Pi report eu-idb-2005


Published on


Published in: Art & Photos
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Pi report eu-idb-2005

  1. 1. Pilot Implementation of the European Injury Database (IDB) Report of 2005 Data for Ireland Ms Sarah Meaney Ms. Eileen Williamson Prof. Ivan J. Perry National Suicide Research Foundation Department of Epidemiology & Public Health 2007 Funded EU Public Health Programme 2003.
  2. 2. Ms. Sarah Meaney Mrs. Eileen WilliamsonResearch Assistant, Programme Manager/National Data AdministratorNational Suicide Research Foundation, National Suicide Research Foundation,Cork. Cork.Prof. Ivan J. PerryProfessor of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, Cork.Director, National Registry of Deliberate Self Harm, National Suicide Research Foundation, CorkAcknowledgementsWe wish to acknowledge the following people for their contribution to the project:Dr. Paul Corcoran Dr. Jean O SullivanDeputy Director/Senior Statistician, Registrar,National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork. Cork University Hospital.Dr. Tony Fitzgerald Dr. Ella ArensmanLecturer in Medical Statistics, Director of Research,Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, National Suicide Research Foundation,Cork. Cork.Mr Desmond O Mahoney Ms. Lisa PerryResearch Assistant, Research Assistant,National Suicide Research Foundation, National Suicide Research Foundation,Cork. Cork.We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the staff of the three participating hospitals;Cork University Hospital, Mercy University Hospital and South Infirmary Victoria Hospital 2
  3. 3. Introduction: of injuries in Ireland. Effective injuryInjury is a global public health emergency prevention policies would have the potential toaffecting mostly children and young adults. reduce morbidity and mortality and produceWorldwide there are 16,000 injury related significant savings for the health services.deaths each day. Injury is the leading cause ofdeath for individuals aged between 0 and 40 In 2001, the Irish Department of Health andyears (World Health Organisation, 2003). Children, in its strategy document Quality &Throughout the European Union injuries Fairness, acknowledged injuries as a publicaccount for 11% of all hospital admissions health issue Chapter 6; Responding to People’s(Council of the European Union 2007). needs (Page 158) “A National Injury Prevention Strategy to co-ordinate action onFatal injuries as a result of suicide and road injury prevention will be prepared”.traffic accidents will continue to grow resultingin a huge economic burden at State level and The Council of the European Union, in Maythroughout the health care services unless the 2007, recommended that “ …with a view toissue is tackled appropriately (World Health providing for a high level of public health,Organisation 1996). However, a vast majority Member States should: (1) Make better use ofof injuries are preventable. existing data and develop, where appropriate, representative injury surveillance and reportingThe prevention of injury is widely instruments to obtain comparable information,acknowledged as a primary objective of public monitor the evolution of injury risks and thehealth policies internationally. It is vital that effects of prevention measures over time andinjury and prevention policies be developed, assess the needs for introducing additionaladopted and maintained both internationally initiatives on product and service safety and inand at national level. other areas;…..”.Communication and coordination among the In 2005, the National Suicide Researchvarious groups working in the area of injury Foundation, because of expertise gained in theprevention is essential to develop effective development and operation of the Nationalpolicy measures aimed at tackling the burden Registry of Deliberate Self Harm, was invited 3
  4. 4. by the European Public Health Programme With unit grant funding from the Health2003 to conduct a pilot study of monitoring of Research Board, the Foundation established theall injuries using the All Injuries - Injury Data first Irish monitoring study of hospital treatedBase (IDB) Monitoring Manual. cases of deliberate self harm based on a geographically defined catchment area (the former Southern and Mid-Western Health Boards).Background to the involvement of theNational Suicide Research Foundation in the In 2000, this work was extended to establish aMonitoring of All Injuries National Registry of Deliberate Self Harm (NRDSH), the first of its kind in the world,The aim of the NSRF is to produce an with funding from the Department of Healthinternationally