />Lutalyse<br />approved<br />for use in<br />cattle<br />1986<br />Follicular<br />waves<br />discovered<br />1990<br />GnRH<br />+<br />PGF<br />protocol<br />published<br />1995<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />2001<br />Presynch<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />1980<br />Targeted<br />breeding<br />system<br />2003<br />Resynch<br />protocol<br />comparison<br />published<br />2008<br />Ovsynch56<br />protocol<br />published<br />2009<br />Double<br />Ovsynch<br />protocol<br />published<br />Synch Timeline <br />1980<br />2010<br />2005<br />2000<br />1995<br />1990<br />1985<br />
  51. 51.
  52. 52. 5-Day OvsynchProtocol<br />
  53. 53.
  54. 54. Comparison among Resynch protocolsGiordano et al., unpublished.<br />GnRH<br />PGF<br />TAI<br />GnRH<br />25%<br />n=375<br />7Days<br />56 h<br />16 h<br />GnRH<br />PGF<br />GnRH<br />TAI<br />GnRH<br />31%<br />n=361<br />7Days<br />56 h<br />16 h<br />GnRH<br />PGF<br />hCG<br />TAI<br />GnRH<br />33%<br />n=346<br />7Days<br />56 h<br />16 h<br />d 18<br />d 25<br />d 32<br />d 34<br />d 35<br />

×