Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
The	
  State	
  a(er	
  Sta*sm:	
  New	
  state	
  Ac*vi*es	
  in	
  the	
  Age	
  of	
  Liberalism	
  
The	
  State	
  Al...
About	
  the	
  Editor	
  	
  
Career	
  	
  Background	
  
•  Professor	
  of	
  Poli*cal	
  Science	
  
•  Director	
  o...
The	
  Role	
  of	
  State	
  is	
  Exis*ng	
  in	
  Globaliza*on	
  Era?	
  
Modern	
  Capitalism	
  
•  The	
  Changing	
  
Balance	
  of	
  Public	
  
and	
  Private	
  Powers	
  
•  Planning	
  Al...
Role	
  of	
  State:	
  The	
  Differences	
  	
  
Modern	
  Capitalism	
  	
   Globaliza*on	
  and	
  Liberaliza*on	
  	
 ...
Threats	
  to	
  Stats	
  Interven*on	
  
Source	
  of	
  State	
  Resilience	
  	
  
l  State	
  has	
  not	
  changed	
  so	
  much:	
  trade	
  integra*ons,	
  ...
Intellectual	
  Antecedents	
  
l  Ins*tu*ons	
  have	
  changed	
  con*nuously	
  (Streeck	
  and	
  Thelen,	
  2005)	
 ...
Sources	
  of	
  Contemporary	
  State	
  Ac*vism	
  
New	
  Missions	
  of	
  State	
  respond	
  to	
  Globaliza*on	
  a...
Sources	
  of	
  Contemporary	
  State	
  Ac*vism	
  (Con’t)	
  
Ø  Technological	
  Change:	
  Digital	
  Revolu*on	
  a...
Sources	
  of	
  Contemporary	
  State	
  Ac*vism	
  (Con’t)	
  
Ø  Societal	
  Change:	
  Decline	
  of	
  Deference	
  ...
State	
  Coordina*on	
  Vs.	
  Employer	
  
Coordina*on	
  
l  Varie*es	
  of	
  Capitalism	
  (LME	
  &	
  CME)	
  :	
  ...
Conclusion	
  
l Globaliza*on	
  and	
  new	
  
technologies,	
  are	
  pressing	
  
for	
  a	
  rollback	
  of	
  state	...
State after statism ppt
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

State after statism ppt

346 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

State after statism ppt

  1. 1. The  State  a(er  Sta*sm:  New  state  Ac*vi*es  in  the  Age  of  Liberalism   The  State  Also  Rises:  The  Roots  of  Contemporary  State  Ac*vism                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Edited  by  Jonah  D.  Levy   KDI  School  of  Public  Policy  and  Management   Globaliza(on  and  Na(onal  Iden(ty   Present  by  Bronh  Sopheana        Date:  Nov  20,  2013  
  2. 2. About  the  Editor     Career    Background   •  Professor  of  Poli*cal  Science   •  Director  of  Undergraduate  Affairs     •   Vice  Chair  Department  of  Poli*cal   Science,     Educa*on  Background   •  Ph.  D.  in  Poli*cal  Science,   MassachuseQs  Ins*tute  of   Technology  in  1994  Contact  :   Email:    jlevy@berkeley.edu  
  3. 3. The  Role  of  State  is  Exis*ng  in  Globaliza*on  Era?  
  4. 4. Modern  Capitalism   •  The  Changing   Balance  of  Public   and  Private  Powers   •  Planning  Allows   Public  Authori*es   to  Control  and   Direct  Private   Enterprise  without   taking  ownership.      Andrew  Shonfield,  1963  in  BBC  Program:  The  Na*on   Tomorrow  (far  right)  
  5. 5. Role  of  State:  The  Differences     Modern  Capitalism     Globaliza*on  and  Liberaliza*on     -­‐  Management  of  Economic  System     -­‐  Keynesian  Demand  S*mulus   -­‐  Taming  of  the  Violence  of  the   Market     -­‐  Increase  innova*on  and  workers   training   -­‐  Intellectual  coherence:  Long  term   planning   -­‐  Repairing  the  variety  of  Capitalism     -­‐  Make  employment  friendly   environment   -­‐  Changing  regular  frameworks  for   transna*onal  trades   -­‐  Expend  market  compe**ons  in   industry  and  services    
  6. 6. Threats  to  Stats  Interven*on  
  7. 7. Source  of  State  Resilience     l  State  has  not  changed  so  much:  trade  integra*ons,  poli*cal-­‐ideological   realm  (  Berger  et  al.,  1996)   l  Demand  of  changing  is  not  much,  ci*zens  did  not  want  to  change,  but   governments  themselves  (S.  Vogel,  1999;  Pierson,  1994)   l  The  constrains  on  the  stats  have  grown,  but  it  is  just  a  small  adjustment   (GarreZ,  1998a;  Mosley,  2003):  Keynesian  demand  s*mula*ons     l  New  development  is  the  path  dependence.    
  8. 8. Intellectual  Antecedents   l  Ins*tu*ons  have  changed  con*nuously  (Streeck  and  Thelen,  2005)   l  Market  making  is  a  state  ac*vi*es  (Polanyi,  1944)   l  An  emerging,  enabling  perspec*ve  on  globaliza*on  (Paul,  Ikenbery,  and  Hall,   2003;  Weiss  2003c)  
  9. 9. Sources  of  Contemporary  State  Ac*vism   New  Missions  of  State  respond  to  Globaliza*on  and  Liberaliza*on     Ø  Economic  Change   Ø  US  and  EU  have  used  the  lure  of  market  access  to  impose  desire  change  on   developing  country   Ø  New  policy  to  solve  the  crisis  of  Mass  Produc*ons;  only  state  can  handle  risks.  
  10. 10. Sources  of  Contemporary  State  Ac*vism  (Con’t)   Ø  Technological  Change:  Digital  Revolu*on  and  Telecommunica*on     Ø  Property  Right  in  digital  informa*on     Ø  Privacy     Ø  Free  speech     Ø  Maintain  Social  Norm     Ø  Etc  
  11. 11. Sources  of  Contemporary  State  Ac*vism  (Con’t)   Ø  Societal  Change:  Decline  of  Deference  and  the  Farwell  to  Materialism     Ø  Bri*sh  Policy  Changes:  Industrial  to  Educa*on,  Financial  policy     Ø  Women  in  Labour  Market:  Changing  labour  policy       Ø  Poli*cal-­‐Ideological  Change:  Economic  Liberaliza*on     Ø  New  policy  of  state  respond  to  liberaliza*ons:  France,  Japan,  Holland,  Germany     Ø  New  influen*al  policy  of  WTO      
  12. 12. State  Coordina*on  Vs.  Employer   Coordina*on   l  Varie*es  of  Capitalism  (LME  &  CME)  :  The  firm-­‐centered  economy   (Hall  and  Soskie  2001a,  2001b).    “This  is  a  firm  centered  poli(cal  economy  that  regards    companies  as  the  crucial  actors  in  a  capitalist  economy”   l  The  authors  in  this  book  claimed  that  firms  cannot  be  the  center   economy.    
  13. 13. Conclusion   l Globaliza*on  and  new   technologies,  are  pressing   for  a  rollback  of  state     regula*on  in  the  economy     l State  ac*vism  has  shihed,   rather  than  simply  eroded.    

×