recognised body of reliable and Children. Under the directorship ofknowledge from a multidisciplinary Professor Ivan J. Perry, University Collegeperspective. The implementation of the pilot Cork, the NRDSH is currently operating in allIDB with data collection, injury surveillance general Irish hospital emergency departmentsand evaluation is the beginning of steps being collecting data on socio-demographic andtaken towards injury prevention. The NSRF behavioural features of cases of deliberate selfhas been recognised as a Centre of Excellence harm (DSH).and the Irish focal point for informationregarding suicide and its prevention by theWHO. For more then a decade the NSRF has The NSRF’s experience in establishing ancarried out work on internationally acknowledged database of deliberate self harm placed it in an excellent (i) the incidence and determinants of position to lead the task of recording injury deliberate self harm in the related attendances in Irish Emergency population Departments. (ii) the analysis of trends in suicide mortality in Ireland, and (iii) the extent and determinants of suicide ideation in the population. 4
  5. 5. Injury Database (IDB) Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Belgium, Germany, Italy and Ireland). England andThe EU IDB is an injury surveillance system Turkey are willing to join the IDB projectbased on hospital Emergency Department (ED) while Wales are to adjust their existing injurydata from selected member state hospitals. The surveillance systems in the coming year.IDB within the current EU Public HealthProgramme 2003-2008 is the successor to the IDB Implementation in Irelandformer European Home and Leisure AccidentsSurveillance System (EHLASS) at DG Ireland participated in data collection as part ofSANCO, European Commission. The data is the European Home and Leisure Accidentcollected by the National Data Administrators Surveillance System (EHLASS) between 1986(NDAs) who are responsible for the and 2000. The National Data Administratorimplementation and maintenance of the IDB in was then Mr. Hugh Magee of the Informationtheir country. The standardised national IDB Management Unit at the Department of Healthdata sets are then prepared and uploaded to the and Children. Data collection systems were setcentral database. This data is aggregated at EU up in Cork University Hospital and Mayolevel in a standardised way and stored in a General Hospital. In 2000, 7,102 accidentspassword restricted central database hosted by were reported from these hospitals with thethe European Commission at: Cork hospital recording 5,332 and 1,770 at thehttps://webgate.cec.eu.int/idb/ Mayo hospital. Although the two hospitals together serve an urban/rural population base, the areas were not sufficiently definable orIn 2004, organisations from seven countries representative to arrive at national estimates.(Austria, Denmark, France, Greece, The However, this EHLASS data proved veryNetherlands, Portugal and Sweden) were valuable in illustrating the distribution ofcollecting data on home and leisure accidents. accidents and their consequent injuries inIn order to develop injury prevention policies addition to identifying products with high riskthroughout the EU the range of the data being of causing injury. Unfortunately, this datacollected was extended from home and leisure collection ceased due to insufficient funding.accidents to all injuries. Currently twelvemember states are collecting "all injuries" IDBdata (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, 5
  6. 6. The IDB was developed under EU PublicHealth Programme 2003, Injury Database - theMaintenance, Development and Promotion ofthe ISS Hospital Survey Project whereby threeprimary objectives have been outlined: 1) Maintain the collection of high quality standardised injury data. 2) Develop data collection from home and leisure injury to all injury data, including intentional injuries. 3) Promote the project in all EU member states.Under the terms of the project, the NSRF,because of the expertise gained in developingand maintaining the National Registry ofDeliberate Self Harm in Ireland, was invited totake charge of the pilot implementation of theextension of the ISS to all injuries, includingintentional injuries, utilising the All Injury IDBCoding Manual. 6
