Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Altmetrics: painting a broader picture of impact

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 30 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (19)

Viewers also liked (20)

Advertisement

Similar to Altmetrics: painting a broader picture of impact (20)

More from Paul Groth (20)

Advertisement

Altmetrics: painting a broader picture of impact

  1. 1. Altmetrics: building a broader picture of impact Paul Groth @pgroth Web & Media Group Department of Computer Science The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth #APE2014
  2. 2. Research Project Grants Applications, awards, and success rates NIH Data Book – (http://report.nih.gov/ndb/index.aspx) Data provided by the Division of Information Services, Reporting Branch
  3. 3. "Outside letters basically trump everything," says Robert Simoni, chairman of the biology department at Stanford University in California. Metrics: Do metrics matter? Nature 2010 http://doi.org/10.1038/465860a
  4. 4. ―Imagine how the academic appointment process might change if search and review committees had access—within an appropriately tagged or linked online CV, for example, or via the ORCID system— to information about the specific contributions made by a candidate to each of his/her works, including contributions that might not otherwise have qualified for ‗authorship‘ status?‖ Point of view: Faculty appointments and the record of scholarship Amy Brand http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00452
  5. 5. Point of view: Faculty appointments and the record of scholarship Amy Brand http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00452 Opportunities • Individuals and institutions need better tools for curating and networking their own record of scholarship • Institutions need more information about scholarly contribution • ALMs that reliably differentiate sources of input (general; academic; expert; etc.) would be more useful‖ Slide 3: http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/files/2013/10/Brand.pptx
  6. 6. ENTER ALTMETRICS
  7. 7. Altmetrics is the study and use of scholarly impact measures based on activity in online tools and environments. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048753
  8. 8. http://blog.peerj.com/post/65345738206/changing-the-currency-of-science-to-solve-our-greatest
  9. 9. Thanks Ian Mulvany
  10. 10. ALTMETRICS AS MEASURES OF IMPACT?
  11. 11. ―It took approximately a generation (20 years) for bibliographic citation analysis to achieve acceptability as a measure of academic impact." (Vaughan and Shaw, 2003)
  12. 12. (Birkholtz et al. 2013) (Fausto et al 2012) http://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/5uni-poster.png The Research is Happening http://ploscollections.org/altmetrics http://asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Piwowar.html
  13. 13. http://www.cwts.nl/pdf/CWTS-WP-2013-003.pdf
  14. 14. http://www.slideshare.net/paulwouters1/issi2013-wg-pw
  15. 15. Bottom Line: use altmetrics as evidence in a larger story
  16. 16. Examples
  17. 17. Published AND discussed AND cited 23
  18. 18. 24
  19. 19. Summary: a broader view • Different research artifacts – papers, preprints, slides, videos, code, data • Different measures – usage, mentions, views, sharing • Different stories – progress so far, workshop impact, outreach
  20. 20. Conclusion • Altmetrics is still developing – But useful today • Allows to build a broader picture of impact – Using a variety of Artifacts & Measures • Final thought: research artifacts exist in a network, we‘re starting to connect it
  21. 21. Thanks Collaborators: Peter van den Besselaar, Julie Birkholz, Frank van Harmelen, Shenghui Wang, Rinke Hoekstra, Thomas Gurney, Mike Taylor, Anita de Waard, Jason Priem, Dario Taraborelli, Cameron Neylon, Ian Mulvany

Editor's Notes

  • This is a pain to calculate!
  • We believe metrics are it but policy makers don’t necessarily. What they want is evidence.
  • There’s more and more “stuff” – where are we
  • From Assistant Provost for Faculty Appointments and Information at Harvard University, where she manages the review of faculty appointments University-wide - See more at: http://elife.elifesciences.org/content/2/e00452#sthash.9shtp91n.dpuf
  • From Assistant Provost for Faculty Appointments and Information at Harvard University, where she manages the review of faculty appointments University-wide - See more at: http://elife.elifesciences.org/content/2/e00452#sthash.9shtp91n.dpuf
  • This will happen closer than 20 years
  • Clear correlation between F1000 recommendations and citations
  • Side note: From the slides:“There is no reason to condemn the incorrectly used Impact Factor and h-index. They can provide supplementary information if they are used in combination with qualitative methods, and are not used as the only decision criterion. Example:• Good practice (h-index as supporting argument): “The exceptionally high h-index of the applicant confirms his/her international standing aested to by our experts.” • Qestionable use (h-index as decision criterion):“We are inclined to support this scientist because his/her h-index distinctly exceeds that of all other applicants.”

×