Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Dar Training

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Dar Training

  1. 1. Decision Analysis and Resolution (DAR) Process Nova Technologies Systems and Software Engineering Processes
  2. 2. The DAR Process <ul><li>Established by the Nova Technologies Systems and Software Engineering Working Group (SSEPWG) </li></ul><ul><li>The purpose of Decision Analysis and Resolution (DAR) is to analyze possible solutions using a formal evaluation process that evaluates identified alternatives against established criteria. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Entry & Exit Criteria <ul><li>A project needs to establish and document in its project plan guidelines to determine which events or items should be subjected to a formal evaluation process. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>DAR is not suitable for every decision, but is important for those with significant impact on key success factors </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Typical guidelines for when a formal evaluation is needed include: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>a change in work products under CM, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>schedule delays over a certain percentage or specific amount of time, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>the ability to achieve project objectives, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>cost increase over a certain percentage, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>make/buy/reuse decision, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>significant architectural or requirements changes, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>selection of third party solution providers, and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>selection of organizational tools. </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Entry Criteria <ul><li>Entry </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Plans exist for establishing this process, assigning responsibilities, establishing monitoring procedures, and providing for improvement of this process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Adequate resources are committed to DAR activities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Personnel are trained on the DAR activities and how to use this process </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Input <ul><li>A critical or high-risk event or item that requires a structured decision-making process. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Examples: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>We need to select a image generator (IG) for a new simulator. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>There are 3 different architectures which would satisfy the statement of work – which one should we use? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Do we need to develop software for some functionality, buy a COTS product, or find something Open Source (reuse)? </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Outputs <ul><li>Selective alternative for event or item </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Example: The ACME 9900 IG </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Evaluation report </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Example: IGs evaluated, criteria used, weights assigned to criteria, selection scores. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>DAR notes </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Example: Any supporting documentation (meeting minutes, vendor brochures, pricing data, etc.) </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Exit Critieria <ul><li>Evaluation report is complete and distributed to appropriate stakeholders. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Roles & Responsibilities <ul><li>A number of roles are required to support the DAR process. These may be filled by different people, a single individual may fill multiple roles. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Program Manager (PM) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Team Lead </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Team Members </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Quality Assurance (QA) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Configuration Management (CM) </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Program Manager (PM) <ul><li>Program Manager (PM) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Person with overall responsibility for the successful execution of the program/project. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Determines that a DAR evaluation is needed, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Selects decision team and its lead, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assigns resources to the team, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Receives the evaluation report, and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Approves resulting decisions. </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Team Lead <ul><li>Team Lead </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Appointed by the program manager to head up a DAR evaluation. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ensures all team members are trained in the DAR process. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Leads team in determining evaluation criteria, weighting, and scoring. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Leads decision-making discussions, leading to selection of a recommended alternative. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Prepares evaluation report. </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Team Members <ul><li>Team Members </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Perform research for alternatives, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Evaluate alternatives, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Present findings at team meetings for discussion. </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. QA & CM <ul><li>Quality Assurance (QA): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ensures the team is using a formal evaluation process for making critical decisions. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Configuration Management (CM) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Provides numbering guidance for documents produced in this process, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enters DAR work products into CM system, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ensures program data plan is followed. </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Process Tasks & Activities <ul><li>The DAR process tasks can be combined or expanded as needed as long as the intent of the process is maintained. </li></ul><ul><li>Rationale for removal of any item must be documented and approved by the appropriate party. </li></ul><ul><li>More detail may always be added, such as “how to” information, if desired. </li></ul>
  14. 14. Process Workflow
  15. 15. Plan the DAR <ul><li>The PM assigns a DAR team lead. </li></ul><ul><li>The PM and DAR team lead assign the team members. </li></ul><ul><li>The team lead ensures all team members are trained in the DAR process. </li></ul><ul><li>The PM or his designee creates a working directory to hold the DAR artifacts. </li></ul><ul><li>The PM or his designee creates an action item in the Project Notebook to track DAR status. </li></ul><ul><li>The PM determines the approval signatures required for this DAR. </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team plans the effort required to perform the DAR and gets PM approval for expending the needed resources. </li></ul>
  16. 16. Identify Stakeholders <ul><li>The DAR team lead identifies stakeholders for this DAR activity. Stakeholders may include the following: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Those who provide the alternatives, risks, and historical data. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The DAR team. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Those who will implement the decision recommended by the DAR team. </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Obtain Stakeholder Input <ul><li>The DAR team obtains input from stakeholders: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A list of requirements applicable to the DAR. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A list of potential alternative approaches. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Suggested evaluation criteria and relative weighting. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Key risks. </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Establish Evaluation Criteria <ul><li>The DAR team determines the evaluation criteria and relative weighting after considering input from all stakeholders. </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team reviews the evaluation criteria with the stakeholders before finalizing the criteria. </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team documents the rationale for choosing the selected evaluation criteria. </li></ul>
  19. 19. Identify Alternative Solutions <ul><li>The DAR team identifies the alternative solutions to be evaluated after considering stakeholder input. </li></ul>
  20. 20. Select Evaluation Methods <ul><li>The DAR team determines the ranking and scoring method. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Suggested ranking and scoring methods are found in the DAR Tools document. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The DAR team must agree on a scoring method, the scoring range, and have a common understanding of what the scores represent. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The DAR team documents the selected approach. </li></ul>
  21. 21. Evaluate Alternatives <ul><li>Acquire data needed to evaluate the alternatives. </li></ul><ul><li>For each alternative, the DAR team assigns a score to each decision criteria, employing the ranking and scoring method previously selected. </li></ul><ul><li>The total weighted score for each alternative is determined </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team may consider new alternatives, criteria, or methods if the proposed alternatives do not test well. </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team documents the evaluation </li></ul>
  22. 22. Evaluation Example <ul><li>You can use tools to help make an objective evaluation of options. </li></ul><ul><li>Example: A simple spreadsheet to weight various evaluation criteria and obtain a ranking of options. </li></ul>
  23. 23. Select Solutions <ul><li>The DAR team makes a decision and reviews it with the stakeholders making changes if necessary. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The DAR team documents the stakeholder review </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The DAR team documents the final decision and rationale for the selection. </li></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Perform Post-Mortem <ul><li>The DAR team lead obtains and records approval signatures. </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team captures lessons learned in the DAR notes. </li></ul><ul><li>The DAR team captures and archives documents per the program Data Management Plan. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The completed DAR scoring and analysis worksheets. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The DAR evaluation report. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DAR notes. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>CM is notified that the DAR is complete and that the DAR artifacts can be archived to the program data management repository. </li></ul><ul><li>The PM documents the effort expended vs. planned. </li></ul>
  25. 25. Metrics and Artifacts <ul><li>The DAR process should capture metrics and artifacts to document the DAR process and support process improvement. </li></ul><ul><li>Examples: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Actual staff hours expended versus planned. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DAR evaluation report with scoring and analysis worksheets that document the process and recommended solution, along with approval signatures. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DAR notes, with lessons learned. </li></ul></ul>
  26. 26. References and Additional Resources <ul><li>Nova Technologies SSEPWG Decision Analysis and Resolution Process </li></ul><ul><ul><li>DAR-Process_Ver_1_0 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Dare To Use DAR… </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Whitepaper </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Tools for Decision Analysis and Resolution </li></ul><ul><ul><li>SPIN Presentation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> </li></ul></ul>