  7. 7. GlossaryFigure 1: Sex of Patient Figure 11: Intent of InjuryFigure 2: Age Groups Figure 12: European Age Standardised Incidence Rates of Intent of Injury Events inFigure 3: Type of Injury the Republic of Ireland by Sex.Figure 4:European Age Standardised Incidence Figure 13: Part of the Body InjuredRates of Injury Events in the Republic ofIreland by Sex. Figure 14: Place of OccurrenceFigure 5: Rate of Injury Events, Aged 0-14 Figure 15: Activity When InjuredYears, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. Figure 16: European Age StandardisedFigure 6: Rate of Injury Events, Aged 15-29 Incidence Rates of Activity when InjuredYears, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. Events in the Republic of Ireland by Sex.Figure 7: Rate of Injury Events, Aged 30-44 Figure 17: Mechanism of Injury.Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. Figure 18: Underlying Object/SubstanceFigure 8: Rate of Injury Events, Aged 45-59 Producing InjuryYears, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. Figure 19: Direct Object/SubstanceFigure 9: Rate of Injury Events, Aged 60-74 Producing InjuryYears, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex.Figure 10: Rate of Injury Events, Aged 75+Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. 7
  8. 8. MethodsEthical approval for injury data collection has respectively. Data were collected over thebeen granted by the Research Ethics period from 1st of July 2005 to 31st ofCommittee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals. December 2005. This sampling strategy generated 2967 IDB entries for 2005. Data were recorded on all injury relatedData collection in Ireland is carried out as a presentations to the emergency departments. Apaper-based system through general hospital sampling strategy was utilised whereby all2005 Emergency Department records. Three presentations on a one in every eight days washospitals were selected in the county of Cork; recorded.Cork University Hospital, Mercy UniversityHospital and South Infirmary VictoriaHospital. The catchment area for these threehospitals is not well defined but is estimated tohave an approximate population of 411,737; Data Itemswhich was ascertained from the NRDSH. The data were anonymised and entered via laptop into the IDB database package. ThisData from the NRDSH were used to estimate package is an Access database that has beenthe percentage of deliberate self harm developed by Psytel – IDB partner in France.presentations made to these three hospitals by The database is based on a standardisedresidents of Cork County. As 85% of the dataset. Detailed in Appendix 1 are the datadeliberate self harm presentations came from elements available in the IDB. Availability ofCork county residents it was estimated that the data elements varied from hospital to hospital;catchment population of the hospitals was 85% details of Cork University Hospital are outlinedof the Cork county population i.e. 411,737. in Appendix 2.The annual number of presentations to theemergency departments of Cork UniversityHospital, The Mercy University Hospital andthe South Infirmary Victoria Hospital is Once collection was completed the data wereapproximately 60,000, 23,000 and 23,000 transferred from the IDB access database into 8
  9. 9. an SPSS 14.0 file for statistical analysis. Forthe purpose of this report the following data f) Undetermined Intent:items were analysed. Cases whereby there is some information but it is insufficient to make a confident decision or cases where the information may be1) Sex of Patient conflicting or inconsistent.Recorded male or female when known.2) Age Groups 4) Part of the Body InjuredRecorded person’s age at the time the injuryoccurred. 5) Type of Injury3) Intent of Injury 6) Place of OccurrenceThe purpose of human action in the injuryevent. Sub-Categories of Intent: 7) Mechanism of Injury The way in which the injury was sustained. a) Unintentional intent: Accidental injury events Sub-Categories of Mechanism of Injury: b) Intentional Self-Harm: a) Blunt Force: Cases of attempted suicide and self- Cases whereby the injury was sustained mutilation. due to contact with any external force but excludes piercing/penetrating force c) Assault: or machinery. Excludes cases of legal intervention. b) Piercing/Penetrating Force: Cases whereby the injury was sustained d) Other Violence: due to a force that makes a way through Includes cases of legal intervention. or into human tissue. e) Unspecified Intent: c) Physical Over-Exertion: Cases whereby there is no information available that can influence a decision. This includes Euthanasia. 9
  10. 10. 8) Activity When Injured Calculation of RatesActivity the person was engaged in at the timeof injury. The anonymisation of the data meant that only event rates could be calculated. For the9) Direct Object/Substance Producing purpose of this report two types of rates wereInjury calculated.The object/substance producing the actualphysical harm. 1) Crude and age specific rates per 100,000 population were calculated. These rates were calculated by dividing10) Underlying Object/Substance Producing the number of injury events by theInjury appropriate population, which wasThe object/substance involved at the start of the broken into six ages groups.injury event. 2) European age standardised rates were calculated. Age-standardisation allows for comparisons across areas by allowing and adjusting for variations in the age distribution of the local population. 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the rates and are represented in the charts by error bars. 10
  11. 11. Results Figure 1: Sex of PatientThe World Health Organisation states that Maleinjury is the lead cause for individuals agedbetween 0 and 40. The IDB data collected in 37% Female 63%Cork for 2005 also reflects this trend whereby77% of presentations been aged between 0 and 0% st Unknown45 years. Over the period from the 1 of Julyto the 31st of December 2005 the IDB recorded2967 presentations to three Cork hospitals. Ofall the presentations recorded by the IDB the Figure 2: Age Groupsmajority were male (63%) as illustrated inFigure 1.1. The most prominent group which 4% 7% >14 15-29presented to Emergency Departments were 21% 12%aged between 15-29 years, 38% (n=1130),which is clearly illustrated in Figure 1.2. 30-44 45-59 18% 38% 60-74 75+ 11
  12. 12. TYPE OF INJURYFigure 3: Type of Injury The main purpose of this data element (in Open Wound combination with data element body part Contusion/Bruise injured) is to enable injury cases to be grouped 6% 19% Fracture into diagnosis categories. 12% Poisoning 2% 9% Distorsion, Sprain Soft tissue injuries (distorsions and sprains) Crushing Injury were the most frequent type of injury (27%, 27% 20% Other Specified Type of n=815) presenting to Emergency Departments. 5% Injury Unspecified Type of The second and third most frequent were Injury fractures (20 %, n=583) and open wounds (19%, n=558) respectively.Figure 4:European Age Standardised IncidenceRates of Injury Events in the Republic ofIreland by Sex. 9000 8000 7000 6000 Per 100000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Male Female A: Fracture B: Contusion/Bruise C: Abrasion D: Open Wound E: Dislocation/Luxation F: Distortion/Sprain G: Crushing Injury H: Consequences of Foreign Body in Natural Orifice I: Burns/Scalds J: Injury to Muscle/Tendon K: Poisoning L: Other Specified Injury M: Unspecified Injury N: No Injury Diagnosed 12
  13. 13. A striking pattern in the incidence of injury Figure 7: Person based Rate of Injury, Agedemerges when the data are broken down by age 30-44 Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex.and compared by sex. 9000 8000 7000 6000Figure 5: Person based Rate of Injury, Aged 0- P er 100000 5000 400014 Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. 3000 9000 2000 1000 8000 0 7000 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 6000 Male Female P er 100000 5000 4000 3000 A: Fracture B: Contusion/Bruise C: Abrasion 2000 D: Open Wound E: Dislocation/Luxation 1000 F: Distortion/Sprain G: Crushing Injury 0 H: Consequences of Foreign Body in Natural Orifice A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Male Female I: Burns/Scalds J: Injury to Muscle/Tendon K: Poisoning L: Other Specified Injury M: Unspecified Injury N: No Injury Diagnosed Figure 5, 6 and 7 illustrate the incidence ofFigure 6: Person based Rate of Injury, Aged injury for the population in three age groups up15-29 Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. to 44 years of age. As mentioned previously 18000 soft tissue injuries are the most common type 16000 14000 of injury presenting to Emergency 12000 Departments. Fractures and open wounds also P er 100000 10000 have high incidence rates. What is interesting 8000 6000 to note is that male rates in the younger 4000 populations are much higher then those of the 2000 0 female rates. This is particularly evident A B C D E F G H I J K L M N amongst the 15-29 year olds. Male Female 13
  14. 14. There is a slight change in the pattern of the Figure 10: Person based Rate of Injury, Agedincidence rates illustrated in Figure 3.6, Figure 75+ Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex.3.7 and Figure 3.8 whereby the rate of injury 14000 12000reduces significantly. 10000 P er 100000 8000 6000Figure 8: Person based Rate of Injury, Aged 400045-59 Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. 2000 6000 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 5000 Male Female 4000 P er 100000 3000 A: Fracture B: Contusion/Bruise C: Abrasion 2000 D: Open Wound E: Dislocation/Luxation F: Distortion/Sprain G: Crushing Injury 1000 H: Consequences of Foreign Body in Natural Orifice 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N I: Burns/Scalds J: Injury to Muscle/Tendon Male Female K: Poisoning L: Other Specified Injury M: Unspecified Injury N: No Injury Diagnosed The above figures 8, 9 and 10 illustrate theFigure 9: Person based Rate of Injury, Aged incidence of injury for the population from 4560-74 Years, in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. to 75+ years of age. Soft tissue injuries remain 7000 the most common type of injury presenting to 6000 emergency departments. However unlike the 5000 younger population examined earlier there is a P er 100000 4000 shift to higher rates of females suffering 3000 fractures and soft tissue injuries than males in 2000 the older population. There is also a clear 1000 reduction in the rate of injuries presenting in 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N comparison to the younger population. Male Female 14
  15. 15. INTENT OF INJURYFigure 11: Intent of Injury Unintentional 4% 7% Unintentional intent refers to accidental injury events 3% Intentional Self Harm Intentional Self-Harm refers to cases of attempted suicide and self-mutilation. Assault Assault excludes cases of legal intervention. 86% Unspecified intent refers to cases where there is no Unspecified Intent information available that can influence a decision. This includes Euthanasia. Data relating to the role of human intent in theFigure 12: Person Based European Age occurrence of an injury was also recorded.Standardised Incidence Rates of Intent in theRepublic of Ireland by Sex. 30000 85% (n=2530) of injuries which presented to 25000 Emergency Departments were unintentional in 20000 nature. Of these unintentional injuries, 61% Per 100000 15000 (n=1555) were presented by male patients. Of 10000 the remaining injuries, (15%), just under half 5000 (7% n=205) were due to assault. Of these 0 -5000 A B C D E assault injuries 76% (n=156) were presented by Male Female male patients. As was previously mentioned the most prominent group which presented to A: Unintentional B: Assault C: Intentional Self-Harm D: Other Specified Intent Emergency Departments were aged between 15 E: Unspecified Intent and 29 years. Within this age group 1130 cases of injury presented to Emergency Departments of which 78% (n=879) were unintentional injuries. Of the remaining injuries in this age group 12% (n=139) were due to assault. 15
  16. 16. PART OF THE BODY INJURED PLACE OF OCCURENCEFigure 13: Part of the Body Injured. Figure 14: Place of Occurrence Head Home 3% 7% Multiple Body Parts 19% Sports and Athletics 21% Area Upper Extremities 1% 28% Transport Area: Trunk 44% Public Highway or 12% Road 35% Lower Extremities Other Specifed 7% Place of Body Part, Other, 10% Occurrence Unknown 13% Unspecified Place Neck/Throat of Occurrence365% (n=1058) were to the upper limbs and Figure 6.1 illustrates it was most common for28% (n=821) were to the lower limbs. Of the injuries to present with 20% (n=615) of injuriesremaining injuries 19% (n=552) were injuries which occurred in the home while 12% ofto the head. injuries occurred in sports and athletics areas. Such data may influence safety and security planning in the community. 16
  17. 17. ACTIVITY WHEN INJUREDFigure 15: Activity When Injured Paid Work Sports and Exercise refers to cases where the Sports and Exercise activity has a functional purpose, eg. partaking 6% During Leisure Time 6% 15% Leisure or Play in competition or preparing for competition. Other Specified Activity Leisure or Play refers to cases where the 6% when Injured Unspecified Activity activity is a hobby or undertaken for pleasure when Injured 46% 15% Travelling not Elsewhere or relaxation, eg. children playing or watching Classified Vital Activity tv. However what is clearly evident from Unpaid Work Figure 15 is that 46% (1356) of injuries which presented to Emergency Departments in 2005 had no record of the activity of the patient when injured. Injuries due to activities such asFigure 16: European Age Standardised sports and exercise during leisure time (15%,Incidence Rates of Activity when Injured n=441), leisure or play (6%, n=177) and paidEvents in the Republic of Ireland by Sex. work (7% n=191) were the most frequent 14000 amongst those injuries that were specified. 12000 10000 Activity when injured data allows injury cases P er 100000 8000 6000 to be grouped into categories that correspond to 4000 2000 areas of responsibility for injury prevention. 0 For example, being able to identify injuries that -2000 A B C D E F G H I J occur while a person is working or injuries that Male Female occur while playing a sport may help guide A: Paid Work B: Unpaid Work C: Education D: Sports and Exercise During development of more effective prevention Leisure Time E: Leisure or Play strategies. Activity data are especially useful F: Vital Activity G: Being Taken Care of when combined with place of occurrence data. H: Travelling Not Elsewhere Classified I: Unspecified Activity of Injury J: Other Specified Activity of Injury 17
  18. 18. MECHANISM OF INJURYFigure 17: Mechanism of Injury: Mechanism of injury describes the process by Blunt Force which the injury occurred. 65% (n=1933) of 6% who presented to Emergency Departments Piercing/Penetrating 5% 8% Force were injured due to a form of blunt force. Physical Over- 8% Excertion Injuries due to blunt force include those due to 65% Other Specified contact with object, animal or person; crushing; 8% Mechanism of Injury Unspecified or due to falling, stumbling, jumping or being Mechanism of Injury Exposure to Chemical pushed. Injuries due to a piercing or or Other Substance penetrating force (n=246); such as scratching, cutting, tearing, stabbing, biting and stingingBlunt Force refers to cases whereby the injury was and injuries due to physical over-exertionsustained due to contact with any external force but (n=245) were the second and third mostexcludes piercing/penetrating force or machinery. common mechanism of injury to present toPiercing/Penetrating Force refers to cases whereby the Emergency Departments in 2005.injury was sustained due to a force that makes a waythrough or into human tissue. 18
  19. 19. OBJECT/SUBSTANCE PRODUCING INJURY The direct object/product producing injury is that which produces the actual physical harm toInjuries are often the result of a sequence of the individual.events. The underlying object/ productproducing injury is involved at the start of an Figure 19: Direct Object/Substanceinjury event, e.g. if an individual trips on an Producing Injuryelectrical cord and hits their head off the Animal, Plant or Personcounter the electrical cord is the underlying Building, Building Component or Related Fitting 4%object producing the injury. Ground Surface or Surface 13% Conformation 21% Material Nec 14%Figure 18: Underlying Object/Substance 5% Unspecified Direct Object/Product ProducingProducing Injury 17% 18% Injury Land Vehicle or Means of 8% Land Transport Animal, Plant or Person Other Specified Direct Object/Product Producing Building, Building Injury Component or Related Fitting Equipment mainly used fo 5% 11% Sports/Recreational Activity Food or Drink 6% 9% Apparatus mainly used for 43% Work-Related Activity 2% Other Specified Underlying Of the injuries which presented to Emergency Object/Substance Producing 22% Injury Material Nec Departments, 25% (n=730) had an unspecified Unpecified Underlying direct object/product producing injury. Injuries Object/Substance Producing 2% Injury due to objects/products such as ground surface Land Vehicle or Means of Land Transport or surface conformation (19%, n=546), animals, plants or people (17%, n=494) andOf the injuries which presented to Emergency building, building component or related fittingDepartments, 48% (n=1286) of the underlying (14% n=415) were the most frequent amongstobjects/products were unspecified. Injuries due those with a specified direct object/productto underlying objects/products such as animals, producing injury.plants or people (11%, n=336) and food ordrink (9% n=264) were the most frequentamongst those with a specified underlyingobject/product producing injury. 19
  20. 20. Recommendations1) Effective injury prevention strategies 4) Further progress in harmonising ITcan only be developed based on recorded data systems in Emergency Departments. Whatof injury patterns. Data items in emergency clearly stands out is the missing data in keydepartments need greater levels of detail and fields. By co-ordinating and standardising ITcompletion. Implementation of IT systems to systems at both local and national level thisrecord data would facilitate better extraction of will allow for comparability at all levelsdata. including comparisons at EU level. In order for this to be achieved there is a need for a centrally funded national database.2) Data which is recorded needs to beutilised more effectively in public healthplanning. This includes road safety, health and 5) The dataset should collect data on thesafety regulations and the introduction of other patients current place of residence to link withpreventative measures. the activities of Health Atlas Ireland.3) There are a variety of differentorganisations recording injury and trauma dataincluding academic departments and healthcareagencies. By co-ordinating information fromthese data sources the extent of the injuryburden in Ireland will become more apparent.This would result in more effective injurysurveillance by informing policy makers of themagnitude, scope and characteristics of thevarious types of injuries at various life stages.This can only be achieved if the approach isevidence based. 20
  21. 21. ConclusionsThe outcomes of the IDB pilot data are relevant when patients present to Emergencynot only to health boards and health care Departments. What became increasinglyproviders but to educators, parents and evident while analysing the data is the amountindividuals. The amount of information that of information which was unspecified,the IDB pilot data provides is vast and enables particularly as the data is analysed in greaterindividuals to draw on the information most detail. This issue needs to be addressed in orderrelevant to the area they are working in. The to facilitate the development of valuable,data enables both individuals and groups to be effective and useful injury prevention policiesmore conscious of the areas that are at most as recommended by the Council of therisk. European Union.One of the primary recommendations whichhas arisen from the IDB pilot data is the needfor more detailed information to be provided inEmergency Departments. The data analysedhere is a sample of three hospitals in the city ofCork in the Republic of Ireland. However, justfewer than 3000 cases were recorded. It isestimated from this that 48,000 cases of injurywill be generated from these hospitals annually.This pilot is a snapshot of the extent of injuriesoccurring across not only Ireland but Europe.Injury prevention needs to become a priority,and in order to do so there has to be anemphasis placed on the initial data collection 21
  22. 22. Appendix 1IDB Dataset Core data set Module Recording country Unique national record number Age of patient Sex of patient Country of permanent residence Date of injury Time of injury Date of attendance Time of attendance If = 5 or 8 Admission Treatment and follow up Number of days in hospital If = 3 Violence Relation victim/perpetrator Sex of perpetrator Age group of perpetrator Intent Context of assault Intentional self-harm If = 2 Proximal risk factor Previous intentional self-harm If = 1 Transport injury event Transport Mode of transport Role of injured person Place of occurrence Counterpart Mechanism of injury If = 3.1 or 4 Sports Activity when injured Type of sports/exercise Object/substance producing injury Type of injury Part of the body injured Narrative 22
  23. 23. Appendix 2Cork Hospitals: Cork University Hospital;The following compulsory information iscollected in electronic format on arrival toCUH:NameAddressDate of BirthGenderOccupationName of General PractitionerNext of KinNumber of Previous AttendancesBrief Synopsis of the Event/InjuryIn the ED the treating doctor hand records thefollowing information:Exact Details of Injury and Symptoms thePatient Complains ofSite of InjuryAllergies/MedicationPrevious Medical HistoryDetermine whether Left or Right HandedDetails of Social Care: Home Care or Help etc.Assess the Risk of Domestic Violence (WhereNecessary) 23
  24. 24. ReferencesDepartment of Health and Children. 2003. World Health Organization. 2004. The WorldEuropean home and leisure accident surveillancesystem report for Ireland 2002. Dublin: Health Report: 2004: changing history.Government of Ireland (Geneva:WHO).Department of Health and Children. 2001. Qualityand Fairness: A Health System for You: HealthStrategy. Dublin: Government of Ireland.Mulder, S. Recording of home and leisureaccidents: differences between population surveysand A&E department surveillance systems.International Journal for Consumer Safety. 1997;4:165-78.Murray CJL, Lopez AD, eds. The global burden ofdisease: a comprehensive assessmentof mortality and disability from diseases, injuriesand risk factors in 1990 and projectedto 2020. Cambridge, MA, Harvard School of PublicHealth on behalf of the World HealthOrganization and the World Bank, 1996 (GlobalBurden of Disease and Injury Series, Vol. 1).Scallan, E. Staines, A. Fitzpatrick, P. 2001. Injuryin Ireland. Department of Public Health Medicineand Epidemiology, University College Dublin.Stone, DH. Morrison, A. Ohn, T. Developinginjury surveillance in accident and emergencydepartments. Archives of Disease Childhood.1998; 78: 108-110.Stone, DH. Morrison, A. Smith, GS. Emergencydepartment injury surveillance systems: the best useof limited resources? Injury Prevention. 1999; 5:166-167. 24